A New Financial Tool in the Fight Against Climate Change: A Proposed Model for the Integration of Agricultural Insurance with Green Agriculture Practices
Öz
The adverse effects of climate change on the agricultural sector are becoming clearer all the time. It is vital that we adapt to these effects and reduce agriculture's environmental footprint, and that we do so by using green farming practices. However, the rate at which farmers adopt these practices is not at the desired level due to high costs and perceived risks. In December 2019, the European Union (EU) unveiled the European Green Deal (EGD), a far-reaching growth strategy with the ambitious goal of making the EU the first climate-neutral (net-zero emissions) continent by 2050. The EGD recognises climate change and environmental degradation as existential threats and aims to decouple economic growth from resource use, transitioning to a sustainable, competitive and inclusive economic model in the process. The EGD has initiated a challenging and transformative process for the Turkish agricultural sector. Its effects are being felt across a wide spectrum, from policy changes to competitiveness in export markets. In summary, while the agreement compels Turkey to align its agricultural policies with the goals of green transformation, it has created both increased costs and new opportunities for the sector. The aim of this study is to redesign the state-supported agricultural insurance system as an incentive mechanism to encourage farmers to adopt green farming practices. The fundamental hypothesis of the study is that environmental sustainability and farmers' resilience to risks can be enhanced by offering discounts on insurance premiums or increased compensation for damages to farmers who adopt green practices. First, the disconnect between existing agricultural insurance systems and green agriculture incentives was analysed at a theoretical level. Subsequently, the potential effects of the proposed integration model were evaluated by examining farmers' risk perception and decision-making processes from a behavioural economics perspective. The study concluded that this model, based on differentiating premiums, could be an effective and efficient policy tool to accelerate the green transformation of the agricultural sector without creating an additional financial burden (and potentially reducing costs by mitigating environmental damage in the long term).
Anahtar Kelimeler
Agricultural Insurance, Green Agriculture, Financial Incentives, European Green Deal, Public Finance.
Kaynakça
- Behera, D., Fathima, J., Saady, N. M. C., Zendehboudi, S., Albayati, T. M., Al-Nayili, A., Chatterjee, P., Ponnusami, V., Peach, B., & Espinoza, J. E. R. (2025). Sustainable agriculture through environmental adaptation engineering for waste management. Green Technologies and Sustainability.
- Botzen, W. W., & Robinson, P. J. (2024). Climate risk and insurance. In Handbook of insurance (Vol. 1, pp. 81–97). Springer Nature Switzerland.
- Congdon, W. J., Kling, J. R., & Mullainathan, S. (2011). Policy and choice: Public finance through the lens of behavioral economics. Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Das, R. C. (2024). Sustainable agricultural practices: Economic and environmental implications. Emerald Publishing.
- Dalhaus, T., Wu, J., & Möhring, N. (2023). Rapidly growing subsidization of crop insurance in Europe ignores potential environmental effects. Nature Plants, 9(12), 1938–1939. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-023-01569-9