Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2020, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 75 - 81, 25.12.2020

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Lorente, J.Pedro, Çağdaş Sanat Müzeleri, 2016, Küy Yayınları
  • 2. Van Aalst, I., & Boogaarts, I. (2002). From Museum to Mass Entertainment. European Urban and Regional Studies, 9(3), 195–209.
  • 3. Kotler, Neil, Cretaivity and Interactivity: New Ways to Experience, Market and Manage Museums, ed; Ruth Rentcheller, 2003, Deakin University
  • 4. Lazzeretti, L., & Capone, F. (2013). Museums as Societal Engines for Urban Renewal. The Event Strategy of the Museum of Natural History in Florence. European Planning Studies, 23(8), 1548–1567.
  • 5. Scott, A. J. The Cultural Economy of Cities, 2000, Londra, Sage
  • 6. https://www.tate.org.uk/about-us/our-priorities Erişim tarihi: 8.10.2020
  • 7. https://www.tate.org.uk/press/press-releases/record-visitor-figures-new-tate-modern Erişim tarihi: 8.10.2020
  • 8. https://www.tate.org.uk/about-us Erişim tarihi: 8.10.2020
  • 9. Dean, C., Donnellan, C., & Pratt, A. C. (2010). Tate Modern: Pushing the limits of regeneration. City, Culture and Society, 1(2), 79–87.
  • 10. Hawkes, D, Tate Modern’s new building: the Switch House Building, Burlington Magazine, CLVIII, 2016, s730-734
  • 11. https://ansiklopedi.vkv.org.tr/Kategoriler/Kurumlar/Vehbi-Koc-Kurumlari-Vakfi/Arter Erişim tarihi: 8.10.2020
  • 12. https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkeys-arts-and-culture-sector-may-become-its-soft-power-151540 , Utkan Özden, Hatice, Hürriyet Daily News websitesi, 29,01,2020. Erişim tarihi: 07.10.2020
  • 13. https://www.arter.org.tr/ogrenme-programi, Erişim tarihi: 9.10.2020
  • 14. Sasaki, M. (2010). Urban regeneration through cultural creativity and social inclusion: Rethinking creative city theory through a Japanese case study. Cities, 27, S3–S9.
  • 15. Erbay, Özer N. Müze ve Sanat, ed; Mehmet Emin Kahraman, 2020, İstanbul

Çağdaş sanat müzelerinin kent kültürüne etkisi: Tate Modern ve Arter örneği

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 75 - 81, 25.12.2020

Öz

Çağdaş sanat müzelerinin, kurulduğu yer açısından, kent kültürüne etkisi ve kente dair yenilikler getirme etkisi büyüktür. Birey, toplum ve kamusal alanda sanat ifadelerinin gelişmesi açısından önemli rol oynar. Kent markalaşmasından, kültürel kimliğin değişimine kadar oldukça güçlü izler bırakan çağdaş sanat müzeleri, toplumla birlikte gelişen ve toplumu da geliştiren kurumlardır. Bir çağdaş sanat müzesinin kent kültürüne ve bu kültürün gelişimine olan etkisi yıllar içinde, müzenin de gelişmesi ve farklılaşmasıyla anlaşılır. Bu çalışma Londra’da bulunan ve kurulduğu yer itibariyle kent kültürünün gelişmesine ve farklılaşmasına önayak olan Tate Modern ve on yıllık sürecinin sonunda farklı bir muhitte kendine yer edinen ve kent kültürüne katkıda bulunan İstanbul’un çağdaş sanat alanında önemli kurumlarından birisi olan Arter’in incelenmesinden oluşmaktadır. Her iki kurum da açıldığı yer ve en önemlisi yıllar içinde geçirdiği gelişimler sayesinde kent kültürüne olumlu katkılar sağlamıştır. Çalışma içinde Arter ve Tate’in gelişimini kent kültürüne olan etkisiyle ele alınmıştır.

Abstract

Contemporary art museums have a huge effect on shaping urban culture considering their location and their power of bringing novelties to the city. They have a major role in terms of developing new statements for individuals, society and public space. There is no doubt contemporary art museums may stand as a milestone in society’s evolution meanwhile a museum can help a city to become a trademark and change it’s cultural identity. The most competent way to understand the museum’s effect is to look its historical changes. This article looks at two different museums in terms of changing city culture, namely Tate Modern, an institution which has changed the city’s culture with it’s location and it’s involvement and Arter, another contemporary art institution, which has transformed city’s culture since the day it opened within ten years. Both institutions have added value to the city with their location and with their innovation throughout the year. This article also emphasizes the importance of Tate Modern’s and Arter’s contribution to urban culture.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Lorente, J.Pedro, Çağdaş Sanat Müzeleri, 2016, Küy Yayınları
  • 2. Van Aalst, I., & Boogaarts, I. (2002). From Museum to Mass Entertainment. European Urban and Regional Studies, 9(3), 195–209.
  • 3. Kotler, Neil, Cretaivity and Interactivity: New Ways to Experience, Market and Manage Museums, ed; Ruth Rentcheller, 2003, Deakin University
  • 4. Lazzeretti, L., & Capone, F. (2013). Museums as Societal Engines for Urban Renewal. The Event Strategy of the Museum of Natural History in Florence. European Planning Studies, 23(8), 1548–1567.
  • 5. Scott, A. J. The Cultural Economy of Cities, 2000, Londra, Sage
  • 6. https://www.tate.org.uk/about-us/our-priorities Erişim tarihi: 8.10.2020
  • 7. https://www.tate.org.uk/press/press-releases/record-visitor-figures-new-tate-modern Erişim tarihi: 8.10.2020
  • 8. https://www.tate.org.uk/about-us Erişim tarihi: 8.10.2020
  • 9. Dean, C., Donnellan, C., & Pratt, A. C. (2010). Tate Modern: Pushing the limits of regeneration. City, Culture and Society, 1(2), 79–87.
  • 10. Hawkes, D, Tate Modern’s new building: the Switch House Building, Burlington Magazine, CLVIII, 2016, s730-734
  • 11. https://ansiklopedi.vkv.org.tr/Kategoriler/Kurumlar/Vehbi-Koc-Kurumlari-Vakfi/Arter Erişim tarihi: 8.10.2020
  • 12. https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkeys-arts-and-culture-sector-may-become-its-soft-power-151540 , Utkan Özden, Hatice, Hürriyet Daily News websitesi, 29,01,2020. Erişim tarihi: 07.10.2020
  • 13. https://www.arter.org.tr/ogrenme-programi, Erişim tarihi: 9.10.2020
  • 14. Sasaki, M. (2010). Urban regeneration through cultural creativity and social inclusion: Rethinking creative city theory through a Japanese case study. Cities, 27, S3–S9.
  • 15. Erbay, Özer N. Müze ve Sanat, ed; Mehmet Emin Kahraman, 2020, İstanbul
Toplam 15 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Hatice Utkan Ozden 0000-0003-4702-2568

Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Aralık 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 18 Kasım 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Utkan Ozden, H. (2020). Çağdaş sanat müzelerinin kent kültürüne etkisi: Tate Modern ve Arter örneği. UNIMUSEUM, 3(2), 75-81.

1462713310

CreativeCommons Attribtion-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence 146271331027042

Diamond Open Access refers to a scholarly publication model in which journals and platforms do not charge fees to either authors or readers.

Open Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Archiving Policy:


http://jfhs.scientificwebjournals.com/en/pub/jfhs/lockss-manifest
Archiving is done according to ULAKBİM "DergiPark" publication policy (LOCKSS).