CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE AND FEMINIST RESISTANCE IN IRAN: RECLAIMING AGENCY UNDER AUTHORITARIAN RULE

Öz

This paper examines how civil disobedience, rather than social disorderliness, is playing a role in forming the Iranian women’s movement, especially after the death of Mahsa Amini and the outburst of the “Woman, Life, Freedom” movement. The article relies on interdisciplinary materials, such as feminist theory, literature on civil disobedience, and media analysis, to retrace the forty years of women’s action against patriarchal laws in Iran. The study explains how the simple actions of bodily resistance by the Iranian women have been reorganized into a mass repertoire of nonviolent resistance against both religious and political authority. It focuses on embodied resistance, e.g., unveiling, dancing, and public speech, which is a moral and political reclamation of agency. It can also be observed that the results help to see how digital media fuel such actions globally, making the Iranian feminist struggle a transnational fight against rights and dignity. The study adds to the discourse of gender politics, social movements, and resistance in authoritarian situations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Civil Disobedience
• Iranian Women’s Movement
• Gender Resistance
• Authoritarianism
• Mahsa Amini

İRAN'DA SİVİL İTAATSİZLİK VE FEMİNİST DİRENİŞ: OTORİTER YÖNETİM ALTINDA FAALİYETİN GERİ KAZANILMASI

Öz

Bu makale, özellikle Mahsa Amini’nin ölümü ve “Kadın, Yaşam, Özgürlük” hareketinin patlak vermesinin ardından, toplumsal düzensizlikten ziyade sivil itaatsizliğin İran kadın hareketinin oluşumunda nasıl bir rol oynadığını incelemektedir. Makale, İran’da kadınların ataerkil yasalara karşı kırk yıllık eylemlerini yeniden ele almak için feminist teori, sivil itaatsizlik literatürü ve medya analizi gibi disiplinlerarası materyallere dayanmaktadır. Çalışma, İranlı kadınların basit bedensel direniş eylemlerinin hem dini, hem de siyasi otoriteye karşı şiddet içermeyen kitlesel bir direniş repertuarına nasıl dönüştürüldüğünü açıklamaktadır. Çalışma, somut direnişe, örneğin başörtüsünü çıkarma, dans etme ve kamusal konuşma gibi, failliğin ahlaki ve siyasi bir geri kazanımı olan somut direnişe odaklanmaktadır. Ayrıca, sonuçların dijital medyanın küresel çapta bu tür eylemleri nasıl beslediğini ve İran feminist mücadelesini hak ve onur mücadelesi olarak ulusötesi bir mücadeleye dönüştürdüğünü görmeye yardımcı olduğu da gözlemlenebilir. Çalışma, toplumsal cinsiyet politikaları, toplumsal hareketler ve otoriter durumlarda direniş söylemine katkıda bulunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sivil İtaatsizlik
• İran Kadın Hareketi
• Toplumsal Cinsiyet Direnişi
• Otoriterlik
• Mahsa Amini

Kaynakça

1. • Abu-Lughod, Lila (2002), “Do Muslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others”, American Anthropologist, 104(3), pp. 783-790.
2. • Ahmed, Sara (2004), The Cultural Politics of Emotion, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
3. • Amnesty International (2019-2024), Reports on women’s rights in Iran, Date of Accession: 10.03.2025 from https://www.amnesty.org/.
4. • Al-Ali, Nadje (2007), Iraqi Women: Untold Stories from 1948 to the Present, London: Zed Books.
5. • Al Jazeera English (2010-2024), Date of Accession: 10.03.2025 from https://www.aljazeera.com/
6. • Arendt, Hannah (1951), The Origins of Totalitarianism, Harcourt.
7. • Arendt, Hannah (1958), The Human Condition, University of Chicago Press.
8. • BBC Persian (2010-2024), Date of Accession: 10.03.2025 from https://www.bbc.com/persian.

9. • Bennett, W. Lance & Segerberg, Alexandra (2013), The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. • Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria (2006), “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77-101.
11. • Butler, Judith (1990), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York: Routledge.
12. • Castells, Manuel (1996), The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford: Blackwell.
13. • Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams (1989), “Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine”, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), pp. 139-167.
14. • Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams (1991), “Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color”, Stanford Law Review, 43(6), pp. 1241-1299.
15. • Entman, Robert M. (1993), “Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm”, Journal of Communication, 43(4), pp. 51-58.
16. • Gamson, William A. & Modigliani, Andre (1989), “Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach”, American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), pp. 1-37.
17. • Gandhi, Mahatma (1948), Non-violent Resistance (Satyagraha), Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House.
18. • Goffman, Erving (1974), Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. • Greene, Joshua David (2007), “Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), pp. 322-323.
20. • Hoodfar, Homa (1999), “The Veil in Their Minds and on Our Heads: Veiling Practices and Muslim Women”, in (eds. by Elizabeth A. Castelli & Rosamond C. Rodman) Women, Gender, Religion: A Reader, New York: Palgrave.
21. • Human Rights Watch (2010-2024), Date of Accession: 10.03.2025 from https://www.hrw.org/middle-east/n-africa/iran.
22. • Iran Human Rights (2022-2024), Date of Accession: 10.03.2025 from https://iranhr.net/.
23. • King Jr., Martin Luther (1963), “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, Date of Accession: 10.06.2025 from https://minio.la.utexas.edu/webeditor-files/coretexts/pdf/1963_mlk_letter.pdf.
24. • Klandermans, Bert (2014), The Psychology of Protest, London: Routledge.
25. • Kohlberg, Lawrence (1969), “Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization”, in (ed. D. A. Goslin) Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 347-480.
26. • McCombs, Maxwell & Shaw, Donald L. (1972), “The agenda-setting function of mass media”, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), pp. 176-187.
27. • Mir-Hosseini, Ziba (2006), “Muslim women’s quest for equality: Between Islamic law and feminism”, Critical Inquiry, 32(4), pp. 629-645.
28. • Moghadam, Valentine M. (2003), Modernizing Women: Gender and Social Change in the Middle East, 3rd ed., Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
29. • Moghissi, Haideh (2005), Women and Islam: Critical Concepts in Sociology, Vol. 3, London: Routledge.
30. • Mohanty, Chandra Talpade (1988), “Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses”, Feminist Review, 30, pp. 61-88.
31. • Mohanty, Chandra Talpade (2003), Feminism without Borders: Decolonising Theory, Practicing Solidarity, Duke University Press.
32. • Riessman, Catherine Kohler (2008), Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences, SAGE Publications.
33. • Rose, Gillian (2016), Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials (4th ed.), SAGE Publications.
34. • Scott, James C. (1990), Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts, Yale University Press.
35. • Sunstein, Cass R. (2017), #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
36. • Tajfel, Henri, & John C. Turner (1979), “An integrative theory of intergroup conflict”, in (eds. by W. G. Austin and S. Worchel) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Monterey: Brooks/Cole, pp. 33-47.
37. • Tajfel, Henri (1982), “Social psychology of intergroup relations”, Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), pp. 1-39.
38. • Tarrow, Sidney (1998), Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. • Thoreau, Henry David (1849), Civil Disobedience, Date of Accession: 10.06.2025 from https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/uprising1313/files/2017/10/Civil-Disobedience-by-Henry-David-Thoreau.pdf.
40. • Tohidi, Nayereh (1997), “The issues at hand: Fundamentalism and women’s rights in Iran”, in (ed. by M. Afkhami) Faith and Freedom: Women’s Human Rights in the Muslim World, Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, pp. 305-316.
41. • Tüfekçi, Zeynep (2017), Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest, Yale University Press.
42. • Van Dijk, Teun A. (1993), “Principles of critical discourse analysis”, Discourse & Society, 4(2), pp. 249-283.
43. • Zimbardo, Philip G. (2007), The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil, New York: Random House.