Araştırma Makalesi

Characterization and Comparison of the Quality Indicators of the Group Exercise Fitness Instructor, Considering the Intervenient, Gender and Age

Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2 8 Haziran 2016
PDF İndir
TR EN

Characterization and Comparison of the Quality Indicators of the Group Exercise Fitness Instructor, Considering the Intervenient, Gender and Age

Öz

Aim: The aim of this study is to characterize and compare the quality indicators of the group exercise fitness instructor, considering the intervenient (owner/general managers; technical managers; trainers; instructors; participants), gender (female; male) and age (<21 years old; 21-30 years old; 31-40 years old; > 40 years old).

Material and Methods: 100 interviews were applied (32,54 ± 6,36 years old) and, through the content analysis technique, was reached a theoretical categorical model with 25 categories, grouped into 4 general dimensions. After that, the Chi-square test was used to test the frequency with which the sample participants are divided into the groups of the qualitative variable (intervenient, gender and age) is whether or not identical (Maroco, 2010).

Results: Considering the intervenient there are significant differences in image (Professional Quality), sympathy (Relational Quality) and fitness level (Technical Quality). In gender, the significant differences are in gaiety, empathy, availability (Relational Quality), fitness level and technical execution (Technical Quality). Finally, in age, there are significant differences in assiduity, dedication (Professional Quality) and in the empathy (Relational Quality)

Conclusion: The organizations (gyms) can and should train their employees (fitness instructors), in order to establish behavioral standards, considering the participants characteristics to, by that, increase their satisfaction and loyalty levels.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Afthinos, Y., Theodorakis, N., & Nassis, P. (2005). Customers expectations of service in greek fitness centers. Gender, age, type of sport center and motivation differences. Managing Service Quality, 15(3), 245-258.
  2. Almeida, L,. & Freire, T. (2003). Metodologia da investigação em psicologia e educação (3a ed.). Braga: Psiquilíbrios.
  3. Baker, D., & Crompton, J. (2000). Quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(3), 785-804.
  4. Bardin, L. (2008). Análise de conteúdo (5a ed.). Lisboa: Edições 70.
  5. Batista, P., Graça, A., & Matos, Z. (2008). Termos e características associadas à competência. Estudo comparativo de profissionais do desporto que exercem a sua atividade profissional em diferentes contextos de prática desportiva. Revista Portuguesa de Ciências do Desporto, 8(3), 377-395.
  6. Cloes, M., Laraki, N., Zatta, S., & Piéron, M. (2001). Identification des critères associés à la qualité des instructeurs d’aérobic. Comparaison des avis des clients et des intervenants. Paper presented at the colloque “L’intervention dans le domaine des activités physiques et sportives”, Grenoble - Switzerland.
  7. Fernandéz, J., Carrión, G., & Ruíz, D. (2012). La satisfacción de clientes y su relación con la percepción de calidad en centro de fitness: utilización de escala CALIDFIT. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 21(2), 309-319.
  8. Filho, C. (2000). O discurso do profissional de ginástica em academia no Rio de Janeiro. Revista Movimento, 4(12), 14-24.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Spor Hekimliği

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Vera Sımões Bu kişi benim

Susana Franco Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

8 Haziran 2016

Gönderilme Tarihi

4 Şubat 2016

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2016 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Campos, F., Sımões, V., & Franco, S. (2016). Characterization and Comparison of the Quality Indicators of the Group Exercise Fitness Instructor, Considering the Intervenient, Gender and Age. International Journal of Sport Exercise and Training Sciences - IJSETS, 2(2), 50-59. https://doi.org/10.18826/ijsets.63014
AMA
1.Campos F, Sımões V, Franco S. Characterization and Comparison of the Quality Indicators of the Group Exercise Fitness Instructor, Considering the Intervenient, Gender and Age. Uls Spor, Egz & Ant Bil Derg. 2016;2(2):50-59. doi:10.18826/ijsets.63014
Chicago
Campos, Francisco, Vera Sımões, ve Susana Franco. 2016. “Characterization and Comparison of the Quality Indicators of the Group Exercise Fitness Instructor, Considering the Intervenient, Gender and Age”. International Journal of Sport Exercise and Training Sciences - IJSETS 2 (2): 50-59. https://doi.org/10.18826/ijsets.63014.
EndNote
Campos F, Sımões V, Franco S (01 Haziran 2016) Characterization and Comparison of the Quality Indicators of the Group Exercise Fitness Instructor, Considering the Intervenient, Gender and Age. International Journal of Sport Exercise and Training Sciences - IJSETS 2 2 50–59.
IEEE
[1]F. Campos, V. Sımões, ve S. Franco, “Characterization and Comparison of the Quality Indicators of the Group Exercise Fitness Instructor, Considering the Intervenient, Gender and Age”, Uls Spor, Egz & Ant Bil Derg, c. 2, sy 2, ss. 50–59, Haz. 2016, doi: 10.18826/ijsets.63014.
ISNAD
Campos, Francisco - Sımões, Vera - Franco, Susana. “Characterization and Comparison of the Quality Indicators of the Group Exercise Fitness Instructor, Considering the Intervenient, Gender and Age”. International Journal of Sport Exercise and Training Sciences - IJSETS 2/2 (01 Haziran 2016): 50-59. https://doi.org/10.18826/ijsets.63014.
JAMA
1.Campos F, Sımões V, Franco S. Characterization and Comparison of the Quality Indicators of the Group Exercise Fitness Instructor, Considering the Intervenient, Gender and Age. Uls Spor, Egz & Ant Bil Derg. 2016;2:50–59.
MLA
Campos, Francisco, vd. “Characterization and Comparison of the Quality Indicators of the Group Exercise Fitness Instructor, Considering the Intervenient, Gender and Age”. International Journal of Sport Exercise and Training Sciences - IJSETS, c. 2, sy 2, Haziran 2016, ss. 50-59, doi:10.18826/ijsets.63014.
Vancouver
1.Francisco Campos, Vera Sımões, Susana Franco. Characterization and Comparison of the Quality Indicators of the Group Exercise Fitness Instructor, Considering the Intervenient, Gender and Age. Uls Spor, Egz & Ant Bil Derg. 01 Haziran 2016;2(2):50-9. doi:10.18826/ijsets.63014

Cited By