The Evolution of Genocide Law: An Examination on the Role of the Bosnian War

Yıl 2024, , 27 - 72, 23.09.2024

Gözde Kılıç Yaşın

https://doi.org/10.54842/ustich.1436952

Öz

This article critically examines the impact of legal proceedings conducted within the realm of
international law pertaining to the 1992-1995 Bosnian War on the evolution of international
genocide law. It explores the developments and challenges in implementing the Convention
on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the implications of the war on
the international legal framework, and the role played by international institutions such as the
International Court of Justice. Through a methodical analysis of pivotal provisions in relevant
court decisions, the article scrutinizes the intersection of legal responsibilities, state
sovereignty, and the politicization of genocide within the international community.

Anahtar Kelimeler

genocide, state, sovereignty, Kristic, Mladic, Jelisic, Tadic, International Court of Justice, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia

Soykırım Hukukunun Evrimi: Bosna Savaşının Rolü Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Öz

Bu makale, 1992-1995 Bosna Savaşı ve Sırbistan'a karşı yürütülen hukuki süreçlerin uluslararası soykırım hukukunun evrimine etkilerini incelemektedir. Soykırımı Önleme ve Cezalandırma Sözleşmesi'nin uygulanmasındaki gelişmeleri ve zorlukları, savaşın uluslararası hukuk sistemine etkisini ve Uluslararası Adalet Divanı gibi uluslararası kurumların rolünü, ilgili mahkeme kararlarının öne çıkan hükümlerinin hukuki analizi yöntemiyle değerlendirmiştir. Makale, hukuki sorumluluklar, devlet egemenliği ve uluslararası camiada soykırımın siyasallaşması arasındaki kesişimi kritik bir şekilde analiz etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

soykırım, Devlet, egemenlik, Kristic, Mladic, Jelisic, Tadic, Uluslararası Adalet Divanı, ICTY

Kaynakça

• Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crime of Genocide (Further Requests for the Indication of Provisional Measures), Separate Opinion of Lauterpacht, ICJ Reports, 1993
• European External Action Service, Report, EU Member States annual meeting on UNSCR 1325 Transitional justice and gender: reducing impunity, Brussels, 27 May 2013, http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/features/features-working-women/working-withwomen/docs/ 11-eu-ms-annual-meeting-on-unscr-27052013_en.pdf.
• First Report on State Responsibility by the Special Rapporteur J. Crawford, U.N. Doc. A/CN./490/Add.5, pp. 29-31
• International Court of Justice, Memorial Of The Government Of 'The Republic Of Bosnia And Herzegovina, Case Concerning Application Of The Convention On The Prevention And Punishment Of The Crime Of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)), 15 Nisan 1994, https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/91/8616.pdf
• Key Figures of the Cases, ICTY, International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavian Countries, March 2016 https://www.icty.org/en/cases/key-figurescases
• Legacies and Lessons: Sexual Violence against Men and Boys in Sri Lanka and Bosnia & Herzegovina, 16 May 2017, https://allsurvivorsproject.org/legacies-and-lessons-sexual- violence-against-men-and-boys-in-sri-lanka-and-bosnia-herzegovina/
• Seventh Report on War Crimes in the Former Yugoslavia: Part II, United Natioans Security Council 1993, (https://phdn.org/archives/www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/documents/sdrpt7b.htm)
• Statute Of The International Tribunal For The Former Yugoslavia, 25 May 1993, annexed to Report of the Secretary-General pursuant to paragraph 2 of Security Council Resolution 808 (1993), Md. 1-5, ICTY, https://www.icty.org/x/file/Legal%20Library/Statute/statute_re808_1993_en.pdf
• United Nations, “Report of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia,” A/72/266, S/2017/662, 1 August 2017
• United Nations, Report of The International Tribunal for The Prosecution Of Persons Responsible For Serious Violations Of International Humanitarian Law Committed in The Territory of The Former Yugoslavia Since 1991, A/52/375, S/1997/729, 18 September https://www.icty.org/x/file/About/Reports%20and%20Publications/AnnualReports/ annual_report_1997_en.pdf
• The Human Rights Watch Global Report on Women’s Human Rights, August 1995, http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/ The Prosecutor v Albina Terzić (S1 1 K 005665 11 KrŽ), Second Instance Verdict, ICTY 5 July 2013 , www.icty.org/en/action/cases/
• The Prosecutor v Blagoje Simić et al, Trial Judgment, IT-95-9-T, ICTY, www.icty.org/en/action/cases/ The Prosecutor v Karadžić, Trial Transcript from 2 July 1996, IT-95-18-R61, 5 Case No. IT- 95-5-R61, https://www.icty.org/x/cases/karadzic/custom1/en/080820.pdf
• The Prosecutor v Milomir Stakić, Trial Judgment, IT-97-24, ICTY, www.icty.org/en/action/cases/
• The Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac, Radomir Kovac and Zoran Vukovic (Trial Judgment), IT-96-23-T & IT-96-23/1-T, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 22 February 2001, https://www.refworld.org/cases,ICTY,3ae6b7560.html
• The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic (Appeal Judgement), , IT-94-1-A, 15 Temmuz 1999, https://www.refworld.org/jurisprudence/caselaw/icty/1999/en/40180
• The Prosecutor v. Goran Jelisic, Judgement, IT-95-10, T., International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 14 December 1999, para. 60-61, https://www.icty.org/x/cases/jelisic/tjug/en
• The Prosecutor v. Mladic, Case No. IT-09–92-T, ICTY, Trial Chamber I, Judgment, 22 November, https://ucr.irmct.org/LegalRef/CMSDocStore/Public/English/Judgement/ NotIndexable/IT-09-92/JUD275R0000516224.pdf
• The Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic, Case IT-98-33-A, 2 August 2001, https://cld.irmct.org/assets/filings/Judgement-Krstic.pdf.
• The Prosecutor v. Ranko Češić, IT-95-10/1, ICTY, 11 March 2004, https://www.icty.org/x/cases/cesic/cis/en/cis_cesic.pdf
• The Prosecutor v. Tadic, Opinion and Judgement, Case IT-94-1-T, 7 Mayıs 1997, https://www.icty.org/x/cases/tadic/tjug/en/tad-tsj70507JT2-e.pdf
• The Prosecutor v. Tadic, Trial Chamber judgment, IT-94-1-A, 15 Temmuz 1999, https://www.refworld.org/jurisprudence/caselaw/icty/1999/en/40180 The Prosecutor v. Vidoje Blagojevic, Dragan Obrenovıc, Dragan Jokıc, Case Number IT-02- 53-PT, ICTY, https://www.icty.org/en/case/blagojevic_jokic
• The Prosecutor v. Vidoje Blagojevic, Judgement , Case IT-02-60-T, ICTY, 17 January 2005, https://www.icty.org/en/sid/8661
• Albert Doja. “Politics of mass rapes in ethnic conflict: A morphodynamics of raw madness and cooked evil”, Crime, Law and Social Change, 2019, 71 (5), pp.541-580
• Anıl Çeçen, İnsan Hakları Rehberi, (Birleşmiş Milletler Anlaşması Başlığı), Bilim Yayıncılık, Ankara, 1999
• Antonio Cassese, “The Nicaragua and Tadic Tests Revisited in the Light of the ICJ Judgment on Genocide in Bosnia,” European Journal of International Law, V.18, I. 4, 2007, s. 649-668
• Antonio Cassese, “Criminal Law Notions and State Responsibility for Genocide,” Journal of International Criminal Justice, Cilt 5, 2007, s. 887
• Caroline Fournet, “‘Face to face with horror’: The Tomašica mass grave and the trial of Ratko Mladic´”, Human Remains & Violence, 6/2 (2020), 23-41
• Catharine A. MacKinnon, “Defining Rape Internationally: A Comment on Akayesu”, 44 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 940 (2006), pp.239 vd
• Catharine A. MacKinnon, “Remedies for War Crimes at the National Level”, The Journal of the International Institute, Volume 6 (1); Fall 1998