The accuracy data presented in the technical specifications of the geodetic surveying instruments produced by various companies are controversial. To be able to say anything about the accuracy of these data, they must be obtained under similar conditions, tested by process, adjusting and appropriate statistical methods, and then compared. In this study, Geodetic GNSS receivers produced by different companies were tested according to horizontal accuracies. However, vertical observations were also obtained, only horizontal accuracies were compared.. For this purpose, a horizontal control network was established and long-term static sessions were held with the instruments of each company in this network. The data obtained as a result of the sessions were converted into data files in the same format and adjusted separately by processing with the commercial software of one of the instruments. As a result of adjustment, the results obtained from the instruments of each company were compared according to the horizontal accuracy criteria.
Reference1
Charles D. Ghilani, Paul R. Wolf (2006). Adjustment Computation Spatial Data Analysis
Reference2
Zahraa Hussein (2019). GNSS Geodetic Network Design using Least Squares Adjustment Method Paperback
Reference3
Pietro Catania et all, (2020). Positioning Accuracy Comparison of GNSS Receivers Used for Mapping and Guidance of Agricultural Machines. Agronomy
Reference4
Mariusz Rychlicki et all. (2020). Analysis of Accuracy and Reliability of Different Types of GPS Receivers
Reference5
Ismail W. (2015). Evaluating the Differences and Accuracies Between GNSS Applications
Reference6
Using PPP, Research Project, University of Southern Queensland
Reference1
Charles D. Ghilani, Paul R. Wolf (2006). Adjustment Computation Spatial Data Analysis
Reference2
Zahraa Hussein (2019). GNSS Geodetic Network Design using Least Squares Adjustment Method Paperback
Reference3
Pietro Catania et all, (2020). Positioning Accuracy Comparison of GNSS Receivers Used for Mapping and Guidance of Agricultural Machines. Agronomy
Reference4
Mariusz Rychlicki et all. (2020). Analysis of Accuracy and Reliability of Different Types of GPS Receivers
Reference5
Ismail W. (2015). Evaluating the Differences and Accuracies Between GNSS Applications
Reference6
Using PPP, Research Project, University of Southern Queensland
Yavuz, E. (2022). Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies. Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 5(1), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.47137/uujes.1123909
AMA
Yavuz E. Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies. UUJES. June 2022;5(1):68-77. doi:10.47137/uujes.1123909
Chicago
Yavuz, Erol. “Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies”. Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences 5, no. 1 (June 2022): 68-77. https://doi.org/10.47137/uujes.1123909.
EndNote
Yavuz E (June 1, 2022) Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies. Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences 5 1 68–77.
IEEE
E. Yavuz, “Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies”, UUJES, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 68–77, 2022, doi: 10.47137/uujes.1123909.
ISNAD
Yavuz, Erol. “Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies”. Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences 5/1 (June 2022), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.47137/uujes.1123909.
JAMA
Yavuz E. Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies. UUJES. 2022;5:68–77.
MLA
Yavuz, Erol. “Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies”. Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, 2022, pp. 68-77, doi:10.47137/uujes.1123909.
Vancouver
Yavuz E. Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies. UUJES. 2022;5(1):68-77.