Production of banana / glass fiber bio–composite profile and its bending strength

Abstract

In this study, biocomposite profiles, in the dimensions of 40x40x1100 mm, were produced. Biocomposites consisting of polyester resin glue and banana fibers as a filling material and glass ropes binding were prepared by compression moulding technique under 400 bar pressure and at 70 °C temperature using a hydraulic pres. In order to gain higher strength on the outer surfaces of the produced profiles, glass fiber and polyester binding were used. One and two fold glass fibers were laid down in two different orientations. One of them was laid by hand lay-up method which was used to increase strength of the outer surfaces. The bending test was applied to the produced specimens in the dimension of 40x40x550 mm. The flexural strength values were calculated according to TS EN 310 using the obtained Fmax values. The test results showed that the highest and lowest bending strengths for a single layer specimen were 13.085 N/mm² and 8.957 N/mm², respectively. While, the highest and lowest bending strengths for the double layers specimens were 18.196 N/mm² and 16.834 N/mm², respectively. From these results it can be concluded that these composites can be used in various structural components for the greenhouse industry and stair handrails, fencing and decoration for garden furniture

Keywords

• Banana fibers, glass fibers, biocomposite

Kaynakça

1. Aydın F and Sarıbıyık M. Concrete with compressive and flexural properties of GRP box section profiles the behavior effects of the use of hybrid, 5. International Symposium on Advanced Technologies, Karabük , Turkey, 2009.
2. Karakuş K, Güleç T, Kaymakçı A and Mengeloğlu F. Evaluation of polymer composite production flour corn straw as a filler material. 3. Congress of National Black Sea Forestry, Artvin, Turkey, 2013 – 2019, 2010.
3. Arslan MB and Karakuş B. Fiber and chipboard production of agricultural wastes. ZKÜ Bartın Journal of the Faculty of Forestry, 2007; 9(12): 54 – 62.
4. Samal SK, Mohanty S and Nayak SK. Banana/glass fiber–reinforced polypropylene hybrid composites: fabrication and performance evaluation. Polimer–Plastic Technology and Engineering, 2009; 397 – 417.
5. Mukhopadhyay S, Fangueiro R, Arpaç Y and Şentürk Ü. Banana fibers–variability and fracture behavior. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 2008; 3(2): 39 – 45.
6. Altınışık F and Yılmaz FB. Post–harvest waste from the banana plant–based natural fiber plastic composites used as reinforcement, MSc., Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey, 2006.
7. Maleque MA, Belal FY and Sapuan SM. Mechanical properties study of pseudo– stem banana fiber reinforced epoxy composite. The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2006; 32(2B): 359 – 363.
8. Herrera–Estrada L, Pillay S and Vaidya U. Banana fiber composites for automotive and transportation applications. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294.

9. Joshi SV, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK and Arora S. Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites. Composites, 2004; 35(Part A): 371 – 376.
10. Bledzki AK, Gassan J. Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Progress in Polymer Science, 1999; 24: 221 – 274.
11. Netravali AN and Chabba S. Composites get greener. Materials Today, 2003: 22 – 29.
12. Mengeloğlu F and Alma MH. Buğday saplarının kompozit levha üretiminde kullanılması. KSÜ Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 2002; 5(2): 37 – 48.
13. Tufan M and Mengeloğlu F. Wood Plastic Composites, Wood Plastic Composite for the production of raw materials and on our country: An Overview. 3. National Black Sea Forestry Congress, Turkey, 1658 – 1664, 2010.
14. Bektaş İ, Güler C and Kalaycıoğlu H. Urea–formaldehyde glue with sunflower stalks, particleboard manufacturing. KSU Journal of Science and Engineering, 2002; 5(2): 49 – 55.
15. Li Y, Mai Y-W and Ye L. Sisal fibre and its composites: a review of recent development. Composites Science and Technology, 2000; 60: 2037 – 2055.
16. Wazzan AA. Effect of fiber orientation on the mechanical properties and farcture characteristic of date palm fiber reinforced composites. International Journal of Polymeric Materials, 2005; 54: 213 – 225.
17. Kunanopparat T, Menut P, Morel M-H and Guilbert S. Reinforcement of plasticized wheat gluten with natural fibers: from mechanical improvement to deplasticizing effect. Composites, 2008; 39(Part A): 777 – 785.
18. Kumar NR, Ramji K, Ratna Prasad AV and Murali Mohan Rao K. Tensile strength of elephant grass fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. International Journal of Applied Engineering, 2009; 4(11): 2363 – 2368.
19. Yuanjian T and Isaac DH. Impact and fatigue behaviour of hemp fibre composites. Composites Science and Technology, 2007; 67: 3300 – 3307.
20. Anuar H, Ahmad SH, Rasid R and Nik Daud NS. Tensile and impact properties of thermoplastic natural rubber reinforced short glass fiber and empty fruit bunch hybrid composites. Polymer–Plastics Technology and Engineering, 2006; 45: 1059 – 1063.