Alt ve Üst Çene Tam Dişsiz Hastalarda Rezidüel Kret Genişliğinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Diş çekiminden sonra, alveolar kemik genişliğinin yanı sıra yüksekliğini de içeren belirgin değişikliklere uğrar. Maksilla veya mandibulada diş kaybından sonra alveolar kemiğin rezorpsiyonu genel olarak üç boyutlu gerçekleşmesine rağmen, horizontal kemik kaybı ile vertikal kemik kaybı oranlarının farklı olduğu gösterilmiştir. Son zamanlarda, konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi (KIBT), alveolar kemik rezopsiyonlarının değerlendirilmesinde yaygın olarak kabul edilen bir tanı aracı haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışmada, alt ve üst tam dişsiz hastalarda KIBT görüntülerinde rezidüel kret genişliğinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmaya implant değerlendirmesi için KIBT alınmış, alt ve üst tam dişsiz çenelere sahip ve diş çekimlerinin üzerinden en az üç yıl geçmiş 50 hasta dahil edilmiştir. Çalışmada alt çenede kretin en dar ve en geniş olduğu bölgedeki ölçüm, üst çenedeki kretin en dar ve en geniş olduğu bölgedeki ölçümden daha büyük bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Total dişsiz çenelerde kret genişliğinin en az ve en geniş olduğu bölgelerin bilinmesi, dental implant planlamalarında ve tedavisinde başarıyı arttıracaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• KIBT
• alveolar kemik
• rezorpsiyon

Evaluation of Residual Crest Width in Patients with Total Edentulous Lower and Upper Jaw

Öz

After tooth extraction, the alveolar bone undergoes explicit changes, including the height of the bone as well as its width. Although resorption of the alveolar bone after tooth loss in the maxilla or mandible is generally three-dimensional, it has been shown that the rates of horizontal bone loss and vertical bone loss are different. Recently, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become a widely accepted diagnostic tool for the evaluation of alveolar bone resoptions. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the residual crest width in cone-beam computed tomography images in upper and lower edentulous patients. In the study, 50 patients who had edentulous upper and lower jaws and at least three years past after tooth extraction were included in the study. In the study, the measurement in the region where the crest is the narrowest and the widest in the mandible was found to be greater than the measurement in the region where the crest is the narrowest and the widest in the maxilla (p<0.05). Knowing the areas where the crest width is the narrowest and the widest in total edentulous jaws will increase the success in dental implant planning and treatment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• CBCT
• alveolar bone
• resorption

Kaynakça

1. 1. Lam RV. Contour changes of the alveolar processes following extractions. J Prosthet Dent. 1960;10(1):25-32.
2. 2. Bernstein S, Cooke J, Fotek P, Wang HL. Vertical bone augmentation: where are we now? Implant Dent. 2006;15(3):219-28.
3. 3. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12- month prosthetic study. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 2003;23(4):313-323.
4. 4. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31(10):820-828.
5. 5. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(2):212-218.
6. 6. Barone A, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Calvo Guirado JL, Covani U. Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study. J Periodontol. 2008;79(8):1370-1377.
7. 7. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(Suppl):43-61.
8. 8. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005;25(2):113-119.

9. 9. Schneider R. Prosthetic concerns about atrophic alveolar ridges. Postgrad Dent. 1999;6(2):3–7.
10. 10. Buser D, Bragger U, Lang NP, Nyman S. Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1990;1(1):22–32.
11. 11. Annibali S, Bignozzi I, Sammartino G, La Monaca G, Cristalli MP. Horizontal and vertical ridge augmentation in localized alveolar deficient sites: a retrospective case series. Implant Dent. 2012;21(3):175-185.
12. 12. Bedrossian E, Tawfilis A, Alijanian A. Veneer grafting: a technique for augmentation of the resorbed alveolus prior to implant placement. A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15(6):853-858.
13. 13. Tolstunov L. Maxillary tuberosity block bone graft: innovative technique and case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(8):1723-1729.
14. 14. Simion M, Baldoni M, Zaffe D. Jawbone enlargement using immediate implant placement associated with a split-crest technique and guided tissue regeneration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992;12(6):462-473.
15. 15. Jensen OT, Cullum DR, Baer D. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(9):1921-1930.
16. 16. McCarthy JG. The role of distraction osteogenesis in the reconstruction of the mandible in unilateral craniofacial microsomia. Clin Plast Surg. 1994;21(4):625-631.
17. 17. Laster Z, Reem Y, Nagler R. Horizontal alveolar ridge distraction in an edentulous patient. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(2):502-506.
18. 18. Kedici S ve İşcan MY. Sex determinatıon from dental dimensions. Turk J Forensic Sci. 2004;3(1):61-66.
19. 19. Swasty D, Lee JS, Huang JC, Maki K, Gansky SA, Hatcher D, Miller AJ. Anthropometric analysis of the human mandibular cortical bone as assessed by conebeam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(3):491–500.
20. 20. Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, Scheetz JP. Ridge preservation with freeze‐dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: A clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol. 2003;74(7):990-999.
21. 21. Zhao D, Chen X, Yue L, Liu W, Mo A, Yu H, Yuan Q. Assessment of residual alveolar bone volume in hemodialysis patients using CBCT. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(7):1619- 1624.
22. 22. Watanabe H, Mohammad Abdul M, Kurabayashi T, Aoki H. Mandible size and morphology determined with CT on a premise of dental implant operation. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32(4):343–349.
23. 23. Zhang V, Tullis J, Weltman R. Cone beam computerized tomography measurement of alveolar ridge at posterior mandible for ımplant graft estimation. J Oral Implantol. 2015;41(6) e231-7.
24. 24. Al-Johany SS, Al Amri MD, Alsaeed S, Alalola B. Dental ımplant length and diameter: A proposed classification scheme. J Prosthodont.2017;26(3):252-26.