TR
EN
HOW WAS THE EFFECT OF BILATERAL TRADE AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ON SOMALIA’S ECONOMIC GROWTH: ROLES OF TURKEY
Öz
The World Investment Report 2010 states that FDI stocks increased more quickly than exports and imports between 1990 and 2009, surpassing even the rise of intermediate goods exports/imports. Since the 1990s, there has been a sharp growth in regional trade agreements RTAs 2, many of which have investment-related clauses, which has coincided with this sharp surge in FDI flows. Therefore, the primary goal of this research was to determine how foreign direct investment and bilateral trade affected Somalia's economic development. Turkish roles The data on bilateral trade, interest rates, government spending, exchange rates, gross domestic product, and terms of trade are taken from the Bank of Somalia, however, the parameters for foreign direct investment are obtained from the Somalian ministry of planning and economic development This study used time series analysis with semiannual information by the first half of 2007 and through regular season of 2020. The study also investigated causality, cointegration, and other time series tests. A VECM short run effect model and a VAR long run effect model were also used in the investigation. According to the Granger causality test, bilateral trade has a positive impact on GDP even though foreign direct investment does not. However, bilateral trade and foreign direct investment both work together to boost the nation's economic growth. Despite the fact that the study's results indicated there is no correlation between GDP and foreign direct investment. The cointegration between bilateral trade and foreign direct investment yielded different results. Data from the VECM suggested that there is a short-term relationship between the two variables. In particular, results showed that when FDI in Somalia is excessively high, it quickly converts to a low GDP rate. Additionally, it returns to an increase in FDI in the economy when the average GDP is in excess. Foreign direct investment, bilateral trade, and terms of trade may be disregarded when predicting future GDP rates, despite the fact that prior government spending, the currency rate, and interest rates are all very sensitive to changes in future GDP. To promote economic growth in the future, it is necessary to manage governmental spending, interest rates, exchange rates, and trade terms.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Adarov, A. 2021 . Working Paper 204 Interactions Between Global Value Chains andForeign Direct Investment: A Network Approach. July. African Journal of Economic Review, 5 2 , 34–54.https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.264565
- Agbodji, A. E. 2008 . The Impact of Subregional Integration on Bilateral Trade: The Case of UEMOA. In AERC Research Ppaer 186 Issue December .
- Ahmad, B. 1996 . Bilateral Trade and Per Capita Income Convergence of Selected South Asian countries and among their ‘ Major Trade Partners .’ 1986, 1–17.
- Ahmed Hannan, S. 2016 . The Impact of Trade Agreements: New Approach, New Insights.
- Aluthge, C., Jibir, A., & Abdu, M. 2021 . Impact of Government Expenditure on EconomicGrowth in Nigeria, 1970-2019. Central Bank of Nigeria Journal of Applied Statistics, Anaripour, J. T. 2011 . Study on relationship between interest rate and economic growth byeviews 2004-2010, Iran . Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 1 11 , 2346–2352. and Economics, 73 May , 133–143. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v7i4.1166
- Anyanwu, J. C., & John, C. 2021 . Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment Inflows toMyanmar. Bulletin of Applied Economics, September, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.47260/bae/812
- Argiro, M. 2003 . Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in the European Union.
- Ari, A., & Cergibozan, R. 2017 . Determinants Of The Trade Balance In The TurkishEconomy. KnE Social Sciences, 1 2 , 160. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v1i2.654
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
-
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Aralık 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi
-
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2022 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 4
APA
Hersi, S. A., & Tekeoğlu, A. N. (2022). HOW WAS THE EFFECT OF BILATERAL TRADE AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ON SOMALIA’S ECONOMIC GROWTH: ROLES OF TURKEY. Working Paper Series, 3(4), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7496527
AMA
1.Hersi SA, Tekeoğlu AN. HOW WAS THE EFFECT OF BILATERAL TRADE AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ON SOMALIA’S ECONOMIC GROWTH: ROLES OF TURKEY. Working Paper Series. 2022;3(4):57-69. doi:10.5281/zenodo.7496527
Chicago
Hersi, Sumaya Abdullahi, ve Aşkım Nurdan Tekeoğlu. 2022. “HOW WAS THE EFFECT OF BILATERAL TRADE AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ON SOMALIA’S ECONOMIC GROWTH: ROLES OF TURKEY”. Working Paper Series 3 (4): 57-69. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7496527.
EndNote
Hersi SA, Tekeoğlu AN (01 Aralık 2022) HOW WAS THE EFFECT OF BILATERAL TRADE AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ON SOMALIA’S ECONOMIC GROWTH: ROLES OF TURKEY. Working Paper Series 3 4 57–69.
IEEE
[1]S. A. Hersi ve A. N. Tekeoğlu, “HOW WAS THE EFFECT OF BILATERAL TRADE AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ON SOMALIA’S ECONOMIC GROWTH: ROLES OF TURKEY”, Working Paper Series, c. 3, sy 4, ss. 57–69, Ara. 2022, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7496527.
ISNAD
Hersi, Sumaya Abdullahi - Tekeoğlu, Aşkım Nurdan. “HOW WAS THE EFFECT OF BILATERAL TRADE AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ON SOMALIA’S ECONOMIC GROWTH: ROLES OF TURKEY”. Working Paper Series 3/4 (01 Aralık 2022): 57-69. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7496527.
JAMA
1.Hersi SA, Tekeoğlu AN. HOW WAS THE EFFECT OF BILATERAL TRADE AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ON SOMALIA’S ECONOMIC GROWTH: ROLES OF TURKEY. Working Paper Series. 2022;3:57–69.
MLA
Hersi, Sumaya Abdullahi, ve Aşkım Nurdan Tekeoğlu. “HOW WAS THE EFFECT OF BILATERAL TRADE AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ON SOMALIA’S ECONOMIC GROWTH: ROLES OF TURKEY”. Working Paper Series, c. 3, sy 4, Aralık 2022, ss. 57-69, doi:10.5281/zenodo.7496527.
Vancouver
1.Sumaya Abdullahi Hersi, Aşkım Nurdan Tekeoğlu. HOW WAS THE EFFECT OF BILATERAL TRADE AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ON SOMALIA’S ECONOMIC GROWTH: ROLES OF TURKEY. Working Paper Series. 01 Aralık 2022;3(4):57-69. doi:10.5281/zenodo.7496527