Sanat ve Ritüel: Kültürel Antropoloji Bağlamında Güncel Tartışmalar

Yıl 2024, , 73 - 99, 30.06.2024

Arif Akbaş

https://doi.org/10.59902/yazit.1480999

Öz

Bu makalede, sanat ve ritüelin kültürel antropoloji bağlamındaki güncel tartışmaları ele alınmaktadır. Araştırma, sanat ve ritüelin kültürel bağlamlardaki rolünü, değişen toplumsal dinamikler ve kültürel değişim süreçleri ışığında incelemektedir. Yöntem olarak, nitel araştırma deseni/ tarihsel sosyoloji-antropoloji yöntemi kullanılmış ve literatür taraması yapılarak güncel araştırma bulguları değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırma, sanat ve kuttörenin toplumlardaki sosyal yapıyı şekillendirme ve toplumsal kimlik oluşturmada önemli roller üstlendiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca, kültürel değişim süreçlerinde sanat ve ritüelin nasıl dönüştüğü ve adaptasyon süreçlerinde nasıl işlev gördüğü üzerinde durulmuştur. Güncel araştırma bulguları, teknolojik gelişmelerin ve küreselleşmenin sanat ve ritüel pratiklerini nasıl etkilediğini ve bu etkilerin kültürel dinamikleri nasıl değiştirdiğini göstermektedir. Çalışma, sanat ve ritüelin kültürel antropoloji bağlamında hala önemli bir araştırma konusu olduğunu ve bu konunun günümüzdeki tartışmalarının kültürel değişimin anlaşılmasında kritik bir rol oynadığını vurgulamaktadır. Sonuç olarak, sanat ile ritüelin toplumlardaki yerini anlamak, kültürel değişim süreçlerini anlamak ve bu değişimlere uyum sağlamak için önemlidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kültürel antropoloji, sanat sosyolojisi, sanat antropolojisi, sanat ve ritüel, toplumsal değişim

Etik Beyan

Bu makale için nitel yöntemin kullanılması nedeniyle etik beyan gerekmemektedir.

Destekleyen Kurum

-

Proje Numarası

-

Teşekkür

-

Current Debates in Cultural Anthropology Regarding Art and Rituals

Öz

In this article, current debates surrounding art and ritual within the framework of cultural anthropology are explored. The study delves into the roles of art and ritual within cultural settings, considering the evolving social dynamics and processes of cultural transformation. Qualitative research methods/ historical sociology-anthropology were employed as the methodology, and the latest research findings were scrutinized through a comprehensive literature review. The study elucidates the significant roles that art and ritual play in shaping social structures and forging societal identities. Moreover, it examines the transformations undergone by art and ritual amidst cultural shifts and their functionalities in adaptation processes. Contemporary research findings illuminate the impact of technological advancements and globalization on art and ritual practices, showcasing how these influences alter cultural dynamics. The research underscores the enduring relevance of art and ritual as pivotal subjects within cultural anthropology, emphasizing the critical role of ongoing discussions in comprehending cultural evolution. Consequently, grasping the significance of art and ritual within societies is paramount for navigating the complexities of cultural change and effectively adapting to them.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cultural anthropology, sociology of art, anthropology of art, art and ritual, social change

Proje Numarası

-

Kaynakça

• Adorno, Theodor (2004). Aesthetic Theory. Ed. Gretel Adorno and Rolf Tiedemann. Trans. Robert Hullot-Kentor. London, New York: Continuum.
• Allan, Derek (2009). Art and the Human Adventure. André Malraux’s Theory of Art. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
• Ashley, Kathleen (1992). “Art in Ritual Context: Introduction”. Journal of ritual studies, 6(1): 1-11.
• Beardsley, Monroe (1975). Aesthetics from Classical Greece to the Present (Vol. 13). USA: University of Alabama Press.
• Benjamin, Walter (1935). “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction”. Illuminations, Ed. Hannah Arendt. New York: Schocken Books, 1-26.
• Benjamin, Walter (2003). Understanding Brecht. Trans. Anna Bostock, London: Verso Books.
• Berger, John (1972). Ways of Seeing. London: Penguin Books.
• Castells, Manuel (1999). Information Technology, Globalization and Social Development. Geneva: UNRISD.
• Chablo, Alexander (1996). “What Can Artificial Intelligence Do for Anthropology?”. Current Anthropology, 37(3): 553-555.
• ChatGPT (2024). “Türk İnsanını Kültürel Antropoloji Bağlamında Analizi”. https://chatgpt.com/ (Erişim: 07.05.2024).
• Danto, Arthur (2003). The Abuse of Beauty. USA: Open Court Publishing.
• Dickie, George (2004). “The New Institutional Theory of Art”. Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art: The Analytic Tradition: An Anthology, 47-54.
• Goldbard, Arlene (2006). New Creative Community: The Art of Cultural Development. Oakland: New Village Press.
• Govia, Leah (2020). “Coproduction, Ethics and Artificial Intelligence: A Perspective from Cultural Anthropology”. Journal of Digital Social Research, 2(3): 42-64.
• Keesing, Felix Maxwell (1965). Cultural Anthropology. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.
• Kim, Minsoo. (2018). “Newly Generated Ritual in the Age of Digital Technology”. Virtual Creativity, 8(2): 179-188.
• Köpping, Klaus-Peter, et al. (2006). Ritual and Identity: Performative Practices as Effective Transformations of Social Reality (Vol. 8). LIT: Verlag Münster.
• Kraidy, Marwan M., & Murphy, Patrick D. (2004). “Media Ethnography: Local, Global or Translocal?”. Global Media Studies, Routledge: 299-307.
• Lamarque, Peter & Olsen, Stein Haugom (2018). Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art: The Analytic Tradition, An Anthology. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Massumi, Brian (1997). “Deleuze, Guattari and the Philosophy of Expression”. CRCL, 24(3): 15-23.
• Matei, Corina Sorana (2014). “Globalization- An Anthropological Approach”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149: 542-546.
• Mazzone, Marian, & Elgammal, Ahmed (2019). “Art, Creativity and the Potential of Artificial Intelligence”. Arts, 8(1): 26.
• Mesch, Claudia (2014). Art and Politics: A Small History of Art for Social Change Since 1945. Bloomsbury: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Mondal, Bhaskar (2020). “Artificial Intelligence: State of the Art”. Recent Trends and Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things, 389-425.
• Morphy, Howard, & Perkins, Morgan (2006). “The Anthropology of Art: A Reflection on Its History and Contemporary Practice”. The Anthropology of Art: A Reader. Ed. Howard Morphy & Morgan Perkins, USA: Blackwell Publishing, 1-32.
• Morris, Rosalind C. (1995). “All Made Up: Performance Theory and the New Anthropology of Sex and Gender”. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24(1): 567-592.
• Novitz, David (1992). The Boundaries of Art. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
• Sassen, Saskia (2003). “The State and Globalization”. Interventions, 5(2): 241-248.
• Scannell, Paddy (2003). “Benjamin Contextualized: On The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction”. Canonic Texts in Media Research: Are There Any? Should There Be? How About These? Ed. Katz et al. (Eds.). Cambridge: Polity Press, 74-89.
• Schneider, Arnd (2012). “Anthropology and Art”. The Sage Handbook of Social Anthropology, 1: 56-72.
• Shen, Yan., & Yu, Fang (2021). “The Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Art Design in the Digital Age”. Scientific programming: 1-10.
• Tedman, Gary (2012). Aesthetics & Alienation. London: Zero Books.
• Thompson, Reynaldo & Mukhopadhyay, Tirtha (2023). “Ritual Humanity at the Intersections of Art and Technology Accounts of the Past and the Future”. DAT Journal, 8(3): 66-73.
• Tolstoy, Leo (1995 [1897]). What is Art?. Trans. by Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky. London: Penguin.
• Turner, Dennis (1985). “The Subject of The Conversation”. Cinema Journal, 24(4): 4-22.
• URL-1: “Impact of Digital Technology on Art”. https://1605collective.com/blogs/blogposts/impact-of-digital-technology-on-art (Erişim: 08.05.2024).
• Valéry, Paul (1928). La Conquête de l’ubiquité. Paris: Œuvres, tome II, Pièces sur l’art, Nrf, Gallimard, Bibl. de la Pléiade. Vargün, Özlem (2023). “Transformation of Technology and Art: Digital Art”. Journal of Arts, 6(1): 49-54.
• Wolff, Janet. (2021). Aesthetics and the Sociology of Art. London: Routledge.
• Goldbard, Arlene (2006). New Creative Community: The Art of Cultural Development. New Village Press.