Alarm Yorgunluğu Konusunda Yapılan Araştırmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi: Web of Science Örneği

Öz

Amaç: Alarm yorgunluğu konularında son on yılda Web of Science veri tabanında yayımlanan araştırmaların bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle incelenmesi planlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırmaya dahil edilen makalelerin bibliyometrik analizi 15 Ağustos 2022 tarihinde yapıldı. “Web of Science Core Collection” da “alarm fatigue” OR “clinical alarms” anahtar kelimeleri girilerek tarama yapıldı. Değerlendirmeye 142 araştırma makalesi alındı. Makale verilerinin bibliyometrik analizleri R Studio da Biblioshiny paketi kullanılarak yapıldı. Bulgular: Bibliyometrik analiz genel verilerine göre 142 araştırma makalesinin 77 farklı kaynakda yayımlandığı, doküman başına ortalama atıf sayısının 10.27 olduğu ve yıllık büyüme oranının %11.51 olduğu görüldü. Makalelerin yayımlanma yıllara göre dağılımları incelendiğinde en çok n:21 makalenin 2020 yılında yayımlandığı görüldü. İncelenen araştırma makalelerinin n:9’unun “American Journal of Critical Care” dergisinde yayımlandığı görüldü. Analiz sonucuna göre Türkiye’de yapılmış üç çalışma olduğu, bu çalışmaların 2020, 2021, 2022 yıllarında farklı dergilerde yayımlandıkları görüldü. Sonuç: Alarm yorgunluğu konusunun güncel bir konu olduğu 2019 yılından sonra hasta güvenliği ile ilgisi nedeniyle trend konular içerisinde yer almaktadır. Konu ile ilgili Türkiye’de yapılmış az sayıda yayının olduğu görüldü. Konu ile ilgili çalışmalar planlanması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Analiz
• bibliyometri
• yorgunluk
• hemşireler

Bibliometric Analysıs of Research on Alarm Fatigue: A Web of Science Example

Abstract

Objective: It was planned to analyze the articles published in the Web of Science database in the last ten years on alarm fatigue using the bibliometric analysis method. Methods: The bibliometric analysis of the articles included in the research was performed on August 15, 2022. The “Web of Science Core Collection” was scanned by entering the keywords “alarm fatigue” OR “clinical alarms”. 142 research articles were included in the evaluation. Bibliometric analyzes of article data were performed in R Studio using the Biblioshiny package. Results: According to the general data of bibliometric analysis, it was seen that 142 research articles were published in 77 different sources, the average number of citations per document was 10.27, the annual growth rate was 11.51%. When the distribution of the articles according to the year of publication was examined, it was seen that the most n:21 articles were published in 2020. It was seen that n:9 of the research articles examined were published in the "American Journal of Critical Care". According to the results of the analysis, it was seen that there were three studies conducted in Türkiye, and these studies were published in different journals in 2020, 2021, 2022. Conclusion: After 2019, when the issue of alarm fatigue is a current issue, it is among the trending topics due to its relevance to patient safety. It was seen that there are few publications on the subject made in Turkey. It is recommended to plan studies on the subject.

Keywords

• Analysis
• bibliometric
• fatigue
• nurses

Kaynakça

1. 1. Deb S, Claudio D. Alarm fatigue and its influence on staff performance. IIE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering. 2015;5(3):183–196.
2. 2. Simpson KR, Lyndon A. False alarms and overmonitoring: Major factors in alarm fatigue among labor nurses. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 2019;34(1):66–72.
3. 3. Ruppel H, Funk M, Whittemore R, Wung SF, Bonafide CP, Powell Kennedy H. Critical care nurses’ clinical reasoning about physiologic monitor alarm customisation: An interpretive descriptive study. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2019;28(15–16):3033–3041.
4. 4. Storm J, Chen HC. The relationships among alarm fatigue, compassion fatigue, burnout and compassion satisfaction in critical care and step-down nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2021;30(3–4):443–453.
5. 5. Dee SA, Tucciarone J, Plotkin G, Mallilo C. Determining the impact of an alarm management program on alarm fatigue among ICU and Telemetry RNs: An evidence based research project. SAGE Open Nursing. 2022;8.
6. 6. Emergency Care Research Institute. Top 10 health technology hazards for 2020. Health Devices. 2020. [Erişim Tarihi 03 Ekim 2022]. https://elautoclave.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/ecri-top-10-technology-hazards-2020.pdf.
7. 7. Oliveira AEC de, Machado AB, Santos ED Dos, Almeida ÉB de. Alarm fatigue and the implications for patient safety. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2018;71(6):3035–3040.
8. 8. Dursun Ergezen F, Kol E. Yoğun bakim hemşi̇releri̇nde alarm yorgunluğu ve yönetimi. Yoğun Bakım Hemşireliği Dergisi. 2019;23(1):43–49.

9. 9. Cvach M, Doyle P, Wong SY, Letnaunchyn K, Dell D, Mamaril M. Decreasing pediatric PACU noise level and alarm fatigue: A quality ımprovement ınitiative to ımprove safety and satisfaction. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing. 2020;35(4):357–364.
10. 10. Bourji H, Sabbah H, Al’Jamil A, Khamis R, Sabbah S, Droubi N. et al. Evaluating the alarm fatigue and its associated factors among clinicians in critical care units. European Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020;1(1):1–10.
11. 11. Jeong YJ, Kim H. Critical care nurses' perceptions and practices towards clinical alarms. Nursing in Critical Care. 2022;1-8
12. 12. Diodato VP, Gellatly P. Dictionary of bibliometrics. Routledge, 2013.
13. 13. Pritchard A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation. 1969;25:348.
14. 14. Öztürk N, Kurutkan MN. Kalite yönetiminin bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile incelenmesi. Journal of Innovative Healthcare Practices. 2020; 1(1): 1-13.
15. 15. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics. 2017;11(4):959-975.
16. 16. Sendelbach S, Funk M. Alarm fatigue: a patient safety concern. AACN Advanced Critical Care. 2013; 24(4): 378-386.
17. 17. Brown H, Terrence J, Vasquez P, Bates DW, Zimlichman E. Continuous monitoring in an inpatient medical-surgical unit: a controlled clinical trial. The American Journal of Medicine. 2014; 127(3): 226-232.
18. 18. Bonafide CP, Lin R, Zander M, Graham CS, Paine CW, Rock W. et al. Association between exposure to nonactionable physiologic monitor alarms and response time in a children's hospital. Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2015; 10(6): 345-351.
19. 19. Whalen DA, Covelle PM, Piepenbrink JC, Villanova KL, Cuneo L, Awtry EH. Novel approach to cardiac alarm management on telemetry units. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2014; 29(5): E13-E22.
20. 20. Funk M, Clark JT, Bauld TJ, Ott JC, Coss P. Attitudes and practices related to clinical alarms. American Journal of Critical Care. 2014; 23(3): e9-e18.
21. 21. Watkins T, Whisman L, Booker P. Nursing assessment of continuous vital sign surveillance to improve patient safety on the medical/surgical unit. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2016; 25(1-2): 278-281.
22. 22. Chen L, Dubrawski A, Wang D, Fiterau M, Guillame-Bert M, Bose E. et al. Using supervised machine learning to classify real alerts and artifact in online multi-signal vital sign monitoring data. Critical Care Medicine. 2016; 44(7): e456.
23. 23. Eccles SR, Subbe C, Hancock D, Thomson N. CREWS: improving specificity whilst maintaining sensitivity of the National Early Warning Score in patients with chronic hypoxaemia. Resuscitation. 2014; 85(1): 109-111.
24. 24. Jarvis S, Kovacs C, Briggs J, Meredith P, Schmidt PE, Featherstone PI. et al. Aggregate National Early Warning Score (NEWS) values are more important than high scores for a single vital signs parameter for discriminating the risk of adverse outcomes. Resuscitation. 2015; 87: 75-80.
25. 25. Cvach MM, Frank RJ, Doyle P, Stevens ZK. Use of pagers with an alarm escalation system to reduce cardiac monitor alarm signals. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 2014; 29(1): 9-18.
26. 26. Ergezen FD, Kol E. Nurses’ responses to monitor alarms in an intensive care unit: An observational study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 2020;59.
27. 27. Ceylan B, Baran L, Güneş ÜY. Frequency of clinical alarms in intensive care units and nurses’ sensitivity to them: An observational study. American Journal of Critical Care. 2021;30(3):186-192.
28. 28. Unal A, Arsava EM, Caglar G, Topcuoglu MA. Alarms in a neurocritical care unit: a prospective study. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 2022;36(4):995-1001.
29. 29. The Joint Commission. National Patient Safety Goals® Effective January 2022 for the Hospital Program. [Erişim Tarihi 05 Ekim 2022]. https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/tjc/documents/standards/national-patient-safety-goals/2022/npsg_chapter_hap_jan2022.pdf.
30. 30. Journal Citation Reports™. [Erişim Tarihi 04 Ekim 2022]. https://jcr.clarivate.com/jcr-jp/journal-profile?journal=AM%20J%20CRIT%20CARE&year=2021&fromPage=%2Fjcr%2Fsearch-results.