Teacher Academies as a Cultural Learning Community

Öz

This article discusses the limitations of professional development approaches that define teacher learning in terms of instructional effectiveness, performance, and measurable outcomes. It examines the Teacher Academies model, launched by the Istanbul Provincial Directorate of National Education in 2016 and expanded nationwide by the Ministry in 2023, within a conceptual framework. While professional learning communities are mostly conceptualized in the international literature as school-based, performance- and accountability-oriented arrangements, teachers' search for professional meaning, cultural positioning, and identity construction processes are addressed at a relatively secondary level. This study aims to reframe Teacher Academies as cultural learning communities where teacher learning is shaped through culture, identity, literacy, ethical participation, and collective meaning-making. In line with sociocultural learning theories and the community of practice approach, the article argues that teacher academies offer a unique community model that integrates teacher learning with its ethical, cultural, and human dimensions through their voluntary nature, out-of-school organization, and interdisciplinary content structure. It also argues that the collective relationship forms established with texts and cultural narratives in academies open up a broad field of practice that links literacy to teacher identity and meaning production. The study offers a theoretical contribution to expanding established concepts related to teacher communities and rethinking teacher learning in a context-sensitive manner.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Teacher Academies
• Teacher Identity
• Professional Learning Communities
• Sociocultural Learning
• Literacy

Destekleyen Kurum

The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

Etik Beyan

This study is theoretical in nature and does not involve any human participants in the data collection process. Since no personal data were used, ethical approval was not required.

Kültürel Bir Öğrenme Topluluğu Olarak Öğretmen Akademileri

Öz

Bu makale, öğretmen öğrenmesini öğretimsel etkililik, performans ve ölçülebilir çıktılar üzerinden tanımlayan mesleki gelişim yaklaşımlarının sınırlılıklarını tartışarak, 2016’da İstanbul Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğünce başlatılan, 2023’te Bakanlıkça ülke sathına genişletilen Öğretmen Akademileri modelini kavramsal bir çerçevede ele almaktadır. Uluslararası alan yazında profesyonel öğrenme toplulukları çoğunlukla okul temelli, performans ve hesap verebilirlik eksenli düzenlemeler olarak kavramsallaştırılırken; öğretmenlerin mesleki anlam arayışları, kültürel konumlanmaları ve kimlik inşa süreçleri görece ikincil düzeyde ele alınmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Öğretmen Akademilerini mekân, kültür ve insan temelli etkileşimler aracılığıyla öğretmenlerin aidiyet, değer ve mesleki kimliklerini birlikte ürettikleri kültürel öğrenme toplulukları olarak yeniden çerçevelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Sosyokültürel öğrenme kuramları ve uygulama toplulukları yaklaşımı doğrultusunda makale, öğretmen akademilerinin gönüllülük, okul-dışı örgütlenme ve disiplinler üstü içerik yapısıyla öğretmen öğrenmesini etik, kültürel ve insani boyutlarıyla bütünleştiren özgün bir topluluk modeli sunduğunu ileri sürmektedir. Ayrıca akademilerde metinlerle ve kültürel anlatılarla kurulan kolektif ilişki biçimlerinin, okuryazarlığı öğretmen kimliği ve anlam üretimiyle ilişkilendiren geniş bir pratik alan açtığı tartışılmaktadır. Çalışma, Öğretmen Akademilerinin öğretmen topluluklarına ilişkin yerleşik kavramları genişletmeye ve öğretmen öğrenmesini bağlama duyarlı biçimde yeniden düşünmeye dönük kuramsal bir katkı sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Okuryazarlık
• Öğretmen Akademileri
• Öğretmen Kimliği
• Profesyonel Öğrenme Toplulukları
• Sosyokültürel Öğrenme

Destekleyen Kurum

Yazarlar bu çalışmanın herhangi bir finansal destek almadığını beyan etmişlerdir.

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma teorik bir nitelik taşımakta olup veri toplama sürecinde insan katılımcılar yer almamıştır. Çalışma kapsamında herhangi bir kişisel veri kullanılmadığından etik kurul onayı gerekmemektedir.

Kaynakça

1. Acar-Ciftci, Y. (2019). Multicultural Education and Approaches to Teacher Training. J Educ Learn, 8(4), 136-152.
2. Akkerman, S. F., & Meijer, P. C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teach Teach Educ, 27(2), 308–319.
3. Aktekin, Semih. "Öğretmen Yeterlikleri". Türk Maarif Ansiklopedisi. https://turkmaarifansiklopedisi.org.tr/ogretmen-yeterlikleri/#yazar-1 Accessed June 9, 2026.
4. Aktekin, S. Öğretmen Strateji Belgesi. Türk Maarif Ansiklopedisi. https://turkmaarifansiklopedisi.org.tr/ogretmen-strateji-belgesi/#yazar-1
5. Alhanachi, S., de Meijer, L. A., & Severiens, S. E. (2021). Improving culturally responsive teaching through professional learning communities: A qualitative study in Dutch pre-vocational schools. Int J Educ Res, 105(3), 101698.
6. Allen, L. Q. (2018). Teacher leadership and the advancement of teacher agency. Foreign Lang Ann, 51(1), 240-250.
7. Baker-Doyle, K. J., & Yoon, S. A. (2011). In search of practitioner-based social capital: A social network analysis tool for understanding and facilitating teacher collaboration in the US-based STEM professional development program. Professional Development in Education, 37(1), 75-93.
8. Ball, S. J. (2016). Neoliberal education? Confronting the slouching beast. Policy Futures Educ, 14(8), 1046-1059.

9. Barth, S. G., Lotter, C., Yow, J. A., Irdam, G., & Ratliff, B. (2023). Understanding the process of teacher leadership identity development. Int J Leadersh Educ, 1-28.
10. Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Camb J Educ, 39(2), 175–189.
11. Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers & Teaching, 21(6), 624-640.
12. Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2019). Talking about education: Exploring the significance of teachers' talk for teacher agency. In Teachers matter–but how? (pp. 38-54). Routledge.
13. Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., Wallace, M., Greenwood, A.,& Smith, M. (2005). Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/5622/1/RR637.pdf Accessed June 9, 2026.
14. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. F. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood. Christensen, A. A. (2025). Professional learning communities and teacher outcomes: Evidence from TALIS 2018. Teach Teach Educ. 156, 104920.
15. Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educ Eval Policy Anal, 30(3), 203–235.
16. Cuban, L. (1969). Teacher and community. Harv Educ Rev, 39(2), 253-272. Çelik, E. (2022). Öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimlerinin İstanbul öğretmen akademileri projesi çerçevesinde değerlendirilmesi (Politika Notu:2022/37). https://ilke.org.tr/files/netstk/50/web/115/3606/dosyalar/epam_pn_37.pdf Accessed June 9, 2026.
17. Damgacı, F. K., & Aydın, H. (2013). Akademisyenlerin Çokkültürlü Eğitime İlişkin Tutumları. ESOSDER, 12(45), 325-341.
18. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6).
19. Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development Council.
20. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2010). The new lives of teachers. Routledge.
21. DuFour, R. (2004). What is a ‘‘Professional Learning Community’’? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11.
22. Erdem, C. (2020). Öğretmen kimliği araştırmalarında yeni bir kavram: Öğretmen etkenliği. ADYÜEBD, 10(1), 32-55.
23. Erdoğan, R. T. (2026, Ocak, 20). Sanat, millî kültür ve kimliğin en belirleyici unsurlarından biridir [Konuşma]. İletişim Başkanlığı. https://www.iletisim.gov.tr/turkce/haberler/detay/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-sanat-milli-kultur-ve-kimligin-en-belirleyici-unsurlarindan-biridir Accessed June 9, 2026.
24. Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (2012). Reviving teaching with ‘professional capital’. Educ Week, 31(33), 30-36.
25. Giroux, H. A. (2011). Education and the crisis of public values: Challenging the assault on teachers, students, and public education. Peter Lang.
26. Giroux, H. A. (2012). Can democratic education survive in a neoliberal society. Crisis and Commonwealth: Marcuse, Marx, McLaren, 137–152.
27. Gökçe, O. G. (2025). Tokat Öğretmen Akademileri/Edebiyat Akademisi’nin Katılımcı Öğretmenler Açısından Verimliliğinin Değerlendirilmesi. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 171-191.
28. Haddix, M. (2015a). Cultivating racial and linguistic diversity in literacy teacher education. J Lit Res, 47(1), 92–120.
29. Haddix, M. (2015b). Preparing community-engaged teachers. Theory Pract, 54(1), 63-70.
30. Hooks, B. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. Taylor&Francis.
31. Hord, S. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
32. Hord, S. M. (2008). Evolution of the professional learning community. The Learning Professional, 29(3), 10.
33. Hökkä, P., Vähäsantanen, K., & Mahlakaarto, S. (2017). Teacher educators' collective professional agency and identity–Transforming marginality to strength. Teach Teach Educ, 63, 36-46.
34. Johnson, S. M. (2006). The workplace matters: Teacher quality, retention, and effectiveness. Teachers College Press.
35. Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Who I am in how I teach is the message: self‐understanding, vulnerability and reflection. Teach Teach: Theory Pract, 15(2), 257-272.
36. Ladson-Billings, G. (1992). Liberatory consequences of Literacy: A case of culturally relevant instruction for African American students. J Negro Educ, 61, 378-391.
37. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that's just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Pract, 34(3), 159-165
38. Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teach Teach Educ, 21(8), 899-916.
39. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
40. Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M. (1998). Does professional learning community affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student experiences in restructuring schools. Am J Educ, 106(4), 532–575.
41. McCormick, T. M., Eick, C. J., & Womack, J. S. (2013). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Awareness and Professional Growth through a School-University Collaboration. School-University Partnerships, 6(1), 6-14.
42. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2024). Öğretmen akademileri uygulama kılavuzu. https://bolu.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2024_11/14140620_ogretmen_akademi.pdf Accessed June 9, 2026.
43. Muhammad, G. G., & Mosley, L. T. (2021). Why we need identity and equity learning in literacy practices: Moving research, practice, and policy forward. Language Arts, 98(4), 189-196.
44. Newmann, F. M. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: JosseyBass Publishers.
45. Nieto, S. (2000). Placing equity front and center: Some thoughts on transforming teacher education for a new century. J Teach Educ, 51(3), 180-187.
46. Nilsson, N. L., Kong, A., & Hubert, S. (2016). Navigating the challenges of becoming a culturally responsive teacher: Supportive networking may be the key. Aust J Teach Educ, 41(8), 1-21.
47. Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Rev Educ Res, 81(3), 376-407.
48. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/talis-2018-results-volume-i_1d0bc92a-en.html Accessed June 9, 2026.
49. Prenger, R., Poortman, C. L., & Handelzalts, A. (2021). Professional learning networks: From teacher learning to school improvement?. J Educ Chang, 22(1), 13-52.
50. Priestley, M. R., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Publishing.
51. Rogers, R., & Wetzel, M. M. (2013). Studying agency in literacy teacher education: A layered approach to positive discourse analysis. Crit Inq Lang Stud, 10(1), 62-92.
52. Rushton, E. A. C. (2023). Understanding teacher identity in teachers’ professional lives: A systematic review. Rev Educ, 11(2), e3417.
53. Sağlam, H. İ., & Kanbur, N. İ. (2017). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin mülteci öğrencilere yönelik tutumlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. SUJE, 7(2), 310-323.
54. Sarıer, Y. (2020). Türkiye’de mülteci öğrencilerin eğitimi üzerine bir meta-sentez çalişmasi: sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. EYYAD, 3(1), 80-111.
55. Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. J Educ Chang, 7, 221–258.
56. Street, B. V. (1995) Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography, and Education. London: Longman.
57. Street, B. V. (2003) At last: Recent applications of New Literacy Studies in educational contexts. Research in the Teaching of English, 39(4): 417–423.
58. Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on professional learning communities. Teach Teach Educ, 24(1), 80–91.
59. Webb, R., Vulliamy, G., Hämäläinen, S., Sarja, A., Kimonen, E., & Nevalainen, R. (2009). Professional learning communities and teacher well-being? Oxford Rev Educ, 35(3), 405–422.
60. Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the US and abroad. National Staff Development Council.
61. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
62. Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & De Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: A conceptual framework. Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science.
63. Wlodkowski, R.J. & Ginsberg, M. B. (1995). A framework for culturally responsive teaching. Educ Leadership, 53(1), 17-21
64. Yurttabir, H. (2024). Öğretmenlerimiz, öğretmen akademileri ile alıştıkları çevrenin dışına çıkıp mekanla ve insanla aynı şehirle temas ederek gelişip olgunlaşıyorlar, İstanbul Akademi, 12-19. https://istanbul.meb.gov.tr/dergi/istanbul_ogretmen_akademileri_dergisi_12_sayisi/mobile/index.html Accessed June 9, 2026.