Araştırma Makalesi

CHINESE ZITHER SE IN ANCIENT AND TRADITIONAL MUSICAL AND INSTRUMENTAL CULTURES OF TURKISH, MONGOLIAN AND TUNGUSKA-MANCHU ETHNIC GROUPS

Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4 31 Aralık 2024
PDF İndir
TR EN

CHINESE ZITHER SE IN ANCIENT AND TRADITIONAL MUSICAL AND INSTRUMENTAL CULTURES OF TURKISH, MONGOLIAN AND TUNGUSKA-MANCHU ETHNIC GROUPS

Abstract

The relevance of this study is conditioned by the dynamic development of the guzheng zither of medieval and folk instruments of Inner Mongolia, Manchuria (North and North-East China), Mongolia, the Far East and Southern Siberia (Russian Federation), the original prototype of which is one of the oldest string plucked instruments in China – the se zither (瑟). The purpose of the study was to investigate the design features and tuning methods of se zither (瑟). A system of scientific research methods was used, namely organological analysis, comparison, deduction, and abstraction. As a result of the study, it was found that the se zither (瑟) differs from the classical Chinese zither qín (琴). Given the study of historical and archaeological sources of the 7th – 2nd centuries BCE, the oldest area of distribution of the xie zither was found within the ancient kingdom of Chu (6th – early 2nd century BCE), whose population was ethnically different from the Huaxia Chinese, and its modification, the zheng zither (箏), during the Qin dynasty (771 – 221 BCE). In addition, the ways of its infiltration into the medieval instrumentation of the ancient peoples of these regions of Central and South-East Asia were determined. The shape, design features, and the method of tuning with movable stands have established the genetic connection of this type of zither with ancient and traditional instruments of Turkic and Mongolian ethnic groups and its infiltration into the medieval court instruments of the Tunguska-Manchu.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Afonina, O., & Karpov, V. (2023). “Art Practices in Modern Culture”. Culture and Contemporaneity, 2, 76-81. https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-0285.2.2023.293863.
  2. Antoshko, M. (2020). “Influence of China’s philosophical views on the country’s musical culture”. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture & Arts Herald, 3, 178-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2020.220128.
  3. Bernshtam, A. N. (1951). Essays on the history of the Huns. Leningrad, Leningrad State University.
  4. Campbell, P. S. (1991). “Chinese music, musicians, and musical training: Perspectives from the post-Tianamen period”. Quarterly, 2 (4), 22-29.
  5. Cardoso, M. (2023). “Musical instrument teaching assessment practices”. Musica Hodie, 23, 74384.
  6. Deng, H. (2006). Musical change and contunuity of Huayin: The essence of Chinese Zheng music. Tallahassee, Florida State University.
  7. Do you know the difference between Qin and Se? (2017). https://m.sohu.com/n/486051098/?wscrid=95360_7.
  8. Doszhan, R. (2023). “Multi-vector cultural connection in the conditions of modern globalisation”. Interdisciplinary Cultural and Humanities Review, 2 (1), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.59214/2786-7110-2023-2-1-27-32.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Müzikoloji ve Etnomüzikoloji

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

24 Aralık 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

5 Eylül 2024

Kabul Tarihi

8 Ekim 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA
Zinkiv, I., & Ren, J. (2024). CHINESE ZITHER SE IN ANCIENT AND TRADITIONAL MUSICAL AND INSTRUMENTAL CULTURES OF TURKISH, MONGOLIAN AND TUNGUSKA-MANCHU ETHNIC GROUPS. Yegah Musicology Journal, 7(4), 510-533. https://doi.org/10.51576/ymd.1543588

 

   download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiZWJzY28ucG5nIiwicGF0aCI6ImNjMjcvMmJiOC8wNTdhLzY5ZTVlNmI2YzE1NGQzLjE3ODQ4MDQxLnBuZyIsImV4cCI6MTc3NjY3ODA4Nywibm9uY2UiOiJlMWI4NjM5YmU2OWI2ZjVjOGUzMGJjZjk5MTIzMTNiNCJ9.abV7HKRWK0ZS-LwT9Gan5KwjGMrb8Jqcz42sC72CQIE   SCImago Journal & Country Rank