TONSILLIT BILGI TUTUM ÖLÇEĞININ GELIŞTIRILMESI; BIR METODOLOJIK ÇALIŞMA

Öz

Amaç: Tonsillit Bilgi Tutum Ölçeğini geliştirip, geçerlik-güvenirlik çalışmasını yapmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırma, metodolojik olarak, gerçekleştirildi. Tonsillit Bilgi Tutum Ölçeğini için madde havuzu çalışması, uzman görüşlerinin alınması, ön uygulamadan sonra geçerlik-güvenirlik çalışması yapıldı. Araştırma, bir Sağlık Bakanlığı Hastanesinin Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları, Kulak -Burun -Boğaz polikliniklerinde, Eylül 2019-Haziran 2020 tarihleri arasında gerçekleştirildi. Evren, ilgili hastanenin belirtilen polikliniklerinde, tonsillit tanısı alan, 0-18 yaş gurubunda olan çocukların ebeveynlerini (S=273) kapsadı ve örnekleme yöntemine gidilmeden evren ile çalışıldı. Veriler, Kişisel Bilgi Formu ve Tonsillit Bilgi Tutum Ölçeği ile elde edildi. Veriler, tanımlayıcı istatistikler, ölçek geliştirme, geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizleri, ki kare, testi ile değerlendirildi. Etik ilkelere bağlı kalındı. Bulgular: Tonsillit Bilgi Tutum Ölçeği; Tonsil, Tonsillit, Bulgular, Tedavi ve Bakım olmak üzere 5 alt boyutu ile 40 maddeden oluşan, 5’li likert tipi, geçerlik (madde toplam korelasyon değerleri; r=.314-.620, Alpha katsayısı=.927) ve güvenirlik (ayırt edicilik; p=.000<.001) ölçütlerini kabul edilebilir ve yüksek düzeyde karşılayan özellikleri ile geliştirildi. Sonuç: Tonsillit Bilgi Tutum Ölçeği, tonsillit bulguları gösteren çocuklar için erişkinlerin tonsillit bilgi ve tutumunu belirleme ve geliştirmede geçerli ve güvenilir bir şekilde değerlendirme aracı olarak kullanılabilir, farklı kültürlere uyarlanabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bilgi
• çocuk
• tonsillit
• tutum

DEVELOPMENT OF THE TONSILLITIS KNOWLEDGE ATTITUDE SCALE; A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY

Öz

Aim: This study aimed to develop the Tonsillitis Knowledge Attitude Scale (Tonsillitis-KAS) and to conduct its validity and reliability studies. Material and Method: This methodological study included item pooling, obtaining expert opinions, a pilot study, and validity-reliability studies for the development of the Tonsillitis-KAS. The study was conducted between September 2019 and June 2020 in the outpatient Pediatrics and Otorhinolaryngology clinics of a hospital affiliated with the Turkish Ministry of Health. The study population included parents (N = 273) of children aged 0–18 years who were diagnosed with tonsillitis in the specified outpatient clinics of the relevant hospital. No sampling method was used and the study was conducted with the entire population. Data were obtained using a personal information form and Tonsillitis-KAS, and they were evaluated using descriptive statistics, scale development, validity and reliability analysis, and the chi-square test. Ethical principles were followed. Results: Tonsillitis-KAS was developed as a 5-point Likert-type scale including 40 items with five subscales: tonsil, tonsillitis, findings, treatment, and care. Validity (item-total correlation values; r = .314–.620, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient = .927) and reliability (discrimination, p = .000 < .001) criteria were acceptable and high. Conclusion: Tonsillitis-KAS can be used as a valid and reliable assessment tool to identify and improve tonsillitis knowledge and attitudes of caregivers for children with tonsillitis symptoms. The scale can also be adapted to different cultures. Keywords: Attitude, child, knowledge, tonsillitis

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Attitude
• child
• knowledge
• tonsillitis

Kaynakça

1. El Hennawi DED, Geneid A, Zaher S, Ahmed MR. Management of recurrent tonsillitis in children. American journal of otolaryngology. 2017;(38).4:371-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.03.001
2. Arnold JC, Nizet V. Pharyngitis. Principles and practice of pediatric infectious diseases. 2018; 202-208.https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.cpp3-0009-2018
3. Alasmari NSH, Bamashmous RÖM, Alshuwaykan RMA, Alahmari MAM, Alshahrani AAM, Algrani SA. Et al. Causes and treatment of tonsillitis. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2017; 69(8):2975-2980. https://doi.org/10.12816/0042838
4. Førsvoll J, Kristoffersen EK, Oymar K. The immunology of the periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis syndrome; what can the tonsils reveal. A literature review. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2020;130:109795.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109795
5. Uzodimma CI, Nwadike M, Olasunkanmi O, A study of group a streptococcal pharyngitis among 3–15-year-old children attending clinics for an acute sore throat. Nigerian Journal of Cardiology. 2017;14(2):97-102.https://doi.org/10.4103/njc.njc_14_17
6. Wonodi W. Prevalence and pattern of beta-haemolytic streptococcal throat infections among primary school children in a rural community in rivers state. Port Harcourt Medical Journal. 2020;14(1):23-30. https://doi.org/10.4103/phmj.phmj_23_19
7. Dut R, Kocagöz S. Use of Streptococcal Tonsillopharyngitis Diagnostic Tests in Children. Journal of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 2016;11(04) : 126-130.https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597697
8. Bozkurt T, Rekürren Tonsillit ve Tonsil Hipertrofisinde Doku ve Serum Matriks Mettaloproteinaz ve Mettaloproteinaz İnhibitör Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırılması. Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Boyun cerahisi Ana Bilim Dalı. Uzmanlık Tezi. 2017

9. Altiparmak D, Arslan TF. The adaptation of Family Centred Care Scale to Turkish a validity and reliability study. The Journal of Pediatric Research. 2016;(3).2:97-103 https://doi.org/10.4274/jpr.60566
10. Karadaş A, Yıldırım A. Nurse managers’ perceived sources of power: A scale development study. Journal of Health and Nursing Management 2019;(6).1:1-10. https://doi.org/10.5222/SHYD.2019.38039
11. Almanasreh E, Köstebekler R, Çetin TF. Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Research in social and administrative pharmacy. 2019;(15).2: 214-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066
12. Sideridis G, Saddaawi A, Al-Harbi K. Internal consistency reliability in measurement: Aggregate and multilevel approaches. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 2018;(17).1:15. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1530027194
13. Lloret S, Ferreres A, Hernández A, Tomas I. The exploratory factor analysis of items: guided analysis based on empirical data and software. Anales de psicología. 2017;(33).2: 417-432. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps
14. Hahs-Vaughn, Debbie L. Applied multivariate statistical concepts. New york: Routledge, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315816685
15. Thompson B. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington: American Psychological Association 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621606290168
16. Theodoros KA, Stalikas A. Applied psychometrics: The steps of scale development and standardization process. Psychology. 2018;(9).11:2531-2560. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.911145
17. Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Quninoez HRM, Genç SL. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Frontiers in public health. ;2018;(6):149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
18. Hair Jr JF, Cebrail MLDS, Silva DD, Genç SB. Development and validation of attitudes measurement scales: fundamental and practical aspects. RAUSP Management Journal. 2019;(54).4:490-507. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-05-2019-0098
19. Morgado FFR, Meireles JFF, Neves CM, Amaral ACS, . "Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices." Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica. 2017;(3):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1
20. Aşçı DA, Beckman MJ. "Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application." The American journal of medicine 2006;(119).2: 166-e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036
21. Clark LA,Watson D. Geçerlik oluşturma: Nesnel ölçek geliştirmede temel konular. A. E. Kazdin'de (Ed.), Klinik araştırmalarda metodolojik konular ve stratejiler. 4. Basım. Amerikan Psikoloji Derneği, 2016: 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/14805-012
22. Anuar A, Daing MS. Validity test of lean healthcare using Lawshe’s method. International Journal of Supply Chain Management. 2018;(7).6:197-203. https://doi.org/10.59160/IJSCM.%20V7I6.262
23. Karakoç FY, Dönmez L. Basic Principles in Scale Development Studies. world of medıcal educatıon. 2014;13(40):39-4. https://doi.org/10.25282/ted.228738
24. Sevinç N, Arslan H. okul yöneticisinin yeterlikleri ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Research Studies Anatolia Journal. 2019;(2).4 :126-135. https://doi.org/10.33723/rs.479118
25. Kang H. A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013;(43).5:587-594. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587
26. Büyüköztürk, Ş. Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı, 23. Baskı. Ankara, Pegem Akademi, 2017: 169.
27. Özdemir Z. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Likert Tipi Tutm Ölçeği Geliştirme. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, 2018, (5): 60-68. https://doi.org/10.31125/hunhemsire.1279985
28. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. Evaluating model fit: a synthesis of the structural equation modelling literature. In 7th European Conference on research methodology for business and management studies. 2008;195-200. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-05-2015-0037
29. McNeish D, An J, Gregory RH. "The thorny relation between measurement quality and fit index cutoffs in latent variable models." Journal of personality assessment 2018;(100).1:43-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1281286
30. Henson RK, Roberts JK. Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological measurement. 2006;66(3):393-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485
31. Mueller RO. Structural equation modeling: Back to basics. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 1997;(4).4:353-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519709540081
32. Kimberlin CL, Winterstein AG. Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 2008; 2276–2284, https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp070364