Akran Eğitiminin Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kendi Kendine Meme Muayenesi Yapma Durumları ve Sağlık İnançlarına Etkisi: Yarı-Deneysel Araştırma

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 137 - 146, 21.03.2025

Kübra Pınar Gürkan

Öz

Amaç: Akran eğitiminin üniversite öğrencilerinin kendi kendine meme muayenesi yapma durumlarına ve sağlık inançlarına etkisinin belirlenmesidir.
Yöntem ve Gereçler: Tek gruplu ön test-son test yarı deneysel bir araştırmadır. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesinde birinci ve ikinci sınıfta öğrenim gören hemşirelik öğrencileri (560) çalışmanın evrenini oluşturmaktadır. Verilerin toplanmasında, “Tanımlayıcı Bilgi Formu”, “Champion’un Sağlık İnanç Modeli Ölçeği (SİM) ve meme HBMülasyon maketi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmacı tarafından akran eğitimcilere beş hafta süren teorik ve pratik eğitim verilmiştir. Verilerin değerlendirilmesine bağımlı gruplarda t test ve Mc nemar testi kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular: Öğrencilerin eğitimden önce ve sonra KKMM yapma durumları karşılaştırıldığında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur (Mc nemar: 74.112, p>0.000). Katılımcıların KKMM eğitimden önce ve sonra SİM duyarlılık, ciddiyet algılarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır (p>0.05). Fakat üniversite öğrencilerinin eğitimden önce ve sonra SİM motivasyon, yarar, engel ve öz-etkililik algılarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark saptanmıştır (p<.005).
Sonuç: Öğrencilerin akran eğitimi ile kendi kendine meme muayenesi yapma durumları eğitim öncesine göre artmıştır ve kendi kendine meme muayenesine yönelik sağlık inançlarından motivasyon, yarar, engel ve özetkililik algısında da da eğitim öncesine göre artış saptanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kendi kendine meme muayenesi, Akran eğitimi, Sağlık inanç modeli.

Etik Beyan

Dokuz Eylül University Non-Interventional Research Ethics Committee (decision number 2021/37-09 dated 15.12.2021)

Destekleyen Kurum

yok

Proje Numarası

yok

Teşekkür

We would like to thank all our students who supported the research as peer educators.

The Effect of Peer Education on University Students' Breast Self-Examination and Health Beliefs: Quasi-Experimental Study

Öz

Aim: To assess the impact of peer education on university students' self-breast examination (BSE) practices and their health beliefs.
Materials and Method: A single-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental study was conducted. The study population comprised 560 first and second-year nursing students enrolled at Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Nursing. Data collection instruments included a "Descriptive Information Form," Champion's Health Belief Model Scale (HBM), and a breast HBMulation model. Peer educators received five weeks of theoretical and practical training facilitated by the Peer educators have had their peers fill out data collection forms, explained self-breast examination using a breast HBMulation model, and sent reminder videos and brochures online twice a week. Post-tests were administered to students six weeks after the training. Dependent groups t-test and McNemar tests were used in the data analysis.
Results: Upon comparing students' BSE performance before and after training, a statistically significant difference was observed (p<0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in participants' perceptions of the sensitivity and seriousness of HBM before and after BSE training (p > 0.05). In contrast, there was a statistically significant difference in university students' perceptions of HBM related to motivation, perceived benefits, obstacles, and self-efficacy before and after the training (p < 0.005).
Conclusion: Peer education had a positive effect on students' ability to conduct breast self-examinations. Moreover, students' health beliefs regarding motivation, perceived benefits, obstacles, and self-efficacy related to breast self-examination improved following the training and peer education to enhance both BSE practices and health beliefs among university nursing students.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Self breast examination, Peer education, Health Belief Model.

Proje Numarası

yok

Kaynakça

• 1.World Health Organization. “Global Cancer Statistic”. 2022. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/20-Breast-fact-sheet.pdf. (Access Date: 07.07.2023).
• 2.Erbil N, Dundar N, Inan C, Bolukbas N. Breast cancer risk assessment using the gail model: A Turkish study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(1):303-6
• 3.T.C. Ministiry of Health. Public Health Istutions of Türkiye.“Türkiye Cancer ControlProgramme”.2021.https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/kanserdb/yayinlar/raporlar/2021_Kanser_Kontrol_Programi_/17.Agustos_2021_Kanser_Kontrol_Programi_versiyon-1.pdf (Access Date: 07.07.2023).
• 4.Puliti D, Miccinesi G, Collina N, De Lisi V, Federico, Ferretti S, Paci E. Effectiveness of service screening: A case-control study to assess breast cancer mortality reduction. British Journal of Cancer. 2008; 99(3):423– 427.
• 5.World Health Organization. “World Cancer Day”. 2018.http://www.who.int/cancer/world-cancer-day /2018/en/ (Access Date: 07.07.2023).
• 6.American Cancer Society. “Meme Kanserinin Erken Teşhisi İçin Öneriler”.2022. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/CRC/PDF/Public/8579.00.pdf. (Access Date: 07.07.2023).
• 7.Amoran OE, Toyobo OO. Predictors of breast self-examination as cancer prevention practice among women of reproductive age-group in a rural town in Nigeria. Nigerian Medical Journal. 2015; 56(3):185– 189.
• 8.Hocaoğlu M, Erşahin AA, Akdeniz, E. Evaluation on the practice and behaviour of women applied for gynecology outpatient clinics about screening methods for early diagnosis of breast cancer. European Journal of Breast Health. 2017;13(3):150-155.
• 9.Gercek S, Duran O, Yildirim G, Karayel H, Demirlicakmak H. Determining the breast cancer and self‑breast examination belief and the effecting factors among the schoolgirls in state dormitory. J Breast Health. 2018;4:157‑61.
• 10.Akhtari MZ, Juni MH, Said SM, Ismail IZ. Beliefs and behavior of Malaysia undergraduate female students in a public university to ward breast self-examination practice. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:57–61
• 11.Arslan M, Şahin DA. Kadınların meme kanseri ve kendi kendine meme muayenesi ile ilgili bilgi durumlarına eğitimin etkisi. Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Hemşirelik E-Dergisi. 2013;1:8–16..
• 12.Liu MX, Li J, Geng YL, Wang YC, Li J, Chen YJ, Ali G, Tarver SL, Wen YF, Sun WJ Correlation study of knowledge and behavior regarding breast care among female under graduate students in China. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:10943–10947
• 13.Özkan A, Malak AT, Gürkan A, Turgay AS. Do Turkish nursing and midwifery students teach breast self-examination to their relatives? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11:1569–1573
• 14.Gözüm S, Karayurt Ö, Kav S, & Platin N. (2010). Effectiveness of peer education for breast cancer screening and health beliefs in eastern Turkey. Cancer nursing. 2010; 33(3): 213-220.
• 15.Turner G, Shepherd J. A method in search of a theory: peer education and health promotion. Health Educ Res. 1999;14:235Y247.
• 16.Kissal, A, Kartal, B. Effects of health belief model-based education on health beliefs and breast self-examination in nursing students. Asia-pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2019;6(4):403-410.
• 17.Demirtaş SG, Aydoğdu NG. Investigation of the effect of poor women's beliefs about breast cancer on their mammography behaviour. Balıkesir Health Sciences Journal. 2021;10(3):379-385.
• 18.Dewi TK, Massar K, Ruiter RA, Leonardi T. Determinants of breast self-examination practice among women in Surabaya, Indonesia: an application of the health belief model. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1-8.
• 19.Champion VL, Skinner CS. The health belief model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath KV, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey‑Bass, Inc.2008
• 20.Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM. Health Behaviour and Health Education. 3rd ed. San Francisco, Jossey‑Bass.2002.
• 21.Moodi M, Mood MB, Sharifzadeh G, Shahnazi H, Sharifirad GR. Evaluation of breast self-examination program using Health Belief Model in female students. J Res Med Sci. 2011;16:316–322.
• 22.Moussa MM, Shalaby NS. Effect of breast self-examination education program on knowledge, attitude, and practice of nursing students. Int J Res Stud Biosci (IJRSB) 2014;2:40–49
• 23.Erkoç A, Oran F, Yorulmaz H. Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin kendi kendine meme muayenesi (KKMM) ile ilgili bilgi durumlarına eğitimin etkisi. J Breast Health. 2011;7:101–105.
• 24.Durmaz YÇ, Doğan R, Polat HT, Uzun E, Şakar H, Önder EY. The effect of breast cancer and breast self-examination training given to university students on students' anxiety level and health beliefs. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences 2020;23(2):259-266.
• 25.Gözüm S, Aydın I. Validation evidence for turkish adaptation of champion’s health belief model scales, Cancer Nursing. 2004; 27:6.
• 26.Karayurt Ö, Dramalı A. Adaptation of Champion’s Health Belief Model scale to Turkish women and examination of the factors ınfluencing the frequency of breast self examination. The First Regional Meeting of the Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention Congress Book, (APOPCP), İzmir 2003;154-155.
• 27.Wood, R. Y. (1994). Reliability and validity of a breast self-examination proficiency rating instrument. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 17(4), 418-435.
• 28.Secginli S. The Effects of a Breast Health Promotion Program on Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors (Doctoral Thesis). İstanbul: Istanbul University, Institute of Health Science, Public Health Nursing Department; 2007.
• 29.Akyolcu N. ve Uğraş G.A. Breastself examination: How important is it in early diagnosis? J Breast Health 2011;7:10 4
• 30.Erblich, J, Bovbjerg, D.H, Valdimarsdottir, H.B. Psychological distress, health beliefs, and frequency of breast self-examination J Behav Med. 2000;23;277–92.
• 31.Haji-Mahmoodi, M, Montazeri, A, Jarvandi, S, Ebrahimi, M, Haghighat, S, Harirchi, I. Breast self-examination: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among female health care workers in Tehran, Iran Breast J. 2002;222–5
• 32.Avci IA, Kumcagiz H, Altinel B, Çaloglu A. Turkish female academician self-esteem and health beliefs for breast cancer screening. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:155–60.
• 33.Koç G, Gülen-Savaş H, Ergöl S, Yıldırım-Çetinkaya M, Aydin N. Female university students' knowledge and practice of breast self-examination in Turkey. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2019;22(3):410-415.
• 34.Ayran G, Fırat M, Kucukakca G, Cuneydioğlu B, Tahta K, Avcı E. The Effect of Peer Education upon Breast Self-Examination Behaviors and Self-Esteem among University Students. Eur J Breast Health. 2017 Apr 4;13(3):138-144
• 35.Ouyang YQ, Hu X. The effect of breast cancer health education on the knowledge, attitudes, and practice: A community health center catchment area. J Cancer Educ Off J Am Assoc Cancer Education. 2014;29(2):375–81.
• 36.Yadav SP, Jiwane NN, Dhanorkar A. Impact of educational intervention on awareness of breast cancer among female students of Government College of Nursing, Nagpur. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2019;6:197-202.
• 37.Mood M, Sharifirad GR, Hossein S, Sharifzadehe G. Evaluation of breast self-examination program using Health Belief Model in female students. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences :The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. 2011;16(3):316-322.
• 38.Wondmu KS, Tessema MT, Degu G. Mihiret GT, Sinshaw MT. Effect of breast cancer education based on the health belief model on knowledge, health belief, and breast self-examination among female students of Debre Markos University, Northwest Ethiopia, in 2021. Frontiers in Oncology. 2022;12:1-12.
• 39.Mahmoud M, Hamdi S, Ibrahim H, Abd-Elhakam E. Effect of health belief model-based educational intervention about breast cancer on nursing students' knowledge, health beliefs and breast self-examination practice. Int J Stud Nursing. 2018;3(3):77.
• 40.Secginli S. and Nahcivan NO. The effectiveness of a nurse-delivered breast health promotion program on breast cancer screening behaviours in non-adherent Turkish women: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2011;48(1):24-36.