OKYANUS ALKALİLEŞMESİ: ULUSLARARASI HUKUKTA DEVLETLERİN HAKLARI VE YÜKÜMLÜLÜKLERİ

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2, 469 - 506, 26.06.2025

Berkant Akkuş

https://doi.org/10.63117/yuhfd.1727741

Öz

Okyanus alkalileşmesi, okyanusun karbon dioksit emme kapasitesini artırmayı ve iklim değişikliğini hafifletmeyi amaçlayan bir jeomühendislik tekniğidir ve uluslararası hukuk çerçevesinde önemli hukuki ve etik değerlendirmeleri gündeme getirmektedir. Bu makale, Birleşmiş Milletler Deniz Hukuku Sözleşmesi (BMDHS), uluslararası çevre hukuku ve uluslararası teamül hukuku bağlamında devletlerin okyanus alkalileşmesi konusundaki hak ve yükümlülüklerini incelemektedir. Devlet egemenliği ilkesi, sınır ötesi zararı önleme yükümlülüğü ve deniz çevresini koruma sorumluluğu ele alınarak, devletlerin deniz kaynaklarını kullanma hakları ile çevresel sürdürülebilirliği sağlama yükümlülükleri arasındaki olası çatışmalar değerlendirilmektedir. Hukuki emsaller, antlaşmalar ve uluslararası anlaşmalar incelenerek, bu araştırma okyanus alkalileşmesinin hukuki statüsünü netleştirmeyi ve sorumlu yönetişim için rehber ilkeler sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Böylece, bu yöntemin uygulanmasının uluslararası hukuki standartlara uygunluğu sağlanarak küresel çevresel adaletin teşvik edilmesi hedeflenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ocean Alkalinization , Geoengineering , Environmental Governance , Marine Environment , Climate Change Mitigation

OCEAN ALKALINIZATION: RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF STATES UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW

Öz

Ocean alkalinization, a geoengineering technique aimed at enhancing the ocean's capacity to absorb carbon dioxide and mitigate climate change, raises significant legal and ethical considerations under international law. This article explores the rights and obligations of states regarding ocean alkalinization within the frameworks of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), international environmental law, and customary international law. It examines the principles of state sovereignty, the duty to prevent transboundary harm, and the obligation to protect the marine environment. The study also addresses the potential conflicts between states' rights to utilise marine resources and their responsibilities to ensure environmental sustainability. By analysing legal precedents, treaties, and international agreements, this research aims to clarify the legal status of ocean alkalinization and propose guidelines for its responsible governance, ensuring that its implementation aligns with international legal standards and promotes global environmental justice.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ocean Alkalinization , Geoengineering , Environmental Governance , Marine Environment , Climate Change Mitigation

Kaynakça

• BIBLIOGRAPHY
• Cases and Advisory Opinions
• ICJ, Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons [1996] ICJ 3.
• ICJ, Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica) [2015] ICJ Rep 665.
• ITLOS, Bluefin Tuna Cases (New Zealand v Japan, Australia v Japan) [1999] Case Nos 3, 4.
• ITLOS, Request for an Advisory Opinion Submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law: Advisory Opinion [2024] Case No 31.
• Permanent Court of Arbitration, The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v The People's Republic of China) [2016] Case No 2013-19.
• Trail Smelter Arbitration (United States v. Canada) (1938 and 1941) 3 R.I.A.A. 1905.
• Legislation
• 1996 Protocol to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter (Signed 7 November 1996) UKTS No 21 (2016).
• Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction, UNGAOR, Further resumed 5th Sess, UN Doc A/CONF.232/2023/4 (19 June 2023).
• Convention on Biological Diversity (Signed 5 June 1992) 1760 UNTS 79.
• Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter (Signed 29 December 1972) 1046 UNTS 120.
• Resolution LP.4(8) on the Amendment to the London Protocol to Regulate the Placement of Matter for Ocean Fertilization and Other Marine Geoengineering Activities (Adopted 18 October 2013) UKTS Misc No 9 (2014).
• Rio Convention on Environment and Development (Adopted 14 June 1992) A/CONF.151/26.
• UNFCCC, Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Signed 11 December 1997) 2303 UNTS 162.
• UNFCCC, Paris Agreement (Signed 22 April 2016) 3156 UNTS 79.
• UNGA, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Signed 10 December 1982) 1833 UNTS 3.
• UNGA, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Signed 4 June 1992) 1771 UNTS 107.
• United Nations Environmental Programme, ‘Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity XI/20: Climate-related Geoengineering’ (UNEP, 2012) UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/XI/20.
• United Nations Environmental Programme, ‘Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity X/33: Biodiversity and Climate Change’ (UNEP, 2010) UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/33.
• Secondary Materials
• Ahmed M, Shayya W, Hoey D, Al-Handal J, ‘Brine disposal from reverse osmosis desalination plants in Oman and the United Arab Emirates’ (2001) 133 Desalination 135.
• Birchenough A, Haag F, ‘The London Convention and London Protocol and Their Expanding Mandate’ (2020) 34 OYO 255.
• Boyd P, Vivian C, High Level Review of a Wide Range of Proposed Marine Geoengineering Techniques (IMO, 2019).
• Brent K, ‘Marine Geoengineering Governance and the Importance of Compatibility with the Law of the Sea’ in J McDonald, J McGee, R Barnes (Eds), Research Handbook on Climate Change, Oceans and Coasts (Edward Elgar, 2020).
• Calel R, ‘Carbon Markets: A Historical Overview’ (2013) 4 WIREs: Climate Change 107.
• Caserini S, Storni N, Grosso M, ‘The Availability of Limestone and Other Raw Materials for Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement’ (2022) 36(5) GBC 1.
• Chichilnisky G, Bal P, Reversing climate change: How carbon removals can resolve climate change and fix the economy (World Scientific, 2020).
• Cole DN, Millar CI, Stephenson NL, ‘Responding to Climate Change: A Toolbox of Management Strategies’ in DN Cole, L Yang (Eds), Beyond Naturalness: Rethinking Park and Wilderness Stewardship in an Era of Rapid Change (Island Press, 2012).
• Cuff M, ‘Geoengineering the seas could be catastrophic for marine life’ (New Scientist, 2023) <https://www.newscientist.com/article/2369221-geoengineering-the-seas-could-be-catastrophic-for-marine-life/> Accessed 12 December 2024.
• de Lannoy C, Eisaman M, Jose A, Karnitz S, DeVaul R, Hannun K, Rivest J, ‘Indirect ocean capture of atmospheric CO2: Part I. Prototype of a negative emissions technology’ (2018) 70 IJGGC 243.
• DeSombre ER, ‘The Evolution of International Environmental Cooperation’ (2004) 1(1) JILIR 75.
• Dobush B, Gallob N, Guerra M, Guilloux B, Holland E, Seabrook S, Levin L, ‘A new way forward for ocean-climate policy as reflected in the UNFCCC Ocean and Climate Change Dialogue submissions’ (2022) 22(2) Climate Policy 254.
• Doney SC, Buck H, Buesseler K, Iglesias-Rodriguez MD, Moran K, Oschlies A, Renforth P, Roman J, Sant GN, Siegel D, Webb R, White A, ‘A Research Strategy for Ocean-based Carbon Dioxide Removal and Sequestration’ (National Academies Press, 2022) <https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/26278/> Accessed 13 December 2024.
• Doney SC, Fabry V, Feely R, Kleypas J, ‘Ocean Acidification: The Other CO2 Problem’ (2016) 6 WJELP 212.
• Donkersloot R, ‘Ocean Acidification and Alaska Fisheries: Views and Voices of Alaska’s Fishermen, Marine Industries and Coastal Residents’ (Alaska Marine Conservation Council, 2012)15 <https://www.cakex.org/sites/default/files/documents/Ocean-Acidification-and-Alaska-Fisheries.pdf> Accessed 5 January 2025.
• Dupuy P, Le Moli G, Viñuales JE, ‘Customary International Law and the Environment’ (2018) C-EENRG Working Papers 2018-2 <https://www.ceenrg.landecon.cam.ac.uk/system/files/documents/CEENRG_WP_19_CustomaryInternationalLawandtheEnvironment.pdf> Accessed 1 January 2025.
• Evans MC, ‘Effective incentives for reforestation: lessons from Australia's carbon farming policies’ (2018) 32 COES 38.
• Farber D, ‘Navigating the Intersection of Environmental Law and Disaster Law’ (2011) 6 BYULR 1783.
• Feely RA, Doney SC, Cooley SR, ‘Ocean Acidification’ 22(4) Oceanography 37.
• Friedlingstein P et al, ‘Global Carbon Budget 2022’ (2022) 14(11) ESSD 4811.
• Friedlingstein P, Solomon S, Plattner GK, Knutti R, Ciais P, Raupach MR, ‘Long-term climate implications of twenty-first century options for carbon dioxide emission mitigation’ (2011) 1(9) Nature: Climate Change 457.
• Friedrich J, ‘Carbon Capture and Storage: A New Challenge for International Environmental Law’ (2007) 67 ZRV 211.
• Guinotte JM, Fabry VJ, ‘Ocean Acidification and Its Potential Effects on Marine Ecosystems’ (2008) 1134 ANYAS 320.
• Harvey LDD, ‘Mitigating the atmospheric CO 2 increase and ocean acidification by adding limestone powder to upwelling regions’ (2008) 113 JGR 1.
• Humphreys S, ‘Introduction’ in S Humphreys (Ed), Human Rights and Climate Change (CUP, 2010).
• Ilyina T, Zeebe R, Brewer P, ‘Changes in underwater sound propagation caused by ocean acidification’ (2009) 6(46) IOP CSEER <https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1307/6/46/462007/meta> Accessed 7 December 2024.
• International Maritime Organization, ‘45th Consultative Meeting of Contracting Parties to the London Convention and the 18th Meeting of Contracting Parties to the London Protocol (LC 45/LP 18)’ (IMO, 2023) <https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/MeetingSummaries/Pages/LC-45-LP-18.aspx> Accessed 30 December 2024.
• International Maritime Organization, ‘Statement on Marine Geoengineering’ (IMO, 2022) <https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/Environment/Documents/LC_LP/LP%20LC%20Statement%20on%20Marine%20Geoengineering_%20LC%2044-17%20annex%202.pdf>
• Jubbawy E, ‘World first protocol for Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement’ (Isometric, 2024) <https://isometric.com/writing-articles/world-first-protocol-for-ocean-alkalinity-enhancement> Accessed 3 January 2024.
• Kinley R, Cutajar M, Boerc Y, Figueres C, ‘Beyond good intentions, to urgent action: Former UNFCCC leaders take stock of thirty years of international climate change negotiations’ (2020) 21(5) Climate Policy 593.
• Kriebel D, Tickner J, Epstein P, Lemons J, Levins R, Loechler EL, Quinn M, Rudel R, Schettler T, Stoto M, ‘The Precautionary Principle in Environmental Science’ (2001) 109(9) EHP 871.
• Landschützer P, Gruber N, Bakker DC, Schuster U, ‘Recent variability of the global ocean carbon sink’ (2014) 28 GBC 927.
• Lefstad L, Paavola J, ‘The evolution of climate justice claims in global climate change negotiations under the UNFCCC’ (2024) 18(3) CPS 363.
• Li S, Hubacek K, Eskander S, Li Y, Chen P, Guan D, ‘Revisiting Copenhagen climate mitigation targets’ (2024) 14 Nature: Climate Change 468.
• Lydersen E, Löfgren SL, Arnesen RT, ‘Metals in Scandinavian Surface Waters: Effects of Acidification, Liming, and Potential Reacidification’ (2010) 32(2) CREST 73.
• Mace MJ, Hendriks C, Coenraads R, ‘Regulatory challenges to the implementation of carbon capture and geological storage within the European Union under EU and international law’ (2007) 1 IJGGC 253.
• Matz N, ‘Conflicts Between Environmental Agreements’ in R Wolfrum, N Matz, Conflicts in International Environmental Law (Springer, 2003).
• Ming T,_Richter R, Liu W, Caillol S, ‘Fighting global warming by climate engineering: Is the Earth radiation management and the solar radiation management any option for fighting climate change?’ (2014) 31 RSER 792.
• Nolt J, ‘Cumulative Harm as a Function of Carbon Emissions’ in C Murphy, P Gardoni, R McKim (Eds), Climate Change and Its Impacts (Springer, 2018).
• O’Connell ME, ‘Enforcement and the Success of International Environmental Law’ (1995) 3(1) IJGLS 47.
• Rackley S, ‘Overview of Negative Emissions Technologies’ in S Rackley, A Sewel, D Clery, G Dowson, P Styring, G Andrews, S McCord, P Knops, R Richter, T Ming, W Li, M Tyka (Eds), Negative Emissions Technologies for Climate Change Mitigation (Elsevier, 2023).
• Rau GH, Baird JR, ‘Negative-CO2-emissions ocean thermal energy conversion’ (2018) 95 RSER 265.
• Robinson NA, ‘Enforcing Environmental Norms: Diplomatic and Judicial Approaches’ (2003) 26 HICLR 387.
• Scherer T, ‘Ocean Alkalinization: The Rights and Obligations under International Law’ (The Arctic University of Norway 2021).
• Schlüter L, Lohbeck K, Gutowska M, Gröger J, Riebesell U, Reusch T, ‘Adaptation of a globally important coccolithophore to ocean warming and acidification’ (2014) 4 Nature: Climate Change 1024.
• Schneider L, Theuer SH, ‘Environmental integrity of international carbon market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement’ (2019) 19(3) Climate Policy 368.
• Scott KN, ‘Mind the Gap: Marine Geoengineering and the Law of the Sea: Gaps and Challenges’ in RC Beckman, M McCreath, J Roach, Z Sun (Eds), High Seas Governance: Gaps and Challenges (Brill Nijhoff, 2018).
• Scott-Buechler CM, Greene CH, ‘Role of the ocean in climate stabilization’ in JCM Peres, ALDC Gonçalves (Eds), Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage: Using Natural Resources for Sustainable Development (Academic Press, 2019).
• Shang Y, Wang X, Shi Y, Huang W, Sokolova I, Chang X, Chen D, Wei S, Khan F, Hu M, Wang Y, ‘Ocean acidification affects the bioenergetics of marine mussels as revealed by high-coverage quantitative metabolomics’ (2023) 858(3) STE 160090.
• Shaw M, International Law (9th Edn, OUP, 2021).
• Sheppard JG, ‘Geoengineering the climate: an overview and update’ (2012) 370 PTRS 4166.
• Sovacool BK, ‘Reckless or righteous? Reviewing the sociotechnical benefits and risks of climate change geoengineering’ (2021) 35 ESR 100656.
• Trouborst A, ‘Prevention, Precaution, Logic and Law’ (2009) 2(2) ELR 105.
• Van Dyke J, ‘Giving Teeth to the Environmental Obligations in the LOS Convention’ in AO Elferink, D Rothwell (Eds), Ocean Management in the 21st Century: Institutional Frameworks and Responses (Brill, 2004).
• van Soest HL, den Elzen MGJ, van Vuuren DP, ‘Net-zero emission targets for major emitting countries consistent with the Paris Agreement’ (2021) 12 Nature: Communications 2140.
• White R, Environmental Harm: An Eco-Justice Perspective (Policy Press, 2013).
• Wilberforce T, Olabi AG, Sayed ET, Elsaid K, Abdelkareem M, ‘Progress in carbon capture technologies’ (2021) 761 STE 143203.
• Williamson P, Wallace D, Law C, Boyd P, Collos Y, Croot P, Denman K, Riebesell U, Takeda S, Vivian C, ‘Ocean fertilization for geoengineering: A review of effectiveness, environmental impacts and emerging governance’ (2012) 90 PSEP 475.
• Wilson G, ‘Murky Waters: Ambiguous International Law for Ocean Fertilization and Other Geoengineering’ (2014) 49 TILJ 507.
• World Meteorological Organization, ‘Record carbon emissions highlight urgency of Global Greenhouse Gas Watch’ (WMO, 2024) <https://wmo.int/media/news/record-carbon-emissions-highlight-urgency-of-global-greenhouse-gas-watch> Accessed 3 January 2024.