New Ecology for Banana Production of Turkey

Abstract

This study was conducted under the farmer greenhouses at Hassa province of Hatay where has being new production area with at Anamur province of Mersin where has been produced banana since long years. The cultivar of ‘Azman’ was used which knows more resistant to cold than other cultivars. The yield was founded by multiplying the bunch weight and the number of plant at each unit area. The analyses of mature fruit that belong to ‘Azman’ were done as fruit diameter, length, and weight, total soluble solid (TSS) content and peel color (L* C and Hueo). As a result, the yield was determined approximately 2 tones higher at Hassa condition for one decare. At the same experiment field, fruit physical properties such as fruit diameter, length, weight and TSS content were clearly found higher than the Anamur condition. Beside of cultivar practices, the higher economical yield and quality could be explained by doesn’t being soil exhaustion at Hassa where started newly production and does not reach the level which could being the problem aspect of special banana diseases and pest in here. The preliminary results were obtained positive about banana cultivation in this region, and it is needed to study more detailed with different cultivars.

Keywords

• Banana,Economy,Quality,Yield

Türkiye Muz Yetiştiriciliği İçin Yeni Bir Ekoloji

Öz

Bu çalışma muz yetiştiriciliğinde yeni bir üretim alanı olma özelliğine sahip Hatay’ın Hassa ilçesi ile uzun yıllardan beri muz yetiştiriciliği yapılan Mersin ilinin Anamur ilçesindeki üretici seralarında yürütülmüştür. Her iki ilçede seçilen seralarda, soğuğa dayanımı diğer çeşitlere göre daha iyi olduğu bilinen ‘Azman’ muz çeşidi yetiştirilmekte olup, araştırmada bu çeşit kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada dekar başına verim, hevenk ağırlığı ile dekardaki bitki sayısının çarpılmasıyla bulunmuştur. Azman çeşidine ait meyvelerde en, boy, ağırlık, suda çözünebilir toplam kuru madde (SÇKM) miktarı ile kabuk rengi (L, C ve Hueo) belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, Hassa’da 1 dekar alandan Anamur’a göre yaklaşık 2 ton daha fazla ürün alındığı belirlenmiştir. Aynı deneme alanında, meyve en, boy ve ağırlık gibi fiziksel özellikler ile meyvelerdeki SÇKM içeriklerinin Anamur’daki muzlara göre belirgin bir şekilde yüksek olduğu hatta meyve ağırlık değerlerinin iki kata ulaştığı dikkat çekmiştir. Ekonomik olarak elde edilen yüksek verim ve kalite, farklı bakım koşulları yanında muz tarımına yeni açılan Hassa’da toprak yorgunluğunun olmaması ile muza özel hastalık ve zararlıların henüz problem yaratacak seviyeye ulaşmaması ile açıklanabilir. Söz konusu bölgede muz yetiştiriciliği konusunda ilk olumlu sonuçların alınmış ve farklı çeşitlerle daha detaylı çalışmalara ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ekonomi,kalite,muz,verim

References

1. Anonim, 2016. www.fao.org. (Erişim tarihi: 15.12.2016).
2. Attia M, Ahmed MA, Sonbaty MREL (2009). Use of biotechnologies to increase growth, productivity and fruit quality of Maghrabi Banana under different rates of phosphorus, World J. Agr. Sci. 5(2): 211-220.
3. Aurore G, Parfait B, Fahrasmane L (2009). Bananas, raw materials for making processed food products. Trends Food Sci.Tech. 20, 78–91.
4. Galan Sauco V, Cabrera Cabrera J, Hernandez Delgado PM, Rodriguez Pastor MC (1998). Comparison of protected and open-air cultivation of Grande Naine and Dwarf Cavendish bananas. Acta Hortic. 490: 247-259.
5. Gübbük H, Pekmezci M Erkan, M (2004). Production Potential of Cavendish Cultivars (Musa spp. AAA) under Greenhouse and Field Conditions in Subtropical Areas of Turkey. Acta Agric. Scans., Sect. B, Soil and Plant Sci. 54:249-253.
6. Gübbük H, Pekmezci M (2004). Comparison of open-field and protected cultivation of banana ( Musa spp. AAA) in the coastal area of Turkey. New Zeal. J. Crop Hort. 32: 375-378.
7. Jullien A, Malézieux E, Michaux-Ferriére N, Chillet M, Ney B (2001). Within-bunch lan-Saúvariability in banana fruit weight: importance of developmental lag between fruit. Ann. Bot-London. 87: 101-118.
8. Karlıdağ H, Eşitken A, Turanç T, Şahin F (2007). Effects of root inoculation of plant growth promoting rhizbacteria (PGPR) on yield: growth and nutrient element contents of leaves of apple. Sci, Hortic. 114: 16-20.

9. Paydaş S, ve Pekmezci M (1983). Muzların depolanması ve olgunlaştırılması üzerinde araştırmalar. Türkiye Bahçe Ürünlerinin Depolanması, Pazara Hazırlanması ve Taşınması Sempozyumu. No:587, 306-321.
10. Pramanik S, Lai S, Ray R, Patra SK (2016). Effect of Drip Fertigation on Yield, Water Use Efficiency, and Nutrients Availability in Banana in West Belgal, India. Commun. soil sci. Plan. 47: 1691-1700.
11. Sarrwy SMA, Mostafa EAM, Hassan HSA (2012). Growth, yield and fruit quality of Williams Banana as affected by different planting distances, International Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(5):266-275.
12. Segura RA, Serrano E, Pocasangre L, Acuῆa O, Bertsch Floria, Stoorvogel JJ, Sandoval JA (2015). Chemical and microbiological interactions between soils and roots in commercial banana plantations (Musa AAA, cv. Cavendish). Sci. Hortic. 197: 66-71.
13. Selli S, Gübbük H, Kafkas E, Güneş E (2012). Comparison of aroma compounds in Dwarf Cavendish banana (Musa spp. AAA) grown from open-field and protected cultivation area. Sci. Hortic. 141: 76-82.
14. Shen Z, Ruan Y, Wang B, Zhong S, Su L, Li R, Shen Q (2015). Effect of biofertilizer for suppressing Fusarium wilt disease of banana as well as enhancing microbial and chemical properties of soil under greenhouse trial. Appl. Soil Ecol. 93: 111-119.
15. Singh B, Singh JP, Kaur A, Singh N (2016). Bioactive compounds in banana and their associated health benefits- A review. Food Chem. 206: 1-11.
16. Souza GLOD, Nietsche S, Xavier AA, Costa MR, Pereira MCT, Santos MA (2016). Triple combinations with PGPB stimulate plant growth in micropropagated banana plantlets. Appl. Soil Ecol. 103: 31-35.
17. Turner DW, Fortescue JA, Ocimati W, Blomme G (2016). Plantain cultivars (Musa spp. AAB) grown at different altitudes demonstrate cool temperrature and photoperiod responses relevant to genetic improvement. Field Crop Res. 94: 103-111.
18. TÜİK, (2016). www.tuik.gov.tr (Erişim tarihi: 15.12.2016).
19. Zhang C, Whiting M (2013). Planth growth regulators improve sweet cherry fruit quality without reducing endocarp growth. Sci. Hortic. 150: 73-79.