Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Investigation into Performance of Some Citrus Rootstocks in In vitro Drought Stress Conditions

Yıl 2018, , 305 - 310, 28.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.428140

Öz

Citrus is a fruit species
commercially in the tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Growth and
development of plants are affected by environmental factors such as salinity
and drought. Global climate change will increase water stress risk in the near
future.  One of the purposes of plant
biotechnology is the development of plants tolerant to drought. Among
environmental stresses, drought stress is one of the factors that negatively
affect plant growth and yield. The response of plants to drought stress is
quite complex and is the process of many genetic expressions. In this study,
Troyer citrange and C-35 citrange from the significant citrus rootstocks were
used. After seeds of plant materials were germinated drought stress was applied
in in vitro condition. The response
of the plants to drought and performance of micropropagation has been
determined. It was determined that both rootstocks continued their life and
proliferation in increasing PEG doses, however their performance found to be
declining.

Kaynakça

  • Bhusal RC, Mizutani F, Rutto KL (2002). Selection of rootstocks for flooding and drought tolerance in citrus species. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 5: 509-512.Blum A (2005). Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Aust. J. Agric. Res. 56(11): 1159–68.
  • Claeys H, Inzé D (2013). The agony of choice: How plants balance growth and survival under water-limiting conditions. Plant Physiol. 162(4): 1768–79.
  • Dulay RMR, Castro MEGD (2016). Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of three Citrus leaves extracts. Der Pharmacia Lettre, 8: 13.
  • Gimeno J, Gadea J, Forment J, Perez-Valle J, Santiago J, Martinez-Godoy MA, Yenush L, Belles JM, Brumos J, Colmenero-Flores JM, Talon M, Serrano R (2009). Shared and novel molecular responses of mandarin to drought. Plant Mol Biol, 70: 403–420.
  • Joshi R, Shukla A, Sairam RK (2011). In vitro screening of rice genotypes for drought tolerance using polyethylene glycol. Acta Physiol. Plant. 33(6): 2209-2217.
  • Lawlor DW (2013). Genetic engineering to improve plant performance under drought: physiological evaluation of achievements, limitations, and possibilities. J. Exp. Bot. 64(1): 83–108.
  • Marssaro AL, Morais-Lino LS, Cruz JL, Ledo, CADS, Santos-Serejo JAD (2017). Simulation of in vitro water deficit for selecting drought-tolerant banana genotypes. Pesq. Agropec. Bras, 52(12), 1301-1304.
  • Paranychianakis NV, Chartzoulakis KS (2005). Irrigation of Mediterranean crops with saline water: from physiology to management practices. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 106: 171–187.
  • Perez-Perez JG, Syvertsen JP, Botia P, Garcia-Sanchez F (2007). Leaf water relations and net gas exchange responses of salinized Carrizo citrange seedlings during drought stress and recovery. Ann. Bot. 100: 335–345.
  • Reddy AR, Chaitanya KV, Vivekanandan M (2004). Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J. Plant Physiol. 161: 1189–1202.
  • Rodriguez-Gamir J, Primo-Millo E, Forner JB, Forner-Giner MA (2010). Citrus rootstock responses to water stress. Sci Hortic. 126: 95–102.Şahin-Çevik M (2012). A WRKY transcription factor gene isolated from Poncirus trifoliata shows differential responses to cold and drought stresses. J. Plant Omics. 5(5): 438-445.
  • Sivritepe N, Erturk U, Yerlikaya C, Türkan I, Bor M, Özdemir F (2008). Response of the cherry rootstock to water stress induced in vitro. Biol. Plant. 52(3): 573-576.Sohi S, Shri R (2018). Neuropharmacological potential of the genus Citrus: A review. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem., 7(2): 1538-1548.
  • Souza JD, de Andrade Silva EM, Coelho Filho MA, Morillon R, Bonatto D, Micheli F, da Silva Gesteira A (2017). Different adaptation strategies of two citrus scion/rootstock combinations in response to drought stress. PloS one, 12(5): e0177993.
  • Verslues PE, Agarwal M, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Zhu J, Zhu JK (2006). Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. J Plant. 45(4): 523–39.
  • Xiao JP, Zhang LL, Zhang HQ, Miao LX (2017). Identification of genes involved in the responses of Tangor (C. reticulata× C. sinensis) to drought stress. BioMed Res. Int. 1-15.
  • Zhao P, Liu P, Shao J, Li C, Wang B, Guo X, et al (2014). Analysis of different strategies adapted by two cassava cultivars in response to drought stress: ensuring survival or continuing growth. J. Exp. Bot. 66(5):1477-1488.

Bazı Turunçgil Anaçlarının In vitro Kuraklık Stresi Koşullarında Performanslarının Araştırılması

Yıl 2018, , 305 - 310, 28.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.428140

Öz

Turunçgiller dünyanın tropik ve subtropik
bölgelerinde ticari olarak yetiştiriciliği yapılan bir meyve türüdür.  Bitkilerin büyüme ve gelişimleri tuzluluk,
kuraklık gibi abiyotik faktörlerden etkilenmektedir.  Küresel iklim değişikliğinin yakın gelecekte
su stresi riskini artıracağı beklenmektedir. 
Bitki biyoteknolojisinin amaçlarından biri kuraklığa tolerant bitkilerin
geliştirilmesidir.  Çevresel stresler
arasında kuraklık stresi bitki büyüme ve verimini en olumsuz etkileyen
faktörlerden biridir.  Bitkilerin
kuraklık stresine verdiği cevap oldukça karmaşık ve birçok genin ifadesinin
gerçekleştiği bir süreçtir.  Bu çalışmada
turunçgil anaçları arasında yer alan Troyer sitranjı ve C-35 sitranjı
kullanılmıştır.  Bitkisel materyallere
ait tohumlar çimlendirildikten sonra in
vitro
koşullarda kuraklık stresi uygulanmıştır.  Bitkilerin in vitro’da kuraklık stresi altında çoğaltım performansları ve
verdikleri tepkiler belirlenmiştir.  Her
iki anacında artan PEG dozlarında yaşamları ve çoğalmalarına devam ettirdikleri
ancak performanslarının gerilediği tespit edilmiştir.  

Kaynakça

  • Bhusal RC, Mizutani F, Rutto KL (2002). Selection of rootstocks for flooding and drought tolerance in citrus species. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 5: 509-512.Blum A (2005). Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Aust. J. Agric. Res. 56(11): 1159–68.
  • Claeys H, Inzé D (2013). The agony of choice: How plants balance growth and survival under water-limiting conditions. Plant Physiol. 162(4): 1768–79.
  • Dulay RMR, Castro MEGD (2016). Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of three Citrus leaves extracts. Der Pharmacia Lettre, 8: 13.
  • Gimeno J, Gadea J, Forment J, Perez-Valle J, Santiago J, Martinez-Godoy MA, Yenush L, Belles JM, Brumos J, Colmenero-Flores JM, Talon M, Serrano R (2009). Shared and novel molecular responses of mandarin to drought. Plant Mol Biol, 70: 403–420.
  • Joshi R, Shukla A, Sairam RK (2011). In vitro screening of rice genotypes for drought tolerance using polyethylene glycol. Acta Physiol. Plant. 33(6): 2209-2217.
  • Lawlor DW (2013). Genetic engineering to improve plant performance under drought: physiological evaluation of achievements, limitations, and possibilities. J. Exp. Bot. 64(1): 83–108.
  • Marssaro AL, Morais-Lino LS, Cruz JL, Ledo, CADS, Santos-Serejo JAD (2017). Simulation of in vitro water deficit for selecting drought-tolerant banana genotypes. Pesq. Agropec. Bras, 52(12), 1301-1304.
  • Paranychianakis NV, Chartzoulakis KS (2005). Irrigation of Mediterranean crops with saline water: from physiology to management practices. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 106: 171–187.
  • Perez-Perez JG, Syvertsen JP, Botia P, Garcia-Sanchez F (2007). Leaf water relations and net gas exchange responses of salinized Carrizo citrange seedlings during drought stress and recovery. Ann. Bot. 100: 335–345.
  • Reddy AR, Chaitanya KV, Vivekanandan M (2004). Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J. Plant Physiol. 161: 1189–1202.
  • Rodriguez-Gamir J, Primo-Millo E, Forner JB, Forner-Giner MA (2010). Citrus rootstock responses to water stress. Sci Hortic. 126: 95–102.Şahin-Çevik M (2012). A WRKY transcription factor gene isolated from Poncirus trifoliata shows differential responses to cold and drought stresses. J. Plant Omics. 5(5): 438-445.
  • Sivritepe N, Erturk U, Yerlikaya C, Türkan I, Bor M, Özdemir F (2008). Response of the cherry rootstock to water stress induced in vitro. Biol. Plant. 52(3): 573-576.Sohi S, Shri R (2018). Neuropharmacological potential of the genus Citrus: A review. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem., 7(2): 1538-1548.
  • Souza JD, de Andrade Silva EM, Coelho Filho MA, Morillon R, Bonatto D, Micheli F, da Silva Gesteira A (2017). Different adaptation strategies of two citrus scion/rootstock combinations in response to drought stress. PloS one, 12(5): e0177993.
  • Verslues PE, Agarwal M, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Zhu J, Zhu JK (2006). Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. J Plant. 45(4): 523–39.
  • Xiao JP, Zhang LL, Zhang HQ, Miao LX (2017). Identification of genes involved in the responses of Tangor (C. reticulata× C. sinensis) to drought stress. BioMed Res. Int. 1-15.
  • Zhao P, Liu P, Shao J, Li C, Wang B, Guo X, et al (2014). Analysis of different strategies adapted by two cassava cultivars in response to drought stress: ensuring survival or continuing growth. J. Exp. Bot. 66(5):1477-1488.
Toplam 16 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Mühendislik
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Özhan Şimşek

Dicle Dönmez

Yıldız Aka Kaçar

Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Eylül 2018
Kabul Tarihi 4 Eylül 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018

Kaynak Göster

APA Şimşek, Ö., Dönmez, D., & Aka Kaçar, Y. (2018). Bazı Turunçgil Anaçlarının In vitro Kuraklık Stresi Koşullarında Performanslarının Araştırılması. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 28(3), 305-310. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.428140

Cited By








Creative Commons License
Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi CC BY 4.0 lisanslıdır.