BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Etlik Piliç Yetiştiriciliğinde Çevresel Koşulların ve Beslemenin Karkas Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1, 115 - 122, 19.12.2015

Arda Sözcü Mehmet Koyuncu

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Abbott W.W., Couch J.R. and R.L. Atkinson. 1969. The incidence of foot-pad dermatitis in young turkeys fed high levels of soybean meal. Poultry Science. 48: 2186–2188.
  • Anonim. 2007. Council Directive. 2007/43/EC. 2007. Laying down minimum rules for the protection of chickens kept for meat production.
  • Ain Baziz H., Geraert P.A. and S. Guillaumin. 1996. Chronic heat exposure enhances fat deposition and modifies muscle and fat partition in broiler carcasses. Poultry Science. 75: 505–513.
  • Bessei W. 2006. Welfare of broilers: A Review, World’s Poult. Sci. Jour. 62(3): 455-466.
  • Buijs S., Van Poucke E., Tuyttens F.A.M., Keeling, L. and S. Rettenbacher. 2009. Stocking density effects on broiler welfare: Identifying sensitive ranges for different indicators. Poultry Science. 88: 1536–1543.
  • Dozier W.A., Thaxton J.P., Branton S.L., Morgan G.W., Miles D.M., Roush W.B., Lott B.D. and Y.V. Thaxton. 2005. Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers. Poultry Science. 84: 1332 – 1338.
  • EC. 2000. European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General, The Welfare Of Chickens Kept For Meat Production (Broilers), Report Of The Scientfic Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare, Adopted 21 March 2000. SANCO.B.3/AH/R15/2000.
  • Eichner G., Vieira S.L., Torres C.A., Coneglian J.L.B., Freitas D.M. and O.A. Oyarzabal. 2007. Litter moisture and footpad dermatitis as affected by diets formulated on an all-vegetable basis or having the inclusion of poultry by-product. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 16: 344–350.
  • Fairchild B.D. and C.W. Ritz. 2006. Poultry drinking water primer accessible at http://pubs.caes.uga.edu/caespubs/pubcd/B1301.html.
  • Feddes J.J.R., Emmanuel E.J. and M.J. Zuidhoft. 2002. Broiler performance, bodyweight varience, feed, water intake and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poultry Science. 81: 774 – 779.
  • Garcia R.G., Mendes A.A., Garcia E.A., Naas I.A., Mureira J., Almeida I.C.L. and T.S. Takita. 2002. Effect of stocking density and sex on feathering, body ınjury and breast meat quality of broiler chickens. Revista Brasileria de Ciência Avicola. 40: 1-9.
  • Grashorn M.A. and B. Kutritz. 1991. Effect of stocking density on perfromance of modern broiler breeds. Archive der Geflügelkunde. 55: 84-90.
  • Hartung J. and B. Spindler. 2012. Aspects of animal welfare in broiler productionfoot pad dermatitis and litter quality. Proceedings of 24th World's Poultry Congress, Salvador, Brazil. pp. 527-530.
  • Haslam S.M., Knowles T.G., Brown S.N., Wilkins L.J., Kestin S.C., Warris P.D. and C.J. Nicol. 2007. Factors affecting the prevalence of footpad dermatitis, hock burn and breast burn in broiler chicken. British Poultry Science. 48(3): 264-274.
  • Julian R.J. 2004. Measuring and Auditing Broiler Welfare. C. Weeks, and A. Butterworth, eds. CAB Int., Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK. pp. 51–59.
  • Kadim I.T., Al-Qamshui B.H.A., Mahgoub O., Al-Marzooqi W. and E.H. Johnson. 2009. The effects of ascorbic acid and seasonal temperatures on meat quality characteristics of broiler chickens maintained in open-sided and closed houses. International Journal of Poultry Science. 8: 733- 739.
  • Kampschöer M.V.T. 2007. Pass Reform Technical Documents. Setting Standarts for Uniformity. http://www.pasreform.com/academy.html.(Erişim Tarihi:17.02.2014).
  • Kannan G., Heath J.H., Wabeck C.J., Souza M.C.P., Howe J.C. and Mench J.A. 1997. Effects of crating and transport on stress and meat quality characteristics in broilers. Poultry Science. 76: 532-529.
  • Koca S. 2014. Beyaz Et İhracatı: Sorunlar ve Hedefler. Performans Dergisi. Mayıs, 2014. 183: 72-77.
  • Kun Z., Uluocak A.N. and M. Karaman. 2009. The influence of some factors on carcass defects during fattening period in broilers. Revista Archivos De Zootecnia. 58: 117-120.
  • Lin H., Zhang H. F., Jiao H. C., Zhao T., Sui S.J., Gu X.H., Zhang Z.Y., Buyse J. and E. Decuypere. 2005a. The thermoregulation response of broiler chickens to humidity at different ambient temperatures I. One-week-age. Poultry Science. 84: 1166-1172.
  • Lin H., Zhang H. F., Du R., Gu X.H., Zhang Z.Y., Buyse J. and E. Decuypere. 2005b. The thermoregulation response of broiler chickens to humidity at different ambient temperatures I. Fourweek-age. Poultry Science. 84: 1173-1178.
  • Lyon B.G. and C.E. Lyon. 1991. Research note: Shear value ranges by instron Warner-Bratzler and singleblade Allo-Kramer devices that correspond to sensory tenderness. Poultry Science. 70: 188-191.
  • Manning L., Chadd S.A. and R.D. Baines. 2007. Key health and welfare indicators for broiler production. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 63(1): 46-62.
  • Mayes F.J. 1980. The incidence of bruising in broiler flocks. British Poultry Science. 21: 505-509.
  • Meluzzi A., Fabbri C., Folegatti E. and F. Sirri. 2008. Survey of chicken rearing conditions in Italy: effects of litter quality and stocking density on productivity, foot dermatitis, carcase injuries and meat quality. British Poultry Science. 49: 257–264.
  • Moran E.T. 2004. Husbandry techniques. In: Poultry Meat Processing and Quality. Edited by:G.C.Mead. Published by Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, England. pp. 38-62.
  • Petracci M., Mudalal S., and C. Cavani. 2014. Meat quality in fast-growing broiler chickens. In the proceedings of 14th European Poultry Conference, Stavanger, Norway, pp. 221-234.
  • Puron D., Santamaria R., Segaura J.C. and J.L. Alamilla. 1995. Broiler performance at different stocking densities. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 4: 55–60.
  • Rahimi G., Rezaei M., Hafezian H. and H. Saiyahzadeh. 2005. The effect of intermittent lighting schedule on cellular and humoral immune responses in broiler performance. International Journal of Poultry Science. 4: 396-398.
  • Renden J. A., Moran Jr. E. T. and S.A. Kincaid. 1994. Lack of interactions between dietary lysine or strain cross and photoschedule for male broiler performance and carcass yield. Poultry Science. 73: 1651-1662.
  • Renden J. A., Moran Jr. E. T. and S.A. Kincaid. 1996. Lighting programs for broilers that reduce leg problems without loss of performance or yield. Poultry Science. 75: 1345-1350.
  • Scahaw. 2000. European Commission – Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Welfare 2000. The Welfare of Chickens Kept for Meat Production (Broilers) European Commission, Brussels, Belgium Adopted 21 March 2000.
  • Shepherd E. M. and B.D. Fairchild. 2010. Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poultry Science. 89: 2043- 2053.
  • Sorensen P., Su G. and S.C., Kestin. 2000. Effects of age and stocking density on leg weakness in broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 79: 864–870.
  • Tuncer, Ş. D. 2014. Broilerlerde beslenme ve pigmentasyon ilişkisi. Besd-Bir yayınları, Yayın no:18. S.6.
  • Vieira S.L. 2009, Broiler Carcass Quality, Sau Paulo.

Etlik Piliç Yetiştiriciliğinde Çevresel Koşulların ve Beslemenin Karkas Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1, 115 - 122, 19.12.2015

Arda Sözcü Mehmet Koyuncu

Öz

Son yirmi yılda kanatlı eti üretimi dünyada ve Türkiye’de çok önemli gelişme göstermiştir. Özellikle son yıllarda tüketicilerin daha kaliteli gıda tüketme isteklerinin artış göstermesiyle, karkas kalitesi önemli bir kriter haline gelmiştir. Bu açıdan, piliç eti üretiminde karkas kusurlarının oluşumunu etkileyen faktörlerin bilinmesi üretimde maksimum karlılığın sağlanması noktasında önem arz etmektedir. Diğer yandan, giderek yaygınlaşan hayvan refahı kavramına yönelik direktifler yetiştirme uygulamalarında buna bağlı değişikliklerin ortaya çıkmasını zorunlu kılmıştır. Etlik piliçlerde refah kavramı çerçevesinde yetiştirme dönemi, kesim öncesi aşamalar (yükleme, sevkiyat, asma, bayıltma gibi) ve kesim esnasında uygulanan işlemler olmak üzere üç farklı dönem ele alınmaktadır. Böylece, hem hayvan refahı iyileştirilmekte, hem de son ürün olan piliç etinin kalitesi korunmaktadır. Bu süreçlerin içerisinde uzun bir süreyi kapsayan yetiştirme döneminde etlik piliçlere sağlanan barındırma yoğunluğu, altlık kalitesi, sıcaklık ve nem gibi kümes içi koşullar ve besleme karkas kalitesinde belirleyici rol oynamaktadır. Bu derlemede, etlik piliçlerde yetiştirme döneminde uygulanması gereken çevresel koşullar ve besleme ile ilgili genel noktalar ve bunların karkas kalitesi üzerine olası etkileri hakkında bilgi verilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Etlik piliç karkas kalitesi performans çevresel koşullar besleme

Kaynakça

  • Abbott W.W., Couch J.R. and R.L. Atkinson. 1969. The incidence of foot-pad dermatitis in young turkeys fed high levels of soybean meal. Poultry Science. 48: 2186–2188.
  • Anonim. 2007. Council Directive. 2007/43/EC. 2007. Laying down minimum rules for the protection of chickens kept for meat production.
  • Ain Baziz H., Geraert P.A. and S. Guillaumin. 1996. Chronic heat exposure enhances fat deposition and modifies muscle and fat partition in broiler carcasses. Poultry Science. 75: 505–513.
  • Bessei W. 2006. Welfare of broilers: A Review, World’s Poult. Sci. Jour. 62(3): 455-466.
  • Buijs S., Van Poucke E., Tuyttens F.A.M., Keeling, L. and S. Rettenbacher. 2009. Stocking density effects on broiler welfare: Identifying sensitive ranges for different indicators. Poultry Science. 88: 1536–1543.
  • Dozier W.A., Thaxton J.P., Branton S.L., Morgan G.W., Miles D.M., Roush W.B., Lott B.D. and Y.V. Thaxton. 2005. Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers. Poultry Science. 84: 1332 – 1338.
  • EC. 2000. European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General, The Welfare Of Chickens Kept For Meat Production (Broilers), Report Of The Scientfic Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare, Adopted 21 March 2000. SANCO.B.3/AH/R15/2000.
  • Eichner G., Vieira S.L., Torres C.A., Coneglian J.L.B., Freitas D.M. and O.A. Oyarzabal. 2007. Litter moisture and footpad dermatitis as affected by diets formulated on an all-vegetable basis or having the inclusion of poultry by-product. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 16: 344–350.
  • Fairchild B.D. and C.W. Ritz. 2006. Poultry drinking water primer accessible at http://pubs.caes.uga.edu/caespubs/pubcd/B1301.html.
  • Feddes J.J.R., Emmanuel E.J. and M.J. Zuidhoft. 2002. Broiler performance, bodyweight varience, feed, water intake and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poultry Science. 81: 774 – 779.
  • Garcia R.G., Mendes A.A., Garcia E.A., Naas I.A., Mureira J., Almeida I.C.L. and T.S. Takita. 2002. Effect of stocking density and sex on feathering, body ınjury and breast meat quality of broiler chickens. Revista Brasileria de Ciência Avicola. 40: 1-9.
  • Grashorn M.A. and B. Kutritz. 1991. Effect of stocking density on perfromance of modern broiler breeds. Archive der Geflügelkunde. 55: 84-90.
  • Hartung J. and B. Spindler. 2012. Aspects of animal welfare in broiler productionfoot pad dermatitis and litter quality. Proceedings of 24th World's Poultry Congress, Salvador, Brazil. pp. 527-530.
  • Haslam S.M., Knowles T.G., Brown S.N., Wilkins L.J., Kestin S.C., Warris P.D. and C.J. Nicol. 2007. Factors affecting the prevalence of footpad dermatitis, hock burn and breast burn in broiler chicken. British Poultry Science. 48(3): 264-274.
  • Julian R.J. 2004. Measuring and Auditing Broiler Welfare. C. Weeks, and A. Butterworth, eds. CAB Int., Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK. pp. 51–59.
  • Kadim I.T., Al-Qamshui B.H.A., Mahgoub O., Al-Marzooqi W. and E.H. Johnson. 2009. The effects of ascorbic acid and seasonal temperatures on meat quality characteristics of broiler chickens maintained in open-sided and closed houses. International Journal of Poultry Science. 8: 733- 739.
  • Kampschöer M.V.T. 2007. Pass Reform Technical Documents. Setting Standarts for Uniformity. http://www.pasreform.com/academy.html.(Erişim Tarihi:17.02.2014).
  • Kannan G., Heath J.H., Wabeck C.J., Souza M.C.P., Howe J.C. and Mench J.A. 1997. Effects of crating and transport on stress and meat quality characteristics in broilers. Poultry Science. 76: 532-529.
  • Koca S. 2014. Beyaz Et İhracatı: Sorunlar ve Hedefler. Performans Dergisi. Mayıs, 2014. 183: 72-77.
  • Kun Z., Uluocak A.N. and M. Karaman. 2009. The influence of some factors on carcass defects during fattening period in broilers. Revista Archivos De Zootecnia. 58: 117-120.
  • Lin H., Zhang H. F., Jiao H. C., Zhao T., Sui S.J., Gu X.H., Zhang Z.Y., Buyse J. and E. Decuypere. 2005a. The thermoregulation response of broiler chickens to humidity at different ambient temperatures I. One-week-age. Poultry Science. 84: 1166-1172.
  • Lin H., Zhang H. F., Du R., Gu X.H., Zhang Z.Y., Buyse J. and E. Decuypere. 2005b. The thermoregulation response of broiler chickens to humidity at different ambient temperatures I. Fourweek-age. Poultry Science. 84: 1173-1178.
  • Lyon B.G. and C.E. Lyon. 1991. Research note: Shear value ranges by instron Warner-Bratzler and singleblade Allo-Kramer devices that correspond to sensory tenderness. Poultry Science. 70: 188-191.
  • Manning L., Chadd S.A. and R.D. Baines. 2007. Key health and welfare indicators for broiler production. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 63(1): 46-62.
  • Mayes F.J. 1980. The incidence of bruising in broiler flocks. British Poultry Science. 21: 505-509.
  • Meluzzi A., Fabbri C., Folegatti E. and F. Sirri. 2008. Survey of chicken rearing conditions in Italy: effects of litter quality and stocking density on productivity, foot dermatitis, carcase injuries and meat quality. British Poultry Science. 49: 257–264.
  • Moran E.T. 2004. Husbandry techniques. In: Poultry Meat Processing and Quality. Edited by:G.C.Mead. Published by Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, England. pp. 38-62.
  • Petracci M., Mudalal S., and C. Cavani. 2014. Meat quality in fast-growing broiler chickens. In the proceedings of 14th European Poultry Conference, Stavanger, Norway, pp. 221-234.
  • Puron D., Santamaria R., Segaura J.C. and J.L. Alamilla. 1995. Broiler performance at different stocking densities. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 4: 55–60.
  • Rahimi G., Rezaei M., Hafezian H. and H. Saiyahzadeh. 2005. The effect of intermittent lighting schedule on cellular and humoral immune responses in broiler performance. International Journal of Poultry Science. 4: 396-398.
  • Renden J. A., Moran Jr. E. T. and S.A. Kincaid. 1994. Lack of interactions between dietary lysine or strain cross and photoschedule for male broiler performance and carcass yield. Poultry Science. 73: 1651-1662.
  • Renden J. A., Moran Jr. E. T. and S.A. Kincaid. 1996. Lighting programs for broilers that reduce leg problems without loss of performance or yield. Poultry Science. 75: 1345-1350.
  • Scahaw. 2000. European Commission – Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Welfare 2000. The Welfare of Chickens Kept for Meat Production (Broilers) European Commission, Brussels, Belgium Adopted 21 March 2000.
  • Shepherd E. M. and B.D. Fairchild. 2010. Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poultry Science. 89: 2043- 2053.
  • Sorensen P., Su G. and S.C., Kestin. 2000. Effects of age and stocking density on leg weakness in broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 79: 864–870.
  • Tuncer, Ş. D. 2014. Broilerlerde beslenme ve pigmentasyon ilişkisi. Besd-Bir yayınları, Yayın no:18. S.6.
  • Vieira S.L. 2009, Broiler Carcass Quality, Sau Paulo.
Toplam 37 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Arda Sözcü Bu kişi benim

Mehmet Koyuncu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 19 Aralık 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Sözcü, A., & Koyuncu, M. (2015). Etlik Piliç Yetiştiriciliğinde Çevresel Koşulların ve Beslemenin Karkas Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1), 115-122.
AMA Sözcü A, Koyuncu M. Etlik Piliç Yetiştiriciliğinde Çevresel Koşulların ve Beslemenin Karkas Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri. Uludag Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg. Nisan 2015;29(1):115-122.
Chicago Sözcü, Arda, ve Mehmet Koyuncu. “Etlik Piliç Yetiştiriciliğinde Çevresel Koşulların Ve Beslemenin Karkas Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 29, sy. 1 (Nisan 2015): 115-22.
EndNote Sözcü A, Koyuncu M (01 Nisan 2015) Etlik Piliç Yetiştiriciliğinde Çevresel Koşulların ve Beslemenin Karkas Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 29 1 115–122.
IEEE A. Sözcü ve M. Koyuncu, “Etlik Piliç Yetiştiriciliğinde Çevresel Koşulların ve Beslemenin Karkas Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri”, Uludag Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg., c. 29, sy. 1, ss. 115–122, 2015.
ISNAD Sözcü, Arda - Koyuncu, Mehmet. “Etlik Piliç Yetiştiriciliğinde Çevresel Koşulların Ve Beslemenin Karkas Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 29/1 (Nisan 2015), 115-122.
JAMA Sözcü A, Koyuncu M. Etlik Piliç Yetiştiriciliğinde Çevresel Koşulların ve Beslemenin Karkas Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri. Uludag Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg. 2015;29:115–122.
MLA Sözcü, Arda ve Mehmet Koyuncu. “Etlik Piliç Yetiştiriciliğinde Çevresel Koşulların Ve Beslemenin Karkas Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 29, sy. 1, 2015, ss. 115-22.
Vancouver Sözcü A, Koyuncu M. Etlik Piliç Yetiştiriciliğinde Çevresel Koşulların ve Beslemenin Karkas Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri. Uludag Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg. 2015;29(1):115-22.