Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2020, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 271 - 277, 15.09.2020
https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Ahmad, I., Iftikhar, S., Soomro, M.H and Aslam, M. (1991). Investigation of powdery scab of potato in Pakistan CDRI-PSPDR, PARC, Islamabad, Pakistan, pp. 1-2.
  • Arega, A., Tekilen, A., Solomon, T and Tekile, B. (2018). Effect of inter and intra row Spacing on Tuber Yield and Yield Components of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Guji zone, Southern Ethiopia. Journal od advancements in plant science. 1: 1-11.
  • Chandra,R., Birhman, R.K. (1994). In vitro micropropagation in relation to pedigree in potato. J. Indian Potato Assoc. 21(1&2):87.
  • Demo, P., Low W.J, Mwenye, J.O. (2007). Potato production in Malawi: strength, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. African potato association conference proceedings, Alexandria, Egypt. 7, 339-345.
  • Demo, P., Pankomera P, Connel, L. T, Khumar, N. (2009). Potential of potato farming in improving the livelihoods of small scale farmers in Malawi. African crop science conference proceedings, Uganda: Afr. Crop Sci. Soc. P.9. Retrived from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20133232452
  • Essah, S.Y.C. and Honeycutt, C.W. (2004). Tillage and seed-sprouting strategies to improve potato yield and quality in short season climates. American Journal of Potato Research, 81, 177-186. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02871747
  • FAOSTAT. (2008). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistical Database. Retrived from http//faostat.fao.org
  • GOP, Govt. of Pakistan. Ministry of Finance 2016-17. Economic survey of Pakistan 2016-17. Economic advisor’s wing, Islamabad. Retrived from http://www.finance.gov.pk/survey_1617.html
  • Gulluoglu, L. and Arıoglu, H. (2009). Effects of seed size and in row spacing on growth and yield of early potato in a Mediterranean-type environment in Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research.4 (5):535-541. Retrived from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20093175520
  • Hani, N.M.B., Said, J.A., Al-Tabbal, Haddad, M.A., Aldalin in, H.K, Al-Fraihat, Alhrout, H.H., Hasan, H.S . and Aldabbas, F.M. (2018). Effect of plant density on water use efficiency and quality of potato (Solanum Tuberosum L. Cv. Spunta) in the Jordan valley. Journal of Agricultural Science. 10: 203-214.
  • Hawkes, J. (1990). The potato evolution, biodiversity and genetic resources.1990 pp.viii + 259 pp. ref.7 pp. Retrived from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19901615687
  • Idoko, J. A., Osang, P.O. & Ngbian, Z. (2017). Effect Of Intra-Row Spacing And Portion Of Planting Material On The Growth And Yield Of Sweet Potato In Makurdi, Southern Guinea Savannah Agro-Ecological Zone Of Nigeria. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR). 3: 5, 1345-1355.
  • Lommen, W.J.M. (1999). Causes for low tuber yields of transplants from in vitro potato plantlets of early cultivars after field planting. Journal of Agricultural Science. 133:275-284. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185969900698X
  • Murashige T. & Skoog F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15, 473-497.
  • Mahmood, A. (2005). A study of planting method and spacing on yield potato using Tps, Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 4(2):102-105. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2005.102.105 
  • Malik, N. J. (1995). Potato in Pakistan. A handbook. Word Mate. Islamabad. pp. 3-7.
  • Naik, P., Sarkar, D. (2000). Potato Global Research and Development, Volume-I, Indian Potato Association, Shimla, pp.194-211.
  • Ritter, E., Angulo, B., Riga, P. Herran, C., Relloso, J. and San Jose, M. (2001). Comparison of hydroponic and aeroponics cultivation systems for the production of potato mini-tubers. Potato Research44:127-135. Retrived from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02410099.pdf
  • Swaminathan, M.S., Sawyer, R.L. (1983). The potential of potato as a world food.In: Hook, W.J. (Ed.). Proceeding International Congress “Research for Potato in the Year 2000”, CIP, Lima, Peru, pp. 3-10.
  • Sultana, S., Shahiduzzaman, Md. (2016). Effect of plant spacing on the growth and yield of sweet potato cultivars in medium high land condition under AEZ-9.International Journal of Applied Research. 2(3): 108-112.
  • Tokita , N., Ichikawa , M., Kainuma , K., Kitazawa , T., Shimamura , H., Kanayama , A., Sato , S., Kurita , T., Youshimura , I., Tokita , T., Iwasaki , E and Iwasaki , T.(2015). Effects of planting density and fertilizer type on growth and yield of yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius) tubers. Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research. 5 (11): 38-41. Retrived from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f84c/69b84046d70a8895a0a4dccd88956014602d.pdf
  • Getachew, T., Belew, D and Tulu, S. (2013). Combined effect of plant spacing and time of earthing up on tuber quality parameters of potato (solanumtuberosuml.) At degem district, north showa zone of oromia regional state. Asian journal of crop science, 5: 24-32. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajcs.2013.24.32
  • Yenagi, B.S., Meli, S.S and Angadi, S.S. (2004). Effect of row spacing, planting date and nitrogen level on tuber grade, yield and economics of potato. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 17: 220-223.
  • Zerga, k., Alemu, M., Tebasa, F and Tesfaye, B. (2017). Impacts of different mulching material on seedling emergence and growth performance of hot pepper (Capsicum annum l) at gurage zone, Ethiopia. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. 7: 01-04. https://doi.org/10.25081/imrj.2017.v7.3362

Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 271 - 277, 15.09.2020
https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5

Öz

The present research work was conducted to find out the most suitable inter and intra spacing for Greenhouse transplantation of in vitro grown potato plantlets in peat moss soil in order to get maximum seed potato yield. There were nine different combinations of inter and intra row spacing (30x15, 30x10, 10x15, 20x5, 30x5, 10x5, 20x15, 10x10, 20x10cm) in completely randomized design. Regarding vegetative growth, maximum plant height i.e 59.01 cm, 58.92 cm, 57.01 cm was observed at 30cmx5cm, 20cmx5cm, and 10cmx5cm, respectively. Greater number of minitubers in each tuber category i.e. large, medium and small were obtained at greater inter and intra plant spacing , whereas the maximum average tubers yield per plant (165.0g) were recorded at spacing of 30cm x15cm followed by the spacing 20cm x10cm where the average yield per plant was 145.38g. It was concluded that the plant spacing of 30x15cm is the best for potato plantlets transplantation in the greenhouse benches in order to get maximum minituber yield. 

Kaynakça

  • Ahmad, I., Iftikhar, S., Soomro, M.H and Aslam, M. (1991). Investigation of powdery scab of potato in Pakistan CDRI-PSPDR, PARC, Islamabad, Pakistan, pp. 1-2.
  • Arega, A., Tekilen, A., Solomon, T and Tekile, B. (2018). Effect of inter and intra row Spacing on Tuber Yield and Yield Components of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Guji zone, Southern Ethiopia. Journal od advancements in plant science. 1: 1-11.
  • Chandra,R., Birhman, R.K. (1994). In vitro micropropagation in relation to pedigree in potato. J. Indian Potato Assoc. 21(1&2):87.
  • Demo, P., Low W.J, Mwenye, J.O. (2007). Potato production in Malawi: strength, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. African potato association conference proceedings, Alexandria, Egypt. 7, 339-345.
  • Demo, P., Pankomera P, Connel, L. T, Khumar, N. (2009). Potential of potato farming in improving the livelihoods of small scale farmers in Malawi. African crop science conference proceedings, Uganda: Afr. Crop Sci. Soc. P.9. Retrived from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20133232452
  • Essah, S.Y.C. and Honeycutt, C.W. (2004). Tillage and seed-sprouting strategies to improve potato yield and quality in short season climates. American Journal of Potato Research, 81, 177-186. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02871747
  • FAOSTAT. (2008). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistical Database. Retrived from http//faostat.fao.org
  • GOP, Govt. of Pakistan. Ministry of Finance 2016-17. Economic survey of Pakistan 2016-17. Economic advisor’s wing, Islamabad. Retrived from http://www.finance.gov.pk/survey_1617.html
  • Gulluoglu, L. and Arıoglu, H. (2009). Effects of seed size and in row spacing on growth and yield of early potato in a Mediterranean-type environment in Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research.4 (5):535-541. Retrived from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20093175520
  • Hani, N.M.B., Said, J.A., Al-Tabbal, Haddad, M.A., Aldalin in, H.K, Al-Fraihat, Alhrout, H.H., Hasan, H.S . and Aldabbas, F.M. (2018). Effect of plant density on water use efficiency and quality of potato (Solanum Tuberosum L. Cv. Spunta) in the Jordan valley. Journal of Agricultural Science. 10: 203-214.
  • Hawkes, J. (1990). The potato evolution, biodiversity and genetic resources.1990 pp.viii + 259 pp. ref.7 pp. Retrived from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19901615687
  • Idoko, J. A., Osang, P.O. & Ngbian, Z. (2017). Effect Of Intra-Row Spacing And Portion Of Planting Material On The Growth And Yield Of Sweet Potato In Makurdi, Southern Guinea Savannah Agro-Ecological Zone Of Nigeria. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR). 3: 5, 1345-1355.
  • Lommen, W.J.M. (1999). Causes for low tuber yields of transplants from in vitro potato plantlets of early cultivars after field planting. Journal of Agricultural Science. 133:275-284. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185969900698X
  • Murashige T. & Skoog F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15, 473-497.
  • Mahmood, A. (2005). A study of planting method and spacing on yield potato using Tps, Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 4(2):102-105. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2005.102.105 
  • Malik, N. J. (1995). Potato in Pakistan. A handbook. Word Mate. Islamabad. pp. 3-7.
  • Naik, P., Sarkar, D. (2000). Potato Global Research and Development, Volume-I, Indian Potato Association, Shimla, pp.194-211.
  • Ritter, E., Angulo, B., Riga, P. Herran, C., Relloso, J. and San Jose, M. (2001). Comparison of hydroponic and aeroponics cultivation systems for the production of potato mini-tubers. Potato Research44:127-135. Retrived from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02410099.pdf
  • Swaminathan, M.S., Sawyer, R.L. (1983). The potential of potato as a world food.In: Hook, W.J. (Ed.). Proceeding International Congress “Research for Potato in the Year 2000”, CIP, Lima, Peru, pp. 3-10.
  • Sultana, S., Shahiduzzaman, Md. (2016). Effect of plant spacing on the growth and yield of sweet potato cultivars in medium high land condition under AEZ-9.International Journal of Applied Research. 2(3): 108-112.
  • Tokita , N., Ichikawa , M., Kainuma , K., Kitazawa , T., Shimamura , H., Kanayama , A., Sato , S., Kurita , T., Youshimura , I., Tokita , T., Iwasaki , E and Iwasaki , T.(2015). Effects of planting density and fertilizer type on growth and yield of yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius) tubers. Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research. 5 (11): 38-41. Retrived from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f84c/69b84046d70a8895a0a4dccd88956014602d.pdf
  • Getachew, T., Belew, D and Tulu, S. (2013). Combined effect of plant spacing and time of earthing up on tuber quality parameters of potato (solanumtuberosuml.) At degem district, north showa zone of oromia regional state. Asian journal of crop science, 5: 24-32. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajcs.2013.24.32
  • Yenagi, B.S., Meli, S.S and Angadi, S.S. (2004). Effect of row spacing, planting date and nitrogen level on tuber grade, yield and economics of potato. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 17: 220-223.
  • Zerga, k., Alemu, M., Tebasa, F and Tesfaye, B. (2017). Impacts of different mulching material on seedling emergence and growth performance of hot pepper (Capsicum annum l) at gurage zone, Ethiopia. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. 7: 01-04. https://doi.org/10.25081/imrj.2017.v7.3362
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Ziraat, Veterinerlik ve Gıda Bilimleri
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Zishan Gul 0000-0002-4792-5268

Faizan Qureshi Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-0780-2909

Zafar Jamal Bu kişi benim 0000-0003-2441-6054

Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Eylül 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 2 Ocak 2020
Kabul Tarihi 15 Temmuz 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Gul, Z., Qureshi, F., & Jamal, Z. (2020). Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, 4(3), 271-277. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5
AMA Gul Z, Qureshi F, Jamal Z. Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. Eylül 2020;4(3):271-277. doi:10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5
Chicago Gul, Zishan, Faizan Qureshi, ve Zafar Jamal. “Growth and Minituber Yield Response of Potato Plantlets in Micropropagation to Different Plant Spacing under Greenhouse Conditions”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 4, sy. 3 (Eylül 2020): 271-77. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5.
EndNote Gul Z, Qureshi F, Jamal Z (01 Eylül 2020) Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 4 3 271–277.
IEEE Z. Gul, F. Qureshi, ve Z. Jamal, “Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions”, int. j. agric. environ. food sci., c. 4, sy. 3, ss. 271–277, 2020, doi: 10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5.
ISNAD Gul, Zishan vd. “Growth and Minituber Yield Response of Potato Plantlets in Micropropagation to Different Plant Spacing under Greenhouse Conditions”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 4/3 (Eylül 2020), 271-277. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5.
JAMA Gul Z, Qureshi F, Jamal Z. Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2020;4:271–277.
MLA Gul, Zishan vd. “Growth and Minituber Yield Response of Potato Plantlets in Micropropagation to Different Plant Spacing under Greenhouse Conditions”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, c. 4, sy. 3, 2020, ss. 271-7, doi:10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5.
Vancouver Gul Z, Qureshi F, Jamal Z. Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2020;4(3):271-7.

by-nc.png

International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences dergisinin içeriği, Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari (CC BY-NC) 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile yayınlanmaktadır. Söz konusu telif, üçüncü tarafların içeriği uygun şekilde atıf vermek koşuluyla, ticari olmayan amaçlarla paylaşımına ve uyarlamasına izin vermektedir. Yazarlar, International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences dergisinde yayınlanmış çalışmalarının telif hakkını elinde tutar. 

Web: dergipark.org.tr/jaefs  E-mail: editor@jaefs.com WhatsApp: +90 850 309 59 27