Accuracy Order of English Grammatical Morphemes of Saudi EFL Learners

Öz

Purpose: This paper investigates the accuracy order of grammatical morphemes followed by Saudi EFL learners. The major aim of the research was to reveal the pattern of grammatical morpheme acquisition of the participants, and to compare it against the Natural Order Hypothesis (NOH) as stated by Krashen (1977). The different factors that affected the generated order were also discussed. Research Methods:  The present research adopted a descriptive quantitative design. Three groups of male and female students (n= 258) participated in the study. The participants were selected randomly from public schools and university colleges. They responded to a grammar elicitation task designed to test their accuracy of using grammatical morphemes.

Pica's (1983) TLU method was used to assess the participants' performance. Findings:  It was found that Saudi EFL learners developed the accuracy of using grammatical morphemes in a similar sequence regardless of their educational stages. Although this sequence was fixed, there seemed to be a clear effect of the educational stage upon the quality of their usage. The generated accuracy order was found to be different from the NOH. This result suggested that the participants' first language (L1) affected the accuracy order of grammatical morphemes. Implications for research and practice: The findings of the study suggested that course book lesson plans should be designed according to the generated order to facilitate grammatical morpheme acquisition. Further research that will utilize a bigger size of samples is also required to confirm the generated order.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Second Language Acquisition,Morpheme Acquisition,Natural Order Hypothesis

Kaynakça

1. Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S. (1974). Is there a “natural sequence” in adult second language learning? Language Learning, 24, 235-243.
2. Barrot, J. (2010). Accuracy order of selected grammatical morphemes in the monitored written Compositions of Filipino adult language. Philippine ESL Journal, 4, 45 -65.
3. Behajat, F. & Sadighi, F. (2011). The acquisition of English grammatical morpheme: A case of Iranian EFL learners. The Modern Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 105-123.
4. Brown, R. (1973). A First language: The early stages. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.
5. Corder, P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161-171.
6. Dabove, A. (2014). A study of morpheme acquisition in an EFL corpus of L1 Spanish – L2 English: Some pedagogical implications (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from digibug.ugr.es/.../1/AGUSTINA%20DEMARTA%20TFM%20final%20version.pdf de Villiers, J., & de Villiers, P. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 2, 267-278.
7. Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied Linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1973). Natural sequence in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24(1), 37-53.

9. Ellis, R. (2010). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Ibrahim, A., Nor, M., & Abu, A. (2013). English grammatical morpheme acquisition order of Malay secondary school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI, Journal of Sultan Idris Education University, 4, 1-22.
11. Izumi, E. & Isahara, H. (2004). Investigation into language learners’ acquisition order based on an error analysis of a learner corpus. In L.
12. Anthony, S. Fujita, & Y. Harada (Ed.), An interactive workshop on language e-learning (pp. 63-71).
13. Kharrati, A., Ahmadi, S., Mohammaditabar, M., & Sadighi, F. (2015). The accuracy order of English grammatical morphemes of Iranian EFL learners: An explanation of a universal order. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 5(4), 43-51.
14. Khor, S. (2012). A corpus-based study in morpheme acquisition order of young learners of English. Retrieved from Uppsala University, www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:608517/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
15. Kim, J. (2001). Grammatical morpheme accuracy order in Korean adult learners of English (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3039252).
16. Kown, E. (2005). The “natural order” of morpheme acquisition: A historical survey and discussion of three putative determinants. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 1-21.
17. Krashen, S. (1977). The monitor model for adult second language performance. In Burt, M., Dulay, H., & Finocchiaro, M. (Ed.), Viewpoints on English as a second language. New York, Regents Publishing.
18. Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. New York: Pergamon Press Inc.
19. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press Inc.
20. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Luk, Z., & Shirai, Y. (2009). Is the acquisition order of grammatical morphemes impervious to L1 knowledge? Evidence from the acquisition of plural -s, articles, and possessive ’s. Language Learning, 59(4), 721-754.
22. Mansouri, F. (Ed.). (2008). Second language acquisition research: Theory construction and testing. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.
23. Murkami, A., & T. Alexopoulou. (2016). L1 influence on the acquisition order of English grammatical morphemes: A learner corpus study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 365 - 401. doi:10.1017/S0272263115000352
24. Murakami, A. (2013). Individual variation and the role of L1 in the L2 development of English grammatical morphemes: Insights from learner corpora (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge). Retrieved from https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/254430.
25. Pica, T. (1983). Target-like use (TLU) analysis. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopaedia of second language acquisition (pp. 627-628). London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
26. Schenk, A. & Choi, W. (2013). Unlocking the secrets of morphosyntactic development by examining acquisition order of disparities in an EFL context. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 3(1), 47-57. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2013.31006
27. Seliger, H., & Shohamy, E. (2000). (2000): Second language research methods (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Seog, D. S. Y. (2015). Accuracy order of grammatical morphemes of Korean EFL learners: Disparities among the same L1 groups. Linguistic Research 32 Special Edition, 151-171.
29. VanPatten, B., & Benati, A. (2010). Key terms in SLA. London and New York. Continuum International Publishing Group.