EU’s Taiwan Policy in The Context of European Strategic Autonomy

Abstract

This article analyzes the European Union's (EU) Taiwan policy in the context of European strategic autonomy. The concept of European strategic autonomy lacks a clear framework and is challenged by the inherent problems of its applicability. Historically, strategic autonomy has been present in EU documents and discourse for over a decade, but its meaning has been transformed by regional and global challenges. The situation becomes more complex in the context of the EU's Taiwan policy, which is the focus of this study. On the one hand, EU official documents show that rising tensions and regional geopolitical challenges in the Indo-Pacific, especially in the Taiwan Strait, have a direct impact on Europe's security. On the other hand, the EU officially respects the 'One China policy', albeit with caution on issues such as respect for democratic norms and human rights. Moreover, in terms of the EU's Taiwan policy, the strategic autonomy approach could have very important economic, political, security and defense implications. However, this article argues that the EU is unlikely to act as an autonomous actor in the Indo-Pacific region due to the push and pull factors of global actors such as the United States and China. It analyzes the EU's Taiwan policy within the framework of strategic autonomy, sheds light on EU-Taiwan relations and assesses the challenges to European strategic autonomy in the Indo-Pacific region.

Keywords

• European Strategic Autonomy
• European Union
• Taiwan
• Indo-Pacific

Supporting Institution

No funding or support was received for this study.

Ethical Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Thanks

The authors have no additional acknowledgments to declare.

Avrupa Stratejik Özerkliği Bağlamında AB’nin Tayvan Politikası

Abstract

Bu makale, Avrupa Birliği'nin (AB) Tayvan politikasını Avrupa'nın stratejik özerkliği çerçevesinde incelemektedir. Avrupa stratejik özerkliği kavramı hem net bir çerçevesinin olmaması hem de AB için uygulanabilirliğinin doğasında var olan sorunlar nedeniyle zorluklarla doludur. Tarihsel olarak stratejik özerklik on yılı aşkın bir süredir AB belgelerinde ve söyleminde yer almakla birlikte, anlamı bölgesel ve küresel zorluklarla değişime uğramıştır. Bu çalışmanın odak noktası olan AB'nin Tayvan politikası bağlamında ise analiz daha kompleks bir hal almaktadır. Bir yandan AB'nin resmî belgelerine göre Hint-Pasifik bölgesinde ve özellikle Tayvan Boğazı'nda artan gerilim ve bölgesel jeopolitik zorluklar Avrupa'nın güvenliği üzerinde doğrudan etkiye sahiptir. Öte yandan AB, demokratik normlara ve insan haklarına saygı gibi konularda bazı çekinceler ortaya koysa da resmi olarak 'Tek Çin politikasına' saygı duymaktadır. AB'nin Tayvan politikası açısından stratejik özerkliğin önemli ekonomik, siyasi, güvenlik ve savunma sonuçları bulunmaktadır. Ancak bu makale, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ve Çin gibi aktörlerin itme ve çekme faktörleri nedeniyle AB'nin Hint-Pasifik bölgesinde özerk bir aktör olarak hareket kabiliyetinin sınırlı olduğunu savunmaktadır. Makale, AB'nin Tayvan politikasını stratejik özerklik çerçevesinde analiz etmekte, AB-Tayvan ilişkilerine ışık tutmakta ve Hint-Pasifik bölgesinde Avrupa'nın stratejik özerkliğine yönelik zorlukları değerlendirmektedir.

Keywords

• Avrupa stratejik özerkliği
• Avrupa Birliği
• Tayvan
• Hint-Pasifik

Supporting Institution

Çalışmada herhangi bir kurum ya da kuruluştan destek alınmamıştır.

Ethical Statement

Çalışmada herhangi bir potansiyel çıkar çatışması söz konusu değildir.

Thanks

Yazarların ek teşekkür beyanı bulunmamaktadır.

References

1. Adıbelli, Barış. Çin Dış Politikasında Tayvan Sorunu. IQ Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık, 2006.
2. “Avrupa Çip Yasası Yürürlüğe Girdi.” Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Avrupa Birliği Başkanlığı. September 22, 2023. https://ab.gov.tr/p.php?e=53606
3. Azimli Çilingir, Gülcan and Doğan Durna. “Uluslararası Hukuk Açısından Tayvan’ın Durumu”. In Türkiye’de Tayvan Çalışmaları-III: Tarih, Ekonomi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler, edited by A. Merthan Dündar. Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları 752, Asya-Pasifik Çalışmaları Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi APAM Yayınları 24, 2022.
4. Bajpai, Prableen. “An Overview of Taiwan’s Economy.” Nasdaq. October 18, 2022. https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/an-overview-of-taiwans-economy.
5. Borrell, Josep. “Why European Strategic Autonomy Matters?” December 3, 2020. Accessed March 14, 2024. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/why-european-strategic-autonomy-matters_en.
6. Blanchard, Ben and Thomas Escritt. “Germany spends big to win $11 billion TSMC chip plant.” Reuters. August 8, 2023. https://www.reuters.com/technology/taiwan-chipmaker-tsmc-approves-38-bln-germany-factory-plan-2023-08-08/
7. Brustlein, Corentin. “European Strategic Autonomy: Balancing Ambition and Responsibility.” Ifri: Editoriaux de l’Ifri, November 16, 2018.
8. Carpenter, Ted Gallen. America’s Coming War with China: A Collision Course over Taiwan. Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.

9. Chandler, Jennifer. “When the supply chain breaks: strategies for the chip shortage.” Journal of Business Strategy, 2023, Vol.44, No.5, 287-293. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-02-2022-0029.
10. Cheng-Yi, Lin ve Wen-Cheng Lin. “Democracy, Divided National Identity, and Taiwan’s National Security.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy, Vol: 1, No: 2, 2005, 69-87.
11. “China Mutual Defense (1954)”, American Institute in Taiwan. Accessed March 18, 2024. https://web-archive-2017.ait.org.tw/en/sino-us-mutual-defense-treaty-1954.html.
12. Damen, Mario. “Briefing EU Strategic Autonomy Monitor.” European Parliamentary Research Service, 2022. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/733589/EPRS_BRI(2022)733589_EN.pdf..
13. Diez, Thomas. “Constructing the Self and Changing Others: Reconsidering `Normative Power Europe’.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 33, no. 3 (June 2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330031701.
14. EEAS. “A Strategic Compass for Security and Defence.” 2022. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/strategic-compass-security-and-defence-1_en.
15. ———. “EU-US: Dialogue on China and Indo-Pacific Consultations.” 2024. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/eu-us-dialogue-china-and-indo-pacific-consultations_en.
16. ———. “Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe a Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy,” 2016. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_review_web_0.pdf.
17. ———. “Taiwan: Statement by the Spokesperson on China’s Military Drills.” 2024. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/taiwan-statement-spokesperson-china%E2%80%99s-military-drills_en.
18. European Commission. “A New Industrial Strategy for a Globally Competitive, Green and Digital Europe.” 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_416.
19. ———. “EU-US Trade and Technology Council.” 2022. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/stronger-europe-world/eu-us-trade-and-technology-council_en.
20. ———. “The EU Strategy for Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific.” September 16, 2021. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/jointcommunication_2021_24_1_en.pdf.
21. ———.“Taiwan.” https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions/taiwan_en.
22. European Commission: Joint Research Centre and Kroll, H. “Assessing open strategic autonomy.” Publications Office of the European Union, 2024
23. European Council. “European Green Deal.” 2023. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/green-deal/.
24. European Parliament. “EU-Taiwan Political Relations and Cooperation.” October 21, 2021. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0431_EN.html.
25. Fairbank John King and Merle Goldman, China: A New History. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006.
26. John King Fairbank, The Cambridge History of China: Volume 12, Republican China (1912-1949), Part I. Cambridge University Press, 1983.
27. Fiott, Daniel. “Strategic Autonomy: Towards ‘European Sovereignty’ in Defence?” 2018. https://www.iss.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUISSFiles/Brief%2012__Strategic%20Autonomy.pdf.
28. Gelber, Harry G. M.Ö 1100’den Günümüze Çin Ve Dünya: Ejder ve Yabancı Deccallar. Translated by H.Hülya Kocaoluk. Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2007.
29. George, Alexander L, and Andrew Bennett. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT, 2005.
30. Gerring, John. Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
31. ———. “What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good For?” American Political Science Review 98, no. 2 (May 2004): 341–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404001182.
32. Haruko, Wada. “The ‘Indo-Pacific’ Concept: Geographical Adjustments and Their Implications.” RSIS Working Paper No:326, 2020.
33. Helwig, Niklas, and Ville Sinkkonen. “Strategic Autonomy and the EU as a Global Actor: The Evolution, Debate and Theory of a Contested Term.” European Foreign Affairs Review 27, no. Special Issue (April 1, 2022): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2022009.
34. Howorth, Jolyon. “EU’s Strategic Autonomy: Origins, Challenges, and Prospects”. European Policy Centre, 2019.
35. ———. “Strategic Autonomy: Why It’s Not about Europe Going It Alone.” European View 18, no. 2 (October 2019): 254–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685819883195.
36. Huang, Ray. Çin Tarihi: Bir Makro Tarih Yaklaşımı. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2005.
37. Kan, Shirley A. and Wayne M. Morrison. “US-Taiwan Relationship: Overview of Policy Issues.” CRS Report, 2014.Koga, Kei. “Japan and the Development of Quadrilateral Cooperation.” Pensamiento Propio, 54, 2021, 157-186. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/155556.
38. Krumbein, Frédéric. “Leaving the Dragon’s Shadow – Normative Power Europe and the Emergence of a Taiwan Policy in the EU?” Journal of European Integration 46, no. 2 (September 25, 2023): 171–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2258263.
39. Le Corre, Philippe. “The “Rebirth” of Europe-Taiwan Relations: Explaining Europe’s New Balance Between Beijing and Taipei.”Asia Society Policy Institute. January 10, 2024. https://asiasociety.org/policy-institute/rebirth-europe-taiwan-relations-explaining-europes-new-balance-between-beijing-and-taipei
40. Macron, E. “Initiative pour l’Europe- Discours d'Emmanuel Macron pour une Europe souveraine, unie, démocratique.” (September 26, 2017), https://www.elysee.fr/emmanuel-macron/2017/09/26/initiative-pour-l-europe-discours-d-emmanuel-macron-pour-une-europe-souveraine-unie-democratique
41. ———. “Discours sur l’Europe”, (April 24, 2024). https://www.elysee.fr/emmanuel-macron/2024/04/24/discours-sur-leurope
42. Manners, Ian. “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40, no. 2 (June 2002): 235–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00353.
43. McBride James, Noah Berman and Andrew Chatzky, “China’s Massive Belt and Road Initiative.” February 2, 2023, Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-massive-belt-and-road-initiative
44. McCarthy, Simone. “China’s Xi claims ‘reunification’ with Taiwan is ‘inevitable’ as crucial election looms.” CNN. December 26, 2023, https://edition.cnn.com/2023/12/27/china/china-xi-jinping-taiwan-reunification-intl-hnk/index.html
45. Olkan, Kartal Batuhan, “Çin-ABD İlişkilerinde Güvenlik İkilemi: Tayvan Sorunu”, Journal of Business, Innovation and Governance, Vol:4, No:1, 2021, 27-41.
46. Pekcan, Cemre. Çin Dış Politikası ve ABD ile İlişkiler. Dora Basım Yayın Dağıtım, 2019.
47. Pekcan, Cemre and Ayşe Gülce Uygun. “Çin’in Akdeniz Politikaları Kapsamında Avrupa Birliği-Çin Stratejik Ortaklığı.” Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 35, no. 3 (May 6, 2021): 1145–64. https://doi.org/10.16951/atauniiibd.907251.
48. “Relations with the EU, Belgium and Luxembourg.” Taipei Representative Office in the EU and Belgium, July 3, 2017. https://www.taiwanembassy.org/be_en/post/115.html. Shin, Francis. “The Prospects for Taiwan-EU Cooperation.” The Diplomat. February 16, 2024. https://thediplomat.com/2024/02/the-prospects-for-taiwan-eu-cooperation/
49. Shafar, Guy. “The Lithuania-Taiwan Saga: Reshaping EU-China Relations and European Unity.” Foreign Affairs Review. October 15,2021. https://www.foreignaffairsreview.com/home/the-lithuania-taiwan-saga-reshaping-eu-china-relations-and-european-unity.
50. Shattuck, Thomas J. “Lithuania’s Bet on Taiwan and What It Means for Europe.” Foreign Policy Research Institute. July 20, 2023. https://www.fpri.org/article/2023/07/lithuanias-bet-on-taiwan-and-what-it-means-for-europe/.
51. Suzuki, Hiroyuki. “Japan’s Leadership Role in a Multipolar Indo-Pacific.” Center for Strategic & International Studies, 2020, 1-12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep26987.pdf.
52. “Taiwan’s dominance of the chip industry makes it more important.” The Economist. March 6, 2023. https://www.economist.com/special-report/2023/03/06/taiwans-dominance-of-the-chip-industry-makes-it-more-important?utm_medium=cpc.adword.pd&utm_source=google&ppccampaignID=18151738051&ppcadID=&utm_campaign=a.22brand_pmax&utm_content=conversion.direct-response.anonymous&gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjw57exBhAsEiwAaIxaZlmE8rVtSf_bcg-doDjEJA93lO_EmCclDEsuOSaFX79bx2yDk4rPuhoC_oAQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds
53. “The European Union and Taiwan.” European Economic and Trade Office in Taiwan, July 26, 2021. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/taiwan/european-union-and-taiwan_en?s=242.
54. “The Chinese Dream Is a Dream of the People.” Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 2022. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/topics_665678/zggcddwjw100ggs/xsd/202208/t20220826_10754300.html
55. Tobin, James, “AUKUS Security Partnership”, 19 February, 2024, House of Lords Library. Retrieved from https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/aukus-security-partnership/
56. Torreblanca, José Ignacio. “Onwards and Outwards: Why the EU Needs to Move from Strategic Autonomy to Strategic Interdependence.” ECFR. European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), August 24, 2023. https://ecfr.eu/article/onwards-and-outwards-why-the-eu-needs-to-move-from-strategic-autonomy-to-strategic-interdependence.
57. “Trans-Pacific Partnership: Summary of U.S. Objectives.” Office of the United States Trade Representative. https://ustr.gov/tpp/Summary-of-US-objectives
58. “U.N. Resolution 2758.” American Institute in Taiwan. October 25, 1971. https://web-archive-2017.ait.org.tw/en/un-res-2758-voted-to-admit-communist-china.html
59. Vohra, A. “‘Strategic Autonomy’ Is a French Pipe Dream”. July 3, 2023. https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/07/03/strategic-autonomy-is-a-french-pipe-dream/
60. Von Der Leyen, Ursula. “Europe’s Choice: Political Guidelines for the next European Commission 2024−2029.” 2024. https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/e6cd4328-673c-4e7a-8683-f63ffb2cf648_en?filename=Political%20Guidelines%202024-2029_EN.pdf.
61. Walker, Alex. “Macron, Taiwan, and European Strategic Autonomy - UK in a Changing Europe.” April 19, 2023. https://ukandeu.ac.uk/macron-taiwan-and-european-strategic-autonomy/.
62. Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, 2003.