CLAIM FOR DAMAGES BASED ON UNFAIR PROVISIONAL MEASURES UNDER THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE NO. 6100

Number: 3 May 1, 2013
Cenk Akil
EN TR

CLAIM FOR DAMAGES BASED ON UNFAIR PROVISIONAL MEASURES UNDER THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE NO. 6100

Abstract

It is contented with presuptive evidence at the rendering of the decision of provisional measure. The counter party is not listened during the decision of provisional measure. Therefore, it is possible that the party demanding the provisional measures may be proved right in the claim for damages at the end of the claim. In the meantime, counter party or third party may suffer material or moral damage due to the rendering of implementation of the decision of provisional measure. Hence the right to claim for damages against the party who has the provisional measures imposed upon the damaged party has been granted to the injured party. The party who has the provisional measures imposed does not have to be faulty in order to file this lawsuit against him. The period of prescription to claim for damages is one year starting from the finalization of the decision or the removing of the provisional measure.

Keywords

The law of civil procedure, temporary legal protections, provisional measures, provisional attachment, claim for damages due to unfair provisional measures.

References

  1. No references found
APA
Akil, C. (2013). 6100 SAYILI HUKUK MUHAKEMELERİ KANUNU’NDA HAKSIZ İHTİYATİ TEDBİR NEDENİYLE AÇILAN TAZMİNAT DAVASI. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 3, 172-194. https://izlik.org/JA34LG96JT
AMA
1.Akil C. 6100 SAYILI HUKUK MUHAKEMELERİ KANUNU’NDA HAKSIZ İHTİYATİ TEDBİR NEDENİYLE AÇILAN TAZMİNAT DAVASI. JABA. 2013;(3):172-194. https://izlik.org/JA34LG96JT
Chicago
Akil, Cenk. 2013. “6100 SAYILI HUKUK MUHAKEMELERİ KANUNU’NDA HAKSIZ İHTİYATİ TEDBİR NEDENİYLE AÇILAN TAZMİNAT DAVASI”. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, nos. 3: 172-94. https://izlik.org/JA34LG96JT.
EndNote
Akil C (May 1, 2013) 6100 SAYILI HUKUK MUHAKEMELERİ KANUNU’NDA HAKSIZ İHTİYATİ TEDBİR NEDENİYLE AÇILAN TAZMİNAT DAVASI. Ankara Barosu Dergisi 3 172–194.
IEEE
[1]C. Akil, “6100 SAYILI HUKUK MUHAKEMELERİ KANUNU’NDA HAKSIZ İHTİYATİ TEDBİR NEDENİYLE AÇILAN TAZMİNAT DAVASI”, JABA, no. 3, pp. 172–194, May 2013, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA34LG96JT
ISNAD
Akil, Cenk. “6100 SAYILI HUKUK MUHAKEMELERİ KANUNU’NDA HAKSIZ İHTİYATİ TEDBİR NEDENİYLE AÇILAN TAZMİNAT DAVASI”. Ankara Barosu Dergisi. 3 (May 1, 2013): 172-194. https://izlik.org/JA34LG96JT.
JAMA
1.Akil C. 6100 SAYILI HUKUK MUHAKEMELERİ KANUNU’NDA HAKSIZ İHTİYATİ TEDBİR NEDENİYLE AÇILAN TAZMİNAT DAVASI. JABA. 2013;:172–194.
MLA
Akil, Cenk. “6100 SAYILI HUKUK MUHAKEMELERİ KANUNU’NDA HAKSIZ İHTİYATİ TEDBİR NEDENİYLE AÇILAN TAZMİNAT DAVASI”. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, no. 3, May 2013, pp. 172-94, https://izlik.org/JA34LG96JT.
Vancouver
1.Cenk Akil. 6100 SAYILI HUKUK MUHAKEMELERİ KANUNU’NDA HAKSIZ İHTİYATİ TEDBİR NEDENİYLE AÇILAN TAZMİNAT DAVASI. JABA [Internet]. 2013 May 1;(3):172-94. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA34LG96JT