Aim: In the endobronchial treatment of tumors that cause obstruction in the tracheobronchial system; Applications such as cryo-recanalization and argon plasma coagulation (APC) are widely used. Patients presenting with central airway obstruction (CAO) require urgent intervention, sharing the airway with the bronchoscopist, severe shortness of breath in patients, and the presence of comorbid diseases make it difficult for anesthetists. This situation becomes more complicated due to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes in geriatric patients. In this article, it is aimed to present the anesthesia method in geriatric patients who underwent interventional bronchoscopy due to central airway obstruction.
Material and Method: The files of geriatric patients who underwent interventional procedures for central airway obstruction between January 2021 and September 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. The treatments applied to the patients and the applied anesthetic protocols were recorded.
Results: Forty-five geriatric patients who underwent interventional procedures for CAO were identified. 74% of the patients were male. 95.6% of the patients were in the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III or ASA IV risk group, which we can refer to as the high risk group. It was observed that rapid and short-acting propofol and remifentanil were used in induction and maintenance of anesthesia, rocuronium was used as muscle relaxant, and sugammadex was used to eliminate the residual effect of the muscle relaxant.
Conclusion: Airway management is very complex in severe life-threatening airway stenosis. This situation requires a more comprehensive preoperative evaluation, selection of appropriate short-acting anesthetics, and effective anesthetic monitoring, especially in geriatric patients. In addition, the anesthetist and bronchoscopist should be prepared and in constant communication against complications that may develop.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Health Care Administration |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | January 24, 2022 |
Published in Issue | Year 2022 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI is under evaluation.
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"