Aim: Thoracotomy is among the most painful surgical incisions and causes severe acute pain in the postoperative period. Many analgesic methods have been suggested for thoracotomy pain treatment. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) are common regional methods for post-thoracotomy pain. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and the side effects of TEA and TPVB methods applied for post-thoracotomy analgesia.
Material and Method: After ethical committee approval, we retrospectively analyzed postoperative analgesia records of patients, who underwent thoracotomy, received TEA or TPVB for postoperative analgesia between 01.01.2019 and 01.01.2021. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores of the patients who received analgesic treatment for 24 hours postoperatively after TEA or TPVB application were evaluated.
Results: Data of 474 patients were found eligible for analysis. Demographic data of patients, VAS scores, patient satisfaction, and additional analgesic requirements were not statistically significant between the groups (p>0.05). Nausea-vomiting, hypotension, headache, itching, and sweating was statistically significantly higher in the TEA group when compared to patients who underwent TPVB (p<0.05).
Conclusion: In the present study, in the early postoperative pain management after thoracotomy; it was observed that preemptive TPVB and postoperative IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and TEA provided similar VAS scores and additional analgesic requirements. On the other hand, postoperative complications were observed less frequently in patients who underwent TPVB with postoperative IV PCA compared to TEA. Therefore, TPVB may be a good alternative to prevent acute pain after thoracotomy.
Postoperative acute pain thoracic epidural analgesia thoracic paravertebral block thoracotomy
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Health Care Administration |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | January 24, 2022 |
Published in Issue | Year 2022 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI is under evaluation.
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"