Research Article

Meningomyelocele defect report: surgical technique selection

Volume: 6 Number: 5 September 30, 2024
EN

Meningomyelocele defect report: surgical technique selection

Abstract

Aims: Surgical repair of meningomyelocele is important in terms of infection, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, and preservation of neural structures. While there are numerous techniques available for repair, there are few guidelines on when flap repair should be performed. In this study, we employed a method to select the surgical technique. Methods: Thirty-two patients with meningomyelocele who underwent surgery were included in the study. The decision to use or not to use a flap was based on the ratio of defect height to width and the ratio of the axillary line to defect width. Results: Fasciocutaneous transposition flap (FTF) repair was performed in 17 patients, whereas primary repair was performed in 15 patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of preoperative characteristics of the patients. In the FTF group, one patient experienced necrosis at the wound site, and one patient developed a cerebrospinal fluid fistula. In the primary repair group, necrosis was observed in one patient, CSF fistula developed in two patients, and central nervous system infection developed in one patient. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of complications. Conclusion: The results obtained in the present study suggest that the shape of the defect and the ratio of intact tissue to defect size are more important than the size of the defect itself in achieving appropriate tension during repair. By employing the patient selection guidelines we achieved successful outcomes using a different flap technique.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

The entire study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (as revised in 2004 and 2008) This retrospective cohort study was approved by the ethics committee of Harran University (HRU/23.24.03, date of approval 25. 12. 2023). Since this was a retrospective study, consent was not obtained from the patients or their relatives.

References

  1. Schroeder HK, Nunes JC, Madeira L, et al. Postsurgical infection after myelomeningocele repair: a multivariate analysis of 60 consecutive cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114(7):981-985.
  2. Liptak GS, Dosa NP. Myelomeningocele. Pediatr Rev. 2010;31(11):443-450.
  3. Sarifakioglu N, Bingül F, Terzioglu A, et al. Bilateral split latissimus dorsi V-Y flaps for closure of large thoracolumbar meningomyelocele defects. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56(3):303-306.
  4. Blanco-Dávila F, Luce EA. Current considerations for myelomeningocele repair. J Craniofac Surg. 2000;11(5):500-508.
  5. Turhan Haktanir N, Eser O, Demir Y, et al. Repair of wide myelomeningocele defects with the bilateral fasciocutaneous flap method. Turk Neurosurg. 2008;18(3):311-315.
  6. Atik B, Tan O, Kiymaz N, et al. Bilobed fasciocutaneous flap closure of large meningomyeloceles. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56(5):562-564.
  7. Kemaloğlu CA, Özyazgan İ, Ünverdi Ö F. A decision-making guide for the closure of myelomeningocele skin defects with or without primary repair. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;18(2):187-191.
  8. Mutaf M, Bekerecioğlu M, Erkutlu I, et al. A new technique for closure of large meningomyelocele defects. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59(5):538-543.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Brain and Nerve Surgery (Neurosurgery)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2024

Submission Date

September 4, 2024

Acceptance Date

September 20, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 6 Number: 5

APA
Besnek, A. (2024). Meningomyelocele defect report: surgical technique selection. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, 6(5), 331-334. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1543785
AMA
1.Besnek A. Meningomyelocele defect report: surgical technique selection. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2024;6(5):331-334. doi:10.38053/acmj.1543785
Chicago
Besnek, Atakan. 2024. “Meningomyelocele Defect Report: Surgical Technique Selection”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 6 (5): 331-34. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1543785.
EndNote
Besnek A (September 1, 2024) Meningomyelocele defect report: surgical technique selection. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 6 5 331–334.
IEEE
[1]A. Besnek, “Meningomyelocele defect report: surgical technique selection”, Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 331–334, Sept. 2024, doi: 10.38053/acmj.1543785.
ISNAD
Besnek, Atakan. “Meningomyelocele Defect Report: Surgical Technique Selection”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 6/5 (September 1, 2024): 331-334. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1543785.
JAMA
1.Besnek A. Meningomyelocele defect report: surgical technique selection. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2024;6:331–334.
MLA
Besnek, Atakan. “Meningomyelocele Defect Report: Surgical Technique Selection”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, Sept. 2024, pp. 331-4, doi:10.38053/acmj.1543785.
Vancouver
1.Atakan Besnek. Meningomyelocele defect report: surgical technique selection. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2024 Sep. 1;6(5):331-4. doi:10.38053/acmj.1543785

 

TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
 

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency:  Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show

 

Journal Indexes and Platforms: 

TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.


 

The indexes of the journal's are;


 

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiVHJfSW5kZXhfbG9nby5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiMDFiOS82MmZhLzA3MzMvNjlkZjNlNTdhMmI4ZjkuODYxMzMxMjQucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzc2MjQxNzY3LCJub25jZSI6ImQyMTQ4MjdiNTg1ZjVmMGQwYzAzZTMxNzMwM2QwMThmIn0.RmnGvwR536HdIoKpGO-ApytZ5aRPRT_BFXE2EpGSIqc

asos-index.png
 
f9ab67f.png
 
WorldCat_Logo_H_Color.png
 

 

18596download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiT3BlbkFpcmUuanBnIiwicGF0aCI6IjUyMWYvZjljYy8wMDk3LzY5ZGYzZDNiYmVkZGU0LjQzNDM2OTU3LmpwZyIsImV4cCI6MTc3NjI0MTQ4NCwibm9uY2UiOiIwYjgxZDE2NzRiNzhjMWQyOGVmMDM1OTA1MzI5NjdjZiJ9.xeFppR1ubA4i-dHG-u07ht9bQNogFheXQjLyEaP9GgAimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQgDnBwx0yUPRKuetgIurtELxYERFv20CPAUcPe4jYrrJiwXzac8rGXlzd57gl8iikb1Tk&usqp=CAU

 

84039476_619085835534619_7808805634291269632_n.jpg

 

 

 

The platforms of the journal's are;
 

COPE.jpg
 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTbq2FM8NTdXECzlOUCeKQ1dvrISFL-LhxhC7zy1ZQeJk-GGKSx2XkWQvrsHxcfhtfHWxM&usqp=CAUicmje_1_orig.png
 
 
ncbi.png
 
ORCID_logo.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQlwX77nfpy3Bu9mpMBZa0miWT2sRt2zjAPJKg2V69ODTrjZM1nT1BbhWzTVPsTNKJMZzQ&usqp=CAU
 

 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTaWSousoprPWGwE-qxwxGH2y0ByZ_zdLMN-Oq93MsZpBVFOTfxi9uXV7tdr39qvyE-U0I&usqp=CAU
 


 


 

 


 


The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
 

TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit 
 


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"

 

All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND)