Research Article

Surgical treatment outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of 32 patients and evaluation of prognostic factors

Volume: 8 Number: 3 May 22, 2026

Surgical treatment outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of 32 patients and evaluation of prognostic factors

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent surgical treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and to identify prognostic factors. Methods: Thirty-two patients who underwent surgical treatment for CSM at our clinic between 2019 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, preoperative and postoperative modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores, Nurick scores, radiological parameters, and complications were recorded. Radiological measurements were performed by two independent observers, with excellent inter-observer reliability (ICC=0.92 for compression ratio, ICC=0.89 for Cobb angle). The effects of T2 hyperintensity severity, presence of OPLL (Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament), age, compression ratio, and number of compression levels on surgical outcomes were analyzed using correlation analysis, comparative tests, and multivariate linear regression. The median follow-up period was 6.0 months (IQR: 3.0-12.0 months; range: 1-48 months). Results: Of the 32 patients included in the study, 27 (84.4%) were male and 5 (15.6%) were female. The mean age was 57.6±9.2 years (range: 42-73 years). The mean preoperative mJOA score was 9.78±4.02, which increased to 15.44±2.90 postoperatively (p<0.001). The mean neurological recovery rate calculated using the Hirabayashi formula (27) was 73.0±22.2%. Nurick scores significantly improved from 3.00±1.30 preoperatively to 0.91±1.20 postoperatively (p<0.001). Marked T2-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) hyperintensity was detected in 71.9% of patients. OPLL was present in 40.6% of patients. The mean preoperative spinal cord compression ratio was 47.0±10.9%. Correlation analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between preoperative mJOA score and recovery rate (r=0.551, p=0.001). Multivariate linear regression analysis confirmed that preoperative mJOA score was the only independent predictor of recovery rate (β=0.551, p=0.001), while T2 hyperintensity severity (p=0.513), presence of OPLL (p=0.079), age (p=0.984), compression ratio (p=0.645), and number of levels (p=0.631) did not show significant independent associations. Post-hoc power analysis revealed that the study had 80% power to detect large effect sizes (Cohen’s d ≥0.90) but was underpowered for moderate effects. Only one patient (3.1%) developed pulmonary embolism as a complication. Conclusion: Surgical treatment in CSM provides significant improvement in mJOA and Nurick scores with a low complication rate. Preoperative mJOA score is the most important prognostic factor and emphasizes the importance of early surgical intervention. In this patient cohort, marked T2 hyperintensity, presence of OPLL, high compression ratio, advanced age, and multilevel involvement did not show significant associations with surgical outcomes, though the limited sample size may have precluded detection of moderate effects. These findings suggest that satisfactory functional outcomes can be achieved across a diverse patient population, though larger studies are needed to definitively establish the role of these factors.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

none

Ethical Statement

Hatay Mustafa Keaml Üniversitesi Girişimsel Olmayan Klinik Araştırmalar Etik Kurul Kararları 25/12/2023-10-21

References

  1. Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics, and pathogenesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(12):E675-E693. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000913
  2. Boogaarts HD, Bartels RH. Prevalence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2015;24 Suppl 2:139-141. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2781-x
  3. Rao R. Neck pain, cervical radiculopathy, and cervical myelopathy: pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(10):1872-1881. doi:10.2106/00004623-200210000-00021
  4. McCormick WE, Steinmetz MP, Benzel EC. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: make the difficult diagnosis, then refer for surgery. Cleve Clin J Med. 2003;70(10):899-904. doi:10.3949/ccjm.70.10.899
  5. Karadimas SK, Erwin WM, Ely CG, Dettori JR, Fehlings MG. Pathophysiology and natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(22 Suppl 1):S21-S36. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7f2c3
  6. Toledano M, Bartleson JD. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurol Clin. 2013;31(1):287-305. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2012.09.003
  7. Benzel EC, Lancon J, Kesterson L, Hadden T. Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord. 1991;4(3):286-295. doi:10.1097/00002517-199109000-00005
  8. Nurick S. The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1972;95(1):87-100. doi:10.1093/brain/95.1.87

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Brain and Nerve Surgery (Neurosurgery)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

May 22, 2026

Submission Date

January 22, 2026

Acceptance Date

April 20, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 8 Number: 3

APA
Aykut, A. M., Kaya, M. E., Serarslan, Y., & Aras, M. (2026). Surgical treatment outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of 32 patients and evaluation of prognostic factors. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, 8(3), 485-490. https://izlik.org/JA27XF44BP
AMA
1.Aykut AM, Kaya ME, Serarslan Y, Aras M. Surgical treatment outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of 32 patients and evaluation of prognostic factors. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2026;8(3):485-490. https://izlik.org/JA27XF44BP
Chicago
Aykut, Ali Maksut, Mustafa Emrah Kaya, Yurdal Serarslan, and Mustafa Aras. 2026. “Surgical Treatment Outcomes in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Analysis of 32 Patients and Evaluation of Prognostic Factors”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 8 (3): 485-90. https://izlik.org/JA27XF44BP.
EndNote
Aykut AM, Kaya ME, Serarslan Y, Aras M (May 1, 2026) Surgical treatment outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of 32 patients and evaluation of prognostic factors. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 8 3 485–490.
IEEE
[1]A. M. Aykut, M. E. Kaya, Y. Serarslan, and M. Aras, “Surgical treatment outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of 32 patients and evaluation of prognostic factors”, Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 485–490, May 2026, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA27XF44BP
ISNAD
Aykut, Ali Maksut - Kaya, Mustafa Emrah - Serarslan, Yurdal - Aras, Mustafa. “Surgical Treatment Outcomes in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Analysis of 32 Patients and Evaluation of Prognostic Factors”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 8/3 (May 1, 2026): 485-490. https://izlik.org/JA27XF44BP.
JAMA
1.Aykut AM, Kaya ME, Serarslan Y, Aras M. Surgical treatment outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of 32 patients and evaluation of prognostic factors. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2026;8:485–490.
MLA
Aykut, Ali Maksut, et al. “Surgical Treatment Outcomes in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Analysis of 32 Patients and Evaluation of Prognostic Factors”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, vol. 8, no. 3, May 2026, pp. 485-90, https://izlik.org/JA27XF44BP.
Vancouver
1.Ali Maksut Aykut, Mustafa Emrah Kaya, Yurdal Serarslan, Mustafa Aras. Surgical treatment outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of 32 patients and evaluation of prognostic factors. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj [Internet]. 2026 May 1;8(3):485-90. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA27XF44BP

 

TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
 

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency:  Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show

 

Journal Indexes and Platforms: 

TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.


 

The indexes of the journal's are;


 

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiVHJfSW5kZXhfbG9nby5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiMDFiOS82MmZhLzA3MzMvNjlkZjNlNTdhMmI4ZjkuODYxMzMxMjQucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzc2MjQxNzY3LCJub25jZSI6ImQyMTQ4MjdiNTg1ZjVmMGQwYzAzZTMxNzMwM2QwMThmIn0.RmnGvwR536HdIoKpGO-ApytZ5aRPRT_BFXE2EpGSIqc

asos-index.png
 
f9ab67f.png
 
WorldCat_Logo_H_Color.png
 

 

18596download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiT3BlbkFpcmUuanBnIiwicGF0aCI6IjUyMWYvZjljYy8wMDk3LzY5ZGYzZDNiYmVkZGU0LjQzNDM2OTU3LmpwZyIsImV4cCI6MTc3NjI0MTQ4NCwibm9uY2UiOiIwYjgxZDE2NzRiNzhjMWQyOGVmMDM1OTA1MzI5NjdjZiJ9.xeFppR1ubA4i-dHG-u07ht9bQNogFheXQjLyEaP9GgAimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQgDnBwx0yUPRKuetgIurtELxYERFv20CPAUcPe4jYrrJiwXzac8rGXlzd57gl8iikb1Tk&usqp=CAU

 

84039476_619085835534619_7808805634291269632_n.jpg

 

 

 

The platforms of the journal's are;
 

COPE.jpg
 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTbq2FM8NTdXECzlOUCeKQ1dvrISFL-LhxhC7zy1ZQeJk-GGKSx2XkWQvrsHxcfhtfHWxM&usqp=CAUicmje_1_orig.png
 
 
ncbi.png
 
ORCID_logo.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQlwX77nfpy3Bu9mpMBZa0miWT2sRt2zjAPJKg2V69ODTrjZM1nT1BbhWzTVPsTNKJMZzQ&usqp=CAU
 

 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTaWSousoprPWGwE-qxwxGH2y0ByZ_zdLMN-Oq93MsZpBVFOTfxi9uXV7tdr39qvyE-U0I&usqp=CAU
 


 


 

 


 


The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
 

TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit 
 


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"

 

All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND)