Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant effects of folic acid and its effects on contraction and relaxation responses in rat aorta in hyperhomocysteinemic rats.
Methods: Thirty-four male Wistar Albino rats were allocated into four groups. Rats in the hyperhomocysteinemia group (Group 1, n=9) received 1g/kg/day methionine via orogastric gavage for 30 days and then injected with intraperitoneal saline for the next 7 days. In the hyperhomocysteinemia+folic acid group (Group 2, n=9), following the administration of methionine for 30 days, folic acid (4mg/kg/day) was delivered intraperitoneally for 7 days. Sham group rats (Group 3, n=8) received orogastric saline for 30 days, which was followed by an IP injection of saline for another 7 days. Animals allocated into the folic acid group (Group 4, n= 7) had orogastric saline for 30 days and intraperitoneal folic acid for 7 days. After 5 weeks of treatment, blood samples were obtained, all animals were sacrificed, and hearts were harvested. Thoracic aortic segments were suspended on individual organ baths, and acetylcholine-induced (endothelium-dependent) relaxation responses of isolated aortic rings were evaluated.
Results: Relaxation responses in Group 1 thru 4 were 73.889.96, 76.159.28, 76.618.83, and 69.2615.68, respectively. There was no significant difference in the organ bath in terms of relaxation response to acetylcholine at a dose of 10-9 mM between the groups (F=0.716, p=0.550).
Conclusion: Folic acid therapy failed to produce a significant improvement in vascular reactivity.
Keywords: Hyperhomocysteinemia, folic acid, vascular reactivity
Teşekkürler.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Health Care Administration |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | April 24, 2021 |
Published in Issue | Year 2021 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI is under evaluation.
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"