Research Article

Comparative analysis of the anaesthesia management of gynecological operations between the normal period and COVID-19 pandemic

Volume: 3 Number: 3 July 14, 2021
EN

Comparative analysis of the anaesthesia management of gynecological operations between the normal period and COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

Aim In the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2) disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic period, one of the major objectives of the anaesthesia team was providing quality care for patients whose procedures cannot (or can no longer) be postponed while limiting the risk of contamination of these patients and healthcare professionals. The aim of this study is to analyse and document the changes in anaesthesia management of gynecological operations in accordance with this objective during the pandemic period. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients who had gynecological operation from 01.09.2019 to 31.12.2020. Anaesthetic management of gynecological operations corresponding to the pandemic process (After Pandemic Group) were compared with anaesthetic management of gynecological operations from the before the pandemic process (Before Pandemic Group) . Anaesthesia records of the patients were examined. The following parameters are recorded: Surgery type, indication of the surgery, urgency of the surgery and anaesthesia method performed, airway management of the patients, used medications for the anaesthesia management. Results There was an increment in the percentage of operations performed with regional anaesthesia after the start of the pandemic. There was a statistically significant decrement in the percentage of operations performed with laparoscopic technique after the start of the pandemic. There was an increment in the percentage of operations with oncologycal or suspected oncologycal indications after the start of the pandemic; there was no difference in the percentage of urgent surgeries while there was a decrement in the percentage of operations with elective indications. Conclusion By taking alterations and fluctations in community prevalence into consideration, decisions about cancellation of surgeries must be made dynamically. Possibility of COVID-19 infection must be considered in every patient. In anaesthesia management, regional anaesthesia methods may be considered in appropriate cases. Proper PPE must be used if airway manipulations are needed.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

yok

References

  1. Mahase E. Covid-19: WHO declares pandemic because of “alarming levels” of spread, severity, and inaction. BMJ 2020; 368: 1036.
  2. Liu Y, Yan LM, Wan L, et al. Viral dynamics in mild and severe cases of COVID-19. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 6: 656-7.
  3. Lin Q, Abraham M, Wen D, et al. Management of gynecology patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: Chinese expert consensus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223: 3-8.
  4. Wang J, Du G. COVID-19 may transmit through aerosol. Ir J Med Sci 2020; 189: 1143-4.
  5. Greenland JR, Michelow MD, Wang L, London MJ. COVID-19 infection: implications for perioperative and critical care physicians. Anesthesiology 2020; 132: 1346-61.
  6. Chang D, Xu H, Rebaza A, Sharma L, Dela Cruz CS. Protecting healthcareworkers from subclinical coronavirus infection. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8: 13.
  7. Iacobucci G. Covid-19: all non-urgent elective surgery is suspended for at least three monthsin England. BMJ 2020 Mar 18; 368: m1106.
  8. Inslee orders halt to elective surgeries and dental services to reserve critical equipment for COVID-19 health care workers. Washington Governor Jay Inslee; 2020. Accessed,https://www.governor.wa.gov/news-media/inslee-ordershalt-elective-surgeries-and-dental-services-reserve-critical-equipment. [Accessed 3 April 2020].

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

July 14, 2021

Submission Date

April 26, 2021

Acceptance Date

July 4, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 3 Number: 3

APA
Uyar Türkyılmaz, H. E., & Aydın Güzey, N. (2021). Comparative analysis of the anaesthesia management of gynecological operations between the normal period and COVID-19 pandemic. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, 3(3), 220-226. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.928198
AMA
1.Uyar Türkyılmaz HE, Aydın Güzey N. Comparative analysis of the anaesthesia management of gynecological operations between the normal period and COVID-19 pandemic. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2021;3(3):220-226. doi:10.38053/acmj.928198
Chicago
Uyar Türkyılmaz, Havva Esra, and Nihan Aydın Güzey. 2021. “Comparative Analysis of the Anaesthesia Management of Gynecological Operations Between the Normal Period and COVID-19 Pandemic”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 3 (3): 220-26. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.928198.
EndNote
Uyar Türkyılmaz HE, Aydın Güzey N (July 1, 2021) Comparative analysis of the anaesthesia management of gynecological operations between the normal period and COVID-19 pandemic. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 3 3 220–226.
IEEE
[1]H. E. Uyar Türkyılmaz and N. Aydın Güzey, “Comparative analysis of the anaesthesia management of gynecological operations between the normal period and COVID-19 pandemic”, Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 220–226, July 2021, doi: 10.38053/acmj.928198.
ISNAD
Uyar Türkyılmaz, Havva Esra - Aydın Güzey, Nihan. “Comparative Analysis of the Anaesthesia Management of Gynecological Operations Between the Normal Period and COVID-19 Pandemic”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 3/3 (July 1, 2021): 220-226. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.928198.
JAMA
1.Uyar Türkyılmaz HE, Aydın Güzey N. Comparative analysis of the anaesthesia management of gynecological operations between the normal period and COVID-19 pandemic. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2021;3:220–226.
MLA
Uyar Türkyılmaz, Havva Esra, and Nihan Aydın Güzey. “Comparative Analysis of the Anaesthesia Management of Gynecological Operations Between the Normal Period and COVID-19 Pandemic”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, July 2021, pp. 220-6, doi:10.38053/acmj.928198.
Vancouver
1.Havva Esra Uyar Türkyılmaz, Nihan Aydın Güzey. Comparative analysis of the anaesthesia management of gynecological operations between the normal period and COVID-19 pandemic. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2021 Jul. 1;3(3):220-6. doi:10.38053/acmj.928198

 

TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
 

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency:  Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show

 

Journal Indexes and Platforms: 

TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.


 

The indexes of the journal's are;


 

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiVHJfSW5kZXhfbG9nby5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiMDFiOS82MmZhLzA3MzMvNjlkZjNlNTdhMmI4ZjkuODYxMzMxMjQucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzc2MjQxNzY3LCJub25jZSI6ImQyMTQ4MjdiNTg1ZjVmMGQwYzAzZTMxNzMwM2QwMThmIn0.RmnGvwR536HdIoKpGO-ApytZ5aRPRT_BFXE2EpGSIqc

asos-index.png
 
f9ab67f.png
 
WorldCat_Logo_H_Color.png
 

 

18596download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiT3BlbkFpcmUuanBnIiwicGF0aCI6IjUyMWYvZjljYy8wMDk3LzY5ZGYzZDNiYmVkZGU0LjQzNDM2OTU3LmpwZyIsImV4cCI6MTc3NjI0MTQ4NCwibm9uY2UiOiIwYjgxZDE2NzRiNzhjMWQyOGVmMDM1OTA1MzI5NjdjZiJ9.xeFppR1ubA4i-dHG-u07ht9bQNogFheXQjLyEaP9GgAimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQgDnBwx0yUPRKuetgIurtELxYERFv20CPAUcPe4jYrrJiwXzac8rGXlzd57gl8iikb1Tk&usqp=CAU

 

84039476_619085835534619_7808805634291269632_n.jpg

 

 

 

The platforms of the journal's are;
 

COPE.jpg
 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTbq2FM8NTdXECzlOUCeKQ1dvrISFL-LhxhC7zy1ZQeJk-GGKSx2XkWQvrsHxcfhtfHWxM&usqp=CAUicmje_1_orig.png
 
 
ncbi.png
 
ORCID_logo.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQlwX77nfpy3Bu9mpMBZa0miWT2sRt2zjAPJKg2V69ODTrjZM1nT1BbhWzTVPsTNKJMZzQ&usqp=CAU
 

 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTaWSousoprPWGwE-qxwxGH2y0ByZ_zdLMN-Oq93MsZpBVFOTfxi9uXV7tdr39qvyE-U0I&usqp=CAU
 


 


 

 


 


The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
 

TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit 
 


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"

 

All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND)