Research Article

Assessment of failed spinal anesthesia for cesarean section during COVID-19 pandemic

Volume: 4 Number: 2 March 29, 2022
EN

Assessment of failed spinal anesthesia for cesarean section during COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

Objective: 1490 pregnant women with confirmed COVID 19 were admitted to the hospital between April 2020 and February 2021. In Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, 416 pregnant women gave birth spontaneously and 251 underwent cesarian section. We attempted spinal anesthesia for cesarian sections because all regional anesthesia organizations advised regional anesthesia for obstetric surgery. However, spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery is not a foolproof method. Material and Method: We used a retrospective analysis of 251 COVID 19 cesarean section anesthesia to determine the incidence of failed spinal anesthesia, management strategies, and risk variables that contribute to failure. Results: The total number of failed spinal anesthesia instances was 14 (5.58%), with 1% of complete failures and 4% of partial failures. One patient was given spinal anesthesia for the 2nd attempt (0.4%), while the other two were given general anesthesia (0.79%). In failed spinal cases, sedation was utilized. Patients received varied dosages of midazolam, fentanyl, ketamine, and propofol. Conclusion: The rate of failed spinal anesthesia among COVID 19 pregnant women was similar to, even lower than, the rate of failed spinal anesthesia in the general population. Despite all the negative consequences, such as wearing PPE and moving around, vision and hearing problems due to PPE, anesthesiologist fear about being infected by the patient or patient anxiety about infection, the future and babies’ health is the reason for this result.

Keywords

References

  1. Warren J, Sundaram K, Anis H, et al. Spinal anesthesia is associated with decreased complications after total knee and hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020; 28: e213-e221.
  2. Neuman MD, Silber JH, Elkassabany NM, Ludwig JM, Fleisher LA. Comparative effectiveness of regional versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults. Anesthesiology 2012; 117: 72-92.
  3. Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ 2000; 321: 1493.
  4. Tran K, Cimon K, Severn M, Pessoa-Silva CL, Conly J. Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: A systematic review. PLoS One 2012; 7: e35797.
  5. Uppal V, Sondekoppam RV, Lobo CA, Kolli S, Kalagara HKP. Practice recommendations on neuraxial anesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks during the COVID-19 pandemic. https://www.asra.com/page/2905/practicerecommendations-on-neuraxial-anesthesia-andperip heral-nerve-blocks-dur. [Accessed 10 May 2020]
  6. Sng BL, Lim Y, Sia ATH. An observational prospective cohort study of incidence and characteristics of failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2009; 18: 237e41.
  7. Shrestha AB, Shrestha CK, Sharma KR, Neupane B. Failure of subarachnoid block in caesarean section. Anesth Analg 2009; 11: 50e1.
  8. Jairo J, Paez L, Ricardo J. Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología Regional versus general anesthesia for cesarean section delivery. Colomb J Anesthesiol 2012; 40: 203e6

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 29, 2022

Submission Date

December 20, 2021

Acceptance Date

March 9, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 4 Number: 2

APA
Güler, A., & Özcan, N. (2022). Assessment of failed spinal anesthesia for cesarean section during COVID-19 pandemic. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, 4(2), 206-209. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.991520
AMA
1.Güler A, Özcan N. Assessment of failed spinal anesthesia for cesarean section during COVID-19 pandemic. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2022;4(2):206-209. doi:10.38053/acmj.991520
Chicago
Güler, Aygün, and Namık Özcan. 2022. “Assessment of Failed Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section During COVID-19 Pandemic”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 4 (2): 206-9. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.991520.
EndNote
Güler A, Özcan N (March 1, 2022) Assessment of failed spinal anesthesia for cesarean section during COVID-19 pandemic. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 4 2 206–209.
IEEE
[1]A. Güler and N. Özcan, “Assessment of failed spinal anesthesia for cesarean section during COVID-19 pandemic”, Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 206–209, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.38053/acmj.991520.
ISNAD
Güler, Aygün - Özcan, Namık. “Assessment of Failed Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section During COVID-19 Pandemic”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 4/2 (March 1, 2022): 206-209. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.991520.
JAMA
1.Güler A, Özcan N. Assessment of failed spinal anesthesia for cesarean section during COVID-19 pandemic. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2022;4:206–209.
MLA
Güler, Aygün, and Namık Özcan. “Assessment of Failed Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section During COVID-19 Pandemic”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, Mar. 2022, pp. 206-9, doi:10.38053/acmj.991520.
Vancouver
1.Aygün Güler, Namık Özcan. Assessment of failed spinal anesthesia for cesarean section during COVID-19 pandemic. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2022 Mar. 1;4(2):206-9. doi:10.38053/acmj.991520

 

TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
 

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency:  Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show

 

Journal Indexes and Platforms: 

TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.


 

The indexes of the journal's are;


 

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiVHJfSW5kZXhfbG9nby5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiMDFiOS82MmZhLzA3MzMvNjlkZjNlNTdhMmI4ZjkuODYxMzMxMjQucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzc2MjQxNzY3LCJub25jZSI6ImQyMTQ4MjdiNTg1ZjVmMGQwYzAzZTMxNzMwM2QwMThmIn0.RmnGvwR536HdIoKpGO-ApytZ5aRPRT_BFXE2EpGSIqc

asos-index.png
 
f9ab67f.png
 
WorldCat_Logo_H_Color.png
 

 

18596download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiT3BlbkFpcmUuanBnIiwicGF0aCI6IjUyMWYvZjljYy8wMDk3LzY5ZGYzZDNiYmVkZGU0LjQzNDM2OTU3LmpwZyIsImV4cCI6MTc3NjI0MTQ4NCwibm9uY2UiOiIwYjgxZDE2NzRiNzhjMWQyOGVmMDM1OTA1MzI5NjdjZiJ9.xeFppR1ubA4i-dHG-u07ht9bQNogFheXQjLyEaP9GgAimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQgDnBwx0yUPRKuetgIurtELxYERFv20CPAUcPe4jYrrJiwXzac8rGXlzd57gl8iikb1Tk&usqp=CAU

 

84039476_619085835534619_7808805634291269632_n.jpg

 

 

 

The platforms of the journal's are;
 

COPE.jpg
 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTbq2FM8NTdXECzlOUCeKQ1dvrISFL-LhxhC7zy1ZQeJk-GGKSx2XkWQvrsHxcfhtfHWxM&usqp=CAUicmje_1_orig.png
 
 
ncbi.png
 
ORCID_logo.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQlwX77nfpy3Bu9mpMBZa0miWT2sRt2zjAPJKg2V69ODTrjZM1nT1BbhWzTVPsTNKJMZzQ&usqp=CAU
 

 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTaWSousoprPWGwE-qxwxGH2y0ByZ_zdLMN-Oq93MsZpBVFOTfxi9uXV7tdr39qvyE-U0I&usqp=CAU
 


 


 

 


 


The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
 

TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit 
 


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"

 

All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND)