Dental Seramiklerde Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 103 - 107, 17.01.2022

Firdevs Oral , Arzu Zeynep Yıldırım Biçer

Öz

Diş hekimliğinde porselen; estetik ve biyouyumlu olmasının yanı sıra fiziksel özelliklerinden dolayı sıklıkla kullanılan bir materyaldir. Gelişen teknolojiler ve yükselen yaşam standardına bağlı olarak estetik beklentilerin de artması ile yeni estetik restoratif materyaller geliştirilmektedir. Bu amaca uygun olarak metal destekli restorasyonlardan tam seramik sistemlerine ve CAD-CAM ile üretilen restorasyonlara eğilim artmaktadır. Modern dental seramiklerin uzun vadeli klinik başarısı bir dizi faktöre bağlıdır. Bu faktörler, malzemenin fiziksel özelliklerini, laboratuar üretim sürecini, laboratuar üretim tekniğini ve bu kırılgan malzemelere zarar verebilecek klinik prosedürleri içerir.
Bu derlemede seramik sistemlerin dayanıklılığını ve klinik başarısını etkileyen faktörlerden olan yüzey pürüzlülüğü, sebepleri ve sonuçları açısından değerlendirilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ağız Gargarası, Dental Seramikler, Yüzey pürüzlülüğü

SURFACE ROUGHNESS IN DENTAL CERAMİCS

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ağız Gragarası,, Dental Seramikler

Kaynakça

• 1. Soygun K, Varol O, Ozer A, Bolayir G. Investigations on the effects of mouthrinses on the colour stability and surface roughness of different dental bioceramics. The journal of advanced prosthodontics. 2017;9(3):200.
• 2. Rashid H. The effect of surface roughness on ceramics used in dentistry: A review of literature. European journal of dentistry. 2014;8(4):571.
• 3. Kocaağaoğlu Hh, Gümüş Hö, Albayrak H. Tam Seramik Restorasyonlarda Yüzey Pürüzlendirme ve Polisaj. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi.7(1):1409-18.
• 4. Hamza TA, Alameldin AA, Elkouedi AY, Wee AG. Effect of artificial accelerated aging on surface roughness and color stability of different ceramic restorations. Stomatological Disease and Science. 2017;1:8-13.
• 5. Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2004;92(6):557-62.
• 6. Volpato CÂM, Garbelotto L, Fredel MrC, Bondioli F. Application of zirconia in dentistry: biological, mechanical and optical considerations. Advances in ceramics-electric and magnetic ceramics, bioceramics, ceramics and environment. 2011:25.
• 7. Oliveira-Junior OB, Buso L, Fujiy FH, Lombardo G, Campos F, Sarmento HR, et al. Influence of polishing procedures on the surface roughness of dental ceramics made by different techniques. Gen Dent. 2013;61(1):e4-8.
• 8. Lohbauer U, Müller FA, Petschelt A. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical strength of resin composite versus glass ceramic materials. Dental Materials. 2008;24(2):250-6.
• 9. Değirmenci K, Büyükdere Ak. İn Vitro Yöntemlerle Tam Seramiklerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü ve Translusensinin Değerlendirilmesi: Derleme. Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi. (1):13-8.
• 10. Aksoy G, Polat H, Polat M, Coskun G. Effect of various treatment and glazing (coating) techniques on the roughness and wettability of ceramic dental restorative surfaces. Colloids and surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2006;53(2):254-9.
• 11. Milleding P, Wennerberg A, Alaeddin S, Karlsson S, Simon E. Surface corrosion of dental ceramics in vitro. Biomaterials. 1999;20(8):733-46.
• 12. Çelakıl T, Evlioğlu G. Asidik maddelerin farklı dental porselenlerin yüzey özellikleri ve iyon çözünürlüğü üzerindeki etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi.
• 13. Jakovac M, Živko-Babić J, Ćurković L, Aurer A. Measurement of ion elution from dental ceramics. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2006;26(9):1695-700.
• 14. Vicentini BC, Braga SRM, Sobral MAP. The measurement in vitro of dentine abrasion by toothpastes. International dental journal. 2007;57(5):314-8.
• 15. Özdoğan A, Duymuş Zy, İncesu E, Köseoğlu M. Farkli Kimyasal Yapilara Sahip Diş Macunlarinin Feldspatik Porselenin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğüne Etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi.29(1):44-8.
• 16. Garza LA, Thompson G, Cho S-H, Berzins DW. Effect of toothbrushing on shade and surface roughness of extrinsically stained pressable ceramics. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2016;115(4):489-94.
• 17. Zakir T, Dandekeri S, Suhaim KS, Shetty NH, Ragher M, Shetty SK. Influence of aerated drink, mouthwash, and simulated gastric acid on the surface roughness of dental ceramics: A comparative In Vitro study. Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences. 2020;12(Suppl 1):S480.
• 18. Lee JH, Kim SH, Yoon HI, Yeo ISL, Han JS. Colour stability and surface properties of high‐translucency restorative materials for digital dentistry after simulated oral rinsing. European journal of oral sciences. 2020;128(2):170-80.
• 19. Özel Y, Özel E, Attar N, Aksoy G. Diş hekimliğinde beyazlatma. EÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2007;28:33-40.
• 20. Qasim S, Ramakrishnaiah R, Alkheriaf AA, Zafar MS. Influence of various bleaching regimes on surface roughness of resin composite and ceramic dental biomaterials. Technology and Health Care. 2016;24(2):153-61.
• 21. Ourique SAM, Arrais CAG, Cassoni A, Ota-Tsuzuki C, Rodrigues JA. Effects of different concentrations of carbamide peroxide and bleaching periods on the roughness of dental ceramics. Brazilian oral research. 2011;25(5):453-8.
• 22. Souza Dcfd, Gonçalves Lac, Gasque Kcds, Moretti Abds, Da Silva Bf, Moretti Neto Rt. Dental bleaching gels do not alter the surface roughness and microhardness of feldspathic porcelain. RGO-Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia. 2020;68.
• 23. Turker ŞB, Biskin T. Effect of three bleaching agents on the surface properties of three different esthetic restorative materials. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2003;89(5):466-73.
• 24. Zaki AA, Fahmy NZ. The effect of a bleaching system on properties related to different ceramic surface textures. Journal of Prosthodontics: Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry. 2009;18(3):223-9.
• 25. Polydorou O, Mönting JS, Hellwig E, Auschill TM. Effect of in-office tooth bleaching on the microhardness of six dental esthetic restorative materials. Dental Materials. 2007;23(2):153-8.
• 26. Sulik WD, Plekavich EJ. Surface finishing of dental porcelain. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1981;46(2):217-21.
• 27. Bollenl CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dental materials. 1997;13(4):258-69.
• 28. Haywood VB, Heymann H, Kusy R, Whitley J, Andreaus S. Polishing porcelain veneers: an SEM and specular reflectance analysis. Dental Materials. 1988;4(3):116-21.
• 29. Çökük Dn. Tam Seramik Sistemlerine Uygulanan Farkli Polisaj Metotlarinin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğüne Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi.2009(2):98-104.
• 30. Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, Beck P, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2013;109(1):22-9.
• 31. Sikalidis C. Advances in Ceramics: Electric and Magnetic Ceramics, Bioceramics, Ceramics and Environment: BoD–Books on Demand; 2011.
• 32. Yilmaz K, Özkan P. Profilometer evaluation of the effect of various polishing methods on the surface roughness in dental ceramics of different structures subjected to repeated firings. Quintessence international. 2010;41(7).
• 33. Tholt B, Miranda-Júnior WG, Prioli R, Thompson J, Oda M. Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer. Operative dentistry. 2006;31(4):442-9.
• 34. Awad D, Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Ilie N. Translucency of esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials and composite resins with respect to thickness and surface roughness. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2015;113(6):534-40.