Research Article

Learner Autonomy: A Comparison of Instructor and Learner Perspective

Volume: 15 Number: 2 December 31, 2025
EN TR

Learner Autonomy: A Comparison of Instructor and Learner Perspective

Abstract

Considering the general framework of Learner Autonomy, this study explores the perspectives of instructors and students in higher education within the Engilsh as a Foreign Language environment of Ankara and aims to determine whether their views align. Although numerous studies have been conducted on the topic, there is limited research that directly compares the beliefs of students and instructors. The study involved 514 participants in total (405 students and 109 instructors) from preparation schools at 5 different universities in Ankara. Data were gathered through a questionnaire created by Camilleri (1997). According to the survey, both participants expressed a desire for greater LA in their classes to a certain extend. However, instructors were more cautious when it came to granting learners power over more general pedagogical elements like topic selection and classroom management, even if they frequently encourage LA in areas like task comprehension and self-assessment. Both groups tended to fall into the same interpretive category of "partial support," although their results differed statistically. These variations point to a gap between the theoretical support and practical use of LA. This suggests a subtle discrepancy in viewpoints that may warrant further research, particularly in relation to how each group views and values autonomy in educational activities.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmadianzadeh, B., Seifoori, Z., & Tamjid, N. H. (2018). Exploring EFL teachers’ beliefs about and practices of learner autonomy across experience and licensure. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1501694
  2. Al Husban, H. A., & Tawalbeh, A. H. (2022). EFL university teachers’ beliefs and practices of learner autonomy during COVID 19 in Saudi Arabia. ELT Journal, 15(6), 135–152.
  3. Borg, S. and Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Learner autonomy: English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. British Council. Retrieved from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/ teacheng/files/b459%20ELTRP%20Report%20Busaidi_final.pdf (Accessed on 3. 1. 2021).
  4. Balçıkanlı, C. (2007). The investigation of the instructors’ attitudes towards learner autonomy at preparatory school. Paper presented at In proceedings of language teaching and learning in multilingual Europe International Conference, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
  5. Balçıkanlı, C. (2008.) Learner autonomy (LA) in EFL settings, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(3), 1-16. Balçıkanlı, C. (2010). Learner autonomy in language learning: student teachers’ beliefs. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 31(5), 90- 103.
  6. Baylan, S. (2007). University students‟ and their teachers‟ perceptions and expectations of learner autonomy in EFL prep classes. (Unpublished M.A. Thesis). Marmara University, İstanbul.
  7. Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning. London: Pearson Education Limited.
  8. Benson, P., & Voller, P. (1997). Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. London: Pearson Education Limited.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Social and Humanities Education (Excluding Economics, Business and Management)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 31, 2025

Submission Date

May 7, 2025

Acceptance Date

September 16, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 15 Number: 2

APA
Uysal, Z. G., & Karabıyık, C. (2025). Learner Autonomy: A Comparison of Instructor and Learner Perspective. Adıyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(2), 645-671. https://doi.org/10.17984/adyuebd.1695072

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
by-nc-nd.png?resize=300%2C105&ssl=1 This work is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0