Tane Heterojenitesi ve Farklı Anaçların Papazkarası Üzüm Çeşidi Tane Özelliklerine Etkisi

Year 2025, , 1 - 11

Elman Bahar , Ilknur Korkutal , Semih Erişken

https://doi.org/10.17097/agricultureatauni.1534567

Abstract

Deneme Kırklareli ili Pınarhisar ilçesinde İrem Çamlıca Bağcılık ve Şarapçılık Ltd. Şti. bağında yürütülmüştür. Bitkisel materyal olarak on yaşında olan; Papazkarası/1103P, Papazkarası/110R ve Papazkarası/420A aşı kombinasyonu omcaları seçilmiştir. Çalışmada farklı anaçlara aşılı Papazkarası üzüm çeşidi salkımlarından alınan tanelerin özellikleri belirlenmiştir. Diğer amaç ise tane heterojenitesinin tane özelliklerini nasıl etkilediğinin ortaya konmasıdır. Bu amaçla, hasat edilen salkımlardan alınan taneler boyutlarına göre sınıflanmıştır; ≤12 mm (B2); 12,01-14,00 mm (B3); 14,01-16,00 mm (B4); 16,01-18,00 mm (B5) ve ≥18 mm (B6). Ayrıca Kontrol (B1) boyut grubu toplam tane sayısının tane boyutlarına dağıtılmasıyla oluşturulmuştur. Tane özelliklerini ortaya koymak için; tane eni-boyu, tane yaş ve kuru ağırlığı, 100 tane ağırlığı, tane hacmi ve 100 tane hacmi kriterleri incelenmiştir. Ayrıca; tane özkütlesi, % kuru ağırlık, TKA/TH, şeker konsantrasyonu, tanede şeker miktarı, 1g tanede şeker miktarı ile verim belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, düşük vigora sahip 420A anacının tane özellikleri açısından şaraplık çeşitlerde istenilen en düşük değerlere sahip olduğu; öte yandan tane özkütlesi, % kuru ağırlık ve TKA/TH değerlerinin de yüksek olması sebebiyle öne çıktığı belirlenmiştir. Tane boyutları açısından da en yüksek tane sayısının 12,01 mm ile 18,00 mm arasında yer alan boyut gruplarında olduğu saptanmıştır. Üzüm kalitesi açısından bu boyutlar arasındaki taneler, yüksek kaliteli olmamakla birlikte şarap üretimi için idealdir. Öte yandan B2 (≤12,00 mm) ve B6 (≥18,00 mm) boyut gruplarında istenilen tane sayısına erişilememiştir.

Keywords

Anaç, tane heterojenitesi, otokton, Papazkarası, Vitis vinifera L.

Ethical Statement

Etik beyan gerektiren bir araştırma değildir.

Supporting Institution

Yoktur

Project Number

Bir proje değildir

Thanks

Yazarlar, bağında araştırma yapılmasına imkan sağlayan İrem Çamlıca Vineyards and Winery Ltd. Kurucusu Mustafa Çamlıca’ya teşekkür ederler.

Effect of Berry Heterogeneity and Different Rootstocks on the Berry Characteristics of the Papazkarası cv.

Abstract

The trial was conducted in the vineyard of İrem Çamlıca Bağcılık ve Şarapçılık Ltd. Şti. in the Pınarhisar district of Kırklareli province. As plant material, ten-year-old grapevines of the Papazkarası/1103P, Papazkarası/110R, and Papazkarası/420A graft combinations were selected. The study determined the characteristics of berries taken from the clusters of the Papazkarası cv. grafted onto different rootstocks. Another aim was to reveal how berry heterogeneity affects berry characteristics. For this purpose, the berries taken from the harvested clusters were classified according to their size: ≤12 mm (B2); 12.01-14.00 mm (B3); 14.01-16.00 mm (B4); 16.01-18.00 mm (B5); and ≥18 mm (B6). Additionally, the Control (B1) size group was formed by distributing the total number of berries according to their sizes. To determine berry characteristics, berry width-length, fresh-dry berry weight, 100-berry weight, berry volume (BV), and 100-berry volume criteria were examined. Furthermore, berry skin area (BSA), berry density, % dry weight, BSA/BV, sugar concentration, sugar content in the berry, and sugar content per g of berry, along with yield, were determined. As a result, it was found that the 420A rootstock, with low vigor, had the lowest values desired in wine grape varieties in terms of berry characteristics; on the other hand, it stood out due to its high berry density, % dry weight, and BSA/BV values. In terms of berry size, the highest number of berries was found in the size groups between 12.01 mm and 18.00 mm. Although the berries in these size groups are not of the highest quality, they are ideal for wine production. On the other hand, the desired number of berries could not be reached in the B2 (≤12.00 mm) and B6 (≥18.00 mm) size groups.

Keywords

Rootstock, heterogeneity, Autochtonous, Papazkarası, Vitis vinifera L.

Project Number

Bir proje değildir

References

• Ausari, P.K., Gurjar, P.K.S., Somkuwar, R.G., Naruka, I.S., Sharma, A.K., & Gharate, P.S. (2024). Effect of rootstocks on yield and wine quality of Sauvignon blanc variety. Plant Archives, 24(1), 1477-1482. https://doi.org/10.51470/PLANTARCHIVES.2024.v24.no.1.207
• Blouin, J., & Guimberteau, G. (2000). Maturation et maturite des Raisins. Feret.
• Candar, S., Açıkbaş, B., Ekiz, M., Zobar, D., Korkutal, İ., & Bahar, E. (2021a). Influence of water scarcity on macronutrient contents in young leaves of wine grape cultivars. Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola, 36(2), 104-115. https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/ctv20213602104
• Candar, S., Açıkbaş, B., Korkutal, İ., & Bahar, E. (2021b). Trakya Bölgesi şaraplık üzüm çeşitlerinde kısıntılı sulama uygulamalarının yaprak ve stoma morfolojik özelliklerine etkileri. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 24(4), 766-776. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.738285
• Candar, S., Demirkapı, E.K., Ekiz, M., Alço, T., Korkutal, İ., & Bahar, E. (2022). Effects of restricted irrigation on root morphological properties of wine grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 27(3), 601-614. https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1104298
• Carbonneau, A., & Bahar, E. (2009). Vine and berry responses to contrasted water fluxes in ecotron around ‘veraison’. manipulation of berry shriveling and consequences on berry growth, sugar loading, and maturation. In Proceedings of the 16th International GiESCO Symposium.
• Champagnol, F. (1998). Critéres de qualitié de la vendange. in: c. flanzy (ed) oenologie, fondements scientifiques et technologiques. Lavoisier Tec & Doc.
• Chen, K. W., He, F., Wang, X. Y., Liu, X., Duan Q. C., & Wang, J. (2018). Influences of berry size on fruit composition and wine quality of Vitis vinifera L. cv. ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ grapes, South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 39(1), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.21548/39-1-2439.
• Creasy, G.L., & Creasy, L.L. (2018) Grapes: Crops production science in horticulture. 2nd edition. Cabi.
• Ergül, A., Perez-Rivera, G., Söylemezoǧlu, G., Kazan, K., & Arroyo-Garcia, R. (2011). Genetic diversity in Anatolian wild grapes (Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris) estimated by SSR markers. Plant Genetic Resources, 9, 375-383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262111000013
• Erseç, Ç., & Demirci, A.Ş. (2023). Isolation, identification and determination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast species from the wines made by spontaneous fermentation using Papazkarası grapes from Thrace Region. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 20(1), 155-165. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1124694
• Eshel, A., & Beeckman, T. (2013). Plant Roots: The Hidden Half. 4th edition. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b14550
• Gazioğlu Şensoy, R.İ., & Balta, F. (2010). Bazı üzüm çeşitlerinin Van ekolojik şartlarına adaptasyonu. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 20(3), 159-170.
• Gil, M., Pascual, O., Gómez-Alonso, S., García-Romero, E., Hermosín-Gutiérrez, I., Zamora, F., & Canals, J.M. (2015). Influence of berry size on red wine color and composition. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 21, 200-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12123
• Harbertson, J., & Keller, M. (2012). Rootstock effects on deficit-irrigated winegrapes in a dry climate: Grape and wine composition. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 63(1), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2011.11079
• Holt, H.E., Francis, I.L., Field, J., Herderich, M.J., & Iland, P.G., (2008). Relationships between berry size, berry phenolic composition and wine quality scores for Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) from different pruning treatments and different vintages. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 14(3), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2008.00019.x
• Hunter, J.J., Barbagallo, M.G., & Guidoni, S. (2015). Berry size and qualitative characteristics of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Syrah. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 32(1), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.21548/32-1-1372
• Keller, M., Mills, L.J., & Harbertson, J.F. (2012). Rootstock effects on deficit-irrigated winegrapes in a dry climate: Vigor, yield formation, and fruit ripening. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 63, 29-39. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2011.11078
• Keller, M. (2015). The science of grapevines: Anatomy and Physiology. 2nd edition. Academic Press.
• KMM (2022). Kırklareli Meteoroloji Müdürlüğü Kayıtları. Demirtaş Mah. Fuat Umay Caddesi No: 27, Kırklareli.
• Kocsis, L., & Lehoczky, É. (2002). The significance of yield production and sugar content of the grapejuice with macronutrients in grape rootstock–scion combinations on dry climatic condition. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 33, 3159-3166. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120014696
• Korkutal, İ., Bahar, E., & Uzun, M. (2023). Effect of berry heterogeneity and water deficit in organic and conventional vineyards on grape berry characteristics. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(3), 510-519. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1264738
• Kontoudakis, N., Esteruelas, M., Fort, F., Canals, J.M., De Freitas, V., & Zamora, F. (2011) Influence of the heterogeneity of grape phenolic maturity on wine composition and quality. Food Chemistry, 124, 767-774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.06.093
• Krstic, M., Kelly, G., Hannah, E., & Clingeleffer, P. (2005) Manipulating grape composition and wine quality through the use of rootstocks. Proceedings of the Grapevine Rootstocks: Current Use, Research, and Application 2005 Rootstock Symposium Osage Beach, Missouri.
• Malamy, J.E., & Benfey, P.N. (1997). Organization and cell differentiation in lateral roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development, 124(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.124.1.33
• Marín, D., Armengol, J., Carbonell-Bejerano, P., Escalona, J.M., Gramaje, D., Hernández-Montes, E., Intrigliolo, D.S., Martínez-Zapater, J.M., Medrano, H., Mirás-Avalos, J.M., Palomares-Rius, J.E., Romero-Azorín, P., Savé, R., Santesteban, L.G., & de Herralde, F. (2021). Challenges of viticulture adaptation to global change: tackling the issue from the roots. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 27, 8-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12463
• Matthews, M.A., & Anderson, M.M. (1988). Fruit ripening in Vitis vinifera L.: Response to seasonal water deficits. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 39(4), 313-320. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1988.39.4.313
• Melo, M.S., Schultz, H.R., Volschenk, C.G., & Hunter J.J. (2015). Berry size variation of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Syrah: morphological dimensions, berry composition and wine quality. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 36(1), 1-10. http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2224-79042015000100018&lng=en&tlng=en
• Migicovsky, Z., Cousins P., Jordan L.M., Myles S., Striegler R.K.,Verdegaal P., & Chitwood D.H. (2021). Grapevine rootstocks affect growth-related scion phenotypes. Plant Direct, 5(5), e00324. https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.324
• MSTAT-C (1990). MSTAT user guide: A microcomputer program for the design, management, and analysis of agronomic research experiments. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Chapter 3.1.1. pp. 3.3-3.7.
• OIV (2009). 2nd Edition of the OIV descriptor list for grape varieties and vitis species. OIV Press.
• Peccoux, A., Loveys, B., Zhu, J., Gambetta, G.A., Delrot, S., Vivin, P., Schultz, H.R., Ollat, N., & Dai, Z. (2018). Dissecting the rootstock control of scion transpiration using model-assisted analyses in grapevine. Tree Physiology, 38, 1026-1040. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx153
• Plantgrape (2024, August 10). Catalogue of rootstock varieties registered in France. https://www.plantgrape.fr/en/varieties/rootstock-varieties.
• Pisciotta, A., Abruzzo, F., Barbagallo, M.G., Santangelo, T., & di Lorenzo, R. (2012). Ulteriori approfondimenti degli effetti della dimensione degli acini sulla qualità dell’uva nella cv. Cabernet Sauvignon. Italus Hortus, 3(1), 82-88.
• Roby, G., & Matthews, M. (2004). Relative proportions of seed, skin and flesh, in ripe berries from Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines grown in a vineyard either well irrigated or under water deficit. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 10(1), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2004.tb00009.x
• Roby, G., Harbertson, J.F., Adams, D.A., & Matthews, M.A. (2004). Berry size and vine water deficits as factors in wine grape composition: anthocyanins and tannins. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 10(2), 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2004.tb00012.x
• Shellie, K.C., (2010). Water deficit effect on ratio of seed to berry fresh weight and berry weight uniformity in wine grape cv. Merlot. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 61(3), 414-418. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2010.61.3.414
• Smart, D.R., Schwass, E., Lakso, A., & Morano, L. (2006). Grapevine rooting patterns: A comprehensive analysis and a review. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 57, 89-104. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2006.57.1.89
• Striegler, K.R., Morris, R.J., Main, L.G., & Lake, B.C. (2005). Effect of rootstock on fruit composition, yield, growth, and vine nutritional status of Cabernet Franc current use. Research, and Application 2005 Rootstock Symposium Osage Beach, Missouri.
• Theocharis, S., Gkrimpizis, T., Karadimou, C., Alatzas, A., Koundouras, S., & Taskos, D. (2024). Modulating ‘Xinomavro’ (Vitis vinifera L.) vine growth and berry composition: A comparative analysis of rootstock effects. Horticulturae, 10(5), 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10050490
• Ünlüsoy, S., (2019). Merlot üzüm çeşidinde farklı toprak işleme ve salkım seyreltme uygulamalarının tane heterojenitesi ve bileşimi üzerine etkileri. [Yüksek Lisans tezi, TNKÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Bahçe Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı]. Tekirdağ.
• Walker, R.R., Blackmore, D.H., Clingeleffer, P.R., Kerridge, G.H., Rühl, E.H., & Nicholas, P.R. (2005). Shiraz berry size in relation to seed number and implications for juice and wine composition. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 11(1), 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00273.x
• Wooldridge, J., Louw, P., & Conradie, W.J. (2016). Effects of rootstock on grapevine performance, petiole and must composition, and overall wine score of Vitis vinifera cv. Chardonnay and Pinot noir. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 31, 45-48. https://doi.org/10.21548/31-1-1399
• Yılmaz, E., & Dardeniz, A., (2009). Bazı üzüm çeşitlerindeki salkım ve sürgün pozisyonunun üzüm verim ve kalitesi ile vejetatif gelişime etkileri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), 1-7.
• Yılmaz F., Shidfar M., Hazrati N., Kazan K., Yüksel C.Ö., Uysal T., Özer C., Yaşasın A.S., Söylemezoğlu G., Boz Y., Çelik H., & Ergül A. (2020). Genetic analysis of central Anatolian grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) germplasm by simple sequence repeats. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 16, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-020-01429-z
• Zhang, L., Marguerit, E., Rossdeutsch, L., Ollat, N., & Gambetta, G.A. (2016). The influence of grapevine rootstocks on scion growth and drought resistance. Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology, 28, 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-016-0070-x