Bilgi İletişim Teknolojilerinin Demokrasi İçerisinde Kullanımı ve Dijital Demokrasiye Geçiş

Year 2013, Volume: 17 Issue: 4, 271 - 304, 01.10.2013

Mehmet Ali Zengin

Abstract

Demokrasi çok derin boyutları olan büyük bir serüvendir ve bu yüzyılda da demokrasi kendi rotası boyunca ilerlemeye devam etmektedir. Ancak her serüven gibi demokrasi de modern çağın etkisi altında kendisini yenilemeye ihtiyaç duymaktadır. Bugün demokrasi kavramını yeni yaşam koşullarına göre tekrar ele alıyoruz. Bu noktada internetin demokrasinin tekrar tanımlanmasında büyük bir rolü olduğunu söyleyebiliriz. Eğer bu çağda teknolojik gelişmelere kapıları kapatmak imkânsız ise dijital dünya algısı içerisinde demokrasiyi yeniden tanımlamak gerekecektir. Diğer yandan bilindiği üzere siyasi katılım demokrasi içerinde önemli bir role sahiptir. Ancak siyasi katılımın önünde engelli olma, yaşlılık ya da mesafe gibi pek çok zorluk ya da engel bulunmaktadır. Dahası bilgi eksikliği dahi siyasi katılım önünde ciddi bir engel olarak görülebilir. Bu noktada dijital demokrasi engelli olma, yaşlılık ya da mesafe gibi tüm engellerin kaldırılması ve siyasi katılım oranlarının artırılmasını önermektedir. Bununla birlikte güvenliğin sağlanması gibi ciddi sorunlar karşısında dijital imkânların kullanılması kolay olmayacaktır

Keywords

Demokrasi, Siyasi Katılım, İnternet, Seçim, Siyasi Haklar

Mehmet Ali ZENGİNUSING OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES IN DEMOCRACY AND TRANSITION OF DIGITAL DEMOCRACY

Abstract

Democracy is a big adventure which has deep dimensions and in this century, democracy proceeds to go through its route. However, it needs to innovate itself under the effection of modern era, like in every adventure. Today, we reconsider democracy conception in the light of new life conditions. In this point, it can be said that internet is a huge role on redefi nition of democracy. If it is impossible to close doors against technological developments in this era, redefi niton of democracy will be necessity in the context of dijital world. On the other hand, as we know political paricipation has a key role in the democracy. However, there are many diffi culties or obstacles to participate political process, like disabling, agedness or distance. Furthermore, even lack of information can be seen a serious barrier in front of the political participation. In this point, dijital democracy offers to take all drawbacks such as disabling, agedness or distance and to augment political participation rates. Nevertheless, it will not be easy to practise dijital facilities against severe challenges like providing security

Keywords

Democracy, Political Participation, Internet, Election, Political Rights

References

• ALVAREZ, R. Michael, HALL, Thad E. TRECHSEL, Alexander H. Internet Voting in Comparative Perspective: The Case of Estonia, Political Science and Politics, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2009, s. 503.
• BEST, Samuel J. KRUEGER, Brian S. Analyzing the Representativeness of Internet Political Participation, Political Behavior. Vol. 27, No. 2, 2005, s.185.
• BISHOP, Matt, WAGNER David, Risk of E-voting, Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2007, s.120.
• BOCHSLER, Daniel, Can Internet voting increase political participation? Remote electronic voting and turnout in the Estonian 2007 parliamentary elections, Internet and Voting, Conference Paper, Fiesole, 3-4 June 2010, s.2. (www.eui.eu/Projects/EUDO-PublicOpinion/Documents/ bochslere-voteeui2010.pdf, erişim 10 Kasım 2013)
• BRADY, Henry, RICHARD, Johnston, SIDES, John, The Study of Political Campaigns, s. 2, http://home.gwu. edu/~jsides/study.pdf 15 Aralık 2013.
• BRAUN, Nadja, Switzerland: External Voting in a Federal State with Direct Democracy, s.230. (http://www.idea.int/publications/voting_from_ abroad/upload/chap10-switz.pdf erişim, 11 Aralık 2013.)
• BROX, Brian, SHAW, Daron, Political Parties, American Campaigns and Effects on Outcomes, (Ed) KATZ Richard, CROTT, William (İç) Handbook of Party Politics, London, 2006, s. 153.
• DAHL, Robert, Democracy and its Critics, New Haven, 1989.
• Department of Economic and Social Afairs, United Nations E-Government Survey 2012 E-Government for the People, 2012, s. 43.
• DIJK, Jan, A.G.M. van, Digital Democracy: Vision and Reality, s.1. (http://www.utwente.nl/gw/vandijk/research/itv/itv_plaatje/Digital%20 Democracy%20Vision %20and %20Reality.pdf, erişim 15 Aralık 2013)
• E-democracy, Parliamentary Offi ce of Science and Technology, Postnote, Number 321, January, 2009, s.1
• Electoral Commission, Key Issues and Conclusions, May 2007 Electoral Pilot Schemes, August 2007.
• Election 2001: The Offi cial Results, London, The Electoral Commission, 2001.
• E-voting Polls, www.ec.europa.eu/ipg/ services/interactive_services/ evoting-polls/#section_5 (04.12.2013)
• Federal Council, Bericht über den Vote Électronique. Chancen, Risiken und Machbarkeit elektronischer Ausübung politischer Rechte vom 9. Januar 2002, BBl 2002 645, s. 651. Nakl. GERLACH, GASSER, s.3.
• FERNÁNDEZ, Rosa M, GONZÁLEZ, Esther, José Manuel VERA, The Electoral Legislation of The Basque Autonomous Community Regarding Electronic Vote (Ed.) KRIMMER, Robert (İç) Electronic Voting, Bregenz, 2006, s. 71.
• FILHO, José Rodrigues, ALEXANDER, Cynthia J. BATISTA, Luciano C. E-Voting in Brazil - The Risks to Democracy, (Ed.) KRIMMER, Robert (İç) Electronic Voting, Bregenz, 2006, s. 85.
• FUGLSANG, Lars, IT and Senior Citizens: Using the Internet for Empowering Active Citizenship, Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2005, s. 493.
• GERLACH, Jan, GASSER, Urs, Three Case Studies from Switzerland: E-Voting, Berkman Center Research Publication, 2009, s.12.
• GIBSON, Rachel, CANTIJOCH, Marta, WARD, Stephen, “Citizen participation in the e-campaign”, (İç) Gibson, R., Williamson, A. Ward, S. (Eds.) The internet and the 2010 election. Putting the small ‘p’ back in politics? London: Hansard Society, 2010, s. 11-12. (http://drupals.humanities. manchester.ac.uk/ipol/sites/ default/fi les/ newdocs/ ChapHansard.pdf, erişim 15 Aralık 2013)
• Global Parliamentary Report, The changing nature of parliamentary representation, Inter-Parliamentary Union, United Nations Development Programme, Geneva - New York, 2012, s.53.
• GRIFFITH, Jeffrey, (İç) SOBACI, Mehmet Zahid, E-Parliament and ICT-Based Legislation: Concept, Experiences and Lessons, Hershey, 2012, s. xiv.
• HAGEN, Martin, Digital Democray and Political Sytems, (edit): HACKER, Kenneth, DIJK, Jan van, Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice, Clifornia, 2000, s. 54.
• HC Deb, 23 October 2008, col 559W. Nakl. E-democracy, s.2.
• History of the Minnesota Electronic Democracy Project (www.isoc. org/inet96/proceedings/e9/e9_1.htm, erişim 25 Kasım 2013)
• HOWE, Catherine, Digital Democracy Building New Relationships With The Public – An APCC Guide, London, 2012, s.6.
• LAU, Richard, SIGELMAN, Lee, ROVNER, Ivy Brown, The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment, The Journal of Politics,Vol. 69, No. 4, 2007, s. 1176.
• LIJPHART, Arend, Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma. American Political Science Review, Vol. 91, 1997, s. 1.
• MADISE, Ülle, MARTENS, Tarvi, E-voting in Estonia 2005. The First Practice Of Country-Wide Binding Internet Voting in the World, (Ed) KRIMMER, Robert (İç) Electronic Voting, Bregenz, 2006, s. 15.
• LOPEZ, Mark Hugo, KIRBY, Emily, SAGOFF, Jared, The Youth Vote in 2004, Centre for Informatıon and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. (www.civicyouth.org/PopUps/FactSheets/FS_Youth_ Voting_72-04.pdf, erişim 07 Aralık 2013)
• Minnesota e-Democracy Survey, (www.e-democracy.org/research/ edemsurvey2002-jakobjensen.pdf, erişim 25 Kasım 2013)
• MITROU, Lilian , GRITZALIS, Dimitris, KATSIKAS, Sokratis , QUIRCHMAYR, Gerald , Electronic Voting: Constitutional and Legal Requirements, and Their Technical Implications, (Eds) GRITZALIS, Dimitris, (İç) Secure Electronic Voting, Springer US, 2003, s.43.
• Modernisation of the House of Commons.Report, Modernisation Committee, First Report of Session, 2004.
• MURDOCK, Graham, GOLDING, Peter Information Poverty and Political Inequality: Citizenship in The Age of Privatized Communications, Journal of Com-Munication. Vol. 39, 1989, s. 180-193.
• Open Rights Group, May 2007 Election Report, June 2007.
• PAMMETT Jon H, LeDUC, Lawrence, Explaining the Turnout Decline in Canadian Federal Elections: A New Survey of Non-voters, 2003, s. 58- 59. (www.elections.ca/res/rec/part/tud/ TurnoutDecline.pdf, erişim 07 Aralık 2013)
• PETERS, Guy, Institutional Theory in Political Science, The New Institutionalism, London, 2005, s. 18.
• PRINT, Murray, Citizenship Education and Youth Participation in Democracy British Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 55, No. 3, 2007, s. 329
• SARTORİ, Govanni, (Çev. BATUŞ, Gül, ULUKAN, Bahar) Görmenin İktidarı, Homo Videns: Gören İnsan, İstanbul, 2004, s.85.
• SCOTT, Richard, The Adolescence of Institutional Theory, Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 32, No. 4, 1987, s. 493.
• SOBACI, Mehmet Zahid, E-Parliament and ICT-Based Legislation: Concept, Experiences and Lessons, Hershey, 2012, s. xv.
• Summary of the Problem with Electronic Voting, www.verifi edvoting. org/wp-content/uploads/down loads/revised_summary31.pdf (16.11.2013) (Electronic Voting).
• SUNSTEIN, Cas, Infotopia. How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. Oxford, 2008, s. 10.
• SUROWIECKI, J. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations. New York, 2004.
• SUSMAN, Thomas M. The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly: E-Government and The People’s Rıght to Know, Vital Speeches of the Day Vol. LXVIII, No. 2; Nov. 1, 2001, s. 2. (www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/ Intellectual_Life/CL-OGI-Susman-GoodBadUgly-English.pdf, erişim 02 Aralık 2013)
• Transformational Government, Enabled by Technology, CM6683, November, 2005.
• UK Parliament Procedure Committee, First Report of Session 2007-08, e-Petitions, HC 136.
• Vote 2005, A Review of Social and Academic Research in to Voting at UK Parliamentary General Elections, London, The Electoral Commission, 2005.
• WILLIAMSON, Andy, MILLER, Laura, FALLON, Freddy, Behind the Digital Campaign, Hansard Society, 2010, s. 1.
• World e-Parliament Report 2012, Global Centre for ICT in Parliament is administered by the Division for Public Administration and Development Management of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2012, s.195.
• ZAVESTOSKI, Stephen, SHULMAN, Stuart, SCHLOSBERG, David, Democracy and the Environment on the Internet: Electronic Citizen Participation inRegulatory Rulemaking , Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2006, s. 383.
• http://www.e2d-international.org/2011/11/23/partido-de-internet-pdi- runs-for-spanish-congress/ 22 Aralık 2013
• http://www.e2d-international.org/2011/11/23/partido-de-internet-pdi- runs-for-spanish-congress/ 22 Aralık 2013
• http://alexandrasamuel.com/netpolitics/studentsites/classsites/ MitchHooker/benefi ts.html, erişim 14 Aralık 2013.
• http://www.offi cial-documents.gov.uk/document/cm66/6683/6683.pdf erişim 12 Aralık 2013.
• http://www.admin.ch/ch/e/rs/161_1/a4.html erişim 11 Aralık 2013.
• http://www.admin.ch/ch/e/rs/1/101.en.pdf erişim 11 Aralık 2013.
• www.admin.ch/ch/e/rs/161_1/a6.html, erişim 04 Aralık 2013
• www.avaaz.org/tr/about.php, erişim 29 Kasım 2013
• www.blogs.e.gov.kz/