BibTex RIS Cite

Özel Hayatın Kapsamı: Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İçtihatları Işığında Bir Değerlendirme

Year 2013, Volume: 17 Issue: 3, 227 - 266, 01.07.2013

Yaşar Salihpaşaoğlu

Abstract

Özel hayat ile ilgili olarak en çok dile getirilen şikâyet, bu kavramın tanımlanmasının zorluğuna ve kapsamının belirsizliğine ilişkindir. Birçok uluslararası ve ulusal belgede özel hayatın gizliliği hakkının tanınmasına rağmen tanımlanmaması bunun en açık göstergesidir. Özel hayatın gizliliği hakkını tanıyan ama tanımlamayan uluslararası belgelerden biri olan Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesinin uygulayıcısı konumundaki Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi de birçok kararında “Mahkeme, özel hayat kavramının tam olarak tanımlanmasının mümkün olduğu ya da böyle bir gayretin gerekli olduğu kanaatinde değildir.” diyerek onu tanımlamaktan kaçınmıştır. Bunun yerine verdiği kararlarla özel hayatın kapsamını belirlemiştir. Buna göre; kişinin adı, soyadı, cinsiyet kimliği, etnik kimliği, yaşam biçimi, görüntüsü, onur ve şöhreti, fi ziksel ve psikolojik bütünlüğü, cinsel hayatı ve kişisel verileri özel hayata dâhil hususlar içinde yer alır.

Keywords

Özel Hayat Kişinin Kimliği Onur ve Şöhret Kişisel Veriler Fiziksel ve Psikolojik Bütünlük Cinsel Hayat

References

  • Arslan Öncü, Gülay: Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesinde Özel Yaşamın Korunması Hakkı, İstabul, 2011.
  • Çeçen, Anıl: İnsan Hakları, Genişletilmiş Üçüncü Basım, Ankara, 2000.
  • Doğru, Osman: Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru Rehberi, İstanbul, 2012.
  • Duerr, Hans Peter: Uygarlaşma Sürecinin Miti: I, Çıplaklık ve Utanç, Çeviren: Tarhan ONUR, Ankara, 1999.
  • Elias, Norbert: Uygarlık Süreci, Cilt:1, 2. Baskı, Çev.: Ender ATEŞMAN, İstanbul, 2002.
  • Fejos, Pàl: Ethnography of the Yagua, New York, 1943.
  • Gemalmaz, Mehmet Semih: Ulusalüstü İnsan Hakları Hukuku Belgeleri, II. Cilt, Uluslararası Sistemler, İstanbul, 2011.
  • Gözübüyük, A. Şeref - Gölcüklü, Feyyaz: Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Uygulaması, 9. Bası, Ankara, 2011.
  • Gündüz, Aslan: Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Teşkilatlar Hakkında Temel Metinler, Gözden geçirilmiş 2. Baskı, İstanbul, 1994.
  • Helvacı, Serap: Türk ve İsviçre Hukuklarında Kişilik Hakkını Koruyucu Davalar (MK md.24/a fıkra I/ İMK md. 28/a fıkra I), İstanbul, 2001.
  • İnness, Julie C.: Privacy, Intimacy and Isolation, Oxford University Press, 1992.
  • Kaboğlu, İbrahim Ö.: Özgürlükler Hukuku, Gözden Geçirilmiş ve Genişletilmiş 6. Baskı, İstanbul, 2002.
  • Kahraman, Abdullah: İslam Hukuk ve Ahlak İlkeleri Işığında Özel Hayatın Gizliliği(Mahremiyet), Ankara, 2008.
  • Kilkelly, Ursula.: The right to respect for private and family life: A guide to the implementation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Human rights handbook, No:I, Council of Europe, 2007.
  • Küzeci, Elif: Kişisel Verilerin Korunması, Ankara, 2010.
  • Michael, James: Privacy and Human Rights: An International and Comparative Study, with Special Reference to Development in Information Technology, Paris, 1994.
  • Miller, Arthur Raphael: Assault on Privacy: Computers, Data Banks and Dossiers, The University of Michigan Press, 1971.
  • Moore, Barrington: Privacy: Studies in Social and Cultural History, New York, 1984.
  • Öztan, Bilge: Şahsın Hukuku, Hakiki Şahıslar, 10. Bası, Ankara, 2001.
  • Roagna, Ivana: Protecting the right to respect for private and family life under the European Convention on Human Rights, Council of Europe human rights handbooks, Council of Europe, Strausbourg, 2012.
  • Rossler, Beate: The Value of Privacy, Cambridge, 2005.
  • Salihpaşaoğlu, Yaşar: Türkiye’de Basın Özgürlüğü, Ankara, 2007.
  • Schoeman, Ferdinand David: Privacy and Social Freedom, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  • Sennett, Richard: Kamusal İnsanın Çöküşü, 3. Basım, Çev. Serpil DURAK&Abdullah YILMAZ, İstanbul, 2010.
  • Solove, Daniel J.: Understanding Privacy, Harvard University Press, 2008.
  • Üzeltürk, Sultan: 1982 Anayasası ve İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesine Göre Özel Hayatın Gizliliği Hakkı, İstanbul, 2004.
  • Yıldırım, Suat: Kur’ân-ı Hakîm ve Açıklamalı Meali, İstanbul, 2008.
  • Zafer, Hamide: Özel Hayatın ve Hayatın Gizli Alanının Ceza Hukukuyla Korunması, İstanbul, 2010.
  • Zevkliler, Aydın- Acabey, M. Beşir- Gökyayla, K.Emre: Medeni Hukuk, Ankara, 1992.
  • Atak, Songül: “Avrupa Konseyi’nin Kişisel Veriler Açısından Sağladığı Temel Güvenceler”, TBB Dergisi, sayı:87, 2010, s. 90-120.
  • Francis, Huw W. S.: “Of Gossips, Eavesdroppers, And Peeping Toms”, Journal Of Medical Ethics, Volume:8, No:3,, Sem., 1982, s.134-143.
  • Gavison, Ruth E.: “Privacy and the Limits of Law”, The Yale Law Journal, Vol.:89,No:3, 1980, s. 421-471.
  • Gross, Hyman: “The Concept of Privacy”, New York University Law Review, Volume: 42, İssue: 1, 1967, s.34-54.
  • Loenen, B. Van. - Zevenbergen, J.A.: “The Impact of the European Privacy Regime on Location Technology Development”,Journal of Location Based Services, Volume:1, No:3, 2007, s.165-178.
  • Lundsgaarde, Henry P.: “Privacy: An Antropological Perspective on the Right to be Let Alone”, Houston Law Review, Volume: 8, 1970-1971, s.858-875.
  • Mckaig, Dianne Louise: “Public İnterest as a Limitation of the Right to Privacy”, Kentucky Law Journal, Volume:41, 1952-1953, s.126-133.
  • Mills, Robert W.: “Radio, Television and the Right of Privacy”, Journal of Broadcasting, Volume: 13, 1968-1969, No:1, s.51-62.
  • Oppenheimer, Walter D.: “Television and the Right of Privacy”, Journal of Broadcasting, Volume:1, 1956-1957, s.194-201.
  • Rachels, James: “Why Privacy is Important?”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol: 4, No:4, 1975, s.323-333.
  • Smet, Stijn: “Freedom of Expression and the Right to reputation: Human Rights in Confl ict”, American University International Law Review, Volume:26, Issue:1, s. 183-236.
  • Warren, Samuel D.- Brandeis, Louis D.: “The Right to Privacy”, Harvard Law Review, Volume: IV, No: 5, 1980, s. 193-220.
  • Workman, Russell. D.: “Balancing the Right to Privacy and the First Amendment”, Houston Law Review, Volume:29, 1992, s.1059-1089.
  • Collins Cobuild Essential Dictionary, İngilizce-İngilizce Türkçe Sözlük, Türkçeye uygulayan Ö. Renkliyıldırım, İstanbul, 1994.
  • Nişanyan, Sevan: Sözlerin Soyağacı, Çağdaş Türkçenin Etimolojik Sözlüğü, Gözden Geçirilmiş 2. Basım, İstanbul, 2004.
  • Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology, Edited by C. T. Onions with the assistance of G.W.S. Friedrichsen and R.W. Burchfi eld, Oxford University Press, First Published 1966.
  • Türk Dil Kurumu, Türkçe Sözlük, 10. Baskı, Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları:549, Ankara 2005.
  • (http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml#a11, erişim 24.02.2013).
  • (http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/, erişim 01.03.2010).
  • (http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3ae6b3aa0.html, erişim 24.02.2013).
  • (http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/389/347/case.html, erişim 26.02.2013).
  • (http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,NATLEGBOD,,BRA,,4c4820 bf2,0.html, erişim 26.02.2013)
  • (http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,NATLEGBOD,,FIN,,4e5cf5f 12,0.html, erişim 26.02.2013)
  • (http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,NATLEGBOD,,GEO,,3ae6b5 b10,0.html, erişim 26.02.2013)
  • (http://www.info.gov.za/documents/constitution/1996/96cons2. htm#14, erişim 26.02.2013)
  • (http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/topic,4565c2252,459d2ecd2,3ae6b4 dd14,0, NATLEGBOD, LEGISLATION, KOR.html, erişim 26.02.2013)
  • (http://www.privireal.org/content/dp/countries.php, erişim 26.02.2013)
  • (http://www.un.org/fr/documents/udhr/, erişim 14.06.2012). (http:// www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_FRA.pdf, erişim 14.06.2012).
  • (http://www.un.org/es/documents/udhr/, erişim 14.06.2012). (http:// www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_SPA.pdf, erişim 14.06.2012)
  • (http://www.un.org/depts/german/grunddok/ar217a3.html, erişim 14.06.2012). Avrupa İnsan (http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ DEU.pdf, erişim 14.06.2012).
  • (http://www.unhcr.it/news/dir/15/view/375/dichiarazione-universaledei-diritti-delluomo-del-1948-37500.html, erişim 14.06.2012). (http://www. echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ITA.pdf, erişim 14.06.2012).
  • (http://www.ucs.louisiana.edu/~ras2777/judpol/lake.html, erişim 26.07.2012).
  • (http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3ae6b3aa0.html, erişim 24.02.2013).
  • (http://www.cidh.oas.org/basicos/english/basic3.american%20 convention.htm, erişim 27.02.2013).
  • (http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/capacitybuilding/Source/ documentation/hb11_privatelife_en.pdf, erişim 28.11.2012).
  • (http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/capacitybuilding/Source/ documentation/hb11_privatelife_en.pdf, erişim 28.11.2012).
  • (http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/108.htm, erişim 26.01.2013).
  • (http://www.avrupakonseyi.org.tr/antlasma/aas_108.htm, erişim 26.01.2013).
  • (http://www.avrupakonseyi.org.tr/antlasma/aas_108.htm, erişim 26.01.2013)
  • (http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17489720701779644, erişim 25.01.2013)
  • (http://www.idare.gen.tr/akillioglu-idariusul.htm, erişim 25.01.2013)
  • (http://echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/77A6BD48-CD95-4CFF-BAB4- ECB974C5BD15/0/DG2ENHRHA ND012003.pdf, erişim 28.07.2012)
  • (http://www2.tbmm.gov.tr/D23/2/2-0656.Pdf, erişim 30.04.2013).
  • Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
  • Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967).
  • Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 582 N.W.2d 235 (Minn. Sup. Ct. 1998).
  • Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
  • Public Utilities Commission v. Pollak, 343 U.S. 451 (1952)
  • Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
  • A, B and C v. Ireland, (Grand Chamber), 25579/05, 16.12.2010.
  • A. and Others v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 3455/05, 19.02.2009.
  • A. v. Croatia, 55164/08, 14.10.2010.
  • A. v. Norway, 28070/06, 09.04.2009.
  • A.D.T. v. The United Kingdom, 35765/97, 31.10.2000.
  • Aksu v. Turkey, (Grand Chamber), 4149/04, 41029/04, 15.03.2012.
  • Alkaya v. Turkey, 42811/06, 09.10.2012.
  • Amann v. Switzerland, (Grand Chamber), 27798/95, 16.02.2000.
  • Avram and Others v. Moldova, 41588/05, 05.07.2011.
  • Axel Springer AG v. Germany, (Grand Chamber), 39954/08, 07.02.2012.
  • Beard v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 24882/94, 18.01.2001.
  • Bevacqua and S. v. Bulgaria, 71127/01, 12.06.2008.
  • Biriuk v.Lithuania, 23373/03, 25.11.2008.
  • Boso v. Italy, (Decision), 50490/99, 05.09.2002.
  • Brüggemann and Scheuten v. Germany, 6959/75, Report of the Commission, 12.07.1977.
  • Buckley v. The United Kingdom, 20348/92, 25.09.1996.
  • Bulgakov v. Ukraine, 59894/00, 11.09.2007.
  • Burghartz v. Switzerland, 16213/90, 22.02.1994.
  • Calogero Diana v. Italy, 15211/89, 15.11.1996.
  • Camenzind v. Switzerland, 21353/93, 16.12.1997.
  • Campbell v. The United Kingdom, 13590/88, 25.031992.
  • Cemalettin Canli v. Turkey, 22427/04, 18.11.2008.
  • Chapman v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 27238/95, 18.01.2001.
  • Chauvy and Others v. France, 64915/01, 29.06.2004.
  • Christine Goodwin v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 28957/95, 11.07.2002.
  • Ciubotaru v. Moldova, 27138/04, 27.04.2010.
  • Cossey v. The United Kingdom, 10843/84, 27.09.1990.
  • Costello-Roberts v. The United Kingdom, 13134/87, 25.03.1993.
  • Coster v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 24876/94, 18.01.2001.
  • Cruz Varas and Others v. Sweden, 15576/89, 20.03.1991.
  • D.P. and J.C. v. The United Kingdom, 38719/97, 10.10 2002.
  • Dudgeon v. The United Kingdom, 7525/76, 22.10.1981.
  • E.S. and Others v. Slovakia, 8227/04, 15.09.2009.
  • Ebcin v. Turkey, 19506/05, 01.02.2011.
  • Evans v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 6339/05, 10.04.2007.
  • Gillow v. The United Kingdom, 9063/80, 24.11.1986.
  • Guerra and Others v. Italy, (Grand Chamber), 14967/89, 19.02.1998.
  • Guillot v. France, 22500/93, 24.10.1996.
  • H. v. Norway, (Decision), 17004/90, 19.05.1992.
  • Hass v. Switzerland, 31322/07, 20.01.2011.
  • Hatton and Others v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 36022/97, 08.07.2003.
  • Herczegfalvy v. Austria, 10533/83, 24.09.1992.
  • Jalloh v. Germany, 54810/00, 11.07.2006.
  • Jane Smith v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 25154/94, 18.01.2001.
  • Johansson v.Finland, 10163/02, 06.09.2007.
  • Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 9697/82, 18.12.1986.
  • Juhnke v. Turkey, 52515/99, 13.05.2008.
  • K. and T. v. Finland, (Grand Chamber), 25702/94, 12.07.2001.
  • Kemal Taşkın and Others v. Turkey, 30206/04, 37038/04, 43681/04, 45376/04, 12881/05, 28697/05, 32797/05, 45609/05, 02.02.2010.
  • Klass and Others v. Germany, 5029/71, 06.09.1978.
  • Kopp v. Switzerland, 23224/94, 25.03.1998.
  • Krone Verlag GmbH & Co. KG v. Austria, 34315/96, 26.02.2002.
  • Kroon and Others v. The Netherlands, 18535/91, 27.10.1994.
  • Laskey and Others v. The United Kingdom, 21627/93, 21826/93, 21974/93, 19.02.1997.
  • Leander v. Sweden, 9248/81, 26.03.1987.
  • Lee v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 25289/94, 18.01.2001.
  • Leempoel&S.A. ED. Ciné Revue v. Belgium, 64772/01, 09.11.2006.
  • Lopez Ostra v. Spain, 16798/90, 09.12.1994.
  • M.C. v. Bulgaria, 39272/98, 04.12.2003.
  • M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece, (Grand Chamber), 30696/09, 21.01.2011.
  • Mitkus v. Latvia, 7259/03, 02.10.2012.
  • Modinos v. Cyprus,15070/89, 22.04.1993.
  • Mosley v. The United Kingdom, 48009/08, 10.05.2011.
  • News Verlags GmbH & CoKG v.Austria, 31457/96, 11.01.2000.
  • Niemietz v. Germany, 13710/88, 16.12.1992.
  • Norris v. Ireland, 10581/83, 26.10.1988.
  • P. and S. v. Poland, 57375/08, 30.10.2012.
  • Peck v. The United Kingdom, 44647/98, 28.01.2003.
  • Pfeifer v. Austria, 12556/03, 15.11.2007.
  • Powell and Rayner v. The United Kingdom, 9310/81, 21.02.1990.
  • Pretty v. The United Kingdom, 2346/02, 29.04.2002.
  • R.R. v. Poland, 27617/04, 26.05.2011.
  • Rees v. The United Kingdom, 9532/81, 17.10.1986.
  • Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, 1234/05, 15.01.2009.
  • Rotaru v. Romania, (Grand Chamber), 28341/95, 04.05.2000.
  • S. and Marper v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 30562/04, 30566/04, 04.12.2008. Perry v.The United Kingdom, 63737/00, 17.07.2003.
  • Sanchez Cardenas v. Norway, 12148/03, 04.10.2007.
  • Schlumpf v. Switzerland, 29002/06, 08.01.2009.
  • Schönenberger and Durmaz v. Switzerland, 11368/85, 20.06.1988.
  • Schüth v. Germany, 1620/03, 23.09.2010.
  • Sciacca v. Italy, 50774/99, 11,01,2005.
  • Sheffi eld and Horsham v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 22985/93, 23390/94, 30.07.1997.
  • Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania,55480/00, 59330/00, 27.07.2004.
  • Stanev v. Bulgaria, (Grand Chamber), 36760/06, 17.01.2012.
  • Stjerna v. Finland, 18131/91, 25.11.1994.
  • Stubing v. Germany, 43547/08, 12.04.2012.
  • Tysiąc v. Poland, 5410/03, 24.09.2007.
  • Uzun v. Germany, 35623/05, 02.09.2010.
  • Van Kück v. Germany, 35968/97, 12.06.2003.
  • Vo v. France, (Grand Chamber) 53924/00, 08.07.2004.
  • Von Hannover v. Germany (No.2), (Grand Chamber), 40660/08, 40641/08, 07.02.2012.
  • Von Hannover v. Germany, 59320/00, 24.06.2004.
  • Wainwright v. The United Kingdom, 12350/04, 26.09.2006.
  • White v. Sweden, 42435/02, 19.09.2006.
  • Wisse v. France, 71611/01, 20.12.2005.
  • X and Y v. The Netherlands, 8978/80, 26.03.1985.
  • X. v. Belgium, (Decision), 2568/65, 06.02.1968.
  • X. v. The United Kingdom, (Decision), 8416/79, 13.05.1980.
  • X., Y. and Z. v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 21830/93, 22.04.1997.
  • Y.F. v. Turkey, 24209/94, 22.07.2003.
  • Yazgül Yılmaz v. Turkey, 36369/06, 01.02.2011.

THE SCOPE OF PRIVATE LIFE: AN ASSESSMENT IN THE LIGHT OF THE CASE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Year 2013, Volume: 17 Issue: 3, 227 - 266, 01.07.2013

Yaşar Salihpaşaoğlu

Abstract

Private life is a complex and broad concept, so it is diffi cult to defi ne it and determine its scope. For this reason it is not defi ned although it is recognized as a human right in many national and international documents. For instance, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and European Convention on Human Rights recognizes the right of private life but doesn’t defi ne it. Human Rights Court has also never offered a clear and precise defi nition of what is meant by private life. Because “the Court does not consider it possible or necessary to attempt an exhaustive defi nition of the notion of private life.” Instead, the Court determined the scope of private life by judgments. According to the Court’s case law, private life covers name, surname, gender and ethnic identifi cation, lifestyle, image, honour and reputation, personal data, physical and moral integrity and sexual life

Keywords

Private Life Personal Identifi cation Honour and Reputation Personal Data Physical and Moral Integrity Sexual Life

References

  • Arslan Öncü, Gülay: Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesinde Özel Yaşamın Korunması Hakkı, İstabul, 2011.
  • Çeçen, Anıl: İnsan Hakları, Genişletilmiş Üçüncü Basım, Ankara, 2000.
  • Doğru, Osman: Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru Rehberi, İstanbul, 2012.
  • Duerr, Hans Peter: Uygarlaşma Sürecinin Miti: I, Çıplaklık ve Utanç, Çeviren: Tarhan ONUR, Ankara, 1999.
  • Elias, Norbert: Uygarlık Süreci, Cilt:1, 2. Baskı, Çev.: Ender ATEŞMAN, İstanbul, 2002.
  • Fejos, Pàl: Ethnography of the Yagua, New York, 1943.
  • Gemalmaz, Mehmet Semih: Ulusalüstü İnsan Hakları Hukuku Belgeleri, II. Cilt, Uluslararası Sistemler, İstanbul, 2011.
  • Gözübüyük, A. Şeref - Gölcüklü, Feyyaz: Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Uygulaması, 9. Bası, Ankara, 2011.
  • Gündüz, Aslan: Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Teşkilatlar Hakkında Temel Metinler, Gözden geçirilmiş 2. Baskı, İstanbul, 1994.
  • Helvacı, Serap: Türk ve İsviçre Hukuklarında Kişilik Hakkını Koruyucu Davalar (MK md.24/a fıkra I/ İMK md. 28/a fıkra I), İstanbul, 2001.
  • İnness, Julie C.: Privacy, Intimacy and Isolation, Oxford University Press, 1992.
  • Kaboğlu, İbrahim Ö.: Özgürlükler Hukuku, Gözden Geçirilmiş ve Genişletilmiş 6. Baskı, İstanbul, 2002.
  • Kahraman, Abdullah: İslam Hukuk ve Ahlak İlkeleri Işığında Özel Hayatın Gizliliği(Mahremiyet), Ankara, 2008.
  • Kilkelly, Ursula.: The right to respect for private and family life: A guide to the implementation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Human rights handbook, No:I, Council of Europe, 2007.
  • Küzeci, Elif: Kişisel Verilerin Korunması, Ankara, 2010.
  • Michael, James: Privacy and Human Rights: An International and Comparative Study, with Special Reference to Development in Information Technology, Paris, 1994.
  • Miller, Arthur Raphael: Assault on Privacy: Computers, Data Banks and Dossiers, The University of Michigan Press, 1971.
  • Moore, Barrington: Privacy: Studies in Social and Cultural History, New York, 1984.
  • Öztan, Bilge: Şahsın Hukuku, Hakiki Şahıslar, 10. Bası, Ankara, 2001.
  • Roagna, Ivana: Protecting the right to respect for private and family life under the European Convention on Human Rights, Council of Europe human rights handbooks, Council of Europe, Strausbourg, 2012.
  • Rossler, Beate: The Value of Privacy, Cambridge, 2005.
  • Salihpaşaoğlu, Yaşar: Türkiye’de Basın Özgürlüğü, Ankara, 2007.
  • Schoeman, Ferdinand David: Privacy and Social Freedom, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  • Sennett, Richard: Kamusal İnsanın Çöküşü, 3. Basım, Çev. Serpil DURAK&Abdullah YILMAZ, İstanbul, 2010.
  • Solove, Daniel J.: Understanding Privacy, Harvard University Press, 2008.
  • Üzeltürk, Sultan: 1982 Anayasası ve İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesine Göre Özel Hayatın Gizliliği Hakkı, İstanbul, 2004.
  • Yıldırım, Suat: Kur’ân-ı Hakîm ve Açıklamalı Meali, İstanbul, 2008.
  • Zafer, Hamide: Özel Hayatın ve Hayatın Gizli Alanının Ceza Hukukuyla Korunması, İstanbul, 2010.
  • Zevkliler, Aydın- Acabey, M. Beşir- Gökyayla, K.Emre: Medeni Hukuk, Ankara, 1992.
  • Atak, Songül: “Avrupa Konseyi’nin Kişisel Veriler Açısından Sağladığı Temel Güvenceler”, TBB Dergisi, sayı:87, 2010, s. 90-120.
  • Francis, Huw W. S.: “Of Gossips, Eavesdroppers, And Peeping Toms”, Journal Of Medical Ethics, Volume:8, No:3,, Sem., 1982, s.134-143.
  • Gavison, Ruth E.: “Privacy and the Limits of Law”, The Yale Law Journal, Vol.:89,No:3, 1980, s. 421-471.
  • Gross, Hyman: “The Concept of Privacy”, New York University Law Review, Volume: 42, İssue: 1, 1967, s.34-54.
  • Loenen, B. Van. - Zevenbergen, J.A.: “The Impact of the European Privacy Regime on Location Technology Development”,Journal of Location Based Services, Volume:1, No:3, 2007, s.165-178.
  • Lundsgaarde, Henry P.: “Privacy: An Antropological Perspective on the Right to be Let Alone”, Houston Law Review, Volume: 8, 1970-1971, s.858-875.
  • Mckaig, Dianne Louise: “Public İnterest as a Limitation of the Right to Privacy”, Kentucky Law Journal, Volume:41, 1952-1953, s.126-133.
  • Mills, Robert W.: “Radio, Television and the Right of Privacy”, Journal of Broadcasting, Volume: 13, 1968-1969, No:1, s.51-62.
  • Oppenheimer, Walter D.: “Television and the Right of Privacy”, Journal of Broadcasting, Volume:1, 1956-1957, s.194-201.
  • Rachels, James: “Why Privacy is Important?”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol: 4, No:4, 1975, s.323-333.
  • Smet, Stijn: “Freedom of Expression and the Right to reputation: Human Rights in Confl ict”, American University International Law Review, Volume:26, Issue:1, s. 183-236.
  • Warren, Samuel D.- Brandeis, Louis D.: “The Right to Privacy”, Harvard Law Review, Volume: IV, No: 5, 1980, s. 193-220.
  • Workman, Russell. D.: “Balancing the Right to Privacy and the First Amendment”, Houston Law Review, Volume:29, 1992, s.1059-1089.
  • Collins Cobuild Essential Dictionary, İngilizce-İngilizce Türkçe Sözlük, Türkçeye uygulayan Ö. Renkliyıldırım, İstanbul, 1994.
  • Nişanyan, Sevan: Sözlerin Soyağacı, Çağdaş Türkçenin Etimolojik Sözlüğü, Gözden Geçirilmiş 2. Basım, İstanbul, 2004.
  • Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology, Edited by C. T. Onions with the assistance of G.W.S. Friedrichsen and R.W. Burchfi eld, Oxford University Press, First Published 1966.
  • Türk Dil Kurumu, Türkçe Sözlük, 10. Baskı, Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları:549, Ankara 2005.
  • (http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml#a11, erişim 24.02.2013).
  • (http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/, erişim 01.03.2010).
  • (http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3ae6b3aa0.html, erişim 24.02.2013).
  • (http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/389/347/case.html, erişim 26.02.2013).
  • (http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,NATLEGBOD,,BRA,,4c4820 bf2,0.html, erişim 26.02.2013)
  • (http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,NATLEGBOD,,FIN,,4e5cf5f 12,0.html, erişim 26.02.2013)
  • (http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,NATLEGBOD,,GEO,,3ae6b5 b10,0.html, erişim 26.02.2013)
  • (http://www.info.gov.za/documents/constitution/1996/96cons2. htm#14, erişim 26.02.2013)
  • (http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/topic,4565c2252,459d2ecd2,3ae6b4 dd14,0, NATLEGBOD, LEGISLATION, KOR.html, erişim 26.02.2013)
  • (http://www.privireal.org/content/dp/countries.php, erişim 26.02.2013)
  • (http://www.un.org/fr/documents/udhr/, erişim 14.06.2012). (http:// www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_FRA.pdf, erişim 14.06.2012).
  • (http://www.un.org/es/documents/udhr/, erişim 14.06.2012). (http:// www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_SPA.pdf, erişim 14.06.2012)
  • (http://www.un.org/depts/german/grunddok/ar217a3.html, erişim 14.06.2012). Avrupa İnsan (http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ DEU.pdf, erişim 14.06.2012).
  • (http://www.unhcr.it/news/dir/15/view/375/dichiarazione-universaledei-diritti-delluomo-del-1948-37500.html, erişim 14.06.2012). (http://www. echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ITA.pdf, erişim 14.06.2012).
  • (http://www.ucs.louisiana.edu/~ras2777/judpol/lake.html, erişim 26.07.2012).
  • (http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3ae6b3aa0.html, erişim 24.02.2013).
  • (http://www.cidh.oas.org/basicos/english/basic3.american%20 convention.htm, erişim 27.02.2013).
  • (http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/capacitybuilding/Source/ documentation/hb11_privatelife_en.pdf, erişim 28.11.2012).
  • (http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/capacitybuilding/Source/ documentation/hb11_privatelife_en.pdf, erişim 28.11.2012).
  • (http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/108.htm, erişim 26.01.2013).
  • (http://www.avrupakonseyi.org.tr/antlasma/aas_108.htm, erişim 26.01.2013).
  • (http://www.avrupakonseyi.org.tr/antlasma/aas_108.htm, erişim 26.01.2013)
  • (http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17489720701779644, erişim 25.01.2013)
  • (http://www.idare.gen.tr/akillioglu-idariusul.htm, erişim 25.01.2013)
  • (http://echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/77A6BD48-CD95-4CFF-BAB4- ECB974C5BD15/0/DG2ENHRHA ND012003.pdf, erişim 28.07.2012)
  • (http://www2.tbmm.gov.tr/D23/2/2-0656.Pdf, erişim 30.04.2013).
  • Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
  • Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967).
  • Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 582 N.W.2d 235 (Minn. Sup. Ct. 1998).
  • Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
  • Public Utilities Commission v. Pollak, 343 U.S. 451 (1952)
  • Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
  • A, B and C v. Ireland, (Grand Chamber), 25579/05, 16.12.2010.
  • A. and Others v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 3455/05, 19.02.2009.
  • A. v. Croatia, 55164/08, 14.10.2010.
  • A. v. Norway, 28070/06, 09.04.2009.
  • A.D.T. v. The United Kingdom, 35765/97, 31.10.2000.
  • Aksu v. Turkey, (Grand Chamber), 4149/04, 41029/04, 15.03.2012.
  • Alkaya v. Turkey, 42811/06, 09.10.2012.
  • Amann v. Switzerland, (Grand Chamber), 27798/95, 16.02.2000.
  • Avram and Others v. Moldova, 41588/05, 05.07.2011.
  • Axel Springer AG v. Germany, (Grand Chamber), 39954/08, 07.02.2012.
  • Beard v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 24882/94, 18.01.2001.
  • Bevacqua and S. v. Bulgaria, 71127/01, 12.06.2008.
  • Biriuk v.Lithuania, 23373/03, 25.11.2008.
  • Boso v. Italy, (Decision), 50490/99, 05.09.2002.
  • Brüggemann and Scheuten v. Germany, 6959/75, Report of the Commission, 12.07.1977.
  • Buckley v. The United Kingdom, 20348/92, 25.09.1996.
  • Bulgakov v. Ukraine, 59894/00, 11.09.2007.
  • Burghartz v. Switzerland, 16213/90, 22.02.1994.
  • Calogero Diana v. Italy, 15211/89, 15.11.1996.
  • Camenzind v. Switzerland, 21353/93, 16.12.1997.
  • Campbell v. The United Kingdom, 13590/88, 25.031992.
  • Cemalettin Canli v. Turkey, 22427/04, 18.11.2008.
  • Chapman v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 27238/95, 18.01.2001.
  • Chauvy and Others v. France, 64915/01, 29.06.2004.
  • Christine Goodwin v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 28957/95, 11.07.2002.
  • Ciubotaru v. Moldova, 27138/04, 27.04.2010.
  • Cossey v. The United Kingdom, 10843/84, 27.09.1990.
  • Costello-Roberts v. The United Kingdom, 13134/87, 25.03.1993.
  • Coster v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 24876/94, 18.01.2001.
  • Cruz Varas and Others v. Sweden, 15576/89, 20.03.1991.
  • D.P. and J.C. v. The United Kingdom, 38719/97, 10.10 2002.
  • Dudgeon v. The United Kingdom, 7525/76, 22.10.1981.
  • E.S. and Others v. Slovakia, 8227/04, 15.09.2009.
  • Ebcin v. Turkey, 19506/05, 01.02.2011.
  • Evans v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 6339/05, 10.04.2007.
  • Gillow v. The United Kingdom, 9063/80, 24.11.1986.
  • Guerra and Others v. Italy, (Grand Chamber), 14967/89, 19.02.1998.
  • Guillot v. France, 22500/93, 24.10.1996.
  • H. v. Norway, (Decision), 17004/90, 19.05.1992.
  • Hass v. Switzerland, 31322/07, 20.01.2011.
  • Hatton and Others v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 36022/97, 08.07.2003.
  • Herczegfalvy v. Austria, 10533/83, 24.09.1992.
  • Jalloh v. Germany, 54810/00, 11.07.2006.
  • Jane Smith v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 25154/94, 18.01.2001.
  • Johansson v.Finland, 10163/02, 06.09.2007.
  • Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 9697/82, 18.12.1986.
  • Juhnke v. Turkey, 52515/99, 13.05.2008.
  • K. and T. v. Finland, (Grand Chamber), 25702/94, 12.07.2001.
  • Kemal Taşkın and Others v. Turkey, 30206/04, 37038/04, 43681/04, 45376/04, 12881/05, 28697/05, 32797/05, 45609/05, 02.02.2010.
  • Klass and Others v. Germany, 5029/71, 06.09.1978.
  • Kopp v. Switzerland, 23224/94, 25.03.1998.
  • Krone Verlag GmbH & Co. KG v. Austria, 34315/96, 26.02.2002.
  • Kroon and Others v. The Netherlands, 18535/91, 27.10.1994.
  • Laskey and Others v. The United Kingdom, 21627/93, 21826/93, 21974/93, 19.02.1997.
  • Leander v. Sweden, 9248/81, 26.03.1987.
  • Lee v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 25289/94, 18.01.2001.
  • Leempoel&S.A. ED. Ciné Revue v. Belgium, 64772/01, 09.11.2006.
  • Lopez Ostra v. Spain, 16798/90, 09.12.1994.
  • M.C. v. Bulgaria, 39272/98, 04.12.2003.
  • M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece, (Grand Chamber), 30696/09, 21.01.2011.
  • Mitkus v. Latvia, 7259/03, 02.10.2012.
  • Modinos v. Cyprus,15070/89, 22.04.1993.
  • Mosley v. The United Kingdom, 48009/08, 10.05.2011.
  • News Verlags GmbH & CoKG v.Austria, 31457/96, 11.01.2000.
  • Niemietz v. Germany, 13710/88, 16.12.1992.
  • Norris v. Ireland, 10581/83, 26.10.1988.
  • P. and S. v. Poland, 57375/08, 30.10.2012.
  • Peck v. The United Kingdom, 44647/98, 28.01.2003.
  • Pfeifer v. Austria, 12556/03, 15.11.2007.
  • Powell and Rayner v. The United Kingdom, 9310/81, 21.02.1990.
  • Pretty v. The United Kingdom, 2346/02, 29.04.2002.
  • R.R. v. Poland, 27617/04, 26.05.2011.
  • Rees v. The United Kingdom, 9532/81, 17.10.1986.
  • Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, 1234/05, 15.01.2009.
  • Rotaru v. Romania, (Grand Chamber), 28341/95, 04.05.2000.
  • S. and Marper v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 30562/04, 30566/04, 04.12.2008. Perry v.The United Kingdom, 63737/00, 17.07.2003.
  • Sanchez Cardenas v. Norway, 12148/03, 04.10.2007.
  • Schlumpf v. Switzerland, 29002/06, 08.01.2009.
  • Schönenberger and Durmaz v. Switzerland, 11368/85, 20.06.1988.
  • Schüth v. Germany, 1620/03, 23.09.2010.
  • Sciacca v. Italy, 50774/99, 11,01,2005.
  • Sheffi eld and Horsham v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 22985/93, 23390/94, 30.07.1997.
  • Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania,55480/00, 59330/00, 27.07.2004.
  • Stanev v. Bulgaria, (Grand Chamber), 36760/06, 17.01.2012.
  • Stjerna v. Finland, 18131/91, 25.11.1994.
  • Stubing v. Germany, 43547/08, 12.04.2012.
  • Tysiąc v. Poland, 5410/03, 24.09.2007.
  • Uzun v. Germany, 35623/05, 02.09.2010.
  • Van Kück v. Germany, 35968/97, 12.06.2003.
  • Vo v. France, (Grand Chamber) 53924/00, 08.07.2004.
  • Von Hannover v. Germany (No.2), (Grand Chamber), 40660/08, 40641/08, 07.02.2012.
  • Von Hannover v. Germany, 59320/00, 24.06.2004.
  • Wainwright v. The United Kingdom, 12350/04, 26.09.2006.
  • White v. Sweden, 42435/02, 19.09.2006.
  • Wisse v. France, 71611/01, 20.12.2005.
  • X and Y v. The Netherlands, 8978/80, 26.03.1985.
  • X. v. Belgium, (Decision), 2568/65, 06.02.1968.
  • X. v. The United Kingdom, (Decision), 8416/79, 13.05.1980.
  • X., Y. and Z. v. The United Kingdom, (Grand Chamber), 21830/93, 22.04.1997.
  • Y.F. v. Turkey, 24209/94, 22.07.2003.
  • Yazgül Yılmaz v. Turkey, 36369/06, 01.02.2011.
There are 179 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Yaşar Salihpaşaoğlu This is me

Publication Date July 1, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 17 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Salihpaşaoğlu, Y. (2013). Özel Hayatın Kapsamı: Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İçtihatları Işığında Bir Değerlendirme. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 227-266.
AMA Salihpaşaoğlu Y. Özel Hayatın Kapsamı: Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İçtihatları Işığında Bir Değerlendirme. AHBVU-FLJ. July 2013;17(3):227-266.
Chicago Salihpaşaoğlu, Yaşar. “Özel Hayatın Kapsamı: Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İçtihatları Işığında Bir Değerlendirme”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 17, no. 3 (July 2013): 227-66.
EndNote Salihpaşaoğlu Y (July 1, 2013) Özel Hayatın Kapsamı: Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İçtihatları Işığında Bir Değerlendirme. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 17 3 227–266.
IEEE Y. Salihpaşaoğlu, “Özel Hayatın Kapsamı: Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İçtihatları Işığında Bir Değerlendirme”, AHBVU-FLJ, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 227–266, 2013.
ISNAD Salihpaşaoğlu, Yaşar. “Özel Hayatın Kapsamı: Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İçtihatları Işığında Bir Değerlendirme”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 17/3 (July 2013), 227-266.
JAMA Salihpaşaoğlu Y. Özel Hayatın Kapsamı: Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İçtihatları Işığında Bir Değerlendirme. AHBVU-FLJ. 2013;17:227–266.
MLA Salihpaşaoğlu, Yaşar. “Özel Hayatın Kapsamı: Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İçtihatları Işığında Bir Değerlendirme”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 17, no. 3, 2013, pp. 227-66.
Vancouver Salihpaşaoğlu Y. Özel Hayatın Kapsamı: Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İçtihatları Işığında Bir Değerlendirme. AHBVU-FLJ. 2013;17(3):227-66.