BibTex RIS Cite

Haziran 2005 Tarihli Yetki Antlaşmasına Dair Lahey Sözleşmesi

Year 2007, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 321 - 354, 01.06.2007

Feriha Bilge Tanrıbilir

Abstract

Yetki Anlaşmasına Dair Lahey Sözleşmesi, Lahey Devletler Özel Hukuku Konferansının yirminci oturumunda kabul edilmiş bir milletlerarası usul hukuku sözleşmesidir. Sözleşme esas itibariyle münhasır yetki anlaşmalarını ve yetkili kılınan mahkemenin verdiği kararların etkisini düzenlemektedir. Âkit devletler üç konuda yükümlülük altına girmektedirler: 1. Sözleşmeye uygun olarak hazırlanmış bir münhasır yetki anlaşması ile yetkili kılınan devlet mahkemesi davayı görmelidir, 2. Münhasır yetki anlaşması ile yetkili kılınan mahkeme dışında başka bir âkit devlet mahkemesi davaya bakamaz, 3. Münhasır yetkili kılınan devlet mahkemesinin verdiği kararlar diğer âkit devletlerde tanınır ve tenfi z edilir. Sözleşme, yetki anlaşmalarının, en azından, âkit devletler arasında etkinliğini sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır.

Keywords

münhasır yetki anlaşması tanıma tenfiz

References

  • AKINCI, Z.: Milletlerarası Usul Hukukunda Yetki Sözleşmesine Dayanan Yabancı Derdestlik, Ankara 2002.
  • American Bar Association adopted by the House of Delegates, (7-8.8.2006), Recommendation (18.2.2008) . http://www.abanet.org/intlaw/policy/investment/hcca0806.pdf
  • AUST, A.: Modern Treaty Law and Practice, Cambridge 2000.
  • BAYRAKTAROĞLU-ÖZÇELİK, B.: Avrupa Topluluğunun Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk alanında Uluslararası Anlaşma Akdetme Yetkisi ve C-01/03 sayılı ve 7 Şubat Tarihli Avrupa Toplulukları Adalet Divanı Görüşü, AÜHFD, 57(2008), S. 2, s.17-50.
  • BIRNBAUM, S.L./DUNHAM, D.W.: Foreign Plaintiffs and Forum Non Conveniens, Brook.J.Int’l L., 16(1990), s. 241-265.
  • BRAND, R.A.: Introductory Note to the 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, Int’l Legal Materials, 44(2005), s. 1291-1293.
  • BERLIN, M.B.: The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements: Creating an International Framework for Recognizing Foreign Judgements, Int’l L.&Mgmt Rev., 3(2006), s. 43-78.
  • DOĞAN, V.:Türk Hukukunda Yabancı Derdestlik, Prof. Dr. Ergin Nomer Armağanı, MHB, 22(2002), S. 2, s. 121-147.
  • DICEY, A./MORRIS, J.: The Confl ict of Laws, 13. bası, (ed. L. Collins ve diğerleri), Londra 2000.
  • FAWCETT, J.: The Interrelationships of Jurisdiction and Choice of Law in Private International Law, Current Legal Problems, 44(1991), s. 39-62.
  • HARTLEY, C.: Hague Choice-of-Court Convention, European Law Review, (2006), S. 3, s. 414-424.
  • HARTLEY, T.C./DOGAUCHI, M.: Explanatory Report on the Preliminary Draft Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, Prel. Doc. No 25 of March 2004, http://www.hcch.net/index _en. php ?act =publications.details&pid=3510&dtid=35 (18.2.2008).
  • HARTLEY, T.C./DOGAUCHI, M.: Draft Report, Preliminary Draft Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Prel. Doc. No 26 of December 2004, http:// www.hcch. net/upload /wop/jdgm _ pd26e.pdf (18.2.2008).
  • HARTLEY, T./DOGAUCHI, M.: Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements, Explanatory Report, (report), http://www.hcch.net/upload/expl37e.pdf (18.2.2008).
  • KRUGER, T.: The 20th Session of Hague Conference: A New Choice of Court Convention and the Issue of EC Membership, Int’l&Comp.L.Q., 55(2006), s. 447
  • KURU, B.: Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usulü, C. I, 4. Bası, Ankara 1979.
  • NANDA, V.P.: The Landmark 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, Texas Int’l L.J., ,42(2007), s. 773-788.
  • NOMER, E./ŞANLI, C.: Devletler Hususî Hukuku, 16. bası, İstanbul 2008.
  • NORTH, P./FAWCETT, J.: Cheshire and North’s Private International Law, 11. Bası, Londra 1987.
  • NYGH, P./POCAR, F.: Report on the Preliminary Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Prel. Doc. No 11 of August , http://www.hcch.net /upload /wop/jdgmpd11.pdf (18.2.2008).
  • SARGIN, F.: Milletlerarası Usul Hukukunda Yetki Anlaşmaları, Ankara 1996.
  • SCHULZ, A.: The Hague Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements, (Convention), Yearbook of Private International Law, VII(2005), s. 1-16.
  • SCHULZ, A.: Report on the Meeting of the Drafting Committee of 18-20 April 2005 in Preparation of Twentieth session of June 2005, (report), Prel. Doc. No 28 of April , http://www.hcch.net/ upload /wop /jdgm_pd28e.pdf (18.2.2008).
  • SCHULZ, A.: The Future Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements and Arbitration, Parallel Proceedings and Possible Treaty Confl icts, in Particular with ICSID and the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards,(arbitration), Prel. Doc. No 32 of June 2005, http://www. hcch.net/upload/wop/jdgm_pd32e.pdf (18.2.2008).
  • TEITZ, L.E.: The Hague Choice of Court Convention: Validating Party Autonomy and Providing an Alternative to Arbitration, Am.J.Com.L., 53(2005), s. 543-558.
  • VLAS, P.: The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements in Dutch Perspective, Crosing Borders, Essays in European and Private International Law, Nationality Law and Islamic Law in Honor of Frans van der Velden (ed.: van der Griten, P/Heukels, T.), Kluwer-Deventer 2006, s.85-94.
  • United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol. 1122, s. 331.
  • http://www.unicankara.org.tr/unic_tr/belgeler.html (18.2.2008).
  • http://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?&chapter=23&Temp=mtdsg3&lan g=en (18.2.2008).
  • http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=98 (18.2.2008).
  • http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.publications&dtid=18cid=98 (18.2.2008).
  • http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.publications&dtid=358cid=98 (18.2.2008).
  • http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/sirasayi/donem23/yil01/ss47m.htm (18.2.2008).

Year 2007, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 321 - 354, 01.06.2007

Feriha Bilge Tanrıbilir

Abstract

Convention on Choice of Court Agreements is a convention of international procedure law that was drawn up at the Twentieth Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law. The Convention is mainly about exclusive choice of court agreements and effects of judgments resulting from proceedings based on such agreements. A Contracting State has three obligation with this Convention: 1. The chosen court that designated in exclusive choice of court agreements must hear the case, 2. A court of a Contracting State other than that of the chosen court can not hear the case, 3. A judgment given by a court of a Contracting State designated in a exclusive choice of court agreements shall be recognised and enforced in other Contracting States. The Convention has aimed to maintain effectiveness of choice of court agreements among Contracting States

Keywords

exclusive choice of court agreements recognition and enforcement

References

  • AKINCI, Z.: Milletlerarası Usul Hukukunda Yetki Sözleşmesine Dayanan Yabancı Derdestlik, Ankara 2002.
  • American Bar Association adopted by the House of Delegates, (7-8.8.2006), Recommendation (18.2.2008) . http://www.abanet.org/intlaw/policy/investment/hcca0806.pdf
  • AUST, A.: Modern Treaty Law and Practice, Cambridge 2000.
  • BAYRAKTAROĞLU-ÖZÇELİK, B.: Avrupa Topluluğunun Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk alanında Uluslararası Anlaşma Akdetme Yetkisi ve C-01/03 sayılı ve 7 Şubat Tarihli Avrupa Toplulukları Adalet Divanı Görüşü, AÜHFD, 57(2008), S. 2, s.17-50.
  • BIRNBAUM, S.L./DUNHAM, D.W.: Foreign Plaintiffs and Forum Non Conveniens, Brook.J.Int’l L., 16(1990), s. 241-265.
  • BRAND, R.A.: Introductory Note to the 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, Int’l Legal Materials, 44(2005), s. 1291-1293.
  • BERLIN, M.B.: The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements: Creating an International Framework for Recognizing Foreign Judgements, Int’l L.&Mgmt Rev., 3(2006), s. 43-78.
  • DOĞAN, V.:Türk Hukukunda Yabancı Derdestlik, Prof. Dr. Ergin Nomer Armağanı, MHB, 22(2002), S. 2, s. 121-147.
  • DICEY, A./MORRIS, J.: The Confl ict of Laws, 13. bası, (ed. L. Collins ve diğerleri), Londra 2000.
  • FAWCETT, J.: The Interrelationships of Jurisdiction and Choice of Law in Private International Law, Current Legal Problems, 44(1991), s. 39-62.
  • HARTLEY, C.: Hague Choice-of-Court Convention, European Law Review, (2006), S. 3, s. 414-424.
  • HARTLEY, T.C./DOGAUCHI, M.: Explanatory Report on the Preliminary Draft Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, Prel. Doc. No 25 of March 2004, http://www.hcch.net/index _en. php ?act =publications.details&pid=3510&dtid=35 (18.2.2008).
  • HARTLEY, T.C./DOGAUCHI, M.: Draft Report, Preliminary Draft Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Prel. Doc. No 26 of December 2004, http:// www.hcch. net/upload /wop/jdgm _ pd26e.pdf (18.2.2008).
  • HARTLEY, T./DOGAUCHI, M.: Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements, Explanatory Report, (report), http://www.hcch.net/upload/expl37e.pdf (18.2.2008).
  • KRUGER, T.: The 20th Session of Hague Conference: A New Choice of Court Convention and the Issue of EC Membership, Int’l&Comp.L.Q., 55(2006), s. 447
  • KURU, B.: Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usulü, C. I, 4. Bası, Ankara 1979.
  • NANDA, V.P.: The Landmark 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, Texas Int’l L.J., ,42(2007), s. 773-788.
  • NOMER, E./ŞANLI, C.: Devletler Hususî Hukuku, 16. bası, İstanbul 2008.
  • NORTH, P./FAWCETT, J.: Cheshire and North’s Private International Law, 11. Bası, Londra 1987.
  • NYGH, P./POCAR, F.: Report on the Preliminary Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Prel. Doc. No 11 of August , http://www.hcch.net /upload /wop/jdgmpd11.pdf (18.2.2008).
  • SARGIN, F.: Milletlerarası Usul Hukukunda Yetki Anlaşmaları, Ankara 1996.
  • SCHULZ, A.: The Hague Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements, (Convention), Yearbook of Private International Law, VII(2005), s. 1-16.
  • SCHULZ, A.: Report on the Meeting of the Drafting Committee of 18-20 April 2005 in Preparation of Twentieth session of June 2005, (report), Prel. Doc. No 28 of April , http://www.hcch.net/ upload /wop /jdgm_pd28e.pdf (18.2.2008).
  • SCHULZ, A.: The Future Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements and Arbitration, Parallel Proceedings and Possible Treaty Confl icts, in Particular with ICSID and the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards,(arbitration), Prel. Doc. No 32 of June 2005, http://www. hcch.net/upload/wop/jdgm_pd32e.pdf (18.2.2008).
  • TEITZ, L.E.: The Hague Choice of Court Convention: Validating Party Autonomy and Providing an Alternative to Arbitration, Am.J.Com.L., 53(2005), s. 543-558.
  • VLAS, P.: The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements in Dutch Perspective, Crosing Borders, Essays in European and Private International Law, Nationality Law and Islamic Law in Honor of Frans van der Velden (ed.: van der Griten, P/Heukels, T.), Kluwer-Deventer 2006, s.85-94.
  • United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol. 1122, s. 331.
  • http://www.unicankara.org.tr/unic_tr/belgeler.html (18.2.2008).
  • http://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?&chapter=23&Temp=mtdsg3&lan g=en (18.2.2008).
  • http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=98 (18.2.2008).
  • http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.publications&dtid=18cid=98 (18.2.2008).
  • http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.publications&dtid=358cid=98 (18.2.2008).
  • http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/sirasayi/donem23/yil01/ss47m.htm (18.2.2008).
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Feriha Bilge Tanrıbilir This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2007
Published in Issue Year 2007 Volume: 11 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Tanrıbilir, F. B. (2007). Haziran 2005 Tarihli Yetki Antlaşmasına Dair Lahey Sözleşmesi. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 321-354.
AMA Tanrıbilir FB. Haziran 2005 Tarihli Yetki Antlaşmasına Dair Lahey Sözleşmesi. AHBVU-FLJ. June 2007;11(1):321-354.
Chicago Tanrıbilir, Feriha Bilge. “Haziran 2005 Tarihli Yetki Antlaşmasına Dair Lahey Sözleşmesi”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 11, no. 1 (June 2007): 321-54.
EndNote Tanrıbilir FB (June 1, 2007) Haziran 2005 Tarihli Yetki Antlaşmasına Dair Lahey Sözleşmesi. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 11 1 321–354.
IEEE F. B. Tanrıbilir, “Haziran 2005 Tarihli Yetki Antlaşmasına Dair Lahey Sözleşmesi”, AHBVU-FLJ, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 321–354, 2007.
ISNAD Tanrıbilir, Feriha Bilge. “Haziran 2005 Tarihli Yetki Antlaşmasına Dair Lahey Sözleşmesi”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 11/1 (June 2007), 321-354.
JAMA Tanrıbilir FB. Haziran 2005 Tarihli Yetki Antlaşmasına Dair Lahey Sözleşmesi. AHBVU-FLJ. 2007;11:321–354.
MLA Tanrıbilir, Feriha Bilge. “Haziran 2005 Tarihli Yetki Antlaşmasına Dair Lahey Sözleşmesi”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 11, no. 1, 2007, pp. 321-54.
Vancouver Tanrıbilir FB. Haziran 2005 Tarihli Yetki Antlaşmasına Dair Lahey Sözleşmesi. AHBVU-FLJ. 2007;11(1):321-54.