SOSYAL ADALET KAVRAMININ BAZI TEMEL HAKLAR İLE CEZA VE VERGİ ADALETİNE ETKİLERİ

Year 2019, Volume: 23 Issue: 4, 297 - 323, 25.10.2019

Mehmet Ali Zengin

https://doi.org/10.34246/ahbvuhfd.637943

Abstract

Sosyal adalet kavramı bazı temel haklar bakımından önemli etkilere sahiptir.
Bu kapsamda çalışmamızda çocuk hakları, sağlık hakkı, çevre hakkı ve cinsiyete
bağlı ayrımcılık yasağı ele alınırken güncel tartışmalara ve görüşlere yer verilmiştir.
Sosyal adalet konusu çok sayıda temel hak bakımından ele alınabilir. Ancak konu
iki gerekçeyle bazı temel haklarla sınırlandırılmıştır. Çocuk hakları ve cinsiyete
dayalı ayrım yasağının tercih edilmesinde, ortaya çıkan sorunların toplumun büyük
bir kesimini ilgilendirmesi ve bu alanlarda sosyal adaletin sağlanmasına duyulan
ihtiyacın boyutu etkili olmuştur. Yine sağlık hakkı ve çevre hakkının tercih edilmesinde,
güncel gelişmelerin varlığı ve sosyal adalet açısından bu hakların yeni yeni tartışılıyor
olması etkili olmuştur. Öte yandan vergi ve ceza konusundaki hukuki düzenlemelerin
sosyal adalet ihtiyacını tatmin edecek şekilde tesis edilebilmeleri beklentisi, konunun
bu alanlar bakımından ele alınmasında etkili olmuştur. Vergi ve ceza alanına dair
hukuk kuralları tesis edilirken, sosyal adaletin sağlanması da önemli bir hedeftir.
Ceza adaleti ve vergi adaleti, sosyal adaletin sağlanmasında önemli ve olumlu bir
etki meydana getirmektedir.

Keywords

Sosyal Adalet, İnsan Hakları, Vergi adaleti, ceza adaleti, ayrımcılık

EFFECTS OF SOCIAL JUSTICE CONCEPT ON SOME BASIC RIGHTS WITH TAXATIONAL AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Abstract

Social justice concept has important effects in terms of some basic rights.
Actual discussions and thoughts about children rights, right to environment, right to
health and prohibition of gender discrimination are addressed in our study with in
this context. Social justice concept can be considered with regard to plenty of basic
rights. However, topic was limited with some basic rights in the light of two reasons.
Election of children rights and prohibition of gender discrimination base on two
considerations; one is largeness of problems eff ect major part of society, another one is size of social justice necessity. Nevertheless, actual advances and new discussions
about social justice are the main reasons of election of right to health and right to
environment. On the other hand, regulating taxational and criminal rules in the aim
of expectation of judicial satisfaction needs eff ected election of the topic. Reach to
social justice has got crucial target, when regulating criminal and taxational norms.
Criminal and taxational justice have important and positive impact on achieving
social justice.

Keywords

Social Justice, Human Rights, Taxational Justice, criminal justice, discrimination

References

• BARRY Brian: Why Social Justice Matters, 1. Baskı, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2005.
• BEDAU, Hugo Adam, The Death Penalty: Social Policy and Social Justice, Arizona State Law Journal, 1977.
• BRAITHWAITE, John: Restorative Justice and Social Justice, Saskatchewan Law Review, C.63.
• CAMPBELL, Tom: Can the Law Deliver Social Justice, University of Western Sydney Law Review, C.5.
• COLLINS Chuck, YESKEL Felice: Economic Apartheid in America: A Primer on Economic Inequality and Insecurity, 1.Baskı, The New Press, New York, 2000.
• DIAS, Maria Clara: Affirmative Action and Social Justice, Connecticut Law Review, C.36.
• EWING Keith: Just Words and Social Justice, Review of Constitutional Studies, C.5, Sa.1.
• FOLEY, Edward B: Social Justice and Child Poverty, Ohio State Law Journal, C.57.
• FORTIN, Ernest L: Natural Law and Social Justice, American Journal Jurisprudence, C.30
• FRASER, Nancy: From Redistribution to Recognition?: Dilemmas of Justice in a "Postsocialist" Age, New Left Review, C.212, Sa.1, July-August.
• GOTTLIEB, Henry M: Legal Rights and Social Justice, University of Detroit Law Journal, C.2.
• HAZARD, Geoffrey C. Jr: Social Justice through Civil Justice, University of Chicago Law Review, C.36.
• HUNTER, Nan D: Lawyering for Social Justice, New York University Law Review, C.72, November.
• KALSEM, Kristin, WILLIAMS, Verna L: Social Justice Feminism, UCLA Women's Law Joırnal, C.18.
• MACRORY, R: Environmental Standards, Legitimacy and Social Justice, Acta Juridica,1999.
• MINSON Jeffrey: Second Principles of Social Justice, Law Context: A Socio-Legal Journal, C.10.
• NOVAK, Michael: What is Social Justice, Capital University Law Review, C.21.
• O'SHANE, Pat: Social Justice for Aborigines, Alternative Law Journal, C.19, Sa. 1, February.
• PERLSTADT, Harry: Court Decisions, Social Problems and Social Justice, ALSA Forum, (American Legal Studies Assoc.), C.8, Sa.2.
• POSNER, Eric A: SUNSTEIN Cass R., Global Warming and Social Justice, Regulation, C.31, Spring.
• POUND, Roscoe: Social Justice and Legal Justice, Centeral Law. Journal, C.75.
• ROBERTS, Dorothy E: Sources of Commitment to Social Justice, Roger Williams University Law Review, C.4.
• RODES Robert E. Jr: Social Justice and Liberation, Notre Dame Law Review, C.71.
• ROGOVIN, V: Social Justice and Improving Distribution Relations, Soviet Law and Government, C.25, Summer.
• SANDOVAL Clara: Transitional Justice and Social Change, SUR - International Journal on Human Rights, C.20.
• STEWART, Miranda: Reforming Tax for Social Justice, Alternative Law Journal,C.23,Sa. 4.
• SOLAS John: What Kind of Social Justice Does Social Work Seek, International Social Work, C.51. Sa.6.
• SYTNICHENKO, Liudmyla: Otfried Hoffe's Theory of Social Justice, Polish Political Science Yearbook, C.44.
• THOMPSON, Phil: Social Justice under Thatcher, Sri Lanka Journal of International Law,1998.
• WEHLE, Louis B: Social Justice and Legal Education, American Law Review, C.51.
• WELLMAN, Carl: Social Justice and Human Rights, Persona & Derecho, C.17.
• WILEY, Lindsay F: Health Law as Social Justice, Cornell Journal of Law And Public Policy, C.24.
• YATES Al, BARTLEY Anne: Progressive Thinking: A Synthesis of American Progressive Values, Beliefs and Positions, American Values Project, Denver, 2012,
• www.tr.scribd.com/document/131793272/Progressive-Thinking (erişim: 16.01.2019)
• www.tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penoloji (erişim: 12.01.2019)
• www.seslisozluk.net/ableism-nedir-ne-demek/ (erişim: 16.01.2019)
• www.seslisozluk.net/nativism-nedir-ne-demek/ (erişim: 16.01.2019)