5E Modeline Harmanlanmış Cabri 3D Etkinliklerinin Geometri Başarısına Etkileri

Abstract

Ulusal Matematik Öğretmenleri Birliği geometrik düşünmenin geliştirilmesi için etkili öğretim yöntemleri kullanımını önermektedir. Öğrenenin aktif katılımı ve kendi öğrenmelerini oluşturması bakımından yapılandırmacı yaklaşım modelleri ve bu modeller arasında 5E modeli ön plana çıkmıştır. 5E yapılandırmacı yaklaşım modeli, öğrencilerin aktif katılımını sağlamaktadır. Yapılandırmacı modellerde, bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin birlikte kullanılması önerilmektedir. Matematik öğretiminde 5E modelini kullanan çalışmalar olmakla birlikte teknoloji ve 5E modelini kullanan araştırma sayısı sınırlıdır. Bu makalede, bir geometri yazılım olan Cabri 3D destekli 5E modeline göre hazırlanan etkinliklerin geometri başarısına etkisi incelenmiştir. Ayrıca Cabri 3D kullanımı ile ilgili öğrenci görüşleri sunulmuştur. Sonuçlarını sunduğumuz çalışma, yarı deneysel bir yöntem üzerine inşa edilmiştir. Cabri 3D ve 5E modeli göz önünde bulundurularak hazırlanan çalışma etkinlikleri daha sonra deney grubu öğrencilerine uygulanmıştır. Kontrol grubu öğrencilerinin dersleri, ders kitabındaki etkinliklere göre yürütülmüştür. Çalışma gruplarındaki öğrencilere ön-test son-test olarak Geometri Başarı Testi uygulanmıştır. Ayrıca deney grubunun Cabri 3D hakkındaki görüşlerini öğrenmek için uygulama sonunda bir görüşme yapılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde SPSS ve tanımlayıcı istatistiklerden yararlanılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın sonucunda Cabri 3D destekli 5E modeli ile öğretimin öğrencilerin geometri başarılarını artırdığı söylenebilir. Ayrıca çoğu öğrencinin Cabri 3D hakkında olumlu görüşü belirttiği gözlenmiştir

Keywords

• 5E modeli
• Cabri dinamik geometri yazılımı
• geometri öğretimi
• geometri başarısı.

Effects of Cabri 3D Activities Blended into the 5E Model on Geometry Success

Abstract

The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics recommends using effective teaching methods to develop geometric thinking. Among the constructivist approach models, the 5E model has come to the fore in the active participation of the learner and the creation of their own knowledge. In constructivist models, it is recommended to use information and communication technologies together. The number of studies using the technology-supported 5E model in mathematics teaching is limited. In this article, the effect of activities suitable for the 5E model supported by Cabri 3D geometry software on geometry success has been examined. Student views on Cabri 3D activities were presented. The study was built on the quasi-experimental method. Activities suitable for the Cabri 3D and 5E model were applied to the experimental group students. The control group students conducted their lessons with textbook activities. Academic Achievement Test was applied to the study group students. After the application, the experimental group was interviewed. SPSS and descriptive statistics were used in the analysis of the data. As a result of this study, it can be said that teaching with the Cabri 3D supported 5E model increases the geometry success of the students and most of the students have positive opinions about Cabri 3D.

Keywords

• 5E model
• Cabri dynamic geometry software
• geometry teaching
• geometry achievement.

References

1. Accascina, G., & Rogora, E. (2006). Using Cabri3D diyagrams for teaching. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 13(1), 11-22.
2. Akar, E. (2005). The effect of the 5E learning cycle model on students' understanding of acids and bases [Unpublished master's dissertation]. Middle East Technical University.
3. Akgül, A. (2014). The effect of Cabri 3D software on student achievement and attitude in teaching the areas and volumes of geometric objects in 6th, 7th, and 8th grades [Unpublished master's dissertation]. Fırat University.
4. Alpar, R. (2013). Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik yöntemler (4. baskı). Detay Yayıncılık.
5. Baki, A. (2002). Öğrenen ve öğretenler için bilgisayar destekli matematik. Tübitak Bitav-Ceren Yayınları.
6. Balcı, S. (2005). Developing 8th-grade students' learning of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using the 5E learning model and conceptual change texts [Unpublished master's dissertation]. Middle East Technical University.
7. Bedir-Erişti, S. D., Kuzu, A., Kabakçı-Yurdakul, I., Akbulut Y., & Kurt A. A. (Eds.). (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (1. baskı). Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
8. Bleicher, R. E. (2005). Learning The Learning Cycle: The Differantial Effect on Elementary Preservise Teachers. School Science and Mathematics. 105(2), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18038.x

9. Büyükkarcı, A. (2019). The effect of the 5E model enriched with coding on 4th grade mathematics achievement, retention and attitude [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University.
10. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (29. baskı). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
11. Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. Colorado Springs: Office of Science Education National Institutes of Health.
12. Campbell, M. A. (2000). The effects of the 5E learning cycle model on students’ understanding of force and motion concepts [Unpublished master's dissertation]. The University of Central Florida.
13. Can, A. (2020). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi. (9. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
14. Cannon, T. R. (2005). Student success: a study of computer-based instruction versus lecture-based instruction in developmental mathematics at a Tennessee community college [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.
15. Carin, A. A., Bass, J. E., & Contant, T. L. (2005). Teaching science as inquiry. Prentice Hall.
16. Clarou, P., & Laborde, C. (2000). Regards sur l‟intégration de Cabri-Géomètre. In G.L. Baron, E. Bruillard & J-F. Lévy (Eds), Les technologies dans la classe de l‟innovation à l‟intégration (pp. 101-110). Paris: INRP.
17. Cohen, J. (2007). Statistical power Analysis for the behavioral sciences. New Tork: Academic Press.
18. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
19. Çalışkan, M. (2016). Researching the effects of the instruction of the solid matters assisted with dynamic geometry software on the 7th graders' attitudes towards geometry and spatial thinking [Unpublished master's dissertation]. Dokuz Eylül University.
20. Çetin İ., Erdoğan A., & Yazlık D. Ö. (2015). The effect of using GeoGebra software on students' achievement of transformation geometry. International Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 2015(4), 84-92. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/goputeb/issue/34518/381200
21. Demir, F. (2011). The effect of a dynamic geometry software on elementary school students' proof skills in geometry [Unpublished master's dissertation]. Erzincan University.
22. Demir, Ö., & Kurtuluş, A. (2019). The effect of 5E learning model on 7th grade students' Van Hiele transform geometry thinking levels in transforming geometry teaching. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Social Sciences, 20 (special issue), 1279-1299. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.555483
23. Duatepe-Paksu, A., İymen, E., & Pakmak, G. (2013). Pre-service elementary teachers' concept images on the diagonal of quadrilaterals. Education and Science, (38)167, 162-178.
24. Dur, Z. (2016). Investigation of the instrumental genesis of dragging and measuring artifacts used by the 7th-grade students in the dynamic geometry environment [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Eskişehir Anadolu University.
25. Emhan, A., Mete, M., & Emhan, A. (2012). Investigation of relationship between workaholism and obsession in public and private sector workers. Dicle Medical Journal, 39(1), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2012.01.0098
26. Emrahoğlu, Y. N. & Bülbül, O. (2010). Simulations and animation effects in computer-assisted instruction on academic success and retention when the teaching of the optic unit in physics at 9. class. Çukurova University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 19(3), 409-422. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cusosbil/issue/4385/60238
27. Ergin, İ., Kanlı, U., & Tan, M. (2007). To examine the effects of the 5E model on the student's academic success in physics education. Journal of Gazi University Gazi Education Faculty, 27(2), 191-209. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gefad/issue/6750/90758
28. Eryiğit, P. (2010). The effects of using three-dimensional dynamic geometry software on 12th-grade students' academic achievement and attitudes towards geometry course [Unpublished master's dissertation]. Dokuz Eylül University.
29. Faggiano, E. (2012). About physical and technological manipulation in primary and lower secondary school geometry education. 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education [Paper presentation]. COEX, Seoul, Korea.
30. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
31. Filiz, M. (2009). The effect of using Geogebra and Cabri Geometry II dynamic geometry software in web-supported environments on student achievement [Unpublished master's dissertation]. Karadeniz Technical University.
32. Gay, L. R., Mills, G.E., & Airasian, P. W. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (8th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall.
33. Gürbüz, R., & Gülburnu, M. (2013). Effect of teaching geometry with the use of Cabri 3D in eighth grade on conceptual learning. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 4(3). 224-241. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/turkbilmat/issue/21571/231484
34. Güven, B., & Karataş, İ. (2003). Learning geometry with dynamic geometry software Cabri: Student opinions. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 2(2), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.278069
35. Hançer, A. H., & Yalçın, N. (2007). The effects of 'computer-based learning based upon constructivist approach in science education' on attitudes toward computers. Kastamonu Journal of Education, 15(2), 549-560. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kefdergi/issue/49102/626592
36. Hasançebi, B., Terzi, Y., & Küçük, Z. (2020). Distractor analysis based on item difficulty index and item discrimination index. Gümüşhane University Journal of Science Institute (GÜFBED), 10(1), 224-240. https://doi:10.17714/gümüşfenbil.615465
37. Hiçcan, B. (2008). The influence of teaching activities concerning the 5E learning cycle model on academic achievements in mathematics lessons of 7th-grade students in primary school about linear equations in one variable [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Gazi University.
38. Işıksal, M., & Aşkar, P. (2003). Development of worksheets using spreadsheet and dynamic geometry software. Elementary Education Online, 2(2), 10-18. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ilkonline/issue/8612/107263
39. Johnson, C.D. (2002). The effects of the Geometer’s Sketchpad on the Van Hiele levels and academic of high school students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Wayne State University, Michigan.
40. Kösa, T., & Kalay, H. (2018). Evaluation of the learning environment designed for developing 7th-grade students' spatial orientation skills. Kastamonu Education Journal January, 26(1), 83-92. https://doi:10.24106/kefdergi.348100
41. Karataş, İ., & Güven, B. (2015). using dynamic geometry software Cabri in mathematics education: Pythagorean relationship and exterior angles of polygons. Gazi Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 15-28. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gebd/issue/35201/390638
42. Keser, Ö. F. (2003). The integrative learning environment and design for physics education [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Karadeniz Technical University.
43. Keskin, M., & Tapan-Broutin, M. S. (2019). Examination of students' opinions about the circle course module applied in the smart board environment. Electronic Turkish Studies, 14(4), 2495-2514. https://doi:/10.29228/TurkishStudies.22883
44. Kim, H. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Denistry & Endodontics, 37(44), 52-54. https://doi:/0.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
45. Kurak, Y. (2009). The effect of using dynamic geometry software on students' transformational geometry understanding and academic achievement [Unpublished master’s dissertation].Karadeniz Teknik University.
46. Lawson, A. E. (2001). Using The Learning Cycle to Teach Biology Concepts and Reasoning Patterns. Journal of Biological Education, 35 (4), 165–169.
47. Miles M., & Huberman, M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. Sage Publications. Ministry of National Education - Board of Education. (2006). İlköğretim Matematik Dersi Öğretim Programı ve Kılavuzu, Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü.
48. Ministry of National Education, (2013). İlköğretim Matematik Dersi 6-8. Sınıflar Öğretim Programı, Ankara.
49. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.
50. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2001). Navigating through geometry in prekindergartengrade2. Reston, Va.
51. Okumuş, S. (2011). Investigation of the effects of dynamic geometry environments on 7th-grade students' ability to define and classify quadrilaterals [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Karadeniz Technical University.
52. Özaydın, T. C. (2010). The effect of the activities applied in line with the 5E learning circle and scientific process skills in the seventh-grade science and technology lesson of primary school on the academic achievement, scientific process skills, and attitudes of the students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ege University.
53. Özmen, G. (2019). The effect of using concrete materials and dynamic geometry software on 5th-grade students' geometry achievement, attitude, and spatial abilities [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Uşak University.
54. Özsevgeç, T. (2007). Determining the Effectiveness of the Guide Materials Developed According to the 5E Model for the 5th Grade Force and Motion Unit of Primary Education [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Karadeniz Technical University.
55. Saka, A. (2006). The Effect of 5E Model on Eliminating Science Teacher Candidates' Misconceptions About Genetics [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Karadeniz Technical University.
56. Tekin, H. (1991). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Ankara Yargı Yayınevi.
57. Teltik-Başer, E. (2008). The effect of teaching activities following the 5E model on the academic achievement of 7th-grade students in mathematics [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Gazi University.
58. Temizyürek, K. (2003). Fen öğretimi ve uygulamaları. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
59. Toptaş, V. (2008). Examining the teaching-learning process with the activities done in the classroom in geometry teaching. Elementary Education Online, 7(1), 91-110. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ilkonline/issue/8602/107134
60. Tuna, A., & Kaçar, A. (2013). The effect of the 5E learning cycle model in teaching trigonometry on students' academic achievement and the permanence of their knowledge. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(1), 73-87.
61. Türnüklü, A. (2000). A qualitative research technique that can be used effectively in educational science research: Interview. Journal of Educational Management in Theory and Practice, 24(24), 543-559. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kuey/issue/10372/126941
62. Ubuz, B. (1999). Errors and misconceptions of 10th and 11th-grade students on basic geometry subjects. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Education, 16(17), 95-104.
63. Uğur B., Urhan S., & Arkün- Kocadere S. (2016). Teaching the subject of geometric objects with dynamic geometry software. Necatibey Faculty of Education Journal of Electronic Science and Mathematics Education (EFMED), 10(2), 339-366. https://doi:10.17522/balikesirnef.278069
64. Wilder, M., & Shuttleworth, P. (2005). Cell inquiry: A 5E learning cycle lesson. Science Activities, 41(4), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.3200/SATS.41.4.37-43
65. Yanık, A. (2013). Investigation of the development of 7th-grade students' ability to define, create and classify polygons with Cabri software [Unpublished master's dissertation]. Eskişehir Anadolu University.
66. Yavuzsoy-Köse, N., & Özdaş, A. (2009). How do primary 5th-grade students determine the symmetry lines in geometric shapes with the help of Cabri geometry software? Elementary Education Online 8(1), 159-175. http://İlkogretim-Online.Org.Tr
67. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (5. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.