Research Article

Examining the Japanese Fear of ISIS with Soft Terrorism Concept

Volume: 3 Number: 1 June 30, 2024
EN TR

Examining the Japanese Fear of ISIS with Soft Terrorism Concept

Abstract

Terrorism has emerged as a paramount challenge in recent times. With current terrorist organizations adeptly embracing internet technologies and seamlessly integrating them into their strategies, the landscape of terrorism has evolved into a multifaceted global concern. For instance, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has had a negative impact not only on the citizens of the countries they directly target but also on the psychology of individuals in non-targeted countries through their internet-focused strategies.Despite not carrying out any attacks on Japan, the majority of the Japanese perceive ISIS as a significant threat to their nation. This finding serves as a prime example of how a terrorist organization like ISIS, utilizing internet strategies proficiently, can detrimentally affect individuals in non-targeted countries. This study demonstrates how the soft terrorism concept elucidates the heightened fear of ISIS in Japan. By conducting a Google Trends analysis, the Japanese case is examined in this research. The findings indicate that the soft terrorism activities of ISIS have both short-term and long-term adverse effects on the Japanese, primarily attributed to the dissemination of brutal images and videos posted by ISIS on the internet, as posited by the soft terrorism concept.

Keywords

Google Trends , Japan , Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) , Soft Terrorism Concept , Internet

References

  1. Barceló, J. and Labzina, E. (2020). Do Islamic State’s Deadly Attacks Disengage, Deter, or Mobilize Supporters?. British Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 1539-1559.
  2. Bertram, L. (2016). Terrorism, the Internet and the Social Media Advantage: Exploring How Terrorist Organizations Exploit Aspects of the Internet, Social Media and How These Same Platforms Could Be Used to Counter-Violent Extremism. Journal for deradicalization, 1(7), 225-252.
  3. Braithwaite, A. (2013). The Logic of Public Fear in Terrorism and Counterterrorism. Journal of police and criminal psychology, 28(2), 95-101.
  4. Brück, T. and Müller, C. (2010). Comparing the determinants of concern about terrorism and crime. Global Crime, 11(1), 1-15.
  5. Byman, D. (2016). ISIS Goes Global: Fight the Islamic State by Targeting its Affiliates. Foreign Affairs, 95(2), 76-85.
  6. Ceron, A., Curini, L. and Iacus, S. M. (2019). ISIS at its Apogee: The Arabic Discourse on Twitter and What We Can Learn from that About ISIS Support and Foreign Fighters. Sage, 9(1), 215-229.
  7. Cheung, Y. W. and Lai, K. S. (1995). Lag Order and Critical Values of the Augmented Dickey–Fuller test. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(3), 277-280.
  8. Cohen-Almagor, R. (2016). Hate and Racist Speech in the United States: A Critique. Philosophy and Public Issues, 6(1), 77-123.
  9. Eichenauer, V. Z., Indergand, R., Martínez, I. Z. and Sax, C. (2021). Obtaining Consistent Time Series from Google Trends. Economic Inquiry, 60(2), 694-705.
  10. Finseraas, H. and Listhaug, O. (2013). It Can Happen Here: The Impact of the Mumbai Terror Attacks on Public Opinion in Western Europe. Public Choice, 156(1), 213-228.
APA
Tulga, A. Y. (2024). Examining the Japanese Fear of ISIS with Soft Terrorism Concept. Bölge Çalışmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 27-48. https://izlik.org/JA86RR87WB