Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Reconceptualizing Interregionalism through Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM): A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis

Year 2025, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 1 - 27, 30.06.2025

Abstract

Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) was formed three decades ago to intensify European and Asian relations. Today, it constitutes the widest interregional dialogue mechanism covering 53 countries from Europe to Asia, and it is a special case for regionalism studies. The literature on ASEM discusses its scope, structure, means of cooperation, and possible future scenarios. Yet, the current studies lack an empirical data-based analysis of which themes shape cooperation processes, how regional and international issues reflect upon ASEM, and the extent of change in cooperation themes. In that regard, this study aims to examine ASEM to answer these questions. By using Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis (CACDA), this research analyzes the chair’s statements from ASEM Summits between 1996 and 2021 to identify discursive themes, their chronological shifts, and their alignment with ASEM’s three pillars: political, economic, and socio-cultural. The findings of the research reveal that ASEM functions as an intergovernmental forum facilitating interregional dialogue on shared regional and global issues despite criticisms of lacking enforceable outcomes. The study underlines ASEM’s role in fostering dialogue between Asia and Europe and proposes reconceptualizing interregionalism as an integral component of multilateral governance.

References

  • Abe, S., & Plummer, M. G. (1997). Implications of the Asia-Europe Meeting for the World Trading System: An Issue-Oriented Review. Kobe economic & business review, 41, 1–23.
  • Anthony, L. (n.d). AntConc [Computer Software] http://www.laurenceanthony.net/
  • ASEF (n.d.). Who We Are https://asef.org/
  • ASEM (n.d.). ASEM Pillars https://aseminfoboard.org/asem-pillars/
  • ASEM (n.d.). Overview https://aseminfoboard.org/overview/
  • Ayson, M. E. G. (2010). Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis of CNN’s Representation of The Yemen War. Up Los Baños Journal, 18(1), 103-119
  • Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Continuum: London
  • Baker, P. (2012). Acceptable bias? Using corpus linguistics methods with critical discourse analysis. Critical discourse studies, 9(3), 247-256.
  • Cammack, P. (1999). Interpreting ASEM: Interregionalism and the new materialism. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 4(1), 13-32.
  • Christiansen, T., and Tsui, S. (2017). The value and the limitations of comprehensive multilateralism: An EU perspective on the Asia-Europe Meeting. European Foreign Affairs Review, 22(2), 1–20.
  • de Dios, E., Robles Jr, A. C., & Santiago, J. S. S. (1996). The Philippine Stake in the Asia-Europe Meeting. World Bull., 12, 57.
  • Dent, C. M. (1997). The ASEM: managing the new framework of the EU's economic relations with East Asia. Pacific Affairs, 70(4), 495-516.
  • Dent, C. M. (2001). ASEM and the" Cinderella Complex" of EU-East Asia economic relations. Pacific Affairs, 74(1), 25-52.
  • Dent, C. M. (2004). The Asia-Europe Meeting and inter-regionalism: Toward a theory of multilateral utility. Asian Survey, 44(2), 213-236.
  • Doidge, M. (2004). Inter-regionalism and regional actors: The EU-ASEAN example. The Eurasian Space: Far More than Two Continents, Singapore: ISEAS.
  • Doidge, M. (2019). ASEM’s first two decades: A role discovered. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 9(2), 6-19.
  • European Commission (1994). Communication From the Commission to The Council Towards A New Asia Strategy https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:51994DC0314
  • European Union (n.d.) Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/asia-europe-meeting-asem_en
  • Fort, B. (2004). ASEM’s role for co-operation on security in Asia and Europe. Asia Europe Journal, 2(3), 355-363.
  • Gaens, B. (2006). Beyond ASEM 6: lessons for the actors. S. Bersick, W. Stokhof and P. van der Velde (Ed.). Multiregionalism and multilateralism: Asian-European relations in a global context (pp. 131-140). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Garcia, L. S. (2018). The Philippine president’s rhetoric on Japan-China rivalry and independent foreign policy. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 3(2), 1-16.
  • Gilson, J. (2013). New Interregionalism? The EU and East Asia. F. Söderbaum and L. van Langenhove (Ed.). The EU as a Global Player (pp. 59-78). London: Routledge.
  • Goh, C. T. (1995) Speech By Prime Minister, Mr Goh Chok Tong At The World Economic Forum Held In Davos, Switzerland, On 28 January 1995 Europe-Asia Partnership For Growth https://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/speeches/record-details/7460ffda-115d-11e3-83d5-0050568939ad.
  • Hakses, H. (2022). Karar Alma Mekanizmaları Açısından Bölgesel ve Bölgeler Ötesi Örgütlerin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi: APEC ve ASEM Örneği. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 25(1), 104-113.
  • Katzenstein, P. (2005). A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Kim, K. H. (2014). Examining US news media discourses about North Korea: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 25(2), 221-244.
  • Li, K., & Zhang, Q. (2022). A corpus-based study of representation of Islam and Muslims in American media: Critical Discourse Analysis Approach. International Communication Gazette, 84(2), 157-180.
  • Lim, P. (2001). The unfolding Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) process1: Issues for ASEM III. P. W. Preston and J. Gilson (Ed.). The European Union and East Asia: inter-regional linkages in a changing global system, (pp. 91-108). Edward Elgar Publishing
  • Malamud, A., & Gardini, G. L. (2014). Debunking Interregionalism: Concepts, Types, and Critique-With a Transatlantic Focus. Atlantic Future Working Paper 38.
  • Mohammad, R. M., & Alshahrani, A. A. (2019). Corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of Saudi Vision 2030. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 10. 16-28
  • Papageorgiou, M. M., & Vieira, A. (2021). Mapping the literature on China and Russia in IR and area studies: A bibliometric analysis (1990–2019). Journal of Chinese Political Science, 1- 27.
  • Park, S. H. (2004). ASEM and the future of Asia-Europe relations: Background, characteristics and challenges. Asia Europe Journal, 2(3), 341-354.
  • Pelkmans, J., & Hu, W. (2014). Does ASEM work?. CEPS Policy Briefs.
  • Pereira, R. (2007). The Helsinki summit and the future course of Asia–Europe meeting. Asia Europe Journal, 5(1), 17-21.
  • Reiterer, M. (2001). The Asia Europe meeting and the investment promotion action plan: a bureaucratic exercise or the way ahead?. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 2(4), 805-830.
  • Reiterer, M. (2004). The role of education and culture in contemporary international relations. A challenge for the Asia Europe Meeting (ASEM). Asia Europe Journal, 2(3), 365-371.
  • Reiterer, M. (2006). Interregionalism as a new diplomatic tool: the EU and East Asia. Eur. Foreign Aff. Rev., 11, 223-243.
  • Rüland, J. (2010). Balancers, multilateral utilities or regional identity builders? International relations and the study of interregionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(8), 1271-1283.
  • Segal, G. (1998). A new ASEM agenda: A report on the British council's meeting ‘Asia and Europe: Societies in transition’, 19–22 march 1998. The Pacific Review, 11(4), 561-572,
  • Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.
  • Stubbs, M. (1997). Whorf's children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis (CDA). British studies in applied linguistics, 12, 100-116.
  • Tsardanidis, C. (2010). Interregionalism: A comparative analysis of ASEM and FEALAC. J. Dosch and O. Jacob (Ed.). Asia and Latin America (pp. 240-259). London: Routledge.
  • Vogel, F., Hamann, H., & Gauer, I. (2018). Computer-assisted legal linguistics: Corpus analysis as a new tool for legal studies. Law & Social Inquiry, 43(4), 1340-1363.
  • Widdowson, H. G. (2008). Text, context, pretext: Critical issues in discourse analysis. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Yeo, L. H. (2004). Asia and Europe: The development and different dimensions of ASEM. London: Routledge.
  • Yeo, L. H. (2006). The Ebb and Flow of ASEM Studies. Josine Stremmelaar et Paul van der Velde (Ed.). What about Asia? Revisiting Asian Studies, (pp. 79-80). Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press
  • Yeo, L. H. (2013). Towards a dynamic Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM)?. EUC Working Paper, No. 14. Singapore: EU Centre.
  • Yeo, L. H. (2019). The Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM). In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.

Asya-Avrupa Zirvesi (ASEM) Üzerı̇nden Bölgelerarasılığın Yenı̇den Kavramsallaştırılması: Derlem Desteklı̇ Eleştı̇rel Söylem Analı̇zı̇

Year 2025, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 1 - 27, 30.06.2025

Abstract

Asya-Avrupa Zirvesi (ASEM) otuz yıl önce Avrupa ve Asya ilişkilerini yoğunlaştırmak amacıyla kurulmuştur. Bugün Avrupa'dan Asya'ya 53 ülkeyi kapsayan geniş bir bölgelerarası diyalog mekanizması olan ASEM, bölgeselcilik çalışmaları için vakadır. ASEM ile ilgili literatür ASEM'in kapsamını, yapısını, işbirliği araçlarını ve olası gelecek senaryolarını tartışmaktadır. Ancak mevcut çalışmalarda hangi temaların işbirliği süreçlerini şekillendirdiği, bölgesel ve uluslararası meselelerin ASEM'e nasıl yansıdığı ve işbirliği temalarındaki değişimin boyutları ampirik verilere dayalı olarak analiz edilmemektedir. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışma bu soruları yanıtlamak için ASEM'i incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Derlem Destekli Eleştirel Söylem Analizini (CACDA) kullanan bu araştırma, söylemsel temaları, bunların kronolojik değişimlerini ve ASEM'in üç işbirliği sütunu ile uyumlarını belirlemek için 1996-2021 yılları arasındaki ASEM Zirveleri’nde açıklamalarını analiz etmektedir. Araştırmanın bulguları, ASEM'in, uygulanabilir sonuçlardan yoksun olduğu yönündeki eleştirilere rağmen, ortak bölgesel ve küresel konularda bölgelerarası diyaloğu kolaylaştıran bir hükümetler arası forum olarak işlevi gördüğünü ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışma, ASEM'in Asya ve Avrupa arasındaki diyaloğun geliştirilmesindeki rolünün altını çizmekte ve bölgelerarasılığın çok taraflı yönetişimin ayrılmaz bir bileşeni olarak yeniden kavramsallaştırılmasını önermektedir.

References

  • Abe, S., & Plummer, M. G. (1997). Implications of the Asia-Europe Meeting for the World Trading System: An Issue-Oriented Review. Kobe economic & business review, 41, 1–23.
  • Anthony, L. (n.d). AntConc [Computer Software] http://www.laurenceanthony.net/
  • ASEF (n.d.). Who We Are https://asef.org/
  • ASEM (n.d.). ASEM Pillars https://aseminfoboard.org/asem-pillars/
  • ASEM (n.d.). Overview https://aseminfoboard.org/overview/
  • Ayson, M. E. G. (2010). Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis of CNN’s Representation of The Yemen War. Up Los Baños Journal, 18(1), 103-119
  • Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Continuum: London
  • Baker, P. (2012). Acceptable bias? Using corpus linguistics methods with critical discourse analysis. Critical discourse studies, 9(3), 247-256.
  • Cammack, P. (1999). Interpreting ASEM: Interregionalism and the new materialism. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 4(1), 13-32.
  • Christiansen, T., and Tsui, S. (2017). The value and the limitations of comprehensive multilateralism: An EU perspective on the Asia-Europe Meeting. European Foreign Affairs Review, 22(2), 1–20.
  • de Dios, E., Robles Jr, A. C., & Santiago, J. S. S. (1996). The Philippine Stake in the Asia-Europe Meeting. World Bull., 12, 57.
  • Dent, C. M. (1997). The ASEM: managing the new framework of the EU's economic relations with East Asia. Pacific Affairs, 70(4), 495-516.
  • Dent, C. M. (2001). ASEM and the" Cinderella Complex" of EU-East Asia economic relations. Pacific Affairs, 74(1), 25-52.
  • Dent, C. M. (2004). The Asia-Europe Meeting and inter-regionalism: Toward a theory of multilateral utility. Asian Survey, 44(2), 213-236.
  • Doidge, M. (2004). Inter-regionalism and regional actors: The EU-ASEAN example. The Eurasian Space: Far More than Two Continents, Singapore: ISEAS.
  • Doidge, M. (2019). ASEM’s first two decades: A role discovered. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 9(2), 6-19.
  • European Commission (1994). Communication From the Commission to The Council Towards A New Asia Strategy https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:51994DC0314
  • European Union (n.d.) Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/asia-europe-meeting-asem_en
  • Fort, B. (2004). ASEM’s role for co-operation on security in Asia and Europe. Asia Europe Journal, 2(3), 355-363.
  • Gaens, B. (2006). Beyond ASEM 6: lessons for the actors. S. Bersick, W. Stokhof and P. van der Velde (Ed.). Multiregionalism and multilateralism: Asian-European relations in a global context (pp. 131-140). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Garcia, L. S. (2018). The Philippine president’s rhetoric on Japan-China rivalry and independent foreign policy. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 3(2), 1-16.
  • Gilson, J. (2013). New Interregionalism? The EU and East Asia. F. Söderbaum and L. van Langenhove (Ed.). The EU as a Global Player (pp. 59-78). London: Routledge.
  • Goh, C. T. (1995) Speech By Prime Minister, Mr Goh Chok Tong At The World Economic Forum Held In Davos, Switzerland, On 28 January 1995 Europe-Asia Partnership For Growth https://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/speeches/record-details/7460ffda-115d-11e3-83d5-0050568939ad.
  • Hakses, H. (2022). Karar Alma Mekanizmaları Açısından Bölgesel ve Bölgeler Ötesi Örgütlerin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi: APEC ve ASEM Örneği. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 25(1), 104-113.
  • Katzenstein, P. (2005). A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Kim, K. H. (2014). Examining US news media discourses about North Korea: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 25(2), 221-244.
  • Li, K., & Zhang, Q. (2022). A corpus-based study of representation of Islam and Muslims in American media: Critical Discourse Analysis Approach. International Communication Gazette, 84(2), 157-180.
  • Lim, P. (2001). The unfolding Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) process1: Issues for ASEM III. P. W. Preston and J. Gilson (Ed.). The European Union and East Asia: inter-regional linkages in a changing global system, (pp. 91-108). Edward Elgar Publishing
  • Malamud, A., & Gardini, G. L. (2014). Debunking Interregionalism: Concepts, Types, and Critique-With a Transatlantic Focus. Atlantic Future Working Paper 38.
  • Mohammad, R. M., & Alshahrani, A. A. (2019). Corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of Saudi Vision 2030. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 10. 16-28
  • Papageorgiou, M. M., & Vieira, A. (2021). Mapping the literature on China and Russia in IR and area studies: A bibliometric analysis (1990–2019). Journal of Chinese Political Science, 1- 27.
  • Park, S. H. (2004). ASEM and the future of Asia-Europe relations: Background, characteristics and challenges. Asia Europe Journal, 2(3), 341-354.
  • Pelkmans, J., & Hu, W. (2014). Does ASEM work?. CEPS Policy Briefs.
  • Pereira, R. (2007). The Helsinki summit and the future course of Asia–Europe meeting. Asia Europe Journal, 5(1), 17-21.
  • Reiterer, M. (2001). The Asia Europe meeting and the investment promotion action plan: a bureaucratic exercise or the way ahead?. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 2(4), 805-830.
  • Reiterer, M. (2004). The role of education and culture in contemporary international relations. A challenge for the Asia Europe Meeting (ASEM). Asia Europe Journal, 2(3), 365-371.
  • Reiterer, M. (2006). Interregionalism as a new diplomatic tool: the EU and East Asia. Eur. Foreign Aff. Rev., 11, 223-243.
  • Rüland, J. (2010). Balancers, multilateral utilities or regional identity builders? International relations and the study of interregionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(8), 1271-1283.
  • Segal, G. (1998). A new ASEM agenda: A report on the British council's meeting ‘Asia and Europe: Societies in transition’, 19–22 march 1998. The Pacific Review, 11(4), 561-572,
  • Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.
  • Stubbs, M. (1997). Whorf's children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis (CDA). British studies in applied linguistics, 12, 100-116.
  • Tsardanidis, C. (2010). Interregionalism: A comparative analysis of ASEM and FEALAC. J. Dosch and O. Jacob (Ed.). Asia and Latin America (pp. 240-259). London: Routledge.
  • Vogel, F., Hamann, H., & Gauer, I. (2018). Computer-assisted legal linguistics: Corpus analysis as a new tool for legal studies. Law & Social Inquiry, 43(4), 1340-1363.
  • Widdowson, H. G. (2008). Text, context, pretext: Critical issues in discourse analysis. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Yeo, L. H. (2004). Asia and Europe: The development and different dimensions of ASEM. London: Routledge.
  • Yeo, L. H. (2006). The Ebb and Flow of ASEM Studies. Josine Stremmelaar et Paul van der Velde (Ed.). What about Asia? Revisiting Asian Studies, (pp. 79-80). Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press
  • Yeo, L. H. (2013). Towards a dynamic Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM)?. EUC Working Paper, No. 14. Singapore: EU Centre.
  • Yeo, L. H. (2019). The Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM). In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
There are 48 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Studies of Asian Society, European Union, International Relations (Other)
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Burcu Ermeydan 0000-0002-5809-6717

Publication Date June 30, 2025
Submission Date November 5, 2024
Acceptance Date January 6, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 4 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Ermeydan, B. (2025). Reconceptualizing Interregionalism through Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM): A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis. Bölge Çalışmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 1-27.