works submitted to the Asian Journal of Instruction should be prepared in
accordance with the writing rules and placed in the article template of the
journal. A "copyright transfer form" and "plagiarism report" signed by each of the article
authors must be uploaded to the system in the process of submitting the
articles are first subject to pre-evaluation. Articles with more than 20% similarity are returned to their authors. And then, they are read carefully by the assistant
editors and it is determined whether they comply with journal’s publishing
policies, purpose and scope. The articles that are found to be inappropriate
are returned to the authors with justification without further evaluation.
Works that do not comply with article writing rules are sent to the authors for
articles sent to the journal are passed to the evaluation process if they are
worth sending to the reviewers. In the evaluation process, a double-blind peer
review system is followed. Articles are sent at least two reviewers according
to the content of the studies and the expertise of the reviewers. During the
process authors and reviewers identities are hidden. The time given to the
reviewers for the reviewer evaluation process is 21 days.
reviewers evaluate the originality of the articles, their contribution to the
field, the method used, the presentation of the findings and results, the
research level of source and literature related to the subject, the language
and style used. Works that are non-original, weak in terms of Turkish and
English language and expression rules and contain scientifically critical
mistakes are rejected.
reviewers report on the article as follows; "can be published",
"can be published after the proposed corrections have been made", and
"can not be published". Articles that do not have at least two
acceptance decisions can not be published. If at least one of the two reviewers
makes a negative decision, the article is directed to a third reviewer.
reviewers submit the revision files and the reviewer evaluation form on which
they have filled out the necessary correction proposals via the system.
reviewer evaluation forms and correction files are sent back to the authors
through the journal system. Proposals for corrections from the reviewers must
be completed by the authors within 1 month. Authors are obliged to make
corrections and improvements fully in the knowledge that the proposed
corrections and improvements enhance the originality of the work. The authors
place the corrections they have made in the "article revision table".
reviewers may decide the suitability of article re-examining the revised
articles from the authors and may request revisions more than once if
In the next stage, an editor review is made. At this stage, the editorial board review the article and ask the authors for the corrections it necessary.
decision-making articles are put in order by making the necessary arrangements
and they wait publication. Authors are informed about the issue and volume of
article to be published.