BibTex RIS Cite

Effect of Lysozyme-Chitosan Based Coatings on Microbial Quality of Fresh Eggs

Year 2013, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 40 - 45, 01.03.2013

Abstract

Hen eggs are perishable, and their quality may change during storage. Eggs are susceptible to microbial degradation, and interior quality may reduce during storage. In this research, fresh eggs were coated with chitosan and chitosan coatings containing lysozyme 0, 10, 20 and 60% w/w and stored at room temperature for 5 weeks. Enterobactericeae, coagulase positive Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., total mesophilic aerobic bacteria TMAB and yeast-mold counts were used for the evaluation of microbial quality of fresh eggs coated with different coatings. At the end of 5 weeks, Enterobactericeae, Staphylococcus aureus, total mesophilic aerobic bacteria and yeast-mold counts of the control samples were 2.35, 2.33, 2.61 and 2.76 log cfu/egg respectively. Similarly, the ranges of Enterobactericeae, Staphylococcus aureus, total mesophilic aerobic bacteria and yeast-mold counts for eggs coated with lysozyme-chitosan antimicrobial coatings were 0.91-1.6, 0.89-1.43, 1.07-2.07, and 2.17-2.46 log cfu/egg, respectively. In addition, the differences in the logarithmic counts of total aerobic mesophilic bacteria, Enterobactericeae, Staphylococcus aureus and mold-yeasts between control and treated fresh eggs were statistically significant. Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes were not detected in any of the eggs

References

  • Watkins, B.A., 1995. The nutritive valor of the egg, Egg Science and Technology (4th ed.), Edited by Stadelman WJ and Cotterill OJ, Doof Products Press, Binghamton, NY, 177-194.
  • Caner, C., Cansız, O., 2007. Effectiveness of chitosan-based coating in improving shelf-life of eggs. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture 87(2): 227-232.
  • Caner, C., Cansız, O., 2008. Chitosan coating minimises eggshell breakage and improves egg quality. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture 88: 56-61. [4] USDA, 1998. Salmonella assessment – Shell eggs and egg products. enteritidis risk (Washington, DC, USDA, Food Safety Inspection Service).
  • James, C., Lechevalier, V., Ketteringham, L., 2002. Surface pasteurisation of shell eggs. Journal of Food Engineering 53: 193-197.
  • Meszaros, L., Horti, K., Farkas, J., 2006. Changes of hen eggs and their components caused by non- thermal pasteurizing treatments. I. Gamma Irradiation of shell eggs. Acta Alimentaria 35: 229- 236.
  • Dev, S.R.S., Raghavan, G.S.V., Gariepy, Y., 2008. Dielectric properties of egg components and microwave heating for in-shell pasteurisation of eggs. Journal of Food Engineering 86: 207-214.
  • Valencia-Chamorro, Silvia A.; Palou, Lluis, del Rio, Miguel A., Maria B., Perez-Gago, 2011. Antimicrobial edible films and coatings for fresh and minimally processed fruits and vegetables: A Review . Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 51 (9): 872-900.
  • Wang, G.H., 1992. Inhibition and inactivation of five species of foodborne pathogens by chitosan. Journal of Food Protection 55: 916-919.
  • Nadarajah, K., Prinyawiwatkul, W., No, H.K., Sathivel, S., 2006. Sorption behavior of crawfish chitosan films as affected by chitosan extraction processes and film casting solvents. Journal of Food Science 71: 33-39.
  • Butler, B.L., Vergano, P.J., Testin, R.F., Bunn, J.M., Wiles, J.L. 1996. Mechanical and barrier properties of edible chitosan films as affected by composition and storage. Journal of Food Science 61: 953-961.
  • Bhale, S., No, H.K., Prinyayawiwatkul, W., Farr, A.J., Nadarajah, K., Meyers, S.P., 2003. Chitosan coating improves shelf life of eggs. Journal of Food Science 68(7): 2378-2383.
  • Caner, C,. 2005. Whey protein isolate coating and concentration effects on egg shelf life. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture 85: 2143- 2148.
  • Proctor, V.A., Cunningham, F.E., 1988. The chemistry of lysozyme and its use as a food preservative and a pharmaceutical. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 26: 359–395.
  • Padgett, T., Han, I.Y., Dawson, P.L., 1998. Incorporation compounds into biodegradable packaging films. Journal of Food Protection 61: 1330–1335.
  • Cha, D.S., Choi, J.H., Chinnan, M.S., Park, H.J., 2002. Antimicrobial films based on Na-alginate and κ-carrageenan. LWT 35: 715- 719.
  • Song, Y., Babiker, E.E., Usui, M., Saito, A., Kato, A., 2002. Emulsifying properties and bactericidal action of chitosan–lysozyme conjugates. Food Researc International 35: 459–466.
  • Anker, M., 1996. Edible and biodegradable films and coatings for food packaking. The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology. Goteborg, Sweden.
  • Han, J.H., 2000. Antimicrobial food packaging. Food Technology 54(3): 56–65.
  • BAM, 1998. Bacteriological Analytical Manual. FDA, 8th Ed. Revision A, AOAC Gaithersburg, MD 20877, USA.
  • Hou, H., Sing, R.K., Muriana, P.M., Stadelman, P.J., 1996. Pasteurization of intact eggs. Food Microbiology 13: 93-101.

Lisozim-Kitosan Bazlı Antimikrobiyal Kaplama Uygulamasının Taze Yumurtanın Mikrobiyolojik Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi

Year 2013, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 40 - 45, 01.03.2013

Abstract

Yumurta, kabuk gibi doğal bir ambalaja sahip olmasına karşın hızla bozulabilen gıdalardandır. Yumurtalarda depolama boyunca mikrobiyal gelişme hızla artmakta ve iç kalite bozulmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, taze yumurtalar farklı konsantrasyonlarda %0, 10, 20 ve 60 w/w lisozim içeren kitosan kaplama ile kaplanarak yumurtaların mikrobiyal kalitesine etkinliği; Enterobactericeae, koagülaz pozitif Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., toplam mezofilik aerobik bakteri TMAB ve küf-maya sayım değerleri oda şartlarında 5 hafta boyunca belirlenmiştir. Depolamanın sonunda, kontrol grubu yumurtalarda Enterobactericeae, Staphylococcus aureus, toplam aerobik mezofilik bakteri sayımı ve küf-maya değerleri sırası ile 2.35, 2.33, 2.61 ve 2.76 log kob/yumurta olarak tespit edilmiştir. Aynı şekilde kitosan-lisozim antimikrobiyal kaplanan yumurtalarda sırası ile 0.91-1.6, 0.89-1.43, 1.07-2.07 ve 2.17-2.46 log kob/yumurta sonuçları tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca antimikrobiyal madde içeren kaplamalarla kontrol grubu arasında aerobik mezofilik toplam bakteri, Enterobactericeae, Staphylococcus aureus ve küf-maya sayımları bakımından fark istatistiksel olarak önemli bulunmuştur. Çalışma sonucunda yumurtaların hiç birisinde Salmonella spp. ve Listeria monocytogenes varlığına rastlanılmamıştır

References

  • Watkins, B.A., 1995. The nutritive valor of the egg, Egg Science and Technology (4th ed.), Edited by Stadelman WJ and Cotterill OJ, Doof Products Press, Binghamton, NY, 177-194.
  • Caner, C., Cansız, O., 2007. Effectiveness of chitosan-based coating in improving shelf-life of eggs. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture 87(2): 227-232.
  • Caner, C., Cansız, O., 2008. Chitosan coating minimises eggshell breakage and improves egg quality. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture 88: 56-61. [4] USDA, 1998. Salmonella assessment – Shell eggs and egg products. enteritidis risk (Washington, DC, USDA, Food Safety Inspection Service).
  • James, C., Lechevalier, V., Ketteringham, L., 2002. Surface pasteurisation of shell eggs. Journal of Food Engineering 53: 193-197.
  • Meszaros, L., Horti, K., Farkas, J., 2006. Changes of hen eggs and their components caused by non- thermal pasteurizing treatments. I. Gamma Irradiation of shell eggs. Acta Alimentaria 35: 229- 236.
  • Dev, S.R.S., Raghavan, G.S.V., Gariepy, Y., 2008. Dielectric properties of egg components and microwave heating for in-shell pasteurisation of eggs. Journal of Food Engineering 86: 207-214.
  • Valencia-Chamorro, Silvia A.; Palou, Lluis, del Rio, Miguel A., Maria B., Perez-Gago, 2011. Antimicrobial edible films and coatings for fresh and minimally processed fruits and vegetables: A Review . Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 51 (9): 872-900.
  • Wang, G.H., 1992. Inhibition and inactivation of five species of foodborne pathogens by chitosan. Journal of Food Protection 55: 916-919.
  • Nadarajah, K., Prinyawiwatkul, W., No, H.K., Sathivel, S., 2006. Sorption behavior of crawfish chitosan films as affected by chitosan extraction processes and film casting solvents. Journal of Food Science 71: 33-39.
  • Butler, B.L., Vergano, P.J., Testin, R.F., Bunn, J.M., Wiles, J.L. 1996. Mechanical and barrier properties of edible chitosan films as affected by composition and storage. Journal of Food Science 61: 953-961.
  • Bhale, S., No, H.K., Prinyayawiwatkul, W., Farr, A.J., Nadarajah, K., Meyers, S.P., 2003. Chitosan coating improves shelf life of eggs. Journal of Food Science 68(7): 2378-2383.
  • Caner, C,. 2005. Whey protein isolate coating and concentration effects on egg shelf life. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture 85: 2143- 2148.
  • Proctor, V.A., Cunningham, F.E., 1988. The chemistry of lysozyme and its use as a food preservative and a pharmaceutical. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 26: 359–395.
  • Padgett, T., Han, I.Y., Dawson, P.L., 1998. Incorporation compounds into biodegradable packaging films. Journal of Food Protection 61: 1330–1335.
  • Cha, D.S., Choi, J.H., Chinnan, M.S., Park, H.J., 2002. Antimicrobial films based on Na-alginate and κ-carrageenan. LWT 35: 715- 719.
  • Song, Y., Babiker, E.E., Usui, M., Saito, A., Kato, A., 2002. Emulsifying properties and bactericidal action of chitosan–lysozyme conjugates. Food Researc International 35: 459–466.
  • Anker, M., 1996. Edible and biodegradable films and coatings for food packaking. The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology. Goteborg, Sweden.
  • Han, J.H., 2000. Antimicrobial food packaging. Food Technology 54(3): 56–65.
  • BAM, 1998. Bacteriological Analytical Manual. FDA, 8th Ed. Revision A, AOAC Gaithersburg, MD 20877, USA.
  • Hou, H., Sing, R.K., Muriana, P.M., Stadelman, P.J., 1996. Pasteurization of intact eggs. Food Microbiology 13: 93-101.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Muhammed Yüceer This is me

Cengiz Caner This is me

Publication Date March 1, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 11 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Yüceer, M., & Caner, C. (2013). Lisozim-Kitosan Bazlı Antimikrobiyal Kaplama Uygulamasının Taze Yumurtanın Mikrobiyolojik Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi. Akademik Gıda, 11(1), 40-45.
AMA Yüceer M, Caner C. Lisozim-Kitosan Bazlı Antimikrobiyal Kaplama Uygulamasının Taze Yumurtanın Mikrobiyolojik Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi. Akademik Gıda. March 2013;11(1):40-45.
Chicago Yüceer, Muhammed, and Cengiz Caner. “Lisozim-Kitosan Bazlı Antimikrobiyal Kaplama Uygulamasının Taze Yumurtanın Mikrobiyolojik Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi”. Akademik Gıda 11, no. 1 (March 2013): 40-45.
EndNote Yüceer M, Caner C (March 1, 2013) Lisozim-Kitosan Bazlı Antimikrobiyal Kaplama Uygulamasının Taze Yumurtanın Mikrobiyolojik Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi. Akademik Gıda 11 1 40–45.
IEEE M. Yüceer and C. Caner, “Lisozim-Kitosan Bazlı Antimikrobiyal Kaplama Uygulamasının Taze Yumurtanın Mikrobiyolojik Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi”, Akademik Gıda, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 40–45, 2013.
ISNAD Yüceer, Muhammed - Caner, Cengiz. “Lisozim-Kitosan Bazlı Antimikrobiyal Kaplama Uygulamasının Taze Yumurtanın Mikrobiyolojik Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi”. Akademik Gıda 11/1 (March 2013), 40-45.
JAMA Yüceer M, Caner C. Lisozim-Kitosan Bazlı Antimikrobiyal Kaplama Uygulamasının Taze Yumurtanın Mikrobiyolojik Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi. Akademik Gıda. 2013;11:40–45.
MLA Yüceer, Muhammed and Cengiz Caner. “Lisozim-Kitosan Bazlı Antimikrobiyal Kaplama Uygulamasının Taze Yumurtanın Mikrobiyolojik Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi”. Akademik Gıda, vol. 11, no. 1, 2013, pp. 40-45.
Vancouver Yüceer M, Caner C. Lisozim-Kitosan Bazlı Antimikrobiyal Kaplama Uygulamasının Taze Yumurtanın Mikrobiyolojik Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi. Akademik Gıda. 2013;11(1):40-5.

25964   25965    25966      25968   25967


88x31.png

Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

Akademik Gıda (Academic Food Journal) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).