UGANDA’NIN BİLİM VE TEKNOLOJİ POLİTİKALARINI ŞEKİLLENDİREN ULUSLARARASI AKTÖRLER: SON ON YILA DAİR BİR DERLEME

Year 2025, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 19 - 36, 20.12.2025

İbrahim Hakan Karataş , Kyasanku Charles

https://doi.org/10.54132/akaf.1724228

Abstract

Uganda’nın bilim, teknoloji, yenilik, araştırma ve geliştirme (STIRD) ekosistemi geleneksel olarak Küresel Kuzey’den gelen aktörler tarafından şekillendirilmiştir. Ancak son on yılda Türkiye ve Çin gibi Güney ülkelerinin katılımıyla daha çeşitlenmiş bir tablo ortaya çıkmıştır. Buna rağmen, Uganda’nın STIRD yolculuğunu etkileyen uluslararası aktörlerini bütünsel olarak inceleyen sınırlı sayıda çalışma bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Uganda’nın STIRD ekosistemini şekillendiren kurumsal aktörler beş kategoride ele alınmaktadır: kültürel kurumlar, sağlık araştırma kuruluşları, kalkınma odaklı STK’lar, ikili/çok taraflı kalkınma ajansları ve STI politika ağları. Aktörler rolleri, ortaklıkları, tematik odak alanları ve ulusal politika üzerindeki etkileri belge analizi yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. Bulgular, ABD, Birleşik Krallık ve İsveç gibi yerleşik bağışçıların etkisinin sürdüğünü gösterirken, Türkiye, Çin ve bölgesel ağların artan rollerini de öne çıkarmaktadır. Bu aktörlerin katkıları özellikle finansman, kurumsal ortaklıklar ve kapasite geliştirme alanlarında belirgindir. Çalışma, politika yapıcılar için koordinasyonu güçlendirme ve ulusal kalkınma hedefleriyle daha tutarlı stratejiler geliştirme konusunda öneriler sunarken, yeni aktörlerin daha stratejik STI diplomasisi yaklaşımları oluşturmasına ışık tutmaktadır. Ayrıca Doğu Afrika’daki inovasyon ortamına dair sınır ötesi etkileri daha iyi anlamak için ileriye dönük ampirik ve karşılaştırmalı araştırmalar yapılmasını önermektedir.

Keywords

Bilim diplomasisi , Uganda , STIRD , uluslararası ortaklıklar , yumuşak güç

Project Number

TÜBİTAK BİDEB 2219

INTERNATIONAL ACTORS SHAPING UGANDA’S STIRD LANDSCAPE: A DECADAL REVIEW

Abstract

Uganda’s science, technology, innovation, research, and development (STIRD) ecosystem has historically been shaped by actors from the Global North. However, in the past decade, a more diversified landscape has emerged, marked by increasing engagement from Global South countries, including Türkiye and Chinese. Despite this evolution, limited research has examined the full spectrum of international actors influencing Uganda’s STIRD trajectory. This study addresses this gap by identifying and analysing the organisational actors that shape Uganda’s STIRD ecosystem—categorised into five groups: cultural institutions, health research organisations, development NGOs, bilateral/multilateral development agencies, and emerging STI policy networks. Using qualitative document analysis, the research investigates each actor’s roles, partnerships, thematic focus, and influence on national policy. Findings reveal a continued dominance of established donors like the USA, UK, and Sweden, yet highlight a growing role of actors such as Türkiye, China, and regional networks. These actors contribute through funding, institutional partnerships, and capacity-building. The study offers insights for policymakers to enhance coordination and alignment with national development goals and for new actors to craft more strategic STI diplomacy engagements. It concludes by calling for further empirical and comparative research to deepen understanding of transnational influences in East Africa’s innovation landscape.

Keywords

science diplomacy , Uganda , STIRD , international partnerships , soft power

Ethical Statement

Ethical Considerations This research adhered to ethical standards, including respect for participants' rights and confidentiality. The study was ethically approved by the Istanbul Medeniyet University Social and Humanities Ethics Board. AI Use Disclaimer The authors disclose the use of AI in the research process, manuscript preparation, and data analysis. Specifically, ChatGPT 4.5 was used as a tool to assist with proof reading of the research. The authors take full responsibility for the accuracy, integrity, and ethical considerations of any AI-generated content included in the manuscript.

Supporting Institution

This research was funded and supported by the TÜBİTAK BİDEB 2219 Postdoctoral Research Program, Term 2023-2.

Project Number

TÜBİTAK BİDEB 2219

References

• AAAS. (2010). New Frontiers in Science Diplomacy. Retrieved from https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/New_Frontiers.pdffinance.go.ug+5npa.go.ug+5npa.go.ug+5ResearchGateUN Trade and Development (UNCTAD)+1UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD)+1AAAS
• AFD. (2020). Off-grid solar solutions in Uganda. Agence Française de Développement.
• African Academy of Sciences (AAS). (2023). Annual Report 2022: Accelerating scientific excellence in Africa. Nairobi: AAS. (Insights on AAS-NEPAD grant disbursements and research funding in Uganda)africanleadershipmagazine.co.ukafdb.org.
• African Academy of Sciences (AAS). (2023). Annual Report 2022: Accelerating scientific excellence in Africa. AAS.
• African Academy of Sciences. (2022). DELTAS Africa initiative. https://www.aasciences.africa
• Al-Bader, S., & Singer, P. A. (2010). Case studies of Uganda’s health innovation system. In Science-based health innovation in Uganda: Creative strategies for applying research to development (Vol. 10, Suppl. 1, Article S5). BMC International Health and Human Rights. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-10-S1-S5
• Amanya, L. (2023). Assessing the Contribution of Hubs to Uganda's Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study on the Role of Innovation Hubs in Kampala. Uganda National Council for Science and Technology.
• Ayim, C., Kassahun, A., Tekinerdogan, B., & Addison, C. (2022). Adoption of ICT innovations in the agriculture sector in Africa: A review of the literature. Agriculture & Food Security, 11, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00364-7
• Bhamidipati, P. L., Hansen, U. E., & Haselip, J. (2019). Agency in transition: The role of transnational actors in the development of the off-grid solar PV regime in Uganda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 33, 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.02.001
• Bliss, K. (2021). Global health and diplomacy: Strengthening U.S. influence. CSIS Global Health Policy Center. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
• Brar, S., Farley, S. E., Hawkins, R., & Wagner, C. S. (2011). Science, Technology, and Innovation in Uganda: Recommendations for policy and action (World Bank Studies No. 2250). World Bank. Retrieved from https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/188271468115452838/science-technology-and-innovation-in-uganda-recommendations-for-policy-and-action
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
• British Council. (2019). Science, policy and cultural relations: Building scientific networks. https://www.britishcouncil.org
• British Council. (2021). British Council launches global competition to find top climate science communicators ahead of COP26. British Council Uganda Press Release.
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2023). PEPFAR Uganda Fact Sheet. https://www.cdc.gov/globalhivtb/where-we-work/uganda
• CIPESA. (2020). Gender and ICT Policy Advocacy in Uganda. https://cipesa.org
• Eberhard, A., & Naumann, M. (2019). Agency in transition: The role of transnational actors in the development of the off-grid solar PV regime in Uganda. Energy Research & Social Science, 50, 10-19.
• Embassy of Sweden Kampala. (2022a). How Sweden’s institutional support to Makerere University has helped build capacity at the College of Computing and Information Science. Embassy of Sweden in Uganda News.
• Embassy of Sweden Kampala. (2022b). SIDA’s contribution to higher education and research in Uganda. Embassy of Sweden in Uganda News.
• Gillespie, A., Cornish, F., & Zittoun, T. (2020). Meaning in Action: Constructing the Cultural Mind. Cambridge University Press.
• Gluckman, P., Turekian, V., Grimes, R., & Kishi, T. (2017). Science diplomacy: A pragmatic perspective from the inside. Science & Diplomacy, 6(4).
• Guimon, J., & Narula, R. (2015). Developing Uganda’s Science, Technology, and Innovation System: The Millennium Science Initiative. OECD & World Bank.
• IAVI. (2023). HIV vaccine research in Africa: Collaborations and impact. https://www.iavi.org
• IDRC. (2021). Science Granting Councils Initiative: Annual Report. https://idrc-crdi.ca
• Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI). (2016). Annual Report 2015/16. IDI. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). (2025, March 21). IITA and NARO release NARITA 17: A Matooke banana variety in Uganda. IITA News Release.
• International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). (2023). ILRI in Uganda – Country Profile. ILRI.
• Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). (2017). SMASSE project evaluation report.
• Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). (2024). New Phase of JICA’s Flagship Project in Uganda Marking the 20th Anniversary of Cooperation in Rice Production. JICA Uganda Topics.
• Kajubi, R., et al. (2020). HIV treatment and prevention in Uganda: The role of local institutions. Journal of International AIDS Society, 23(2), e25432.
• Kamunyori, S., Al-Bader, S., Sewankambo, N., Singer, P. A., & Daar, A. S. (2010). Science-based health innovation in Uganda: Creative strategies for applying research to development. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 10(Suppl 1), S5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-10-S1-S5
• Kiira Motors Corporation. (2025, March 14). Kiira Motors and Rotary collaborate for sustainable mobility. Business Times Uganda. Retrieved from https://businesstimesug.com/ugandas-green-future-kiira-motors-and-rotary-collaborate-for-sustainable-mobility/
• Lakshmi, G. (2019). Actors, agency and politics in sustainability transitions: The case of solar PV in East Africa (Doctoral dissertation). Technical University of Denmark.
• Liu, H. (2019). The rise of China’s Confucius Institutes: Soft power and global education. Comparative Education, 55(2), 208–224.
• LSHTM – MRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit. (2023). Major scientific review recognises Unit’s achievements and secures new funding. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine News. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/mrc-uganda
• Marshall‐Lucette, S., Corbett, K., Lartey, N., Opio, D., & Bikaitwoha, M. E. (2007). Developing locally based research capacity in Uganda. International nursing review, 54(3), 227-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-7657.2007.00565.x
• Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development (MoFPED). (2025). Science and technology. Development Policy and Performance Portal.
• Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MoSTI). (2023). STI Sector Overview and Policy Documents. https://mosti.go.ug
• Möbius, M., & Althaus Mugagga, L. (2023, May). Landscape analysis of the Uganda innovation ecosystem. StartHub Africa. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d7fba1a7dc0f278f09832df/t/65084af0c7d1e30f92ddaea6/1695042306039/Landscape%2BAnalysis%2Bof%2Bthe%2BUganda%2BInnovation%2BEcosystem%2B-%2B2023%2B-%2Bfinal%2Breport.pdf
• Mutyaba, C., Lubinga, M. H., Ogwal, R. O., & Tumwesigye, S. (2016). The role of institutions as actors influencing Uganda’s cassava sector. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (JARTS), 117(1), 113-123. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hebis:34-2016020149824
• Namugumya, B. S., Candel, J. J., Talsma, E. F., & Termeer, C. J. (2020). A mechanisms-based explanation of nutrition policy (dis) integration processes in Uganda. Food Policy, 92, 101878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101878
• National Planning Authority. (2020). Third National Development Plan (NDPIII) 2020/21 – 2024/25. https://www.npa.go.ug/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/NDPIII-Finale_Compressed.pdf
• National Planning Authority. (2022). Mid-term review of the Third National Development Plan (NDPIII) 2020/21–2024/25: Synthesis report. Research for Transformation and Development. https://rtdug.org/images/01_National_Development_Plan_III_Mid_term_Review/Synthesis%20report_NDPIII.pdf
• Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs. Ogada, T. P. M., Partey, S. T., Ramasamy, J., & Owade, J. O. (2023). Overview of the Science, Technology and Innovation Landscape of Eastern Africa. UNESCO Regional Office for Eastern Africa.
• ResilientAfrica Network (RAN). (2025). ResilientAfrica Network. Makerere University. Rudincová, K. (2014). New player on the scene: Turkish engagement in Africa. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, (24), 197–213.
• Ruffini, P.-B. (2021). Science and diplomacy: A new dimension of international relations. Springer.
• Şanlı, H. (2020). Turkey’s development aid and soft power in Africa. Insight Turkey, 22(3), 79–96. Science Granting Councils Initiative (SGCI). (2020). Uganda: Unlocking its research potential for long-term development. Uganda National Council for Science and Technology/SGCI Report.
• SoftPower News. (2025, April 6). Germany e-mobility companies explore collaborations with Kiira Motors, NEC. Retrieved from https://softpower.ug/germany-e-mobility-companies-explore-collaborations-with-kiira-motors-nec/
• Sweden Abroad. (2022). Development cooperation with Uganda. Government of Sweden. https://www.swedenabroad.se
• Turekian, V. C., Liden, J. M., & Rizvi, Z. (2015). Connecting science to policy around the world: Strengthening the global science advisory ecosystem. AAAS.
• Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST). (2019). National Science, Technology and Innovation Plan 2017–2022. UNCST.
• UKRI Medical Research Council (MRC). (2025). MRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Unit – Strategy 2025. MRC Unit Uganda.
• UNCTAD. (2019). Science, technology and innovation policy review of Uganda. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/dtlstict2020d4_en.pdf
• UNCTAD. (2020). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Review: Uganda. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/dtlstict2020d4_en.pdf
• UNDP Uganda. (2024, December 5). UNDP and partners launch electric mobility skilling programme. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/uganda/blog/undp-and-partners-launch-electric-mobility-skilling-programme
• UNICEF. (2018). Innovation in Uganda. https://www.unicef.org/uganda
• WIPO, Cornell University, & INSEAD. (2019). Global Innovation Index 2019.
• World Bank. (2019). Science, Technology, and Innovation in Uganda: Recommendations for policy and action. https://documents.worldbank.org
• World Health Organization Uganda & CDC. (2023). Joint external evaluation of IHR core capacities – Uganda Report. WHO.
• World Vision & Makerere University. (2018). Improving Nutrition through Community-Based Interventions: Endline Survey Report. World Vision.
• WOUGNET (Women of Uganda Network). (2020). Annual Report 2019/20. WOUGNET.
• WOUGNET (Women of Uganda Network). (2020). ICT and Gender: Empowering Women in Uganda. https://www.wougnet.org