Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Smear Sonucu ‘Önemi Belirlenemeyen Atipik Skuamöz Hücreler (ASC-US)’ Olarak Raporlanan Hastalar İçin Youtube Yeterli ve Güvenilir Bir Bilgi Kaynağı mı?

Year 2025, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 349 - 356, 29.09.2025
https://doi.org/10.53394/akd.1514840

Abstract

Amaç: ‘Önemi belirlenemeyen atipik skuamöz hücreler (ASC-US)’ servikal smear incelemelerinde en sık raporlanan anormalliktir. Rutin kontrol amaçlı smear testi veren, ancak smear sonucunda ASC-US yazdığını gören ve tedirgin olan hastalar bilgi edinmek için sıklıkla internete başvururlar. Bu çalışmada YouTube’un ASC-US'lu hastalar için yeterli ve güvenilir bir bilgi kaynağı olup olmadığını değerlendirmeyi amaçladık.
Yöntem: Nisan 2024 tarihinde YouTube'da ‘Önemi belirlenemeyen atipik skuamöz hücreler’, ‘ASC-US’ ve ‘ASCUS’ terimleri kullanılarak yapılan aramalarda çıkan Türkçe dilindeki videolar değerlendirilmiştir. Değerlendirmede çalışma için oluşturulan içerik kriterleri (0-18 puan), doğruluk ve güvenilirliği değerlendiren Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) kriterleri (0-4 puan) ile modifiye DISCERN kriterleri (0-5 puan) kullanılmıştır. İzleyiciye ASC-US’un anlamını açıklayan, altta yatan premalign ve malign lezyon olma ihtimalinin düşüklüğünden, HPV testinin gerekliliğinden, izlenebilecek tanı ve tedavi prosedürlerinden bahseden videolar temel yeterlilikte kabul edilmiştir.
Bulgular: Dahil olma ve dışlanma kriterlerini karşılayan 25 video değerlendirilmiştir. Videoların tamamında konuşmacı hekimdir. İçerik kriterlerine göre puanlar 4-17 arasında olup ortalaması 9,04’tür. JAMA kriterlerine göre puanlar 0-2 arasında olup ortalaması 0,96’dır. Modifiye DISCERN kriterlerine göre puanlar 1-3 arasında olup ortalaması 2,16’dır. Yalnızca dört video temel yeterliliktedir.
Sonuç: Paylaşımlar hekimler tarafından anlatılan doğru içeriğe sahip videolar olsada hastalara yeterli bilgi sağlama ve hastaların endişelerini giderme konusunda yetersiz kalmıştır. Ayrıca güvenilirlikleri zayıf-orta düzeydedir.

Ethical Statement

Çalışmada herkesin izleyebileceği YouTube videoları, genel kullanıma açık JAMA ve modifiye DISCERN kriterleri kullanıldığı için literatürde yer alan benzer çalışmalarda olduğu gibi etik kurul onayı alınmamıştır.

References

  • 1) World Health Organization/The International Agency for Research on Cancer/Global Cancer Observatory. Global Cancer Statistics: Age-Standardized Rate (World) per 100 000, Incidence, Females, in 2022. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/en/dataviz/bars?mode=cancer&group_populations=1&cancers=39&sexes=2, Erişim tarihi: 1 Nisan 2024.
  • 2) World Health Organization/The International Agency for Research on Cancer/Global Cancer Observatory. Global Cancer Statistics: Age-Standardized Rate (World) per 100 000, Mortality, Females, in 2022. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/en/dataviz/bars?mode=cancer&group_populations=1&cancers=39&sexes=2&types=1, Erişim tarihi: 1 Nisan 2024.
  • 3) T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı/Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü/Kanser Dairesi Başkanlığı. Kanser taramaları. https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/tr/kanser-taramalari.html, Erişim tarihi: 1 Nisan 2024.
  • 4) T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı/Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü/Kanser Erken Teşhis, Tarama ve Eğitim Merkezi (KETEM) Danışmanlığı. HPV tarama süreci algoritması. https://shm.saglik.gov.tr/images/SHM_Yeni/kanser_danismanligi/HPV_Algoritma_2020.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 1 Nisan 2024.
  • 5) World Health Organization/The International Agency for Research on Cancer/Global Cancer Observatory. Global Cancer Statistics: Age-Standardized Rate (World) per 100 000, Incidence, Females, in 2022, Türkiye. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/en/dataviz/bars?mode=cancer&group_populations=1&cancers=39&sexes=2&types=0&populations=792, Erişim tarihi: 1 Nisan 2024.
  • 6) World Health Organization/The International Agency for Research on Cancer/Global Cancer Observatory. Global Cancer Statistics: Age-Standardized Rate (World) per 100 000, Mortality, Females, in 2022, Türkiye. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/en/dataviz/bars?mode=cancer&group_populations=1&cancers=39&sexes=2&types=1&populations=792, Erişim tarihi: 1 Nisan 2024.
  • 7) Özaltın S. Is it Really Necessary to Perform Colposcopy in Patients with Ascus and HR HPV Positivity? Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2022; 13(4):574-8.
  • 8) Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2021 update. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 155 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):28-44.
  • 9) Pangarkar MA. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology. Cytojournal 2022; 19:28.
  • 10) Nayar R, Wilbur DC (Edited by). The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology. In: Abdul-Karim FW, Powers CN, Berek JS, Sherman ME, Tabbara SO, Sidawy MK. Atypical Squamous Cells. 3rd Edition, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing 2015; 103-34.
  • 11) Nayar R, Wilbur DC (Edited by). The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology. In: Henry MR, Russell DK, Luff RD, Prey MU, Wright TC, Nayar R. Epithelial Cell Abnormalities: Squamous. 3rd Edition, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing 2015; 135-92.
  • 12) Risley C, Clarke MA, Geisinger KR, Stewart MW, Zhang L, Hoover KW, Hiser LM, Owens K, DeMarco M, Schiffman M, Wentzensen N. Racial differences in HPV type 16 prevalence in women with ASCUS of the uterine cervix. Cancer Cytopathol 2020; 128(8):528-34.
  • 13) Nayar R, Wilbur DC (Edited by). The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology. In: Kurtycz DFI, Staats PN, Young NA, et al. Non-Neoplastic Findings. 3rd Edition, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing 2015; 29-90.
  • 14) Türk AE, Şahin BN, Yıldız DG, Aray A, Aksoyak B, Şimşek ZB, Tekelioglu T, Akıllı H, Kuşçu E, Ayhan A. HPV burden and risk of CINII or worse pathology in patients with atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASCUS) cytology. Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi 2023; 2:15-22.
  • 15) Ryu KJ, Lee S, Min KJ, Hong JH, Song JY, Lee JK, Lee NW. Management of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix with human papilloma virus infection among young women aged less than 25 years. Diagn Cytopathol 2016; 44(12):959-63.
  • 16) YouTube Statistics 2024 (Demographics, Users by Country & More). Global Media Insight. Erişim tarihi: 6 Temmuz 2024. Available from: https://www.globalmediainsight.com/blog/youtube-users-statistics/#YouTube_Video_Statistics_2024
  • 17) Güngörmüş Z, Güngörmüş M. Ağız- Diş Sağlığı ile İlgili Türkçe Web Sayfalarının Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesi: Ön Çalışma. Social Sciences Studies Journal 2018; 4(20):2631-4.
  • 18) Orhan O, Tekpınar I, Çetin VB, Kaplan AY, Altay MA. Pes ekinovaruslu hastalar için YouTube etik ve kapsamlı bir bilgi kaynağı mı? Dicle Tıp dergisi 2022; 49(3):491-7.
  • 19) Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis-a wake up call? J Rheumatol 2012; 39(5):899-903.
  • 20) Kurtay S, Ali KY, Hussein AI. Frequency of cervical premalignant lesions in the gynecologic patients of a tertiary hospital in Mogadishu, Somalia. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22(1):501.
  • 21) Clarke S, Jangid G, Nasr S, Atchade A, Moody BL, Narayan G. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): A Cross-Sectional Observational Study Analyzing the Quality of Content on YouTube. Cureus 2023; 15(9):e45354.
  • 22) Kahlam A, Pai S, Kahlam J, Ahlawat S. Quality of YouTube Videos Related to Colorectal Cancer Screening. Cureus 2023; 15(1):e33684.
  • 23) Meteran H, Høj S, Sigsgaard T, Diers CS, Remvig C, Meteran H. The usefulness of YouTube videos on lung cancer. J Public Health (Oxf) 2023; 45(2):e339-45.
  • 24) Arslan E, Gokdagli F, Bozdag H, Vatansever D, Karsy M. Abnormal Pap smear frequency and comparison of repeat cytological follow-up with colposcopy during patient management: the importance of pathologist's guidance in the management. North Clin Istanb 2018; 6(1):69-74.
  • 25) Kim JH, Kim HK. Content and quality of YouTube regarding women's health: a scoping review. Korean J Women Health Nurs 2023; 29(3):179-89.
  • 26) Brachtenbach T, Cardenas R, Pate H, Solis L, Chinnery L, Bowers A, Vassar M. YouTube: Searching for answers about breast cancer. Breast Dis 2020; 39(2):85-90.
  • 27) Aglamis SO, Senel S, Koudonas A. Quality analysis of YouTube videos on vulvodynia. Sex Med 2023; 11(1):qfac013.
  • 28) García-Cano-Fernández AM, Szczesniewski-Dudzik JJ, García-Tello A, Diego-García V, Boronat-Catalá J, Llanes-González L. Quality of bladder cancer information on YouTube. Cent European J Urol 2022; 75(3):248-51.

Is Youtube an Adequate and Reliable Source of Information for Patients with 'Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASC-US)' In Smear?

Year 2025, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 349 - 356, 29.09.2025
https://doi.org/10.53394/akd.1514840

Abstract

Objective: 'Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US)' is the most frequently reported abnormality in cervical smear examinations. Patients who undergo a smear for routine control, but see that the smear result says ASC-US and become anxious, often turn to the internet to get information. We aimed to evaluate whether YouTube is an adequate and reliable source of information for patients with ASC-US.
Material and Methods: Videos in the Turkish language that appeared in searches using the terms ‘Önemi belirlenemeyen atipik skuamöz hücreler’, ‘ASC-US’, or ‘ASCUS’ on YouTube in April 2024 were evaluated. In the evaluation, content criteria created for the study (0-18 points), Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria (0-4 points) and modified DISCERN criteria (0-5 points), were used. Videos that explain to the viewer the meaning of ASC-US, the low likelihood of an underlying premalignant and malignant lesion, the necessity of HPV testing, the diagnostic and treatment procedures that can be followed were considered sufficient.
Results: Twenty five videos that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were reviewed. The speakers in all of the videos were physicians. According to the content criteria, the scores were between 4-17 and the mean was 9,04. According to JAMA criteria, the scores were between 0-2 and the mean was 0,96. According to the modified DISCERN criteria, the scores were between 1-3 and the mean was 2,16. Only four videos were basically sufficient.
Conclusion: Although the videos were explained by physicians and contained correct information, they were insufficient in providing patients with adequate information and alleviating their concerns. Moreover, their reliability was poor to moderate.

References

  • 1) World Health Organization/The International Agency for Research on Cancer/Global Cancer Observatory. Global Cancer Statistics: Age-Standardized Rate (World) per 100 000, Incidence, Females, in 2022. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/en/dataviz/bars?mode=cancer&group_populations=1&cancers=39&sexes=2, Erişim tarihi: 1 Nisan 2024.
  • 2) World Health Organization/The International Agency for Research on Cancer/Global Cancer Observatory. Global Cancer Statistics: Age-Standardized Rate (World) per 100 000, Mortality, Females, in 2022. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/en/dataviz/bars?mode=cancer&group_populations=1&cancers=39&sexes=2&types=1, Erişim tarihi: 1 Nisan 2024.
  • 3) T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı/Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü/Kanser Dairesi Başkanlığı. Kanser taramaları. https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/tr/kanser-taramalari.html, Erişim tarihi: 1 Nisan 2024.
  • 4) T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı/Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü/Kanser Erken Teşhis, Tarama ve Eğitim Merkezi (KETEM) Danışmanlığı. HPV tarama süreci algoritması. https://shm.saglik.gov.tr/images/SHM_Yeni/kanser_danismanligi/HPV_Algoritma_2020.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 1 Nisan 2024.
  • 5) World Health Organization/The International Agency for Research on Cancer/Global Cancer Observatory. Global Cancer Statistics: Age-Standardized Rate (World) per 100 000, Incidence, Females, in 2022, Türkiye. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/en/dataviz/bars?mode=cancer&group_populations=1&cancers=39&sexes=2&types=0&populations=792, Erişim tarihi: 1 Nisan 2024.
  • 6) World Health Organization/The International Agency for Research on Cancer/Global Cancer Observatory. Global Cancer Statistics: Age-Standardized Rate (World) per 100 000, Mortality, Females, in 2022, Türkiye. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/en/dataviz/bars?mode=cancer&group_populations=1&cancers=39&sexes=2&types=1&populations=792, Erişim tarihi: 1 Nisan 2024.
  • 7) Özaltın S. Is it Really Necessary to Perform Colposcopy in Patients with Ascus and HR HPV Positivity? Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2022; 13(4):574-8.
  • 8) Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2021 update. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 155 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):28-44.
  • 9) Pangarkar MA. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology. Cytojournal 2022; 19:28.
  • 10) Nayar R, Wilbur DC (Edited by). The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology. In: Abdul-Karim FW, Powers CN, Berek JS, Sherman ME, Tabbara SO, Sidawy MK. Atypical Squamous Cells. 3rd Edition, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing 2015; 103-34.
  • 11) Nayar R, Wilbur DC (Edited by). The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology. In: Henry MR, Russell DK, Luff RD, Prey MU, Wright TC, Nayar R. Epithelial Cell Abnormalities: Squamous. 3rd Edition, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing 2015; 135-92.
  • 12) Risley C, Clarke MA, Geisinger KR, Stewart MW, Zhang L, Hoover KW, Hiser LM, Owens K, DeMarco M, Schiffman M, Wentzensen N. Racial differences in HPV type 16 prevalence in women with ASCUS of the uterine cervix. Cancer Cytopathol 2020; 128(8):528-34.
  • 13) Nayar R, Wilbur DC (Edited by). The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology. In: Kurtycz DFI, Staats PN, Young NA, et al. Non-Neoplastic Findings. 3rd Edition, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing 2015; 29-90.
  • 14) Türk AE, Şahin BN, Yıldız DG, Aray A, Aksoyak B, Şimşek ZB, Tekelioglu T, Akıllı H, Kuşçu E, Ayhan A. HPV burden and risk of CINII or worse pathology in patients with atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASCUS) cytology. Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi 2023; 2:15-22.
  • 15) Ryu KJ, Lee S, Min KJ, Hong JH, Song JY, Lee JK, Lee NW. Management of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix with human papilloma virus infection among young women aged less than 25 years. Diagn Cytopathol 2016; 44(12):959-63.
  • 16) YouTube Statistics 2024 (Demographics, Users by Country & More). Global Media Insight. Erişim tarihi: 6 Temmuz 2024. Available from: https://www.globalmediainsight.com/blog/youtube-users-statistics/#YouTube_Video_Statistics_2024
  • 17) Güngörmüş Z, Güngörmüş M. Ağız- Diş Sağlığı ile İlgili Türkçe Web Sayfalarının Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesi: Ön Çalışma. Social Sciences Studies Journal 2018; 4(20):2631-4.
  • 18) Orhan O, Tekpınar I, Çetin VB, Kaplan AY, Altay MA. Pes ekinovaruslu hastalar için YouTube etik ve kapsamlı bir bilgi kaynağı mı? Dicle Tıp dergisi 2022; 49(3):491-7.
  • 19) Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis-a wake up call? J Rheumatol 2012; 39(5):899-903.
  • 20) Kurtay S, Ali KY, Hussein AI. Frequency of cervical premalignant lesions in the gynecologic patients of a tertiary hospital in Mogadishu, Somalia. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22(1):501.
  • 21) Clarke S, Jangid G, Nasr S, Atchade A, Moody BL, Narayan G. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): A Cross-Sectional Observational Study Analyzing the Quality of Content on YouTube. Cureus 2023; 15(9):e45354.
  • 22) Kahlam A, Pai S, Kahlam J, Ahlawat S. Quality of YouTube Videos Related to Colorectal Cancer Screening. Cureus 2023; 15(1):e33684.
  • 23) Meteran H, Høj S, Sigsgaard T, Diers CS, Remvig C, Meteran H. The usefulness of YouTube videos on lung cancer. J Public Health (Oxf) 2023; 45(2):e339-45.
  • 24) Arslan E, Gokdagli F, Bozdag H, Vatansever D, Karsy M. Abnormal Pap smear frequency and comparison of repeat cytological follow-up with colposcopy during patient management: the importance of pathologist's guidance in the management. North Clin Istanb 2018; 6(1):69-74.
  • 25) Kim JH, Kim HK. Content and quality of YouTube regarding women's health: a scoping review. Korean J Women Health Nurs 2023; 29(3):179-89.
  • 26) Brachtenbach T, Cardenas R, Pate H, Solis L, Chinnery L, Bowers A, Vassar M. YouTube: Searching for answers about breast cancer. Breast Dis 2020; 39(2):85-90.
  • 27) Aglamis SO, Senel S, Koudonas A. Quality analysis of YouTube videos on vulvodynia. Sex Med 2023; 11(1):qfac013.
  • 28) García-Cano-Fernández AM, Szczesniewski-Dudzik JJ, García-Tello A, Diego-García V, Boronat-Catalá J, Llanes-González L. Quality of bladder cancer information on YouTube. Cent European J Urol 2022; 75(3):248-51.
There are 28 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Pathology, Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Gizem Ay Haldız 0000-0001-5654-6289

Early Pub Date September 22, 2025
Publication Date September 29, 2025
Submission Date July 11, 2024
Acceptance Date November 13, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 11 Issue: 3

Cite

Vancouver Ay Haldız G. Smear Sonucu ‘Önemi Belirlenemeyen Atipik Skuamöz Hücreler (ASC-US)’ Olarak Raporlanan Hastalar İçin Youtube Yeterli ve Güvenilir Bir Bilgi Kaynağı mı? Akd Med J. 2025;11(3):349-56.