Akdeniz Theology Journal

Akdeniz Theology Journal aims to provide an open access academic environment where qualified scholarly studies in the fields of Social Sciences, Humanities and Religious Sciences can be shared. The aim of the journal is to contribute to science by publishing high quality publications of scientific importance. For this purpose, original research articles, reviews, book reviews, symposium reviews and letters to the editor are published in the fields of religious studies (Social Sciences and Humanities/Religion). Religious Studies is an independent, double-blind peer-reviewed, open access and online journal that aims to publish articles in the fields of Religious Studies. Articles should describe original data that have not been previously published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts that are deemed suitable for the submission rules of Akdeniz Theology Journal and the scope of the journal are sent to at least two referees who are experts in their fields for scientific evaluation. The final decision for all submitted manuscripts belongs to the Editor-in-Chief. The Editorial Board of Akdeniz Theology Journal is committed to comply with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) criteria.

Subject Category:
1. Social Sciences:
Education and Educational Research
Psychology
Sociology
Philosophy
Culture Studies (Turkish-Islamic Culture)


2. Humanities:
History
Fine Arts
Literature
Music
Philosophy
Religion

3. Religious Sciences:

Arabic Language and Rhetoric
Hadith
Islamic Law
Islamic Sects
Kelam
Quran Reading and Recitation
Sufism
Tafsir
Islamic Studies


Keywords
Religion
Tafsir
Kiraat
Quran Studies
History of Sects
Kelam
Sufism
Islamic Philosophy
Psychology of Religion
Sociology of Religion
Logic
Philosophy of Religion
Religious Music
Islamic Arts
Siyer
History of Religions
Turkish Islamic Literature
Religious Education

Readership
The target audience of Akdeniz Theology Journal is academicians, experts, researchers, undergraduate, graduate and doctoral students interested in social, humanities and religious sciences.

Text Submissions:
The texts submitted to the journal should be appropriate to the purpose and scope of the journal. The submitted texts must be original, must not have been published before and must not have been taken into the evaluation process by another periodical. Texts submitted after the article acceptance date specified on the journal's website will not be evaluated.
More than one study by one author will not be published in the same issue.

Writing Rules
Articles submitted to the journal should be prepared on the article template .
Article Template

General Rules
1. The article elements should be arranged as follows:
1.1.English Title
1.2. Abstract
1.3. Keywords
1.4. Turkish Title
1.5. Abstract
1.6. Keywords
1.7. Body Text
1.8. Conclusion
1.9. Bibliography
2. All Titles in the manuscript should be in Initial Capitalization and 11 point font size.
3. The manuscript page should be in A4 format.
4. Margins should be 3 cm on all sides.
5. If an end-of-page explanation is to be made for the title of the article, the * sign should be used.
6. No Header and Footer should be entered.
7. Page numbers should not be added.
8. Arabic words and texts in the article should be written in Times New Roman font.

Article Title
1. The title of the article should be arranged according to the ISNAD Citation System; 0 pt from the top; 6 pt from the bottom and without indentation; and should be center aligned. It should be in Times New Roman Bold font with a font size of 11 pt.
2. Titles should be arranged according to the ISNAD Citation System; should be set at 0 pt from the top and bottom, without indentation, and should be aligned on both sides. Titles should be in Times New Roman Bold font with a font size of 11 points.
3. Titles should be as short as possible but should reflect the subject matter, and double quotation marks (“-”) or slashes (/) should not be used. A colon (:) may be used if deemed necessary.
4. Titles (except Abstract, Abstract, Introduction, Conclusion, and References) should be written in decimal system order as “1. 2. 3.; 1.1., 1.2.; 1.2.1.” using a number followed by a period. A space should be left between the title number and the first letter of the title.
5. Only the first letters of the words in the titles should be capitalized. Italics should not be used.

Abstract
1. It should be in the range of 500-750 words. It should not exceed 750 words or 5000 characters (with spaces).
2. Abstract should be written in Times New Roman font, 9-point font size, aligned on both sides, single-spaced and unindented.
The Abstract and Abstract sections of the article should include the following points:
1. The general picture of the study or the background of the problem;
2. A clear statement of the problem/purpose;
3. What is the gap in the literature and how will your work contribute to filling this gap and solving the problem?
4. Details of the way this was done;
5. Conclusions reached in the study.

Keywords
1. It should be written in Times New Roman font, 9 point size, aligned on both sides, single-spaced and unindented. It should consist of at least 5 and at most 8 words.
2. Keywords help the electronic scanning and indexing of the publication and are of great importance in finding the publication by researchers. For this reason, terms that accurately reflect the relevant article should be selected and ordered from general to specific.
3. The first concept must be the name of the discipline. The second concept should be the name of the subject, sect, person or work that reflects the research. Then, concepts that fully reflect the content of the article should be added.
4. If the study is focused on a person or work, the name of the relevant work and author must be written as keywords.
5. Words that do not have a conceptual meaning other than the lexical meaning when used alone should not be preferred as concepts.
6. Each word should begin with a capital letter; a comma should be placed after each word.

Abstract
1. It should be in the range of 500-750 words. It should not exceed 750 words or 5000 characters (with spaces).
2. It should be written in Times New Roman font in 9 point size, aligned on both sides, single-spaced and unindented.
3. The Abstract should include the points mentioned in the Abstract.

Keywords
It should be written in Times New Roman font, 9 point size, aligned on both sides, single-spaced and unindented. It should consist of at least 5 and at most 8 words. Keywords help the publication to be scanned and indexed electronically and are of great importance in finding the publication by researchers. For this reason, concepts that accurately reflect the relevant article should be selected and ordered from general to specific. The first concept must be the name of the discipline. The second concept should be the name of the subject, sect, person or work that reflects the research. Then, concepts that fully reflect the content of the article should be added. If the study is focused on a person or work, the relevant work and the name of the author must be written as keywords. Words that do not have a conceptual meaning other than the lexical meaning when used alone should not be preferred as concepts. Each word should begin with a capital letter and a comma should be placed after each word.

Introduction
The body text must include Introduction and Conclusion sections.
In order to achieve certain academic standards and integrity in the studies to be published in our journal, we expect the texts to be organized by following the steps below. This organization should be applied separately in the ABSTRACT and ABSTRACT sections as well as in the whole articles.
1. Presenting the general picture of the study or the background of the problem;
2. A clear statement of the problem/purpose;
3. Studies on the subject existing in the literature;
4. What is the gap in the literature and how will your study contribute to filling this gap and solving the problem?
5. Details of the path to be followed in doing this;
6. Conclusions and recommendations.
Step 1: This part, which will constitute the sentence or paragraph that is the beginning of the article, is the part where the general picture of the problem to be addressed is introduced to the reader. While this step is limited to a sentence when writing the abstract, it can be extended to a paragraph when writing the introduction. While over-extending this section may overshadow the focus of the article, the use of short but effective statements is an important start to convince the reader of the importance of the topic.
Step 2: Clearly articulate what the problem to be addressed is and why it is important to address it. In other words, a SPECIFIC PROBLEM within the overall picture presented in the previous step and why it is important to solve this problem. Again, similar to the previous step, this step should be limited to one sentence in writing short texts such as the Abstract.
Step 3: A summary of how the problem has been addressed in the literature.
3.1. Has this problem been addressed directly?
3.2. What are the most influential studies and the most recent studies in the field and what do they say?
3.3. If this problem has not been directly addressed, what are the most recent studies?
3.4. Questions should be answered and this LITERATURE should be cited as appropriate.
Step 4:
4.1. How will your work contribute to the literature mentioned above?
4.2. What gap in the literature will it fill?
4.3. What will it do that has not been done?
The answer to the questions should be given.
4.4. This is the part where you convince the reader of the ORIGINALITY and importance of your work.
Step 5: Present in detail how your contribution to the literature will be made. While the previous steps are introductory to the article, this step constitutes the main body of the article. When we think of an entire article, the first 4 steps are included in the introduction of the article, while the body of the article will be written by opening new headings after this step.
In this section, the theories, methods, materials and methods to be used to reach the targeted result should be explained in detail step by step and examples should be presented. In other words, in the body of the article, the theoretical basis of the article should be examined in detail under one heading, which methods and materials will be used. (Then, if necessary and important for the subject, information about the historical background of the subject can be given under a new heading). After this, new headings should be opened and examples of the application of the theory and method to the materials at hand should be presented. At least two examples should be presented. Providing three or more examples will strengthen the argument of the paper.

Body Text
It should be written in Times New Roman font with a font size of 10.5 points, aligned on both sides, and 1.15 line spacing. Spaces should be arranged as 0 pt at the top and 6 pt at the bottom.

Direct Citation
All direct quotations must be in accordance with the ISNAD Citation System. If the direct quotation is a paragraph or if the author of the article wants to use the direct quotation as a separate paragraph, it should be written in Times New Roman font in 10-point font size; aligned on both sides; single-spaced. The beginning of the paragraph should be unindented, the whole paragraph should be indented 2 cm from the left and right; spaces should be set as 0 pt at the top and 6 pt at the bottom.

Footnotes
1. Footnotes should be written in Times New Roman font, 8-point font size, aligned on both sides, and single-spaced. Spacing should be set to 0 nk at the top and bottom.
2. Footnote style should be in accordance with the ISNAD Citation System.
3. Arabic words in footnotes and bibliography should be in 8-point Times New Roman font.
4. Only the End-of-Page reference system should be used.
5. Footnote numbers should be in header size, 8 point font size and Times New Roman font.

Tables, Figures and Images
1. It should be organized in accordance with the ISNAD Citation System.
2. Tables, Figures and Figures should be written in Times New Roman font, 10-point font size and aligned on both sides.
3. Table, Figure and Image captions and references, if any, should be written in Times New Roman font in 8-point font size; aligned on both sides; 1.15 fold spacing, 0 pt from top and bottom.
4. Table, Figure and Image captions should be numbered as 'Table 1.', 'Figure 1.', 'Figure 1.', 'Image 1.' and only the numbering, i.e. 'Table 1.' etc., should be written in bold.
5. Tables should not extend beyond the writing area (page margins should not be violated), and spacing should be set to 0 nk from the top and 6 nk from the bottom. Tables smaller than the page type area should be left aligned.

Abbreviations
1. Abbreviations should be made as specified in the ISNAD Citation System; if the abbreviation is not specified in the ISNAD Citation System, the author's preference should be stated in the description section when submitting the article.
2. No abbreviations should be used in the titles of any works other than the encyclopedias and classical works cited.

Conclusion
There must be a conclusion section.
Step 6: This is the conclusion section of the paper. The conclusion of the study or the proposed solution is clearly stated.
The conclusion should not be a summary of the study.

Bibliography
1. References should start on the page after the conclusion.
2. References should be written in Times New Roman font, 9-point font size, aligned on both sides and single-spaced.
3. The first line for each reference should be indented from the left, and the following lines should be indented 1.25 cm from the left. Spaces for each source should be 0 pt at the top and 6 pt at the bottom.
4. If more than one work of an author is included in the bibliography, the author's name should be written again for each work.
5. References should be organized according to the ISNAD Citation System.
6. DOI numbers, if any, should be added to the articles in the bibliography in accordance with the ISNAD Citation System.
7. The suffix 'el' should not be used in the surname of the author of the work cited in the bibliography and footnotes.
8. In the writing of Arabic source names, as a general rule, only the first letter of the first word is capitalized. However, if there is a proper name (name of a person, country, city or another book) in the book title, it is also capitalized. Titles of works are formatted in italics.
9. References to journals should not include day and month.
10. In references to journals, volumes and numbers should not have Roman numerals.
11. In the bibliography, there should be no spaces before and after the apostrophe (-) between the names of two authors, translators, editors, editors, reviewers, etc.
For the matters that are not specified in the Writing Rules, the ISNAD Citation System must be followed; BK. ISNAD CITATION SYSTEM GUIDE

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

Ethical Principles
The publication process in the Akdeniz Theology Journal was created to develop and present information objectively. For this reason, the processes applied to reflect the quality of the authors and the quality of the institutional work that supports the authors. The articles reviewed embody and encourage the scientific method. In this respect, it is important that all stakeholders of the process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, referees and editors) comply with the standards regarding ethical principles.
Akdeniz Theology Journal expects all stakeholders to bear the ethical responsibilities described below within the scope of publication ethics.
The ethical duties and responsibilities adopted by the Akdeniz Theology Journal have been prepared by taking into account the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines and policies.

Actions contrary to scientific research and publication ethics:
Plagiarism: Presenting others’ ideas, methods, data, practices, writing, forms or studies partly or wholly without referencing to the owners according to scientific rules,
Forgery: Producing data that is not based on research, editing or changing the presented or published study by basing it on fictitious data, reporting or publishing these, claiming research has been done while actually it has not,
Distortion: Falsifying the obtained data and the research records, showing the methods, devices and materials that were not used in the study as if they had been used, not taking the data that is not suitable to the research hypothesis into consideration, changing the data and/or results to make them be appropriate to the related theory and presuppositions, falsifying or manipulating the research results in accordance with the advantages of the people and the institutions that support the researcher,
Re-publishing: To present more than one work containing the same results of a research separately in evaluations for associate professorship exams and academic promotions,
Dissection: Dissecting the results of a study in a way that would destroy the integrity of the study and inappropriately, publishing them separately without referencing each study, thus increasing the number of publications to present them in associate professorship exam evaluations and academic promotions,
Undeserved Authorship: Including those who don’t have an active contribution among authors, not including those who have an active contribution among authors, changing the ranking of authors without a reason and inappropriately, excluding the names of those with active contribution from the study during publication or in next publications, making one’s name included – by exerting influence – in authors despite having no active contribution,
Other Types of Violation of Ethics: Not naming the people, institutions and organizations and their contributions to the study openly in the publication of the research made by the support of those, not following the ethical rules in studies done on humans or animals, not respecting the rights of patients in the publications, sharing the contents of a study appointed as referee before its publication, using the sources, places, opportunities and devices provided for scientific researches out of their purposes, accusing someone of violation of ethics in a baseless, injudicious and malicious way.

Ethics Statement
- Ethical rules must be followed in research on humans and animals.
- For the intellectual and artistic works used, it must be stated that copyright regulations are complied with.
- For the use of scales, questionnaires, photographs, etc. belonging to others, permission from the owners must be obtained and specified.
- In case presentations, it should be stated that the “informed consent form” has been obtained.
- If the research is conducted in the areas listed below, it is mandatory to upload “Ethics Committee Permission” in the appendix of the study.

Research Requiring Ethics Committee Authorization
All kinds of research conducted with qualitative or quantitative approaches that require data collection from participants using survey, interview, focus group, observation, experiment, interview techniques,
Use of humans and animals (including materials/data) for experimental or other scientific purposes,
Clinical trials in humans,
Research on animals,
Retrospective studies in accordance with the law on the protection of personal data.

Publication of Studies Based on Surveys and Interviews
Akdeniz Journal of Theology adopts the Committee on Publication Ethics' (COPE) “Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors” and “Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers” to provide ethical assurance in scientific periodical publishing.
In this context, the following points should be followed in the studies submitted to the journal:
1) For research in all disciplines that require ethics committee approval (ethics committee approval must be obtained, this approval must be stated and documented in the article.
2) In studies requiring ethics committee permission, information about the permission (name of the committee, date and number) should be included in the method section, as well as on one of the first/last pages of the article; in case reports, information on the signing of the informed consent form should be included in the article.

Author's Responsibilities
Article Writing
All authors listed as authors must have contributed significantly to the research. Other contributors should be listed as co-authors. Contributors should be referred to as 'contributors'. In joint studies, the corresponding author should submit the study to the journal with the consent of the other authors. Those who did not contribute directly to the research should not be listed as authors.
Originality and Authenticity
All data in the research must be real and authentic. The author should provide an objective discussion of the significance of the study based on accurate data. Deliberately providing false information is unacceptable unethical behavior.
Multiple, Unnecessary or Simultaneous Publication
The author should not attempt to publish the same research in more than one journal or to republish a previously published article, and should comply with the ethics of scientific research and publication. Such attempts are unacceptable immoral behavior.
References
It is mandatory to show/cite all sources used in the studies.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
All authors should clearly declare any financial and conflicts of interest that may affect the results or interpretation of the study. If financial support was received for the study, the sources should be indicated.
Publication Fee
Authors are not charged any fee for all research published in our journal.
Correction of Published Studies
It is the author's responsibility to notify the editor if significant deficiencies or inaccuracies are detected in the published work. The author should cooperate with the editorial team of our journal to take the necessary actions to correct the situation.
Article Withdrawal
The author can withdraw the work evaluated in the publication processes of our journal only at the pre-control stage. Manuscripts cannot be withdrawn at other stages of the publication process.
Authenticity and Plagiarism
Authors should aim to conduct and report original research. They should properly cite the works they have used. Unauthorized citation of other publications, including the author's own work, is an important ethical problem and a crime. When plagiarism is detected in studies submitted to our journal, it is immediately removed from the publication process. If it is detected after publication in our journal, the necessary information about the author and his/her work will be given to the necessary places.
Double Blind Reviewing
Since double blind refereeing is applied in our journal, author information should not be written in the article file.
Responsibilities of Referees
Contribution to editorial decisions
The referee is obliged to take into account the “Referee Evaluation Criteria” in the evaluation process from the moment he/she is assigned through the system and accepts the task. Assist editors in editorial decisions and help authors to improve their manuscripts through editorial communication. It should indicate the completion of other articles, works, sources, references, citations, rules and similar deficiencies related to the article.

Adhering to the timing
Any reviewer who does not feel qualified to review the manuscript proposal, or who knows that review of the manuscript cannot take place in a timely manner, should immediately notify the editors and decline the invitation to review, so that a new reviewer can be appointed.

Confidentiality
Reviewed manuscripts should be kept confidential before publication.
A reviewer should not share the information contained in a study that he/she has been assigned to review with others before publication.
This also applies to reviewers who decline the invitation to review. The names of the reviewers are not disclosed/published.

Impartiality
Reviewers should be objective in their decision to publish the research they review.
Comments on the manuscript proposal should be made impartially, and suggestions should be made in such a way that the authors can use them to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors is not appropriate.

References
Reviewers should identify relevant published work not cited by the authors. The reviewer should also inform the editor of any significant similarities between the manuscript under review and any other manuscript (published or unpublished).

Conflicts of interest
Conflicts of interest should be reported to the editor. There should be no conflict of interest between the reviewers and the stakeholders of the article under review. In case of any conflict of interest and assignment outside the field of expertise during the peer review process, it is recommended to inform the Editor of the situation and, if necessary, to withdraw from the review.

Ethics
If the referees detect any ethical violations, plagiarism, etc. in the manuscript at any stage of the review process, they are required to notify the Editor.
Reviewers acknowledge that manuscripts submitted for review are the private property of the authors.

Editorial Responsibilities
The Editorial Board has full responsibility and authority to accept or reject an article.
The Editorial Board does not have any conflict of interest regarding the articles it accepts or rejects.
In the publication process, studies are selected and evaluated according to scientific and academic criteria such as contribution to the field and originality.
When errors or omissions are detected in published research, it supports the publication or withdrawal of the correction.
Since the journal adopts double-blind refereeing, the names of the referees are withheld and not published.
The peer review process is central to the success of scientific publishing. Protecting and improving the refereeing process is part of our commitment.
Akdeniz Journal of Theology takes the necessary precautions with sensitivity to cases of violation of publishing ethics.
All kinds of complaints, suggestions, etc. regarding the studies published in Akdeniz Journal of Theology, publication processes and editorial team can be sent to ilahiyatdergi@akdeniz.edu.tr.
Any feedback from stakeholders is considered as an important contribution to R&D studies.

Publication Language
The publication language of Akdeniz Journal of Theology is Turkish. Arabic and English scientific studies are also published.

Publication Principles
All control and evaluation processes of the texts are reported and archived in the Dergipark system.
Articles are accepted between October 1 and January 15 for the March issue and April 1 and July 15 for the September issue. The system is closed for article submission outside of these date ranges.
Texts that are not adjusted according to the Spelling Rules will be returned to the author without being included in the evaluation process.
Mediterranean Journal of Theology publishes texts that have not been published elsewhere before.
Texts that are in the evaluation process in another publication will be returned to the author.
Akdeniz Journal of Theology publishes scholarly texts published in the field of theology. Texts published in the interdisciplinary field related to the field of theology can also be included in the evaluation process, taking into account their contributions to the field.
A maximum of one (1) work by the same author, regardless of its type, can be published in one issue.
A maximum of two (2) studies can be published in the same volume, provided that the type of publication is different.
Members of the editorial board of the journal can submit manuscripts to the journal, but they cannot take part in the publication process during the period when the manuscript is being evaluated.

Publication Policies
Akdeniz Journal of Theology has adopted the mission of contributing to the author and academic journalism as well as publishing qualified scientific research.
The Editorial Processes carried out by the Editorial team, who are experts in their fields and who work devotedly, have been determined in line with this mission.

Akdeniz Journal of Theology is the publication organ of Akdeniz University.
Akdeniz Journal of Theology is an international refereed journal.
Akdeniz Journal of Theology is published electronically.
Akdeniz Journal of Theology is published twice a year, in March and September.
All policies and processes of the Journal of Mediterranean Theology are determined by the editorial board.
Special issues can be published with the decision of the editorial board.
Changes in the publication policies and processes of the journal are announced on the official website of the journal.
Akdeniz Journal of Theology has a unique 6-stage Publication Process. Each stage in the dissemination process is carried out according to specific evaluation criteria within the framework of defined job descriptions and workflows.

Evaluation Policies
Texts in the article and translation genres are subjected to two types of analysis:
Evaluation in terms of form
Spelling Check: Texts are examined in terms of form, spelling rules, and compliance with the ISNAD Citation System. Authors of the texts that require correction must make their corrections within 11 days.
Plagiarism/Similarity Check: Texts are examined for plagiarism/similarity via Turnitin software. The plagiarism/similarity rate set by the Editorial Board is 15%. Manuscripts exceeding this rate are rejected without being included in the referee process.
Language Control: Abstract for Turkish manuscripts and Abstract and Abstract sections for manuscripts written in other languages are grammatically checked.
Proofreading and Redaction: Without interfering with the content of the text, corrections are made within the knowledge of the author regarding the language and style of the text in order to ensure unity of linguistic expression and spelling. After this stage, no corrections are requested from the author, but the text is sent to the author for final reading.

Academic Evaluation
Editorial Board Evaluation:
Studies submitted to the journal are reviewed by two editorial board members, taking into account the field.
The Editorial Board members review and evaluate the studies according to the Editorial Board Evaluation Criteria within the framework of a double blind evaluation system and make referee recommendations.
The articles reviewed and evaluated by the Editorial Board are subjected to a point ranking, and the first 25 articles are included in the evaluation process.
For Book and Symposium Reviews, the evaluation is carried out by the field editor assigned by the editor.

Referee Evaluation:
Texts are subjected to academic evaluation by referees determined by the editorial board according to the Referee Evaluation Criteria. During the referee evaluation process, if the referee requests, text corrections are sent to the author. The author indicates the corrections made in the text in the Author Correction Form.
If the articles receive positive reports from both referees, they are submitted to the final decision of the Editorial Board.
Articles with a negative report from one referee are returned to the author even if the other referee is positive.
It is important that authors do not exceed the deadlines given for corrections in order for the journal publication process to run smoothly. The manuscripts of authors who do not make their corrections within the specified deadlines will be removed from the evaluation process.

Refereeing Policy
Akdeniz Journal of Theology applies a double blind review system.
Confidentiality is essential in referee reports; for this reason, the names of the referees are not included in the journal's imprint.
Multiple articles can be submitted to one referee in one issue.

Archive Policy
The journal is sent to domestic and foreign libraries and international index institutions determined by the Editorial Board within one month from the date of publication.

Copyright Policy
From the date of submission to the Akdeniz Journal of Theology until the end of the evaluation process and from the date of publication, the manuscript may not be published in whole or in part in any visual, audio or printed media without the permission of the Editorial Board of the Akdeniz Journal of Theology, and may be cited with reference to the Akdeniz Journal of Theology.

Plagiarism Policy
The plagiarism/similarity rate determined by the Editorial Board is 15%. Manuscripts exceeding this rate are rejected without being included in the referee process.
Plagiarism / control of the studies is done with the Turnitin program, the similarity report is uploaded to Dergipark.

Financial Policy
Akdeniz Theology Journal is an open access journal, no fee is charged for the journal.
No fee is paid to the author for the published texts.
No fee is paid to the editorial board and referees.
All financial and legal copyright transactions of translations are carried out by the translator.
No financial support is provided to the translator for copyright fees or any other fees.
The author is deemed to have accepted all financial, legal and scholarly responsibility from the date of submission of the translation to Akdeniz Journal of Theology.