Kültürel Değişim Temelinde X ve Z Kuşağınn Ebeveynlik Algısı: Zmet Tekniği Temelinde Bir Analiz

Year 2022, , 194 - 217, 07.12.2022

Mikail Batu , Onur Tos

https://doi.org/10.31123/akil.1172893

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, kültürel değişim ve farklı kuşakların ebeveynlik algısı temelinden hareketle X ve Z kuşağında bulunan kişilerin ebeveynlik algılarının nasıl olduğunu saptamaktır. Bu doğrultuda X kuşağından 10, Z kuşağından 10 olmak üzere toplam 20 kişiden ebeveynlik kavramına yönelik düşünceleri doğrultusunda bir fotoğraf çekmeleri veya görsel bulmaları istenmiştir. 10 gün sonra, önceden belirlenen odada her bir katılımcıyla ayrı ayrı olmak üzere derinlemesine görüşme yapılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda X kuşağında ebeveynliğe ilişkin Z kuşağından farklı olarak her şeye koşuşturma, empati kurma, birliktelik, gurur, umut, sağlık, daha çok zaman, eğlence, oyun ve eğitim kavramlarına rastlanmıştır. Z kuşağında ebeveynliğe ilişkin X kuşağından farklı olarak ise dokunmak, özgürlük, saygı, fedakârlık, baskı, değer, hissetmek, kodlarına rastlanmıştır. İki kuşağı üzerinde durdukları ortak kodlar ise çekirdek aile, mücadele ve düşünmek, merhamet, anne yemeği, anne, baba, saygı, güven, büyüme, eğlence, çocuklar temelinde aile ve mutluluk kavramlarıdır. Genel olarak kodlara bakıldığında ise en çok sevgi, saygı, huzur ve birliktelik kavramları üzerinde durulduğu görülmüştür.

Keywords

Ebeveynlik Algısı, Kültürel Değişim, Kuşaklararası İlişkiler, Algı, ZMET Tekniği.

Parenting Perception of Generation X and Z on the Basis of Cultural Change: An Analysis Based on Zmet Technique

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine how the people in the X and Z generations have parenting perceptions based on cultural change and the perception of parenting of different generations. In this direction, , a total of 20 people, 10 from the X generation and 10 from the Z generation, were asked to take a photograph or find an image in line with their thoughts on the concept of parenting. After 10 days, in-depth interviews were conducted with each participant separately in the predetermined room. As a result of the analysis, the concepts of parenting, rushing to everything, empathizing, togetherness, pride, hope, health, more time, entertainment, games and education were encountered in the X generation, unlike the Z generation. In the Z generation, unlike the X generation regarding parenting, the codes of touching, freedom, respect, sacrifice, pressure, value, feeling were encountered. The common codes that the two generations focus on are the concepts of nuclear family, struggle and thinking, compassion, mother’s food, mother, father, respect, trust, growth, fun, family on the basis of children, and happiness. When the codes were examined in general, it was seen that the concepts of love, respect, peace and togetherness were mostly emphasized.

Keywords

Perception of Parenting, Cultural Change, Intergenerational Relations, Perception, ZMET Technique.

References

• Afonsky, S. A., Fedorova, A. V., Petushkova, E. V. & Terentyev, V. A. (2020). ZMET-Analysis of Communication Codes of Visual Nature. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 128, 465-471.
• Aka, B. (2018). Bebek Patlaması, X, ve Y Kuşağı Yöneticilerin Örgütsel Bağlılık Düzeylerinin Kamu ve Özel Sektör Farklılıklarına Göre İncelenmesi: Bir Araştırma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 9(20), 118-135.
• Anghelvec, G., Chung, M.-Y., Sar, S. & Duff, B. R. L. (2015). A ZMET-Based Analysis of Perceptions of Climate Change Among Young South Koreans Implications for Social Marketing Communication, Journal of Social Marketing, 5(1), 56- 82.
• Akarslan-Esen, M. & Cesur, S. (2015). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Ebeveynlik Stillerini Algılayışları ve Bu Algının Ebeveyn- Çocuk Değer Benzerliğine Etkisi. Psikoloji Çalışmaları, 35(2), 1-24.
• Alabay, E. (2017). Okul Öncesi Dönem Çocuğu Olan Ebeveynlerin Ebeveynlik Tutumlarının İncelenmesi. Erken Çocukluk Çalışmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 156-174.
• Angley, M., Divney, A., Magriples, U. & Kershaw, T. (2015). Social Support, Family Functioning and Parenting Compe- tence in Adolescent Parents. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 19(1), 67-73.
• Aydın, A. & Arslantürk-Egin, C. T. (2018). Zihin Engelli, Serebral Palsili ve Otizmli Çocuk Ebeveynlerinin Psikolojik Dayanıklılıkları ile Ebeveynlik Algılarının Karşılaştırılması. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(1), 171-188.
• Baş, T. & Akturan, U. (2017). Sosyal Bilimlerde Bilgisayar Destekli Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Başbuğ, S., Cesur, G. & Batıgün, A. D. (2017). Algılanan Ebeveynlik Biçimi ve Yetişkin Ayrılma Anksiyetesi: Kişilerarası Bilişsel Çarpıtmaların Aracı Rolü. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 28(4), 255-267.
• Bayramov, S., Geylan, A., & Benligiray, S. (2021). X, Y ve Z Kuşak Çalışanlarının Esnek Çalışmaya Yönelik Tutumlarının Karşılaştırılması. Anadolu Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1), 122-139.
• Bergler, T. E. (2020). Generation Z and Spiritual Maturity. Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Minis-try, 20(10), 1-17.
• Berkup, S. B. (2014). Working With Generations X and Y in Generation Z Period: Management of Different Generations in Business Life. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(19), 218-229.
• Betz, C. L. (2019). Generations X, Y, and Z. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 44, A7-A8.
• Borges, N. J., Manuel, R. S., Elam, C. L. & Jones, B. J. (2010). Differences in Motives Between Millennial and Genera- tion X Medical Students. Medical Education, 44, 570-576.
• Brosch, A. (2016). When the Child is Born into the Internet: Sharenting as a Growing Trend Among Parents on Face- book. The New Educational Review, 43(1), 225-235.
• Buehler, C. & Welsh, D. P. (2009). A Process Model of Adolescents’ Triangulation into Parents’ Marital Conflict: The Role of Emotional Reactivity. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(2), 167-180.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2021). Eğitimde Bilimsel Araştırma Yön- temleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Catchings-Castello, G. (2000). The ZMET Alternative. Marketing Research, 12(2), 6-12.
• Chayomchai, A. (2020). The Online Technology Acceptance Model of Generation-Z People in Thailand During COVID-19 Crisis. Management & Marketing Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 15(Special Issue), 496-513.
• Checa, P. & Abundis-Gutierrez, A. (2017). Parenting and Emperament Influence on School Success in 9–13 Year Olds. Front Psychol., 8, 543-551.
• Chillakuri, B. (2020). Understanding Generation Z Expectations for Effective Onboarding. Jorunal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), 1277-1296.
• Coburn, A. S. & Hall, S. J. (2014). Generational Differences in Nurses’ Characteristics, Job Satisfaction, Quality of Work Life, and Psychological Empowerment. Journal of Hospital Administration, 3(5), 124-134.
• Coleman, P. K. & Karraker, K. H. (1998). Self Efficacy and Parenting Quality Findings and Future Applications. Devel- opmental Review, 18(1), 47-85.
• Crumpacker, M. & Crumpacker, J. M. (2007). Succession Planning and Generational Stereotypes: Should HR Consider Age-Based Values and Attitudes a Relevant Factor or a Passing Fad? Public Personnel Management, 36(4), 349-369.
• Çetin-Aydın, G. & Başol, O. (2014). X ve Y Kulağı: Çalışmanın Anlamında Bir Değişme Var Mı? Ejovoc (Electronic Joun- ral of Vocational Colleges, 4(4), 1-15.
• Dhanapal, S., Vashu, D. & Subramaniam, T. (2015). Perceptions on the Challenges of Online Purchasing: A Study From “Baby Boomers”, Generation “X” and Generation “Y” Point of Views. Contaduría y Administración, 60(1), 107-132.
• Dong, G., Yang, Y., Liu, X., Li, H., Cui, Y., Wang, H., . . . Chen, F. (2018). Prehistoric Trans-Continental Cultural Ex- change in The Hexi Corridor, Northwest China. The Holocene, 28(4), 621-628.
• Draper, H. (2007). Paternity Fraud and Compensation for Misattributed Paternity. J. Med. Ethics, 33, 475-480.
• Ersöz, B. (2018). Kültürel Değişim Programlarının Dönüşen Yapısı: Uluslararası Emek Hareketliliğinin Farklılaşan Boyutları. SAV Katkı, (6), 50-62.
• Fabricant, F., Miller, J. & Stark, D. (2014). Creating Career Success: A Flexible Plan for the World of Work. Boston: Cengage Learning.
• Farrell, W. C. & Phungsoonthorn, T. (2020). Generation Z in Thailand. International Journal of Cross Cultural Manage- ment, 20(1), 25-51.
• Feinberg, M. E. & Kan, M. L. (2008). Establishing Family Foundations: Intervention Effects on Coparenting, Parent/ Infant Well-Being, and Parent–Child Relations. J. Fam. Psychol., 22(2), 253-263.
• Fishman, A. A. (2016). How Generational Differences Will Impact America’s Aging Workforce: Strategies for Dealing with Aging Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers. Strategic HR Review, 15(6), 1-9.
• Fountain, J. & Lamb, C. (2011). Generation Y as Young Wine Consumers in New Zealand: How Do They Differ from Generation X? International Journal of Wine Business Research, 23(2), 107-124.
• Fox, A. K. & Hoy, M. G. (2019). Smart Devices, Smart Decisions? Implications Of Parents’ Sharenting for Children’s Online Privacy: An Investigation of Mothers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 38(4), 414-432.
• García-Jurado, A., Castro-González, P., Torres-Jiménez, M. & Leal-Rodríguez, A. L. (2019). Evaluating the Role of Gamification and Flow in E-Consumers: Millennials Versus Generation X. Kybernetes, 48(6), 1278-1300.
• Gazzola, P., Pavione, E., Pezzetti, R. & Grechi, D. (2020). Trends in the Fashion Industry. The Perception of Sustain- ability and Circular Economy: A Gender/Generation Quantitative Approach. Sustainability, 12(7), 2809-2828.
• Glazer, S., Mahoney, A. C. & Randall, Y. (2019). Employee Development’s Role in Organizational Commitment: A Pre- liminary Investigation Comparing Generation X and Millennial Employees. Industrial and Commercial Training, 51(1), 1-12.
• GuangHui, D., YiShi, Y., JianYe, H., Hui, W. & FaHu, C. (2017). Exploring the History of Cultural Exchange in Prehistoric Eurasia from the Perspectives of Crop Diffusion and Consumption. Science China Earth Sciences, 60, 1110-1123.
• Gürmen, M. S. (2019). Çocukla Gelen ve Hiç Bitmeyen İlişki: Ortak Ebeveynlik. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 22(44), 15-31. Gürses, İ. & Kılavuz, M. A. (2011). Erikson’un Psiko-Sosyal Gelişim Dönemleri Teorisi Açısından Kuşaklararası Din Eğitimi ve İletişiminin Önemi. Uludağ Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(2), 153-166.
• Hume, M. (2010). Compassion Without Action: Examining the Young Consumers Consumption and Attitude to Sustainable Consumption. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 385-394.
• Jackson, S. L. (2012). Leveraging Intergenerational Diversity to Meet Business Goals. C. L. Scott, & M. Y. Byrd içinde, Handbook of Research on Workforce Diversity in a Global Society: Technologies and Concepts (s. 386-402). Hershey: PA: Business Science Reference.
• Ji, M. & King, B. (2018). Explaining the Embodied Hospitality Experience with ZMET, International Journal of Contem- porary Hospitality Management, 30(11), 3442-3461.
• Johnson, P., Buehring, A., Cassell, C. & Symon, G. (2006). Evaluating Qualitative Management Research: Towards a Contingent Criteriology. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(3), 131-156.
• Kapaklıkaya-Eryörük, B. & Özdoğru, A. A. (2021). Belçikalı Türk Göçmenlerde Kültürleşme Stratejileri ve Ebeveynlik Tutumu. Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (12), 107-134.
• Knafo, A., & Schwatz, S. H. (2003). Parenting and Adolescents’ Accuracy in Perceiving Parental Values. Child Dev., 74(2), 595-611.
• Knoche, L., Givens, J. E. & Sheridan, S. M. (2007). Risk and Protective Factors for Children of Adolescents: Maternal Depression and Parental Sense of Competence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16(5), 684-695.
• Koç, Ö., Özkan, H. & Bekmezci, H. (2016). Annelik Rolü ve Ebeveynlik Davranışı Arasındaki İlişkinin Değerlendirilmesi. İzmir Dr. Behçet Uz Çocuk Hast. Dergisi, 6(2), 143-150.
• Krasulja, N., Iliç, D. T. & Markovic, B. M. (2020). Basic Principles of Circular Economy with Special Focus on Sustainable Consumption “Y” and “Z” Generation. ECOFORUM, 9(2(22)).
• Krbova, P. K. (2016). Generation Y Attitudes Towards Shopping: A Comparison of the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(1), 38-54.
• Kumar, P. C. & Schoenebeck, S. (2015). The Modern Day Baby Book: Enacting Good Mothering and Stewarding Pri- vacy on Facebook. Canada: Vancouver.
• Lawrence, P. J., Murayama, K. & Creswell, C. (2019). Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Anxiety and Depressive Disorders in Offspring of Parents With Anxiety Disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 58(1), 46-60.
• Lazoğlu, M., Gümüşdaş, M. & Apay, S. E. (2022). X, Y, Z Kuşağı Lohusaların Ebeveynlik Davranışlarının Karşılaştırılması. Jinekoloji - Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi, 19(1), 1169-1175.
• Lebowitz, E. R., Marin, C., Martino, A., Shimshoni, Y. & Silverman, W. K. (2020). Parent-Based Treatment as Efficacious as Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Childhood Anxiety: A Randomized Noninferiority Study of Supportive Parenting for Anxious Childhood Emotions. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 59(3), 362-372.
• Levickaite, R. (2010). enerations X, Y, Z: How social networks form the concept of the world without borders (the case of Lithuania). Limes Cultural Regionalistics, 3(2), 170-183.
• Lissitsa, S. & Kol, O. (2016). Generation X vs. Generation Y – A Decade of Online Shopping. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 31, 304-312.
• McNichols, D. (2010). Optimal Knowledge Transfer Methods: A Generation X Perspective. Journal of Knowledge Man- agement, 14(1), 24-37.
• Milnitsky-Sapiro, C., Turiel, E. & Nucci, L. (2006). Brazilian Adolescents’ Conceptions of Autonomy and Parental Author- ity. Cognitive Development, 21(3), 317-331.
• Moher, D., Schulz, K. F. & Altman, D. G. (2001). The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomised Trials. The Lancet, 285, 1191-1194.
• Newberger, C. M. (1980). The Cognitive Structure of Parenthood: Designing a Descriptive Measure. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, (7), 45-67.
• Okagaki, L. & Bingham, G. E. (2005). Parents’ Social Cognitions and Their Parenting Behaviors. T. Luster, & L. Okagaki içinde, Parenting: An Ecological Perspective (s. 3-33). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
• Otani, K., Suzuki, A., Shibuya, N., Matsumoto, Y. & Kamata, M. (2009). Dysfunctional Parenting Styles Increase Inter- personal Sensitivity in Healthy Subjects. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 197(12), 938-941.
• Özdemir, M. (2020). Yaşlılık Algısının Koronavirüs Salgını Sürecindeki Kültürel Değişimi. Milli Folklor, 16(127), 46-58. Parker, K. & Wang, W. (2013). Modern Parenthood Roles of Moms and Dads Converge as They Balance Work and Family. Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center.
• Parment, A. (2013). Generation Y vs. Baby Boomers: Shopping Behavior, Buyer Involvement and Implications for Retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(2), 189-199.
• Parry, E. & Urwin, P. (2011). Generational Differences in Work Values: A Review of Theory and Evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(1), 79-96.
• Pektaş, D. & Demircioğlu, H. (2017). Almanya’da Yaşayan Türk Kökenli Annelerin Ebeveynlik Tutumları. Journal of In- ternational Social Research, 10(54), 150-157.
• Petrowski, K., Berth, H., Schmidt, S., Schumacher, Ö., Hinz, A. & Brähler, E. (2009). The Assessment of Recalled Paren- tal Rearing Behavior and Its Relationship to Life Satisfaction and Interpersonal Problems: A General Population Study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(17), 1-9.
• Pushak, R. E. & Gordon, D. A. (2016). Parenting Wisely-Using Innovative Media for Parent Education. J. James & J. Ponzetti (Düz) içinde, Evidence-Based Parenting Education-A Global Perspective (s. 161-191). New York and London: Routledge.
• Reeves, T. C. & Oh, E. (2008). Generational Differences. M. J. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. V. Merrienboer & M. Driscoll içinde, Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (s. 295-303). Georgia: Athens: Taylor & Francis Group.
• Robbins, S. P. & Judge, T. A. (2013). Örgütsel Davranış. İstanbul: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Scott-Smith, G. (2008). Mapping the Undefinable: Some Thoughts on the Releance of Exchange Programs within International Relations Theory. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Sicence, 616(1), 173-195. Silove, D., Manicavasagar, V., OConnell, D. & Morris-Yates, A. (1995). Genetic Factors in Early Separation Anxiety: Implications for the Genesis of Adult Anxiety Disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 92(1), 17-24.
• Sönmez, V. & Alacapınar, F. G. (2021). Örneklendirilmiş Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (8 b.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J. & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational Differences in Work Values: Leisure and Extrinsic Values Increasing, Social and Intrinsic Values Decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117-1142.
• Varnum, M. E. & Grossmann, I. (2017). Cultural Change: The How and The Why. Perspectives on Psychological Sci- ence, 12(5), 1-17.
• Wood, J. J. (2006). Parental Intrusiveness and Children’s Separation Anxiety in a Clinical Sample. Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev., 37(1), 73-87.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yılmaz, H. & Ülker, M. (2018). Kadınlarda Çocukluk Dönemi Mutluluk Anıları ile Ebeveynlik Rollerine İlişkin Kendilik Algısı. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(1), 47-57.
• Yoo, J., Choe, Y. & Gyehee, L. (2022). Exploring Pilgrimage Value by ZMET: The Mind of Christian Pilgrims, Annals of Tourism Research, 96.
• Yu, J. W., Buka, S. L., McCormick, M. C., Fitzmaurice, G. M. & Indurkhya, A. (2006). Behavioral Problems and the Ef- fects of Early Intervention on Eight-Year-Old Children with Learning Disabilities. Matern Child Health Journal, 10(4), 329-338.
• Zaltman, G. (1996). Metaphorically Speaking. Marketing Research, 8(2), 13-20.
• Zeeshan, A. & Iram, A. (2012). Generational Diversity: Strategiesto Bridge the Diversity Gap. International Journal of Engineering and Management Scienece, 3(3), 315-318.
• Zemke, R., Raines, C. & Filipczak, B. (2013). Generations at Work: Managing the Clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in Your Workplace (2 b.). USA: Amacom.