Research Article

The Role of Organizational Rumination Perception in Employee Commitment on the Axis of Response Styles Theory: A Field Study

Number: 47 December 31, 2024
EN TR

The Role of Organizational Rumination Perception in Employee Commitment on the Axis of Response Styles Theory: A Field Study

Abstract

The main theme of this study is to investigate the possible relationship between the perception of organizational rumination and the concept of organizational commitment in the context of response styles theory. According to the reaction styles theory, the negative and repetitive thought process is called rumination; It is considered as a combination of sadness and depression. In the context of the theory, organizational rumination is defined as the individual's thinking over and over again about his/her emotional state and possible causes and consequences, without taking action to solve the problem. Corporate commitment, on the other hand, is the driving force behind corporate success, defined as the loyalty and loyalty of the employee to his institution. What makes it so important is the concept's close relationship with outcomes such as participation, performance, workforce turnover and organizational rumination. In this study, a field research was conducted with employees working as nurses in private hospitals operating in Kayseri; The relationship between employees' ruminative perceptions and their organizational commitment was examined in the context of corporate commitment and its sub-dimensions. In the research, it was determined that employees' ruminative perceptions negatively affected their corporate commitment, and the sub-dimensions of corporate commitment showed significant differences at the level of ruminative perception.

Keywords

Organizational Rumination, Organizational commitment, Response Styles Theory, Organizational commitment sub-dimensions, Organizational behavior

References

  1. Arıkan, R. (2021). Araştırma Teknikleri ve Rapor Hazırlama. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  2. Bernard, H. R. (2013). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. SAGE.
  3. Boselie, P., & Wiele, T. (2001). Employee rerceptions of HRM and TQM and the effects on satisfaction and intention to leave. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 12. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520210429231
  4. Bugay, A., & Baker, Erdur, Ö. (2015). Eşli Ruminasyon Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. 5, 106-114.
  5. Butler, L. (1994). Gender differences in depressed mood in a college sample. Sex Roles, 30, 331-346.
  6. Bülbül, M. (t.y.). Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Kamu Kuruluşlarına Yönelik Araştırma. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi SBE.
  7. Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Taylor, S. (2001). The effect of rumination as a mediator of elevated anxiety sensitivity in major depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25(5), 525-534. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005580518671
  8. Doğan, D. D. selen, & Kılıç, A. G. S. (2007). Örgütsel bağlılığın sağlanmasında personel güçlendirmenin yeri ve önemi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 29, Article 29.
  9. Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2009). Peer victimization, rumination, and problem solving as risk contributors to adolescents’ depressive symptoms. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 143(1), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.143.1.78-90
  10. Güllüoğlu, Ö. (2012). Örgütsel İletişim İletişim Doyumu ve Kurumsal Bağlılık. Eğitim Kitabevi.
APA
Işık, Ö. (2024). The Role of Organizational Rumination Perception in Employee Commitment on the Axis of Response Styles Theory: A Field Study. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 47, 198-223. https://doi.org/10.31123/akil.1493041
AMA
1.Işık Ö. The Role of Organizational Rumination Perception in Employee Commitment on the Axis of Response Styles Theory: A Field Study. Journal of Akdeniz University Faculty of Communication - JAUFC. 2024;(47):198-223. doi:10.31123/akil.1493041
Chicago
Işık, Özlem. 2024. “The Role of Organizational Rumination Perception in Employee Commitment on the Axis of Response Styles Theory: A Field Study”. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, nos. 47: 198-223. https://doi.org/10.31123/akil.1493041.
EndNote
Işık Ö (December 1, 2024) The Role of Organizational Rumination Perception in Employee Commitment on the Axis of Response Styles Theory: A Field Study. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi 47 198–223.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Işık, “The Role of Organizational Rumination Perception in Employee Commitment on the Axis of Response Styles Theory: A Field Study”, Journal of Akdeniz University Faculty of Communication - JAUFC, no. 47, pp. 198–223, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.31123/akil.1493041.
ISNAD
Işık, Özlem. “The Role of Organizational Rumination Perception in Employee Commitment on the Axis of Response Styles Theory: A Field Study”. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi. 47 (December 1, 2024): 198-223. https://doi.org/10.31123/akil.1493041.
JAMA
1.Işık Ö. The Role of Organizational Rumination Perception in Employee Commitment on the Axis of Response Styles Theory: A Field Study. Journal of Akdeniz University Faculty of Communication - JAUFC. 2024;:198–223.
MLA
Işık, Özlem. “The Role of Organizational Rumination Perception in Employee Commitment on the Axis of Response Styles Theory: A Field Study”. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, no. 47, Dec. 2024, pp. 198-23, doi:10.31123/akil.1493041.
Vancouver
1.Özlem Işık. The Role of Organizational Rumination Perception in Employee Commitment on the Axis of Response Styles Theory: A Field Study. Journal of Akdeniz University Faculty of Communication - JAUFC. 2024 Dec. 1;(47):198-223. doi:10.31123/akil.1493041