Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Bursa’nın Hayvansal Biyokütle Enerji Potansiyeli Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Year 2018, Volume: 18 Issue: 3, 1167 - 1173, 30.12.2018

Kenan Saka

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Bursa ilinin sahip olduğu potansiyel biyokütle enerjisine yer verilmiştir. Potansiyel biyokütle kaynağı olarak hayvansal biyokütle atıklarından biri olan gübre dikkate alınmıştır. Gübre biyogaz kaynağı olarak kullanılabilen bir yenilenebilir enerji kaynağıdır. Hayvansal biyokütle atığını oluşturan faktörler büyükbaş hayvanlar, küçükbaş hayvanlar, kanatlılar ve onların alt türleri olarak incelenmiştir. Alt türler kültür sığır, melez sığır, yerli sığır, manda, at, deve, domuz, katır, eşek, koyun, keçi, etlik tavuk, yumurtalık tavuk, hindi, kaz ve ördektir. Hayvan sayıları, atık kütlesi ve potansiyel enerji çizelgelerde gösterilmiştir. Bu alttürler içerisinde potansiyel enerjisi en fazla olanı ve biyokütle kaynaklı yeni tesisler için en uygun konum araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı tarafından yayınlanan veriler kullanılmıştır. Yapılan inceleme Bursa’da hayvansal kaynaklı biyoenerji potansiyelinin % 56’sı büyükbaş, % 40 kanatlı ve % 4 küçükbaş kaynaklıdır. Ayrıca potansiyel biyokütle enerjisi bakımından en zengin ilçeler Karacabey, Mustafakemalpaşa ve Nilüfer’dir.

Keywords

Potansiyel enerji Hayvansal atık Biyokütle Bursa.

References

  • Avcioğlu, A. O., and Türker, U., 2012. Status and potential of biogas energy from animal wastes in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 1557–1561.
  • Balat, M., Acici, N. and Ersoy, G., 2006. Trends in the Use of Biomass as an Energy Source. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 1, 367–378.
  • Balat, M,. 2005. Use of biomass sources for energy in Turkey and a view to biomass potential.Biomass&Bioenergy, 29, 32-41.
  • Benli, H., 2013. Potential of renewable energy in electrical energy production and sustainable energy development of Turkey: Performance and policies. Renewable Energy, 50, 33–46.
  • Cutz L., Haro P., Santana, D. and Johnsson F., 2016. Assessment of biomass energy sources and technologies: The case of Central America.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,58, 1411-1431.
  • Demirbas, A., 2008. Importance of biomass energy sources for Turkey. Energy Policy, 36, 834-842.
  • Erdil, A. and Erbıyık. H., 2015. Renewable Energy Sources of Turkey and Assessment of Sustainability. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 669-679.
  • Erdogdu, E., 2008. An expose´ of bioenergy and its potential and utilization in Turkey. Energy Policy, 36:2182 – 2190.
  • Eyidogan, M., Kilic, F. C., Kaya, D., Coban V. and Cagman, S., 2016. Investigation of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) technologies in Turkey from the technical and economic point of view. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 885-895.
  • Hosseini, S. E., Wahid, M. A., 2016.Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: Promising green energy carrier for clean development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 850-866.
  • Kuang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhou, B., Li, C., Cao, Y. and Li, L., 2016. A review of renewable energy utilization in islands.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,59, 504-513.
  • Kumar, A., Kumar, N., Baredar, P., Ashish, S., 2015. A review on biomass energy resources, potential, conversion and policy in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 530-539.
  • Nematollahi, O., Hoggooghi, H., Rasti, M., Sedaghat, A., 2016. Energy demands and renewable energy resources in the Middle East. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 1172-1181.
  • Paiano, A. and Lagioia, G., 2016. Energy potential from residual biomass towards meeting the EU renewable energy and climate targets. The Italian case.Energy Policy, 91, 161-173.
  • Saracoglu, N. 2010. The Biomass Potential of Turkey for Energy Production: Part I. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 5:272–278.
  • Solorzano, Y. C., Sanchez, J. P P., Trashorras, A. J. G. and Bernat, J. X., 2016. The development of renewable energy resources in the State of Veracruz, Mexico.Utilities Policy, 39, 1-4.
  • Topal, M. and Topal, E. I. A., 2012. Determination of Potential of Biomass Energy from Crop Plants as Renewable Energy Source: The Case ofAfyonkarahisar Province. AfyonKocatepeUniversity Journal of Sciences,12, 1-11.
  • Weldemichael, Y. and Assefa, G., 2016. Assessing the energy production and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions mitigation potential of biomass resources for Alberta. Journal of Cleaner Production,112, 425-4264.
  • 1- http://www.yegm.gov.tr/anasayfa.aspx
  • 2- http://bepa.yegm.gov.tr/
  • 3- http://www.tuik.gov.tr

Year 2018, Volume: 18 Issue: 3, 1167 - 1173, 30.12.2018

Kenan Saka

Abstract

References

  • Avcioğlu, A. O., and Türker, U., 2012. Status and potential of biogas energy from animal wastes in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 1557–1561.
  • Balat, M., Acici, N. and Ersoy, G., 2006. Trends in the Use of Biomass as an Energy Source. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 1, 367–378.
  • Balat, M,. 2005. Use of biomass sources for energy in Turkey and a view to biomass potential.Biomass&Bioenergy, 29, 32-41.
  • Benli, H., 2013. Potential of renewable energy in electrical energy production and sustainable energy development of Turkey: Performance and policies. Renewable Energy, 50, 33–46.
  • Cutz L., Haro P., Santana, D. and Johnsson F., 2016. Assessment of biomass energy sources and technologies: The case of Central America.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,58, 1411-1431.
  • Demirbas, A., 2008. Importance of biomass energy sources for Turkey. Energy Policy, 36, 834-842.
  • Erdil, A. and Erbıyık. H., 2015. Renewable Energy Sources of Turkey and Assessment of Sustainability. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 669-679.
  • Erdogdu, E., 2008. An expose´ of bioenergy and its potential and utilization in Turkey. Energy Policy, 36:2182 – 2190.
  • Eyidogan, M., Kilic, F. C., Kaya, D., Coban V. and Cagman, S., 2016. Investigation of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) technologies in Turkey from the technical and economic point of view. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 885-895.
  • Hosseini, S. E., Wahid, M. A., 2016.Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: Promising green energy carrier for clean development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 850-866.
  • Kuang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhou, B., Li, C., Cao, Y. and Li, L., 2016. A review of renewable energy utilization in islands.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,59, 504-513.
  • Kumar, A., Kumar, N., Baredar, P., Ashish, S., 2015. A review on biomass energy resources, potential, conversion and policy in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 530-539.
  • Nematollahi, O., Hoggooghi, H., Rasti, M., Sedaghat, A., 2016. Energy demands and renewable energy resources in the Middle East. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 1172-1181.
  • Paiano, A. and Lagioia, G., 2016. Energy potential from residual biomass towards meeting the EU renewable energy and climate targets. The Italian case.Energy Policy, 91, 161-173.
  • Saracoglu, N. 2010. The Biomass Potential of Turkey for Energy Production: Part I. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 5:272–278.
  • Solorzano, Y. C., Sanchez, J. P P., Trashorras, A. J. G. and Bernat, J. X., 2016. The development of renewable energy resources in the State of Veracruz, Mexico.Utilities Policy, 39, 1-4.
  • Topal, M. and Topal, E. I. A., 2012. Determination of Potential of Biomass Energy from Crop Plants as Renewable Energy Source: The Case ofAfyonkarahisar Province. AfyonKocatepeUniversity Journal of Sciences,12, 1-11.
  • Weldemichael, Y. and Assefa, G., 2016. Assessing the energy production and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions mitigation potential of biomass resources for Alberta. Journal of Cleaner Production,112, 425-4264.
  • 1- http://www.yegm.gov.tr/anasayfa.aspx
  • 2- http://bepa.yegm.gov.tr/
  • 3- http://www.tuik.gov.tr
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Kenan Saka

Publication Date December 30, 2018
Submission Date September 25, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 18 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Saka, K. (2018). Bursa’nın Hayvansal Biyokütle Enerji Potansiyeli Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(3), 1167-1173.
AMA Saka K. Bursa’nın Hayvansal Biyokütle Enerji Potansiyeli Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. December 2018;18(3):1167-1173.
Chicago Saka, Kenan. “Bursa’nın Hayvansal Biyokütle Enerji Potansiyeli Üzerine Bir İnceleme”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 18, no. 3 (December 2018): 1167-73.
EndNote Saka K (December 1, 2018) Bursa’nın Hayvansal Biyokütle Enerji Potansiyeli Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 18 3 1167–1173.
IEEE K. Saka, “Bursa’nın Hayvansal Biyokütle Enerji Potansiyeli Üzerine Bir İnceleme”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1167–1173, 2018.
ISNAD Saka, Kenan. “Bursa’nın Hayvansal Biyokütle Enerji Potansiyeli Üzerine Bir İnceleme”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 18/3 (December 2018), 1167-1173.
JAMA Saka K. Bursa’nın Hayvansal Biyokütle Enerji Potansiyeli Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018;18:1167–1173.
MLA Saka, Kenan. “Bursa’nın Hayvansal Biyokütle Enerji Potansiyeli Üzerine Bir İnceleme”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 18, no. 3, 2018, pp. 1167-73.
Vancouver Saka K. Bursa’nın Hayvansal Biyokütle Enerji Potansiyeli Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018;18(3):1167-73.