EN
TR
How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths
Abstract
The goal of this study is to set criteria for writing good contextual questions. This is a theoretical
research work based on an extensive literature review. Extensive literature comprised of reviewing leading data
bases, educational journals, and proceedings. All the collected materials from these resources were read, compiled,
analyzed, interpreted, and synthesized. The information gathered from these sources were systematically used as an
input to generate criteria for writing good contextual questions. Eventually, 3 main criteria and 11 sub-criteria were
generated from these studies. Besides, the difference between contextual and idealized questions was presented
comparatively. As a final step, common misunderstandings i.e., myths related to contextual questions were
determined and presented in detail. This study can be seen as a how-to-guide to all stake holders of education for
writing good contextual questions.
Keywords
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Publication Date
December 1, 2015
Submission Date
December 1, 2015
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2015 Volume: 8 Number: 4
APA
Elmas, R., & Eryılmaz, A. (2015). How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences, 8(4), 564-580. https://izlik.org/JA46FR49YK
AMA
1.Elmas R, Eryılmaz A. How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences. 2015;8(4):564-580. https://izlik.org/JA46FR49YK
Chicago
Elmas, Rıdvan, and Ali Eryılmaz. 2015. “How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths”. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences 8 (4): 564-80. https://izlik.org/JA46FR49YK.
EndNote
Elmas R, Eryılmaz A (December 1, 2015) How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences 8 4 564–580.
IEEE
[1]R. Elmas and A. Eryılmaz, “How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths”, Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 564–580, Dec. 2015, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA46FR49YK
ISNAD
Elmas, Rıdvan - Eryılmaz, Ali. “How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths”. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences 8/4 (December 1, 2015): 564-580. https://izlik.org/JA46FR49YK.
JAMA
1.Elmas R, Eryılmaz A. How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences. 2015;8:564–580.
MLA
Elmas, Rıdvan, and Ali Eryılmaz. “How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths”. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences, vol. 8, no. 4, Dec. 2015, pp. 564-80, https://izlik.org/JA46FR49YK.
Vancouver
1.Rıdvan Elmas, Ali Eryılmaz. How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences [Internet]. 2015 Dec. 1;8(4):564-80. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA46FR49YK