EN
TR
How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths
Öz
The goal of this study is to set criteria for writing good contextual questions. This is a theoretical
research work based on an extensive literature review. Extensive literature comprised of reviewing leading data
bases, educational journals, and proceedings. All the collected materials from these resources were read, compiled,
analyzed, interpreted, and synthesized. The information gathered from these sources were systematically used as an
input to generate criteria for writing good contextual questions. Eventually, 3 main criteria and 11 sub-criteria were
generated from these studies. Besides, the difference between contextual and idealized questions was presented
comparatively. As a final step, common misunderstandings i.e., myths related to contextual questions were
determined and presented in detail. This study can be seen as a how-to-guide to all stake holders of education for
writing good contextual questions.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
-
Yayımlanma Tarihi
1 Aralık 2015
Gönderilme Tarihi
1 Aralık 2015
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2015 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4
APA
Elmas, R., & Eryılmaz, A. (2015). How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences, 8(4), 564-580. https://izlik.org/JA46FR49YK
AMA
1.Elmas R, Eryılmaz A. How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences. 2015;8(4):564-580. https://izlik.org/JA46FR49YK
Chicago
Elmas, Rıdvan, ve Ali Eryılmaz. 2015. “How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths”. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences 8 (4): 564-80. https://izlik.org/JA46FR49YK.
EndNote
Elmas R, Eryılmaz A (01 Aralık 2015) How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences 8 4 564–580.
IEEE
[1]R. Elmas ve A. Eryılmaz, “How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths”, Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences, c. 8, sy 4, ss. 564–580, Ara. 2015, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA46FR49YK
ISNAD
Elmas, Rıdvan - Eryılmaz, Ali. “How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths”. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences 8/4 (01 Aralık 2015): 564-580. https://izlik.org/JA46FR49YK.
JAMA
1.Elmas R, Eryılmaz A. How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences. 2015;8:564–580.
MLA
Elmas, Rıdvan, ve Ali Eryılmaz. “How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths”. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences, c. 8, sy 4, Aralık 2015, ss. 564-80, https://izlik.org/JA46FR49YK.
Vancouver
1.Rıdvan Elmas, Ali Eryılmaz. How to Write Good Quality Contextual Science Questions: Criteria and Myths. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2015;8(4):564-80. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA46FR49YK